Ethics and Ethical Theories - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Ethics and Ethical Theories

Description:

Rule utilitarianism Act is good if it comes from following rules that bring good to greatest number. Should we base ethics on happiness and pleasure? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:713
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: CarolE155
Learn more at: http://csis.pace.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Ethics and Ethical Theories


1
Ethics and Ethical Theories
  • Herman T. Tavani, Ethics and Technology, Chapter
    2, Wiley, 2004.

2
Morality and moral systems
  • Rules of conduct
  • Rules for individuals
  • Rules for social policies
  • Principles of evaluation

3
Justifying rules for moral systems
  • Religion teachings of religious leaders
  • Philosophical ethics appeals to reason
  • Law codes determined by constitutions and
    legislation

4
Discussion stoppers
  • People disagree on solutions.
  • They also agree on many things.
  • Who am I to judge?
  • Sometimes we have to make judgments.
  • Ethics is a private matter.
  • Morality is essentially a public system.
  • Morality is a matter for individual cultures.
  • Do in Rome as the Romans do.

5
Why ethical theories are needed
  • Follow the golden rule.
  • Doesnt cover when others have different desires.
  • Follow your own conscience.
  • Some people think it all right to fly airplanes
    into towers.

6
Consequence based ethical theories
  • Bentham (1748-1832) and Mill (1806-1873)
  • What results from an act
  • The ends justify the means
  • Principle of social utility measured by the
    resulting amount of happiness

7
Utilitarianism
  • Act utilitarianism Act is good if it results in
    the greatest good for the greatest number.
  • What happens to minority?
  • Rule utilitarianism Act is good if it comes
    from following rules that bring good to greatest
    number.
  • Should we base ethics on happiness and pleasure?

8
Duty-based ethical theories Deontological
theories
  • Kant (1724-1804) Duties and obligations that
    people have to one another.
  • People have rational natures
  • People should never be treated as means to the
    ends of others
  • Each individual has the same moral worth as every
    other.

9
Rule deontology Kants categorical imperative
  • Rules that all individuals should be treated as
    ends in themselves and not means to an end.
  • Rules that can be universally binding for all
    people.
  • One person or group should not be privileged over
    all others.

10
Act deontology
  • Ross (1930) - Problem if two conflicting moral
    duties
  • When conflict, consider individual situations
  • Prima facie (self-evident) duties.
  • Honesty, justice, helpfulness
  • Actual duty What to do when have conflicts.
  • Use rational intuitionism.
  • Weigh evidence to decide course of action in
    particular case

11
Contract-based ethical theories
  • Hobbes(1588-1679) Premoral state
  • state of nature where all free to do as like
  • People establish formal legal code
  • In each persons self-interest to develop system
    with rules
  • Objections Depends only on formal legal rules
  • Difference between doing no harm and doing
    good.

12
Rights-based contract theories
  • Jefferson (1776) and Aquinas (1225-1274)
  • Natural rights or inalienable and self-evident
    rights
  • Legal rights positive rights and negative
    rights
  • Negative rights
  • Privacy, no interference in right to vote
  • Positive rights
  • Education (in US through 12th grade)

13
Character-based ethical theories
  • Virtue ethics - Plato (427?-327 BCE) and
    Aristotle (384-322 BCE)
  • Development of good character traits and habits
  • Be a moral person rather than just follow rules
  • Agent-oriented rather than action or
    rule-oriented
  • Develop character traits such as kindness,
    truthfulness, honesty, trustworthiness,
    helpfulness, generosity, and justice
  • More likely to work in homogeneous societies
    rather than our pluralistic one
  • Consequences often should be taken into account

14
Single comprehensive theory
  • Rawls (1971) and Moor (1999) Just-Consequentiali
    st Theory
  • Start with core values Do no harm
  • Support justice, rights, and duties Do your
    duty
  • Settle conflicts two steps
  • Consider situation impartially without regard to
    specific case choice between ethical vs.
    unethical policies
  • Consider consequences of specific case choice
    between better vs. worse policies
  • Consider whether problem is disagreement about
    facts rather than value differences

15
Moors ethical framework
  • Deliberate from an impartial point of view
  • Does it cause any unnecessary harm?
  • Does it support individual rights, duties?
  • Select the best policy from the set
  • Weigh the good and bad consequences
  • Distinguish between disagreements about facts vs.
    disagreements about values
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com