Title: Vitrification as a tool to preserve women fertility in cancer patients
1Vitrification as a tool to preserve women
fertility in cancer patients
- Safaa Al-Hasani
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
- Reproductive Medicine
- University of Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck
- Germany
2J. Liebermann, 2009
3- Woldwide 4.0 millions children born through ART
- 20 of the children born through cryopreservation
procedure
4Introduction
- During the last decades there have been
tremendous improvements in cancer treatment with
the survival rates for most types of cancer
increasing considerably. - The dramatic increase in survival after cancer
treatment is indeed true for the types of cancer
that girls and young females may acquire.
5Introduction
- The most common cancer type in children is
leukemia followed by cancer of the central
nervous system, neuroblastoma, Hodgkins,
non-Hodgkins lymphoma, and Wilms tumour.
6Introduction
- The most common type of malignancy among females
during the reproductive age is breast cancer and
64 of the patients are younger than 40 years
old. - It was also shown that the 5 year survival rates
for breast cancer patients increased from 75 in
the mid 1970s to 88 in the late 1990s.
7Introduction
- Nowadays vitrification procedure showed better
results in preservation of women fertility
compared to the slow freezing method.
8- In this presentation we will discuss the
ultra-rapid method for the cryopreservation of
human oocytes, embryos, ovarian tissue but not
the whole ovary
9Indications for fertility preservation
- Oncological
- Non-oncological
- Premature ovarian failure
- Autoimmune diseases
- Infections
10Indications for fertility preservation
- Environmental factors
- Radiation
- Exposure to gonadotoxic agents
- Surgical menopause
- Women wishing to postpone motherhood
11- Healthy delivery of a twin after transfer of
embryos resulted from vitrified oocytes injected
with sperm recovered from cryopreserved
testicular tissue - Safaa Al-Hasani
- Case report
12Cryopreservation of human Oocytes
- Slow Freezing Method
- Ultrarapid Freezing Method (Vitrification)
13The principles of Slow Freezing procedure
- Low concentration of cryoprotectants
- Slow controlled cooling rates
- Slow process of dehaydration of the oocyte to
reduce intracellular ice crystal formation and to
reduce cell damage
14Meiotic spindle
- Microtubule system chain of tubulin polymer hold
the chromosomes in the metaphase plate - The polymer formation is temperature dependant
- Lowering the temperature decrease polymerization
shortening of the chain - At 22C, the tubulin arm completely disappear
- This process is reversible
15Oocyte Freezing
16Principles of cryopreservation
- Water in cell Around 90 of water is free
(water) while the remaining 10 bounds to
other molecular components of the cell (proteins,
lipids, nucleic acids and other solutes). This
water does not freeze and called hydrated water - Removal of water is necessary during freezing to
avoid ice crystal formation, dehydration is
limited to the free water - Removal of hydrated water could have adverse
effect on the cell viability and the molecular
function (freezing injuries)
17Factors causing cell injuries
- Cryopreservation involves chilling and even
freezing or vitrifying cells in order to put
their life on hold - For either freezing or vitrification to maintain
