When HOPE Goes Flat: Redesigning Schools for 21st Century Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 154
About This Presentation
Title:

When HOPE Goes Flat: Redesigning Schools for 21st Century Learning

Description:

17 Year Olds Do Math at Same Levels As White 13 Year Olds ... 'We don't have great schools, principally because we have good schools. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:82
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 155
Provided by: tomw186
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: When HOPE Goes Flat: Redesigning Schools for 21st Century Learning


1
When HOPE Goes FlatRedesigning Schools for 21st
Century Learning
  • 2005 HOPE Institute
  • Nashua, NH
  • August 9, 2005
  • Thomas E. Welch

2
(No Transcript)
3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
  • Goals for the time together
  • Look at the familiar in unfamiliar ways
  • Take a look at U.S. school data
  • Look at the what, how and why of change
  • Understand the implications of a
  • flat New Hampshire and a flat world.

6
  • Where are we?

7
  • Data reveal an interesting glimpse into U.S.
    students performance and how the U.S. stacks up
    to the rest of the world.

The following slides courtesy of The Ed Trust
8
12th Grade Achievement In Math and Science is Up
Somewhat
9
High School Achievement Math and Science NAEP
Long-Term Trends
Source NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress.
10
In Reading, 12th Grade Achievement is Headed
Downward
11
HIGH SCHOOL ACHIEVEMENT READING AND
WRITINGNAEP Long-Term Trends
12
What about different groups of students?During
seventies and eighties, much progress.
13
Gaps Narrow 1970-88NAEP Reading 17 Year-Olds
Source US Department of Education, National
Center for Education Statistics. NAEP 1999 Trends
in Academic Progress (p. 107) Washington, DC US
Department of Education, August 2000
14
Gaps Narrow 1973-86NAEP Math Scores, 13 Year-Olds
Source US Department of Education, National
Center for Education Statistics. NAEP 1999 Trends
in Academic Progress (p. 108) Washington, DC US
Department of Education, August 2000
15
Between 1988-90, that progress came to a haltand
gaps began to widen once again.
16
NAEP Reading, 17 Year-Olds
29
21
17
NAEP Math, 17 Year-Olds
28
20
18
How much learning takes place at each level?
19
Students Make More Growth Grade 5 to 8 than
Grade 9 to 12
20
Academic GrowthGrades 5-8, 9-12
21
Value Added in High School Declined During the
Nineties
22
Value Added Declining in High School Math...
Age 13-17 Growth
Source NAEP 1999 Trends in Academic Progress
23
Still
Age 13-17 Growth
Source Main NAEP 1996, 2000
24
Reading Students Entering Better Prepared, But
Leaving Worse
Source NAEP 1996 Trends in Academic Progress
25
Hormones?
26
Students in Other Countries Gain far More in
Middle and High School
27
TIMSS
28
Source NCES 1999-081R, Highlights From TIMSS
29
Source NCES 1999-081R, Highlights From TIMSS
30
PISA
31
US 15 Year-Olds Rank Near Middle Of The Pack
Among 32 Participating Countries 1999
32
2003 U.S. Ranked 24th out of 29 OECD Countries
in Mathematics
Source Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data
available at http//www.oecd.org/
33
Problems are not limited to our high-poverty and
high-minority schools . . .
34
U.S. Ranks Low in the Percent of Students in the
Highest Achievement Level (Level 6) in Math
Source Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data
available at http//www.oecd.org/
35
U.S. Ranks 23rd out of 29 OECD Countries in the
Math Achievement of the Highest-Performing
Students
Students at the 95th Percentile
Source Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data
available at http//www.oecd.org/
36
U.S. Ranks 23rd out of 29OECD Countries in the
Math Achievement of High-SES Students
Source Organization for Economic Cooperation and
Development (OECD), PISA 2003 Results, data
available at http//www.oecd.org/
37
One measure on which we rank high?Inequality!
38
Performance Of U.S.15 Year-Olds Highly Variable
Of 27 OECD countries
Source OECD, Knowledge and Skills for Life
First Results From PISA 2000, 2001.
39
Where are we now?
40
Where Are We Now? 4th Grade Reading All Students
2003
Source USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP) Summary Data Tables
41
By Race, Ethnicity NAEP 4th Grade Reading 2003
Source USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP)
42
By Family Income NAEP 4th Grade Reading 2003
Source USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP)
43
Where Are We Now? 8th Grade Math All Students
2003
Source USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP) Summary Data Tables
44
By Race, Ethnicity NAEP 8th Grade Math 2003
Source USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP)
45
By Family Income NAEP 8th Grade Math 2003
Source USDOE, NCES, National Assessment of
Educational Progress (NAEP)
46
These gaps begin before students arrive at our
door
47
But, rather than organizing our system to
ameliorate this problem, we organize it to
exacerbate this problem.
48
End of high school?
49
African American and Latino 17 Year Olds Do Math
at Same Levels As White 13 Year Olds
Source NAEP 1999 Long Term Trends Summary Tables
(online)
50
African American and Latino 17 Year Olds Read at
Same Levels as White 13 Year Olds
Source Source NAEP 1999 Long Term Trends
Summary Tables (online)
51
These patterns are reflected, too, in high school
completion, college entry and college graduation
rates.
52
Students Graduate From High School At Different
Rates, 2001
Source Jay P. Greene and Greg Forster, Public
High School Graduation and College Readiness
Rates in the United States, Manhattan Institute
for Policy Research, September 2003.
53
ADD IT ALL UP...
54
Of Every 100 White Kindergartners
(25-to 29-Year-Olds)
Source US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the
Census. March Current Population Surveys,
1971-2001, in The Condition of Education 2002.
55
Of Every 100 African American Kindergartners
(25-to 29-Year-Olds)
Source US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the
Census. March Current Population Survey,
1971-2001, In The Condition of Education 2002.
56
Of Every 100 Latino Kindergartners
(25-to 29-Year-Olds)
Source US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the
Census. March Current Population Surveys,
1971-2001, In The condition of Education 2002.
57
Of Every 100 American Indian/Alaskan Native
Kindergartners
(24 Year Olds)
58
College Graduates by Age 26
Source Tom Mortenson, Research Seminar on Public
Policy Analysis of Opportunity for Post
Secondary, 1997.
59
WHY?
60
What We Hear Adults Say
  • Theyre poor
  • Their parents dont care
  • They come to schools without breakfast
  • Not enough books
  • Not enough parents . . .

