Types of proteinprotein interactions PPI - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Types of proteinprotein interactions PPI

Description:

Types of protein-protein interactions (PPI) Obligate PPI ... Bovine G protein dissociates into G and G subunits upon GTP, but forms a stable trimer upon GDP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:151
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: jul7162
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Types of proteinprotein interactions PPI


1
(No Transcript)
2
Types of protein-protein interactions (PPI)
Non-obligate PPI
Obligate PPI the protomers are not found as
stable structures on their own in vivo
Non-obligate homodimer Sperm lysin
Obligate homodimer P22 Arc repressor DNA-binding
Obligate heterodimer Human cathepsin D
Non-obligate heterodimer RhoA and RhoGAP
signalling complex
3
Types of protein-protein interactions (PPI)
Non-obligate PPI
Obligate PPI usually permanent the protomers
are not found as stable structures on their own
in vivo
Permanent (many enzyme-inhibitor
complexes) dissociation constant KdAB / AB
10-7 10-13 M
Transient
Weak (electron transport complexes) Kd mM-?M
Non-obligate transient homodimer, Sperm lysin
(interaction is broken and formed continuously)
Intermediate (antibody-antigen,
TCR-MHC-peptide, signal transduction PPI), Kd
?M-nM
Strong (require a molecular trigger to shift the
oligomeric equilibrium) Kd nM-fM
Obligate heterodimer Human cathepsin D
Non-obligate permanent heterodimer Thrombin and
rodniin inhibitor
Bovine G protein dissociates into G? and G??
subunits upon GTP, but forms a stable trimer upon
GDP
4
(No Transcript)
5
Types of protein-protein interactions (PPI)
Non-obligate PPI
Obligate PPI usually permanent the protomers
are not found as stable structures on their own
in vivo
Permanent (many enzyme-inhibitor
complexes) dissociation constant KdAB / AB
10-7 10-13 M
Transient
Weak (electron transport complexes) Kd mM-?M
Non-obligate transient homodimer, Sperm lysin
(interaction is broken and formed continuously)
Intermediate (antibody-antigen,
TCR-MHC-peptide, signal transduction PPI), Kd
?M-nM
Strong (require a molecular trigger to shift the
oligomeric equilibrium) Kd nM-fM
Obligate heterodimer Human cathepsin D
Non-obligate permanent heterodimer Thrombin and
rodniin inhibitor
Bovine G protein dissociates into G? and G??
subunits upon GTP, but forms a stable trimer upon
GDP
6
Structural characteristics of protein-protein
interfaces
7
(No Transcript)
8
Types of protein-protein interactions (PPI)
Non-obligate PPI
Obligate PPI usually permanent the protomers
are not found as stable structures on their own
in vivo
Permanent (many enzyme-inhibitor
complexes) dissociation constant KdAB / AB
10-7 10-13 M
Transient
Weak (electron transport complexes) Kd mM-?M
Non-obligate transient homodimer, Sperm lysin
(interaction is broken and formed continuously)
Intermediate (antibody-antigen,
TCR-MHC-peptide, signal transduction PPI), Kd
?M-nM
Strong (require a molecular trigger to shift the
oligomeric equilibrium) Kd nM-fM
Obligate heterodimer Human cathepsin D
Non-obligate permanent heterodimer Thrombin and
rodniin inhibitor
Bovine G protein dissociates into G? and G??
subunits upon GTP, but forms a stable trimer upon
GDP
9
The conclusion is disappointed
  • The problem in definition and study of transient
    protein complexes
  • some of them (weak) show an elevated
    monomer-dimer equilibrium, some (strong) do not
    necessarily change their oligomeric state
    continuously and become effectively permanent
    upon co-operative binding to a macromolecule (for
    example, DNA)
  • they often dont form stable crystals nor give
    good NMR data
  • since they have interfaces similar to crystal
    contacts, it may be difficult to derive the true
    biological structure of the complex from the
    crystal structure.
  • It is difficult to discriminate between different
    types of PPIs based on physicochemical and
    geometrical interface properties.
  • The evolution of PPIs is still far from
    understood.
  • The functional relevance of weak PPI is often
    unclear, especially for homo-oligomers.