vital function of the cells, cooling warming and
solute concentration must be managed in a way to
favor survival and to minimize injury - Living cells can be injured by reduction in
temperature, by ice crystals, by osmotic forces,
and by chemical toxicity - All are factors related to slow freezing procedure
18Oocyte Freezing
- Experience
- A) From 1986 to 1996
- Chen, 1986
- Al-Hasani et al. 1987
- Van Uem et al. 1987
- Serafini et al. 1995
19Oocyte Freezing
- Experience
- B) from 1997
- Porcu et al., 1997
- Antinori et al., 1998
- Borini et al., 1998
- Polak de Fried et al., 1998
- Porcu et al., 1988
- Videli et al., 1998
- Yang et al., 1998
- Young et al., 1998
- Porcu et al., 1999
- Porcu et al., 1999a
- Porcu et al., 1999b
- Yang et al., 1999
- Porcu et al., 2000
- Fabbri et al., 2001
- Porcu et al., 2002
- Yang et al., 2002
20Oocyte Freezing
- Factors that have improved results
- The use of mature eggs
- Cryoprotective solutions
- Freezing speed slow
- Thawing speed rapid
- ICSI
- Vitrification
21Pregnancies and births from frozen human
oocytes (slow cooling)
- Authors
Year Cryoprotectant Oocyte
stage Pregnancies/Births
22Oocyte Freezing
- Pregnancies per cycle
- With frozen eggs 17.2
- With frozen embryos 18.7
- Porcu et al., 2002
-
23Vitrification of human oocytes and embryos
24- In 1937, Luyet wrote that crystallization is
incompatible with living systems and should be
avoided whenever possible
Luyet. Biodynamica 1937 1 114
25Historical review
- It was described at the end of the 18th Century
- Tammann, 1898
- Vitrification of mouse embryos at 196C
- Rall Fahy, 1985 Ali Shelton, 1993
- Blastocyst development from bovine oocytes
- Martino et al., 1996
- Blastocyst development, pregnancies, deliveries
from human vitrified oocytes, zygotes, cleaved
eggs and blastocyst
Tammann. Z Phys Chem 1898 25 441-479 Rall
Fahy. Nature 1985 313 (6003) 573575 Ali
Shelton. J Reprod Fertil 1993 98 (2)
459465 Martino et al. Biol Reprod 1996 54 (5)
10591069
26Vitrification Two droplets of different
solutions plunged directly into liquid
nitrogen left droplet is pure Dulbeccos
phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) with ice
crystallization, in contrast to the right droplet
containing an equimolar combination of 20
ethylene glycol and dimethyl sulphoxide with 0.4
M sucrose in DPBS without ice crystallization
(glassy, vitrified state).
27Vitrification
- Successful vitrification requires
- Minimum volume of holding media (lt1ml)
- Increased viscosity
- High CPAs concentration
- High cooling rate (-50 000 C and warming rate
(36 000 C) - Special vehicle device (carrier) (Cryotops)
- Direct plunging in LN2
28Risk of Contamination of Germplasm during
Cryopreservation and Cryobanking in IVF
UnitsBielanski and Vajta 2009
-It has to be stated that none of the reported infections after insemination or embryo transfer in humans and demostic animals can be clearly attributed to the applied cryopreservation and storage procedure. -To ensure rapid cooling in some vitrification techniques requiring direct contact, sterile LN2 should be used, then samples should be safely sealed into pre-cooled secondary containers. Human Reprod. 24, 2457-2467
29Shortly before loading on Cryotop
30Cryotop (Kuwayama)
31Risk of Contamination of Germplasm during
Cryopreservation and Cryobanking in IVF
UnitsBielanski and Vajta 2009
