From Paper to Practice: Challenges in Implementing Clinical Guidelines - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

From Paper to Practice: Challenges in Implementing Clinical Guidelines

Description:

Recommendations on screening, diagnosis, workup, referral, or management ... Previous polyp now noted. Colonoscopy options displayed. GU note mammogram rec. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:687
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: decisionsy
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: From Paper to Practice: Challenges in Implementing Clinical Guidelines


1
From Paper to PracticeChallenges in
Implementing Clinical Guidelines
William Salomon, MD
  • Postdoctoral Fellow,
  • Medical Informatics
  • Decision Systems Group
  • Harvard Medical School
  • Medical Informatics Specialist
  • Central Maine HealthCare

2
Guidelines a definition
  • Synonyms du jour
  • Protocol
  • Practice Parameter
  • Best Practice

3
Clinical Guidelines
  • Recommendations on screening, diagnosis, workup,
    referral, or management of patients
  • Consensus-based
  • Evidence-based
  • Recurring theme for at least thirty years
  • Clinical algorithms in early 1970s
  • Triage applications
  • Early experiments with computer implementations
  • Comparable to rules for clinical trials or
    research protocols

4
Evidence Categories
  • Epidemiological
  • Evidence stated in terms of probabilities or the
    likelihood in a population, such as estimated
    survival rate
  • Biomedical
  • Domain-specific knowledge of underlying process
  • Clinical
  • Domain-specific knowledge from clinical practice
  • Observational
  • Domain-general knowledge from everyday patient
    observation (e.g. from interacting with patients)
  • Authority
  • Knowledge derived from trust in someone else

5
Typical Concerns
  • Cookbook medicine
  • Guidelines, not absolute dogma
  • Ambiguous
  • Evidence often does not support a single approach
  • Range of options often appropriate
  • Run counter to accepted practices
  • Evidence does not always support accepted
    practices

6
Why Physicians Dont Follow Guidelines
  • Cabana, et al. JAMA 19992821458-65
  • Lack of awareness
  • Lack of familiarity
  • External barriers (guideline, patient,
    environmental)
  • Inertia of previous practice
  • Lack of self-efficacy
  • Lack of Agreement

7
Guideline Dissemination
  • Conventional publication in journals and
    textbooks
  • Mailing of monographs or guideline summaries to
    Clinicians
  • Compilations of guidelines for reference
  • Online resources
  • Locally and regional (www.isci.org)
  • National (www.guidelines.gov) and international
  • Real-time integration with work flow (EMR)

8
Guideline Dissemination Issues
  • Printed guidelines have little impact
  • Cabana et al (JAMA, 1999) barriers to
    guideline adherence
  • Web guidelines have little impact
  • Oregon Health Sciences University study ( Stolte
    et al, AMIA, 1999)

9
Improving guideline compliance
  • Distribute guidelines via Electronic Medical
    Record (EMR) systems
  • Clinical information from existing data
  • Recommendations automatically presented
  • Proven in Clinical Practice
  • Tang influenza (Northwestern University,Chicago,
    IL, 1998)
  • Shojania Vancomycin (Brigham and Womens
    Hospital, 1998)
  • Outpatient EMR usage 11 and growing rapidly

10
Guideline Creation andTranslation Process
Local Representation/ Application
Scientific papers
Paper guidelines
Computable Guideline
Encoder
Clinical Use
Manual
?
HUMAN
HUMAN
HUMAN
HUMAN
MACHINE
MACHINE
Authoring Tool
Clinical Use
Guideline Development Organization
MACHINE
General
Site -specific
11
A Common Feature in Clinical Journals
and Textbooks
12
Cough Chest 1998 Aug115(2 Suppl) 133S-181S
  • Etc, etc (through a total of 17)
  • 65 pages of text, 9 tables, etc.

13
Cough Chest 1998 Aug115(2 Suppl) 133S-181S
14
Analyzing Guidelines for Application to Patients
  • Variety of guideline
  • Intended users
  • Diseases and problems
  • Chronic, acute,
  • Screening, chronic disease management, clinical
    trials ...
  • ...
  • Analytical tasks for modeling
  • Decision-making
  • Workflow specification
  • Goal setting
  • Data interpretation
  • Alerts and reminders

15
Repertoire of Modeling Constructs
  • Decision-making
  • If-then-else condition or case step
  • Rule-in/rule-out criteria for setting preferences
  • Decision-analytic models
  • Workflow specification
  • ...
  • Sequential/concurrent/iterative activities
  • Organizational models
  • ...
  • Data interpretation
  • Classification hierarchy
  • Temporal abstraction
  • ...