61
But if theyre right, then why are poor and
minority children performing so high in...
62
Some schools?
63
  • The good news . . .
  • You are not alone!

64
  • For better or worse, New Hampshires challenges
    are a microcosm of Americas challenges.

65
  • One last data set about one of the most
    significant results of the lack of equity and the
    lack of performance by high school students in
    U.S. schools . . .

66
The National Dropout Problem
  • 488,000 U.S. High School students dropped out of
    school between October 1999 and October 2000
  • If put on school busses they would have filled
    12,000 school busses to capacity

67
  • If lined up end to end the Dropout Caravan
    would have stretched 100 miles. . .
  • farther than from Conway to Manchester.

68
(No Transcript)
69
  • Those busses are stuck in a mid 20th century
    traffic jam.
  • But this isnt a mere traffic problem . . .
  • This is an issue with serious economic
    implications for every community and state in the
    country.

70
  • Three aspects to consider
  • Low educational attainment lost personal
    opportunities in life
  • Lost earnings lost tax revenue
  • Loss of opportunity is a problem that not only
    threatens the welfare of the individual, it
    threatens the welfare of the entire country.

71
  • U.S. Demographics are in rapid flux especially
    with the school-aged population . . .

72
Minority to Majority
  • Hispanic 12 to 25 (2025)
  • These students tend to be the least well educated

73
  • So?

74
  • The needs of the 21st Century workforce have
    changed significantly.

75
1997
1950
Unskilled 15
Skilled 20
Skilled 65
Professional 20
Unskilled 60
Professional 20
ThinkLink
National Summit on 21st Century Skills for 21st
Century Jobs
76
  • As if that werent enough . . .

77
  • Degree majors in our schools do not reflect an
    increasingly scientifically and mathematically
    dominated society . . .
  • Non U.S. citizens represent a relatively small
    percentage of total U.S. student enrollments in
    post-secondary institutions, yet . . .

78
  • Of the 4 year degrees granted by U.S colleges and
    universities . . .
  • Degrees to non U.S. Citizens
  • Physical Sciences 43
  • Mathematics 42
  • Computer Science 46
  • Physics 36
  • Engineering 56

79
  • 5 of all degrees in the U.S. were in the
    sciences and engineering (and approximately half
    of those were to noncitizens)
  • 60 of all degrees in Asia were in the sciences
    and engineering
  • China alone granted 350,000 degrees in biotech in
    2005!

80
  • 90 of the worlds graduates in science and
    engineering will be in Asia in 2010.
  • These graduates will be high skill/low wage
    professionals compared to Americas high
    skill/high wage professionals.

81
  • District improvement plans focus on the how of
    change
  • From examination of root causes to discussion of
    the root canal frustrations

82
  • Will the changes you are proposing produce good
    schools in New Hampshire?
  • The key is in the identified systemic approach to
    school change.

83
(No Transcript)
84
  • Will producing good schools through this systemic
    approach be enough for
  • New Hampshires future?