-Unfortunately, the open system and direct contact might be indispensable to achieve the required cooling and warming rates for every sensitive samples so far, commercially available closed analogues (Cryotips, CBS and SSV analogues) have failed to demonstrate the same efficiency for human oocytes when compared with their counterparts using the direct contact approach. Human Reprod. 24, 2457-2467
32Slow cooling (langsames
Einfrieren)
Vitrifikation
(ultra-rapides Einfrieren)
- 0.3C/min
33Example of cooling rates
- -2500C/min by using 0.25 mL straws
- thick straws and large volumes of medium do not
allow a high cooling rate and thawing rate - -25.000 -50.000C/min by using a carrier that
allows very small volumes - direct contact with LN2
34- The physical definition of vitrification is the
solidification of a solution (water is rapidly
cooled and formed into a glassy, vitrified state
from the liquid phase) at low temperature, not by
ice crystallization but by extreme elevation in
viscosity during cooling -
- Fahy, 1984
Fahy et al. Cryobiology 1984 21 407426
35- In contrast to slow-rate freezing protocols,
during vitrification the entire solution remains
unchanged and water does not precipitate, so no
ice crystals are formed
36Slow freezing versus ultra-rapid freezing
Traditional Vitrification
CPA concentration 1.5 M 3.05.0 M
Volume 0.31.0 mL lt1 µL
Contact between N2 and cell No Yes
Cooling rate 0.5C/min 25.00050.000C/min
Freezing Slow Ultra-rapid
Thawing / warming Slow Rapid
Time consuming 180 min 1 sec
Dehydration Not controlled Controlled
37Slow freezing versus ultra-rapid freezing
Traditional Vitrification
Reduced osmotic injury No Yes
Zona pellucida fracture Possible No
Ice crystal formation Yes No
Seeding Yes No need
Procedure Complicated Simple
Device Yes No need
Costs Liquid nitrogen amount Duration out Incubator High High gt 4 Hrs Less Much less 10 min
38Author Warmed Oocytes N survived N 2 PN cleaved embryos N ET N Preg
Cha, 1999 7 7 7 - - 1
Kuleshova, 1999 17 11 5 3 3 1
Kuwayama, 2000 - - 2 2 1 1
Yoon, 2000 90 57 39 32 7 3
Yoon, 2003 474 325 142 125 28 6
Katayama, 2003 46 42 38 34 6 2
Kim, 2005 186 139 58 39 10 4
Kim, 2005 233 165 77 49 12 7
Chian, 2005 180 169 126 54 15 7
Ruvalcaba, 2005 60 46 38 34 10 8
Kyono, 2005 5 5 5 1 1 1
Kuwayama 2005 107 86 77 64 29 12
Lucena, 2006 159 120 105 97 23 13
Selman, 2006 24 18 14 14 6 2
Total 1588 1190 (75) 733 (61.6) 548 (74.7) 151 68 (45)
39Vitrification
40Vitrification of Human Oocytes
Kuwayama 2005 Kuwayama 2005
Vitrified oocytes 64
Survived oocytes after warming 58(91)
Fertilized oocytes 52(89.6)
Embryo Transfer 29
N of clinical pregnancy 12(41)
Deliveries 7
Ongoing pregnancies 3
41Before Vitrification
2hrs after Culture
Just after Thawing
4-cell stage (Day2)
Blastocyst (Day5)
PN stage (Day 1)
Figs. 5 Human oocytes before and after
vitrification, ICSI and IVC.
42Antinori et al. Reprod Biomed Online 2007 14
(1) 72-79
Vitrified / warmed group Update up to July 2007
No. of cycles 120 270
No. of warmed oocytes 330 707
No. of oocytes survived () 328 (99.3) 699 (98.8)
No. of injected oocytes 328 699
No. of fertilised oocytes (2PN) 305 (92.9) 639 (91.4)
No. of cleaved oocytes 295 (96.7) 624 (97.6)
43Antinori et al. Reprod Biomed Online 2007 14
(1) 72-79
Vitrified / warmed group Update up to July 2007
No. of transfers 120 270
No. of transferred embryo 295 624
No. of embryos per transfer 2.45 2.31
No. of clinical pregnancies 39 (32.5) 76 (28.1), 5 twins
No. of ongoing pregnancies 24