16
Modeling methodologies for Guidelines and
Decision Rules
  • Clinical Guidelines Medical Decision
    Rules
  • GLIF Arden Syntax
  • PROforma GCARE
  • PRODIGY
  • PRESTIGE
  • EON
  • ASBRU

17
Guideline Interchange Format (GLIF 3.0)
  • A guideline may be specified on 3 abstraction
    levels
  • Conceptual flowchart a flowchart of clinical
    decisions and actions. The information within the
    steps is stored as strings
  • Computable the specification may be verified
    for logical consistency and completeness
  • Implementable incorporation into institutional
    information system environments

18
Case study stable angina guideline

ltaction stepgt
ltnon-automatic choice stepgt
ltautomatic conditional stepgt

19
Comparing Clinical Guidelines and Medical
Decision Rules
Decision Rules Clinical Guidelines
  • Evoking method Event-driven
    Eligibility
    determination
  • Temporal character Single point in time
    Prospective guidance
    episodic
  • Support Consensus or Consensus
    or evidence-based
    evidence-based
  • Typical result of Generation of
    Specification of processing warnings or alerts
    preferred actions
  • Characteristics of Precise May be
    imprecise advice delivered recommendations
    and non-algorithmic

20
Arden Syntax What is it?
  • A standard method of encoding rules
  • Formalized in early 1990s
  • Constructed of MLMs
  • (Medical Logic Modules)
  • Production rule / Procedural hybrid
  • Each MLM behaves like a single rule
  • Instructions within a MLM execute serially
  • MLMs can call each other
  • Procedural, not declarative or symbolic
  • Penetration
  • incorporated in vendor products (Eclipsys, HBOC,
    IBM, Micromedex, SMS, etc)

21
Thyroid Evaluation MLM (ACP)
  • Maintenance
  • title TSH Evaluation
  • filename TSH_eval
  • ...
  • Library
  • purpose Screen for thyroid disease
  • ...
  • Knowledge
  • data
  • tsh read damPDQRES2,constraintsC
    58363
  • outpatient_visit event '32511','47638
  • dob read damGYDAPMP HBASIC
    HBIRTHDT
  • age (now - dob) / 1 year
  • last_alert read damPDQDEC1
    mlmself
  • sex read damGYDAPMP HPBASICHSEX

22
Thyroid MLM (contd)
  • evoke outpatient_visit
  • logic
  • if (age gt 50) and (sex F) and (last_alert
    is null) then
  • if (tsh is present) then
  • if (time of (last tsh) is before (age - 50)
    years ago) then
  • conclude true
  • endif
  • else conclude true
  • endif
  • else conclude false
  • endif
  • action write Patient is a woman older than 50
    years.
  • Please obtain a screening TSH.
  • end

23
How is it used?Event Monitor
  • Events Clinically relevant occurrences
  • Result reports Lab, radiology
  • Patient oriented outpt. visit, hosp. admission
  • Organization oriented inpatient unit transfer
  • Output Knowledge Base (MLM) Inference Engine
    (Event Monitor) Patient Data
  • Messaging, paging, ordering
  • Routed as specified in MLM
  • Demands integration with database(s) and
    communication pathways

24
For what is it used?Target Problems
  • Usual Relatively simple decision processes
  • Less Common More complex guidelines

25
Logician 5.4
  • Medscape, Inc., Hillsboro, OR
  • Based on Oracle 8 RDBMS
  • Migrating to Oracle 8i in ver 5.5
  • Uses proprietary scripting language MEL
  • (MedicaLogic Expression Language)
  • Based on C
  • Has various add-in modules
  • Scheduling
  • Formulary
  • Lab Interface (supports HL-7)
  • External document interface (FAX, scanning)
  • Does not include a billing system

26
Logician Protocols
  • An example of a reminder system
  • Universally invoked once created
  • Can operate in three modes requiring more or less
    user participation
  • Background
  • requires user to remember to check Protocols
  • Modal banner alert
  • prompts user to check Protocols if one is active
    from patient header banner
  • Display within Form Component
  • entirely passive, requires no action of user

27
Logician Opening Screen
28
Invoking Protocols
29
Protocol Displayed
30
Protocol Setup
  • This example has no Hx, Med, Dx criteria
  • Note windows for BPs

31
Protocol Setup Selection
32
Protocol Syntax
  • Representation in pseudocode
  • IF
  • DEMOGINFO (Sex AND AgeRange) AND
  • REGINFO (String1 OR String2 ) AND
  • PROBLEM (Modifer_Prob1 OR Modifier_Prob2 ) AND
    MEDICATION (Med1 OR Med2 ) AND
  • OBSERVATION ((ObsVal1 AND ObsDate1) OR
  • ((ObsVal2 AND ObsDate2) OR
  • THEN
  • IF EventObs1
  • THEN Due on ??/??/??
  • ELSE Due NOW
  • IF EventObs2
  • THEN Due on ??/??/??
  • ELSE Due NOW
  • ELSE
  • Protocol Doesnt display

33
Protocol Shortcomings
  • Universally invoked over Enterprise
  • Primitive Boolean structure
  • Demographics No ORs
  • All others No ANDs
  • (Ex. Dx of CHF AND Hypertension)
  • No access to Medication/Allergy engine
  • No branch points
  • Branching accomplished by multiple instances of
    protocol simulating each branch
  • (Ex. USPS Recommendations for Adult Women
    requires 6 instances of protocol)
  • Is this a place that Arden would be useful?