85
  • Redefining the enemy
  • Jim Collins in Good to Great
  • We dont have great schools, principally because
    we have good schools.

86
  • In New Hampshire are you on the road
  • From Good to . . .
  • Gooder ?

87
  • Lets get real and drill down
  • The frustration over the paradigm shift
  • WHAT DO YOU WANT?

88
The need to view things differently
89
  • The first place where the shift hits the fan .
    . .
  • The Schools
  • What used to define a good school?
  • What defines a good school today?
  • The difference for the first time a
    performance metric was applied to school

90
  • What is the plan for communicating the
    school/district change in expectations?
  • Is the plan focused to hit ALL constituents?

91
  • Lets talk about where the shift is going to
    hit next . . .
  • The classroom

92
  • What used to define a good classroom?
  • Who doesnt remember . . .
  • Mr. Ditto from Teachers?

93
  • Teachers feel caught between the vice of school
    accountability and traditional expectations for
    keeping the system running
  • Who is helping the classroom teacher understand
    the shift and how that changes and redefines ALL
    roles and expectations?

94
  • Remember the difficulty with SPED scores can
    only be understood in the context of the value of
    success for each individual student.
  • Ignore this concept and you begin to cherry
    pick for compliance with state and national
    targets

95
  • In terms of leadership focus, is it about all
    students learning. . . ?

96
  • Characteristics of Effective Leadership The two
    studies we have been citing (Beyond Islands of
    Excellence and Characteristics of Improved School
    Districts) highlight several key characteristics
    of effective leadership.
  •  
  • 1.       Focus on all students learning   The
    consensus is that effective leadership provides a
    clear and meaningful focus on all students
    learning.  This means that the district
    articulates clear goals that promote excellence
    and equity in the teaching-learning process and
    that hold schools accountable for their mission
    of ensuring that all students do learn to high
    standards.   This focus on student learning is
    often encapsulated in the value high
    expectations for all students.   But for this
    value to be meaningful, it must be translated
    into action.   At the district level, this means,
    first and foremost, a commitment to instructional
    improvement. This can be recognized by ongoing,
    thorough, data-based inquiry to determine
    system-wide needs related to improving
    instruction for every student followed by focused
    allocation of resources (human fiscal and
    physical) toward meeting those needs and a system
    to monitor and adjust.

97
  • OR instead is it about
  • each student learning?

98
  • Do teachers in your districts understand the
    difference in the goals of consistency of
    instruction and
  • consistency of results?

99
  • Do teachers understand why the identified
    achievement gaps are a serious problem?
  • Do they feel empowered to really make a
    difference with those targeted students?

100
  • Many plans mention the need for alignment of
    curriculum, instruction and assessment.
  • Remember, in the old world, none of this was
    needed to stay in the system.

101
  • When teachers are caught in the transition
    without understanding the why of change,
    frustration results.
  • Why? cannot be answered with
  • The District says we have to
  • The State says we have to or
  • The administration says we have to

102
  • The instructional decisions that have the
    greatest impact are made day to day in the
    classroom.
  • --Rick Stiggins

103
  • Curriculum maps can help administrators get a
    better handle of what SHOULD be going on in a
    classroom, but they dont do much for student
    success when the door is closed if a teacher
    doesnt understand the why.

104
  • In the 20th century, it may still be impossible
    for the administrator to know whats going on
    with teaching. . .
  • but now they can tell whats going on with
    student learning.

105
  • The risk when the why is unclear is compliance
    of the same sort that students give teachers for
    the same reason . . .
  • They may not understand,
  • They may not agree,
  • BUT
  • They will do it if they have to.

106
  • Are you ready to have the shift hit the
    students?
  • What used to define a successful student?
  • What are the student implications for the needed
    changes in student expectations?

107
  • Students at all levels quickly learn how to
    play school so that usually teachers and
    students get what they want.

108
  • The best example is the uncomfortable truth. .
    .
  • High Schools are about the economics of the
    diploma

109
  • Students buy a diploma with X number of
    credits.
  • Each credit is purchased with 125-130 hours of
    class time.
  • Credits are not dependent on learning.

110
  • Grade inflation is inherent because grades are
    not tied to any standards
  • Who has not heard of extra credit for NCAA pools?
  • Cans of food at Thanksgiving?
  • Attending regularly or
  • turning in homework, regardless of its
    correctness?

111
  • When students accumulate enough credits they can
    cash in credits for their diploma.

112
  • Mystified by
  • Senior Year Lite?
  • We offer a special deal to our best and brightest
    . . .

113
  • Instead of spending 25 credits for your diploma,
    we think you should spend 30 or 32!
  • AND . . .
  • you can . . .

114
  • Take courses we warn you will be very difficult
  • Will take a lot of your free time
  • Endanger your GPA
  • Have the potential for negative financial rewards
    by endangering your scholarship (and KEES) money

115
  • Who are the slow learners??