No. of abortions 8 (20.5) 16 (21)
No. of deliveries 31 36, all singleton
IR per transferred embryo 13.2 12.9
IR per thawed oocyte 11.8 11.6
44Embryo Development of Fresh Versus Vitrified
Metaphase II Oocytes after ICSI A Prospective
Randomised Sibling-Oocyte Study
- Conclussion Our results indicate that oocyte
vitrification procedure followed by ICSI is not
inferior to fresh insemination procedure, with
regard to fertilization and embryo developmental
rates. Moreover, ongoing clinical pregnancy is
comparable with this procedure, even with a
restricted number of oocytes available for
inseminat-ion. We believe that these results will
help the spread of vitrification for human
oocytes cryopreservation.The promising clinical
results obtained, in a population of infertile
patients, need to be confirmed on a larger scale. -
-
Rienzi et al., 2010 -
Human
Reprod., 25, 66-73
45Oocyte Donation Vitrification
Vitrified
M II oocytes 231
Survival 96.9
Fertilization 76.3
No. of transfers 23
Mean number of embryos 2.1
Ongoing pregnancy rate 48
Cobo et al., 2008
46Obsteric and perinatal outcome in 200 infants
conceived from vitrified oocytes
- Statement These preliminary findings may provide
reassuring evidence that pregnancies and infants
conceived following oocyte vitrification are not
associated with increased risk of adverse
obstetric and perinatal outcomes. - Chian et al,
RBM online 16, May 2008
47Comparison between fresh and frozen-thawed embryo
transferVitrification of Zygotes (Luebeck)
Fresh ET Frozen-Thawed ET
No of patients 52 59
No of cycles 53 61
No of vitrified Zygotes / 259
No of survived zygotes / 250 (96.5)
No of transferred embryos 114 (2.5) 240 (2.6)
No of embryo transfers 53 83
No of pregancies 13 (24.5) 29 (34.1)
48Our Results in Avoiding Hyperstimulation
Patients Triggered with GnRH-Agonist
No. of Patients No. of Zygotes vitrif. No. of Zygotes re-warmed No. () Zygotes survived No. () Preg. No. Of Children born () of live birth
59 433 163 158 (97) 25 (42) 13 (25)
No. of Patients received warmed Zygotes 45
Two Twins
49The blastocyst is characterized by early
cavitation resulting in the formation of an
eccentric and then expanded cavity lined by a
distinct inner cell mass region and trophectoderm
layer. The blastocele is less than half the
volume of the embryo
50Can fresh embryo transfers be replaced by
cryo-preserved-thawed embryo transfers in
assisted reproductive cycles? A prospective
controlled trial.
Fresh ET (n191) FET (n184) p value
No. of oocytes retrievd 14.2 14 NS
No. Of M II oocytes retrieved 11 10.8 NS
E2 day of hCG (pg/ml) 2861.2 2793.4 NS
Fertilization rate 72.7 73 NS
No. of embryos transferred 2.2 0.4 2.1 0.3 NS
Implantation rate () 14.1 23.0 0.004
Clinical pregnancy rate () 24.6 36.4 0.013
Ongoing pregnancy rate () 22.5 34.2 0.012
Multiple pregnancy rate () 14.9 26.4 NS
Aflatoonian et al. 2009, Human Reprod. (submitted)
51Vitrification of human 8-cell embryos, a modified
protocol for better pregnancy rates Rama Raju et
al. (2005)
Vitrification Slow freezing
Embryos, n 436 420
Embryos thawed, n 127 120
Embryos survival, n () 121 (95.3) 72 (60)
Pregnancy, n () 14 (35) 4 (17.4)
40 ethylene glycol 0.6 mol sucrose, nylon
loop Ethylene glycol is a good croyprotectant
to preserve 8-cell embryos because of its low
toxicity as shown by the high survival rate, and
vitrification is a promising alternate to the
conventional slow-freezing method.