10
Result 1. Significance of oligomerisation. Some
examples
1. Local or temporary oligomerisation can
establish a concentration gradient and facilitate
the receptor binding process. For example, IL8,
SDF1?, MCP-1 (see Table 1, p.993). 2. Local or
temporary oligomerisation can provide temporary
storage of protein. For example, storage of CNTF
in the peripheral nerve (see Table 1 ,
p.993). 3. Biological function or activity can
be modulated by oligomerisation. For diverse homo
and hetero-dimerisation between five members of
the Rel/NFkB family, with varying affinities,
regulate different genes (see Table 1 ,
p.993). 4. The monomer-dimer transition can
provide a dynamic trigger inducing allosteric
conformational changes in the near environment.
For example, lysin (see Table 1 , p.994),
possibly, SCF (see Table 1 , p.993).
11
Weak transient homodimers
Transient heterodimers
1. Curation of significance of oligomerisation
Yes Yes
12
  • Physicochemical and geometrical properties of the
    oligomeric interfaces were obtained using an EBI
    program PROFACE
  • (Jones Thornton, PNAS USA, 1996)
  • Interface atoms are defined as atoms that lose
    more than 0.01 ?2 upon complexation.
  • Measure of contact area. The change in accessible
    surface area upon complexation is measured as the
    average difference between ASA of both protomers
    on their own and in complex.
  • Measure of the hydrophobicity of the complex. The
    polarity is measured as the percentage of the
    contact area that involves polar atoms.
  • Measure of the interface shape. The planarity of
    the interface is measured as rmsd of the
    interface atoms from the least squares plane
    fitted through the interface atoms. (A high rmsd
    denotes a rough or bent interface.)
  • Measure of the shapes complementarities of the
    interface. GAP index is measured as volume of the
    gaps existing between the protomers .
  • Measure of the strength of the contact. Pair
    score (for homodimers only, Table 3) is a
    statistical potential based on atom-pair
    frequencies across the interfaces of homodimers.
    A low log-odds score corresponds with a high
    probability to form a dimer.

13
Is there linear correlation between affinity and
contact area size for transient dimers?
Low affinity
High affinity
14
Result 2
Weak transient homodimers
Transient heterodimers
1. Curation of significance of oligomerisation
Yes Yes
2. Show linear correlation between affinity and
contact area size
No Yes
15
Structural characteristics of protein-protein
interfaces weak transient homodimers can be
distinguished from the more stable dimers
16
Structural characteristics of protein-protein
interfaces non-obligate heterodimers can not be
distinguished from the more stable obligate
complexes
17
(No Transcript)
18
Result 3
Weak transient homodimers
Transient heterodimers
1. Curation of significance of oligomerisation
Yes Yes
2. Show linear correlation between affinity and
contact area size
No Yes
3. Can be distinguished from the more stable
obligate dimers by contact area and polarity?
Yes No (Yes for only antigen-antibody
complexes)
19
  • Sequence homologues (E-value by Psi-Blast 10-15)
    have been identified for the set 1 of weak
    transient homodimers (Table 5).
  • The sum-of-pairs matrix conservation scores of
    residues comprising the inner interface (that
    have less than 5 of their ASA exposed to the
    solvent in the complex), the total interface
    (that lose more than 1 ?2 upon complexation), and
    all the surface residues have been determined by
    the multiple sequence alignment of the Psi-Blast.
    Score ranges from 0 to 1. A value of 0 indicates
    the position is not conserved a value of 1
    indicates it is highly conserved. The ratio (last
    column, Table 5) is greater than 1.0 suggests a
    possible functional evolutionary restraint for
    homo-dimerisation.
  • The average ratio mean conservation inner
    interface / surface for 14 transient weak
    homodimers was 1.10.

20
Result 4
Weak transient homodimers
Transient heterodimers
1. Curation of significance of oligomerisation
Yes -
Yes Yes
2. Show linear correlation between affinity and
contact area size
No Yes
3. Can be distinguished from the more stable
obligate dimers by contact area and polarity?
Yes No (Yes for only antigen-antibody
complexes)
4. Interface residues are more conserved than
surface residues for a conserved oligomeric state
Yes -
21
  • Structural homologues (same SCOP family, i.e.
    same homologues CATH superfamily) have been
    identified for the set 1 of weak transient
    homodimers.
  • The result 9 proteins families amongst 13
    studied families of weak transient homodimers
    (Figure 5) form dimers, i.e. the quaternary state
    is conserved throughout the superfamily. Within
    families of IL-8-like chemokines, insulin,
    retinol-binding proteins, and galectin homologues
    with higher order oligomeric states (i.e. trime,
    tetramer, hexamer) are found.
  • For each protein and species entry in the SCOP
    family, a representative structure was selected
    and analyzed for its interface characteristics
    (Figure 5).
  • The result The lower and upper boundaries of
    contact area size and pair score potential (A
    measure of the strength of the contact. A low
    log-odds score corresponds with a high
    probability to form a dimer.) for 13 studied
    families of homologues are those found for the
    validated set of weak transient homodimers with
    exception for 4 homodimers (Figure 5) which are
    more stable than others.

22
(No Transcript)
23
Result 5
Weak transient homodimers
Transient heterodimers
1. Curation of significance of oligomerisation
Yes -
Yes Yes
2. Show linear correlation between affinity and
contact area size
No Yes
3. Can be distinguished from the more stable
obligate dimers by contact area and polarity?
Yes No (Yes for antigen-antibody
complexes only)
4. Interface residues are more conserved than
surface residues for a conserved oligomeric state
Yes -
5. Existing structural homologues demonstrate the
same range of ASA and pair scores as proteins
from the set of weak homodimers
Yes -
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com