ILCGDE Plan for 2006

1

• ILC/GDE Plan for 2006
• How it relates to Fermilab

Modified slides from A couple of slides on
FNAL organization
Barry Barish GDE Meeting Frascati 8-Dec-05
Robert Kephart ILC Program Director
ILC General meeting
12/21/05
2
Fermilab is now engaged in two types of ILC tasks

• RD to develop ILC technology
• The bulk of our effort
• ILC/GDE tasks are described in an MOU
• Focus Main Linac Components and Site
  development
• Also develop SCRF infrastructure ( for both ILC
  and PD)
• Design and Cost the machine
• Guided by the GDE
• FNAL was asked to assume new tasks at the
  Frascati GDE meeting in Dec 2005
• Goal Complete Design, and Engineering to prepare
  the ILC Reference Design Report for review by the
  end of 2006
• Claim is that there will be additional
  engineering funding to support this work in FY06

3
Global Design Effort

• The Mission of the GDE
• Produce a design for the ILC that includes a
  detailed design concept, performance assessments,
  reliable international costing, an
  industrialization plan , siting analysis, and
  detector concepts and scope.
• Coordinate worldwide R D efforts (to
  demonstrate and improve the performance, reduce
  the costs, attain the required reliability, etc.)

4
Baseline Configuration Document

• BCD is essentially the specification for the
  technical systems and performance of the ILC
• Started in Snowmass in August 2005
• Ratified at the Frascati GDE meeting in Dec
  2005 and now under change control
• Changes to BCD must now go through an approval
  process by the Change Control Board
• Provides the basis for the design to be developed
  in the Reference Design Report (RDR)
• ACD Alternative Configurations options that
  are fully described and costed in the RDR

5
GDE RDR / RD Organization
FALC
ICFA
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDE Directorate
GDE Executive Committee
GDE R D Board
GDE Change Control Board
GDE Design Cost Board
Global RD Program
RDR Design Matrix
6
GDE RDR / RD Organization
FALC
ICFA
Reporting
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
resources
technical
GDE Directorate
GDE Executive Committee
GDE R D Board
GDE Change Control Board
GDE Design Cost Board
Global RD Program
RDR Design Matrix
7
GDE RDR / RD Organization
FALC
ICFA
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDE Directorate
GDE
GDE Executive Committee
GDE R D Board
GDE Change Control Board
GDE Design Cost Board
Global RD Program
RDR Design Matrix
8
Original GDE Members

• Chris Adolphsen, SLAC
• Jean-Luc Baldy, CERN
• Philip Bambade, LAL, Orsay
• Barry Barish, Caltech
• Wilhelm Bialowons, DESY
• Grahame Blair, Royal Holloway
• Jim Brau, University of Oregon
• Karsten Buesser, DESY
• Elizabeth Clements, Fermilab
• Michael Danilov, ITEP
• Jean-Pierre Delahaye, CERN,
• Gerald Dugan, Cornell University
• Atsushi Enomoto, KEK
• Brian Foster, Oxford University
• Warren Funk, JLAB
• Jie Gao, IHEP
• Terry Garvey, LAL-IN2P3
• Hitoshi Hayano, KEK
• Tom Himel, SLAC

• Tom Markiewicz, SLAC
• David Miller, Univ College of London
• Shekhar Mishra, Fermilab
• Youhei Morita, KEK
• Olivier Napoly, CEA-Saclay
• Hasan Padamsee, Cornell University
• Carlo Pagani, DESY
• Nan Phinney, SLAC
• Dieter Proch, DESY
• Pantaleo Raimondi, INFN
• Tor Raubenheimer, SLAC
• Francois Richard, LAL-IN2P3
• Perrine Royole-Degieux, GDE/LAL
• Kenji Saito, KEK
• Daniel Schulte, CERN
• Tetsuo Shidara, KEK
• Sasha Skrinsky, Budker Institute
• Fumihiko Takasaki, KEK
• Laurent Jean Tavian, CERN

9
NEW GDE Members
9 GDE from SLAC vs 4 from Fermilab 55 accel
physicists vs 1 from Fermilab Fermilabs
presence on ILC GDE is still weak vs e.g.
SLAC Trying hard to change this!
Marc Ross (SLAC) Bill Willis (Columbia) Andre
Seryi (SLAC) John Sheppard (SLAC) Ewan Paterson
(SLAC) Maseo Kuriki (KEK) Kiyoshi Kubo
(KEK) Nobuhiro Terunuma (KEK) Norihito Ohuchi
(KEK) Susanna Guiducci (INFN) Deepa Angal-Kalinin
(CCLRC) Totals Americas 22 Europe 23 Asia 16
New total 61 members
10
GDE Structure and Organization

• Executive Committee for Baseline Configuration
• GDE Director
• Barish
• Regional Directors
• Dugan Americas
• Foster Europe
• Takasaki Asia
• Accelerator Leaders
• Yokoya - Asia
• Raubenheimer - Americas
• Walker - Europe
• Executive committee is responsible for decisions.
  For Frascati this included final BCD choices

GDE Executive Committee
11
GDE Structure and Organization

• GDE Groups
• Design / Cost Engineers
• Shidara Asia
• Bialowons Europe
• Garbincius Americas
• Siting, Civil Construction and Infrastructure
• Baldy - Europe
• Enomoto Asia
• Kuchler Americas
• Physics / Detectors (WWS chairs)
• Brau - Americas
• Richard - Europe
• Yamamoto - Asia
• Accelerator Experts (55 GDE members)

12
GDE Organizational Evolution for RDR

• Made additions to the GDE following the BCD
  completion. Added needed skills in design,
  engineering, costing, etc
• Change Control Board
• The baseline is now under configuration control.
  A Board was created with needed expertise.
• Design Cost Board
• A GDE Board was established to coordinate the
  reference design effort, including coordinating
  the overall model for implementing the baseline
  ILC, coordinating the design tasks, costing, etc.
  