Rama Raju et al. Reprod Biomed Online 2005 11
(4) 434437
52Outcome of Blastocyst Cryopreservation by using
the Slow Freezing Method
Reference No. of thawed blastocysts Survival rate Implantation rate Pregnancy rate
Troup et al. 1990 34 38 (13/34) NA no pregnancy
Menezo et al. 1992 106 NA NA 21.0
Kaufmann et al. 1995 1239 83 (1033/1239) 13.4 21.7
Nakayama et al. 1995 69 78 (54/69) 18.8 1.7
Martin et al. 2003 624 86 23.3 30.6
Andersen et al. 2004 202 81 (164/202) 43.0 69.0
Veeck et al. 2004 628 76 (479/628) NA 59.2
Kuwayama et al. 2005 156 84 (131/156) NA 51.0
Stehlik et al. 2005 71 83 (59/71) 6.8 16.7
Liebermann Tucker 2006 254 91 29.6 42.8
53Outcome of Human Blastocyst Vitrification by
using the Hemi-straw Method
Reference No. of vitrif. blastocysts Survival rate Implantation rate Pregnancy rate
Vanderzwalmen et al. 2002 167 58.5 NA 20.5
Vanderzwalmen et al. 2003 281 60 NA 27
Zech et al. 2005 177 82 NA 35
54Outcome of Blastocyst Vitrification by using the
Cryoloop Method
Reference No. of vitrif. blastocysts Survival rate Implantation rate Pregnancy rate
Mukaida et al. 2001 60 63 NA 31.5
Reed et al. 2002 15 100 15.4 25
Mukaida et al. 2003b 725 87 NA 37
55Outcome of Blastocyst Vitrification by using the
Cryotop Method
Reference No. of vitrif. blastocysts Survival rate Implantation rate Pregnancy rate
Hiraoka et al. 2003 49 98 33 50
Stehlik et al. 2005 41 100 NA 50
Kuwayama et al. 2005 6484 90 NA 53
56Post-thaw survival rates of human zygotes,
embryos and blastocysts after vitrification
n5881
n897
n1175
57Vitrification demonstrates significant
improvement versus slow freezing of human
blastocystsStehlik et al. (2005)
Day 5 Day 5 Day 6 Day 6
Slow freezing Vitrification Slow freezing Vitrification
Embryos transferred, No. 24 20 27 15
Embryos survival, 83 100 89.5 100
Pregnancy, 16.7 50 18.5 33.3
- Day 5 vitrified blastocysts showed significantly
increased survival and pregnancy rates compared
with Day 5 slow-frozen blastocysts - A similar trend was observed with Day 6
blastocysts
Stehlik et al. Reprod Biomed Online 2005 11 (1)
5357
58Comparison of vitrification and conventional
cryopreservation of Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts
during clinical application Liebermann Tucker
(2006)
Vitrification Conventional
Blastocysts warmed, n 547 570
Blastocysts survival, n () 528 (96.5) 525 (92)
Blastocysts transferred, n 523 518
Implantation, n () 160 (30.6) 152 (28)
Ongoing pregnancies, n () 117 (88.6) 109 (79.6)
- Vitrification technique yields the same
implantation and pregnancy rate as slow-frozen
blastocyst transfer
Liebermann Tucker. Fertil Steril 2006 86 (1)
2026
59Comparison of vitrification and conventional
cryopreservation of Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts
during clinical application Liebermann Tucker
(2006)
- We believe that vitrification shows much
promise as a successful alternative to
conventional freezing technology. - Even without significant clinical improvement,
the evident advantages of vitrification are that - Cryosurvival seems more consistent, allowing
greater case of patient management, with
transfers being almost certain to occur - Vitrification is able to be undertaken on a more
flexible basis by laboratory staff
Liebermann Tucker. Fertil Steril 2006 86 (1)
2026
60Comparison of vitrification and conventional
cryopreservation of Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts
during clinical application Liebermann Tucker
(2006)
- ...and
- Vitrification allows for the potential reduction
in personnel time needed during the entire
vitrification process - It may enable more optimal timing of embryo
cryopreservation, e.g., individual blastocysts
may be cryopreserved at their optimal stage of
development and expansion
Liebermann Tucker. Fertil Steril 2006 86 (1)
2026
61In the future Cryopreservation of Ovarian
Cortex
- ovarian biopsy and cryopreservation
- in vitro Growth (IVG) followed by In vitro
Maturation (IVM)
Oktay et al. 2004
62- Woldwide 10-12 children born through
retransplantation of ovarian cortex - The number of unsuccessful traials is unknown !!
63(No Transcript)
64Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
Vitrifcation procedure the Cryotissue method.