116
  • So I ask . . .
  • Who is handling the student shift?

117
This is a challenging shift for everyone in
education
118
  • As if all this werent enough . . .
  • Larger changes are on the horizon and headed our
    way. . .

119
(No Transcript)
120
  • What does the future hold?

121
  • Citizens of New Hampshire must come to understand
    that they are part of a world economy, and the
    world is changing faster than ever before.
  • Huge shifts are taking place now that will be
    felt for many decades.

122
  • How will you lead education for students who will
    live in a world you have not experienced?

123
  • As teachers struggle to make sure students learn
    facts that they think are essential, keep this in
    mind . . .

124
  • It took approximately 50,000 years for humanity
    to acquire one unit of knowledge
  • It took 1500 years to double that first knowledge
    base.
  • By the early 70s mankind was doubling knowledge
    every 6 years
  • Human knowledge is expected to be doubling EVERY
    year by 2012
  • (the year this years 6th graders will graduate)
  • (assuming mankind had one unit of knowledge in
    the year AD 1)

125
  • The Internet currently doubles in size every 120
    days and more than 80 of the sites that will
    exist a year from now dont exist today.

126
  • 80 of the jobs todays kindergartners will
    occupy in the future dont exist yet.
  • How are you getting them ready for those jobs?

127
  • The only sustainable competitive advantage is
    the ability to be able to learn faster than your
    competition.
  • --Peter Senge, The Fifth Discipline

128
  • Start thinking about the future of education in
    your districts . . .

129
  • IF you have clearly defined standards for
    students, and assess students on the basis of
    those standards, then . . .
  • what about time?
  • what about place?
  • IF content is seen as a context for learning and
    not as the goal, then what??

130
  • The coming tsunami in public education

131
(No Transcript)
132
  • The three factors that will change the future of
    education . . .

133
  • The identification of standards
  • -- agreement on the product

134
  • The use of Common End of Course Assessments
  • --the first ever introduction of a quality
    guarantee

135
  • Technology
  • Even the education world is going to go flat

136
  • What was the effect of outsourcing on the major
    industries of the United States?

137
  • Is education immune to outsourcing?

138
  • Financial Daily from THE HINDU group of
    publicationsTuesday, Mar 08, 2005

139
  • Education outsourcing wave set to hit India
    Moumita Bakshi Bharat Kumar
  • New Delhi/Chennai , March 7
  • SKILLED manpower in India is a major attraction
    for foreign entrepreneurs to set up operations
    here. Now, Indian entrepreneurs are latching on
    to the very people who give India its skilled
    manpower - namely,
  • skilled teachers.

140
  • Tuitions outsourcing is an opportunity that
    beckons India. Several countries are turning to
    providers who directly, or through their Indian
    arm, employ teachers for tutoring through the
    Internet.
  • And it's not a small ripple. Analysts estimate
    the market for tutoring for competitive
    examinations in the US at 20 billion, while the
    education market itself is pegged at about 800
    billion.

141
  • "Various education processes are being outsourced
    within the US," said Mr Satya Narayanan R,
    Chairman of education service provider Career
    Launcher. These typically include curriculum
    design, academic pedagogy, content development
    and actual delivery.
  • The US, which has always been at the forefront of
    innovation, is likely to be the biggest consumer
    of these services.

142
  • The American high school is obsolete.
  • Bill Gates, address to National Governors
    Conference, February, 2005
  • Were pretty good like we are!
  • KY supt reaction to Gates at the
    Superintendents CEO Network Meeting, Louisville,
    KY March 3, 2005

143
  • Are people in your districts and broader school
    communities also saying Were pretty good like
    we are?

144
  • When the rate of change on the outside exceeds
    the rate of change on the inside, the end is in
    sight.
  • -- Jack Welch, CEO General Electric

145
  • If the end is in sight, is anyone looking?

146
(No Transcript)
147
  • What are the implications for you as education
    leaders in New Hampshire??

148
  • How do you go from being an organization focused
    on powerful teaching, (the 20th century option .
    . .)
  • to an organization focused on great learning,
    the 21st century need?

149
Changing the Essential Questions
  • You used to ask How do we change our schools
    to make them better?
  • Now you must ask How can our schools provide
    the best learning opportunities for each
    individual student in our system?

150
  • The very thing that frightens us today, the
    change curve, the phenomenal rate of change is an
    ally.
  • Its not a change curve, its a possibility
    curve. The times of most change always hold the
    most possibility.
  • DeWitt Jones

151
We can do it!
152

There ARE alternative ways to think about
education in New Hampshire in the 21st century .
. .
153
. . .Ride the wave of possibility!
154
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com