• RD Board
• A GDE Board was created to evaluate, prioritize
  and coordinate the worldwide RD program in
  support of the baseline and alternatives ( How
  will this work ???)

13
Change Control Board (CCB) Nobu Toge (chair)
14
Design Cost Board (DCB) Peter Garbincius
(chair)
15
Design Approach

• Create a baseline configuration for the machine
• Document a concept for ILC machine with a
  complete layout, parameters etc. defined by the
  end of 2005 (done)
• Make forward looking choices, consistent with
  attaining performance goals, and understood well
  enough to do a conceptual design and reliable
  costing by end of 2006.
• Technical and cost considerations will be an
  integral part in making these choices.
• Baseline is now under configuration control,
  with a defined process for changes to the
  baseline.
• A Reference Design will be created and documented
  in a report by the end of 2006. It will be
  costed.
• Technical performance and physics performance
  will be evaluated for the reference design

16
Global RD Board (RDB) Bill Willis (chair)
17
Approach to ILC RD Program

• Proposal-driven RD in support of the baseline
  design.
• Technical developments, demonstration
  experiments, industrialization, etc.
• Proposal-driven RD in support of alternatives to
  the baseline
• Proposals for potential improvements to the
  baseline, resources required, time scale, etc.
• Develop a prioritized DETECTOR RD program aimed
  at technical developments needed to reach
  combined design performance goals

18
GDE RDR / RD Organization
FALC
ICFA
FALC Resource Board
ILCSC
GDE Directorate
GDE Executive Committee
GDE R D Board
GDE Change Control Board
GDE Design Cost Board
Global RD Program
RDR Design Matrix
ILC Design Effort
ILC RD Program
19
GDE Organization for Snowmass

• WG1 LET bdyn.
• WG2 Main Linac
• WG3a Sources
• WG3b DR
• WG4 BDS
• WG5 Cavity

Technical sub-system Working Groups
Provide input
Global Group

• GG1 Parameters
• GG2 Instrumentation
• GG3 Operations Reliability
• GG4 Conventional Facilities
• GG5 Cost Engineering
• GG6 Physics Options

20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22

• The GDE Plan and Schedule

2005 2006 2007 2008
2009 2010
Global Design Effort
Project
Baseline configuration
Reference Design
Funding
Technical Design
globally coordinated
ILC RD Program
regional coord
expression of interest
Siting
Hosting
sample sites
FALC
International Mgmt
ICFA / ILCSC
23
FNAL ILC Organization

• ILC Program Dir R Kephart
• Deputy S Mishra
• Deputy S Nagaitsev
• Resource Manager R Stanek

Accel Div S Nagaitsev
Tech Div S Mishra
PP Div M DeMarteau
Comp Div P McBride
FESS V Kuchler
Division Leaders function like Project
Managers. They are responsible for Division ILC
tasks and work with Division management to secure
needed labor. They manage ILC resources assigned
to the Division
24
Directorate funding of ILC

• This organization will manage all ILC and SCRF
  infrastructure resources at the lab
• Funds for these tasks are held in the
  directorate. Treat it like a project. ( Project
  18)
• Resources are to be used to accomplish an agreed
  upon list of Fermilab ILC and SCRF tasks (
  includes infrastructure for PD)
• A subset of these tasks are listed the ILC GDE
  MOU and are explicitly funded. These must be
  tracked and reported separately (reports to GDE
  DOE)
• Recommendation is that the 3.9 GHz cryomodule
  effort for DESY become a project that is tracked
  separately
• Unspent Project 18 funds will be carried over.
• No contingency this year so overruns must be
  avoided.

25
Directorate funding of ILC

• Division Heads may choose to put additional
  effort beyond this on ILC using Division funds.
• e.g. travel to educate people who are not working
  on ILC tasks
• new initiatives
• We want to track this in project 18, but the cash
  will remain in the Divisions
• Rich Stanek (ILC Resource Manager) will manage
  project 18 out of the directorate which will
  include all resources ( SWF and MS) for ILC and
  SCRF infrastructure
• We are working on the next levels of the project
  18 org chart
• E.g. Identifying Level 3 task managers
• Understanding the scope and resources required
  for each task
• FY06 Funding Levels
• We believe that we will know our FY06 funding
  shortly
• Plan is to present the available funds,
  organization, and our plan in January at these
  meeting

26
The future

• We are asked to provide budget estimates for
  FY07-08 effort in early January
• Division Leaders are asked to work with Rich to
  create these estimates (Current GDE and SCRF
  activities and the SMTF plan starting point)
• Need to include estimates for industrialization
• Expanded site studies and other activities
  appropriate for a US bid to host the ILC
• If there are other specific ILC items that need
  to be in these estimates please make sure your
  Division Leader knows about and includes them