34
Logician Encounter Forms
  • Alternatives for Notes
  • Free-text Entry
  • Macros (Quick-text)
  • Encounter Forms (Form Components)
  • Encounter Forms allow use of
  • Data Entry fields
  • Selective display of data
  • Extensive data manipulation and transformation
    using MEL (MedicaLogic Expression Language)
  • A better method of implementing guidelines

35
Start Update (SexF, Age 45-49)
36
Option to use Protocol settings
37
Previous polyp now noted
38
Colonoscopy options displayed
39
GU note mammogram rec.
40
Colonoscopy now scheduled
41
Nml Cx Exam / Pap Smears noted
42
HRT? Risk of CAD,osteoporosis
43
HRT? Add in Family Hx
44
So what was the reference?
45
HRT discussed declined
46
HRT discussed accepted
47
GU (SexM, Age 40-50)
48
CV risk factors prev. recorded
49
Form-Based Advantages
  • Guidelines are incorporated into standard
    workflow and requires no additional effort
  • Every patient has access to the same level of
    care regardless of experience of provider or
    specialty
  • Guidelines can be updated as a whole, some code
    can be reused (as opposed to Protocols)
  • Reference materials can be added as desired
  • Opt-out comments can be used, providing immediate
    feedback to improve guideline implementation

50
Form-Based Disadvantages
  • Editing in Encounter Form Editor is cumbersome
    and time consuming
  • MEL is still limited in clinical data retrieval
    functions
  • No ability to selectively omit bad data
  • Enforced structure of Observations across an
    Enterprise, regardless of specialty and need for
    detail
  • Need for work-arounds to account for differences
    in recording history (Observations vs. Problems)
  • Forms may not be sharable across Enterprises due
    to different data structures and workflows

51
Blood Pressure OBS (27/50)
52
Continuing Informatics Issues 1
  • No well-defined vocabulary Observation term
    creation is ad-hoc (LOINC, UMLS?)
  • Ill-defined semantic relationships between
    Observations (listed hierarchically) making Form
    creation difficult

53
Conflicting/Inconsistent Data Recording 1
  • Personal History
  • Patient-owned PROBLEM
  • Personal hx of PROBLEM (ICD-V10-15.9)
  • Hx OBSERVATION
  • Family History
  • Family Hx of PROBLEM
  • Patient-owned PROBLEM (ICD-V16-19.8)
  • Family Hx OBSERVATION

54
Family History OBS (34/107)
55
Conflicting/Inconsistent Data Recording 2
  • Problems
  • Primarily ICD-based (few use SNOMED)
  • Irregular use of synonyms makes string searches
    difficult
  • Attempts to solve by Custom Problems lists
    limited by interested individuals willing to
    construct them
  • ICD-10 ??

56
Conflicting/Inconsistent Data Recording 3
  • OBSERVATIONS
  • All observations are stored as strings
    (characters) regardless of what you think they
    are
  • Enforce use of numbers and date/time by using
    Encounter Form masks
  • Each OBSERVATION type has a defined data type
    (lookup in OBSHEAD table)
  • What to do with erroneous data

57
Conflicting/Inconsistent Data Recording 4
  • Medications
  • Uncoded cannot do interaction/allergy checks
  • Delays in dissemination information due to
    quarterly updates

58
Conflicting/Inconsistent Data Recording 5
  • Document Data
  • Now cluttered by large amounts of RTF formatting
    strings

59
Continuing Informatics Issues - 2
  • How should medical records that span long periods
    of time be managed so as to remain accessible,
    but not degrade system performance (selective
    archiving)
  • Forms and Protocols are Reminders if Alerts
    are needed, where should they be implemented and
    how?

60
On-line, real-time activities
  • Perform these when time value is critical
  • Clinical Encounters Updates
  • Critical alerts generated from imported lab
  • High K, INR

61
Off-line, warehoused activities
  • Periodic low-criticality reports
  • Periodic screening reminders
  • Recalls
  • Utilization review
  • Quality Assurance
  • Ad-hoc database intensive queries
  • Reporting
  • Abstraction to other databases
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com