The ovarian tissue slicer was developed, with a
plate to produce 1 10 10 mm slices. (1) The
tissue slicer was put on the surface of ovary.
(2) Then another plate was put on the tissue
slicer, the ovary was cut between the slicer and
the surface of ovary by using a sharp edge. (3)
The ovarian tissue was cut into 1 10 10 mm
slices.
65Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
Gross morphology of vitrifed human ovarian
tissue using the Cryotissue method. Vitrifed
human ovarian tissue was translucent in liquid
nitrogen (196C). Scale bar represents 10 mm.
66Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
All oocytes (arrows) were located in the cortical
area of the human ovarian tissue. Note that they
were all located within 0.75 mm of the surface,
allowing much thinner slices to be made than can
be obtained by hand, or than have been used in
previous studies. Scale bar represents 1 µm.
67Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
Morphologically normal oocyte in a pre-antral
follicle from vitrifed-warmed human ovarian
tissue. (A) Normal oocyte was surrounded by one
or two layers of somatic cells in normal
interstitial tissue of vitrifed ovarian tissue.
Haematoxylineosin staining. (B) Normal oocyte
was surrounded by three or four layers of somatic
cells in normal interstitial tissue of vitrifed
ovarian tissue. Scale bar represents 50 µm.
68Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
Histological section of vitrifed human ovarian
tissue. Immunohistochemical staining for
proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a
marker protein for proliferating cells. Abundant
PCNA-positive proliferating cells were
demonstrated in the interstitial tissue cells and
a few proliferating cells were noted in granulose
cells (arrows) of vitrifed human ovarian tissue.
Scale bar represents 50 µm.
69Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
Surviving oocytes (arrows) of pre-antral
follicles of vitrifedthawed ovarian tissue in
human (Hoechst/propidium iodide stain). Nuclei
of living oocytes were blue. Scale bar
represents 50 µm.
70Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
Survival of oocytes in vitrified-warmed human
ovarian tissue
No. of samples Number of Oocytes () Number of Oocytes ()
No. of samples Collected Surviving
Vitrified 7 954 (100) 855 (89.6)
71Successful vitrification of bovine and human
ovarian tissueKagawa et al., RBMOnline 2009
- Abstract
- In addition, human ovarian tissue from
cancer patients, and from ovary transplant
donors was - also vitrifed by the Cryotissue method. After
warming, high oocyte survival in human tissue
(similar to bovine tissue) was - obtained. These results indicate that an
ultra-rapid cooling vitrifcation method has the
potential for clinical use in human - ovarian tissue cryopreservation.
72Successful vitrification
- High cooling rate (gt 50.000C)
- Fast cooling period (lt1 sec.)
- Low volume (lt1 µL)
- High concentration of cryoprotectants
- gt This will avoid crystal formation
73Why do we prefer the vitrification procedure now?
- No mechanical injury (extracellular crystal
formation) - Less osmotic stress to cells
- No intracellular crystal formation
- Less labour in laboratory daily work
- Simple protocol
- Useful for oocytes and blastocysts, which have
less success with slow freezing - No need for expensive devices
74Future Aspects
- Avoiding hyperstimulation syndrome in patients
with PCOS by vitrification of all 2PN and
replaced in a programmed cycle - Cancelling of fresh ET in case of more than 10
Follicles - Vitrification of all zygotes resulted from IVM
programme - An option for cancer patients to vitrify the
oocytes instead of ovarian tissue - In oocytes donation programme
- Vitrification of the oocytes to postpone
fertility - Mantains viability of specimens during long term
storage
75(No Transcript)
76- Quality is evolution
- Vitrification is a revolution
- Professor Josiane Van der Elst
- 19 January 2007
77Conclusion
- Easy to perform
- Low cost
- Future first choice procedure
- It was shown to be superior to slow freezing
procedure - Very high survival rates of oocytes and embryos
at all stages of development - It seems that the cryotop method is the most
efficient procedure - Revitrification is possible
- Ovarian Cortex is now also possible
78Thank you for your attention!