The Problem with Voting Technology and Its Effect on Society - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

The Problem with Voting Technology and Its Effect on Society

Description:

Voting systems need to be able to handle very large elections ... new president was in the 2000 elections ... Not practical for United States elections system ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:68
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: omari6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Problem with Voting Technology and Its Effect on Society


1
The Problem with Voting Technology and Its Effect
on Society
2
Three required characteristics of a voting system
  • Accuracy
  • Scalability
  • Speed

3
Accuracy
  • Goal of voting is to establish intent of each
    voter and let that translate into a final tally
  • Security is a part of this. It should be
    impossible to alter or destroy someones vote!

4
Scalability
  • Capacity is the key
  • Voting systems need to be able to handle very
    large elections
  • One eligible voter in the U.S is potentially
    faced with dozens of elections (state, local,
    nationwide)
  • 100 million people in America vote for president

5
Speed
  • Voting systems should produce results quickly!
  • People expect to learn the results of an election
    before bedtime
  • It took several days to learn who the new
    president was in the 2000 elections

6
5 Different types of voting equipment
  • Hand counted paper
  • Mechanical lever machine
  • Punch card ballots
  • Optically scanned paper
  • Electronic voting machine

7
Hand counted paper
  • When votes are manually counted by groups of
    individuals
  • Not practical for United States elections system
  • Hand counted method had the lowest rates of
    unmarked, uncounted, and spoiled balls in
    presidential, Senate, and governor elections over
    the last 12 years.

8
Mechanical lever machine
  • Name of candidate is assigned a particular lever
  • Voter pulls down selected levers to indicate
    choices
  • Lever machines have the highest rate of unmarked,
    uncounted, and spoiled ballots in Senate and
    governor elections over the last 12 years

9
Punch card ballots
  • Candidates names will match up with little boxes
    printed on the punch card
  • When you want to vote, you take a little metal
    tool and punch out the square next to the name
  • Punch cards have the highest rate of unmarked,
    uncounted, and spoiled ballots over the last 4
    presidential elections

10
Optically scanned paper
  • Voter fills ovals on piece of paper, then fed
    into an optical-scan reader
  • Reader senses filled-in ovals and tabulates votes
  • Optically scanned paper had lowest rates of
    unmarked, uncounted, and spoiled ballots in
    presidential, Senate and governor elections over
    last 12 years

11
Direct-recording electronic system (DRE)
  • Voter is presented with list of choices on screen
  • Voter makes choice by simply touching the screen
  • Produces tabulation of voting data stored in a
    removable memory component and printed copy

12
DREs benefits ?
  • Easy to operate
  • Can produce final tallies immediately after polls
  • Can manage very complex elections
  • Displays voting instructions in different
    languages
  • Allows blind and handicapped to vote without help
    from other individuals

13
Problems with DREs ?
  • Bugs in software
  • Possibility of system getting hacked
  • Electronic machines have the second highest rate
    of unmarked, uncounted, and spoiled ballots in
    presidential, Senate and governor elections over
    the last 12 years

14
SEE FOR YOURSELF!!
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vEopnvw7mh_8

15
Cases across the country
  • In 2003, Virginia, programming error in DRE
    caused them to mysteriously subtract 100 votes
    from one candidates totals
  • In 2000, Florida, DRE gave Gore final vote count
    of negative 16,022 votes
  • In 2003, Indiana, DRE showed more than 140,000
    votes cast when the county only has 50,000
    residents (less than half were eligible to vote)

16
Public raises questions about voting
  • Can DREs be trusted?
  • Are newer forms of voting technology fair and
    accommodating to ALL members of society?

17
Survey information
  • Despite problems with DREs American public
    generally still supports it

18
Survey information contd
  • People age 65 had the lowest approval rating
    for DREs

19
Survey information contd
  • Members of every racial group have overall
    positive trust levels of the new voting
    technology
  • The Black community had slightly less trust than
    the rest of the groups

20
Fairness of system
  • Non-partisan groups such as NAACP and People for
    the American Way worried that less educated
    individuals would be intimidated by complexity of
    new technologies
  • Some argue that internet voting can never be
    ratified because it discriminates against poorer
    individuals who dont own computers or have
    internet access

21
Possible solutions
  • Some suggest new standards be developed that
    focus on appropriate standards for security,
    human usability, and handicap accessibility
  • More government funding for research
  • Others say DREs and optical scanning should
    completely replace all other forms of voting
    technology (this would cost 200 million a year)

22
THE END p.s. Dont forget to vote
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com