Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 61
About This Presentation
Title:

Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery

Description:

mainstreaming disaster resilience and adaptation in poverty reduction ... Poverty-related policy objectives can't be met if disaster risks are not taken into account ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:139
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 62
Provided by: saro6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery


1
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery
mainstreaming disaster resilience and adaptation
in poverty reduction
Click on the map to access the Hotspots Mapping
Tool
Risk levels? Top 30Red Middle 30yellow
Lowest 40 Blue
  • Saroj Kumar Jha
  • Task Manager, GFDRR
  • The World Bank

List of Pipeline Hotspot Countries
2
All disaster statistics suggest that disaster
risks to development are increasing
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery
3
Natural disasters are increasing due to increased
human-induced vulnerabilities and climatic
uncertainties
F
Number of disasters
W
E
types of triggering hazards
SourceEMDAT
4
(No Transcript)
5
Number of natural disasters by origin regional
distribution1995 - 2004
Regional distribution of disasters by triggering
hazards 1995 - 2004
Source EMDAT/ISDR
6
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery
Climate-related hazards( windstorms, surges, and
floods)
are affecting more people now
SourceEMDAT
7
Natural disasters can make a difference in the
economic development of poor countries
8
More than four-fifths of GDP is located in areas
of relatively high economic risk subject to one
or more hazards and more Hotspots Study by
World Bank and Columbia Univ
  • Economic loss risks are increasing

9
Highest hazard areas have higher than average
population density, GDP, agriculture GDP density
and transportation length
Source Hotspots Study( WB)
10
But underdeveloped economies have limited
capacities to cope with disasters
Largest historical losses due to disasters
compared to economic indicators
WDI 2000 IADB 2001 MunichRe 1998, ECLAC, 2000
11
Uninsured exposure is very high in underdeveloped
economies
Percentage of total losses insured by wealthy
versus poor countries Ratio of insured to tota
l losses according to country income groups for
the period 1985-1999
Source MunichRe, 2000
12
Fiscal and Economic Effects of Disasters
higher is the uninsured economic loss as of
GDP and Government Revenues
Uninsured Economic Loss as
13
There is ample evidence that poverty is the most
important trigger which turns hazards into
disasters
14
Undernourished Population (2000 - 2002)
Global hunger map
Almost 50 of food emergencies
have been caused by natural disasters
Natural disaster-related mortality risks are
higher in area experiencing
food emergencies
GDP risk hotspots
Mortality risk hotspots
Risk levels? Top 30Red Middle 30yellow
Lowest 40 Blue
15
(No Transcript)
16
Poverty-related policy objectives cant be met if
disaster risks are not taken into account
Projected number of people in poverty,
considering disproportionate impacts on the poor
(Nicaragua case study)
Household model based on NLSMSS by WB/UNDP/GON
Source IIASA/Provention/World Bank, 2002
17
Climate change and variability will exacerbate
the hazard and vulnerability in countries prone
to multiple disaster risks
18
Climate change is with us
  • Global average surface
  • temperature increase
  • 0.6?C over 20th Century
  • Predicted 1.4 to 5.8?C
  • increase in global avg surface temp by 2100
  • Global mean sea level
  • Projected to rise by 0.09 0.88 m between 1990
    to 2100

SourceRafik Hirji, World Bank
19
Kenya variability and growth
20
Ethiopia GDP highly correlated to rainfall
  • Impact of historical levels of variability on
    2003-2015 growth projections
  • 38 decline in avg. GDP growth
  • 25 increase in poverty

SourceRafik Hirji, World Bank
21
More than 40 area becomes unfit for tea growing
with 2 degrees increase in temperature
22
Unplanned development is adding to existing high
risk levels of the society
23
Rapid urbanization could be the single most
impact factor contributing to rapidly increasing
complex risk profile of modern societies
24
And, when disasters do occur..
Despite donor support and reallocation of ongoing
development portfolio, recovery has been under f
unded with detrimental impact on development.

25
Gap between end of humanitarian phase and
initiation of medium/long-term recovery needs
urgent attention of development community.
Recovery slows down due to termination of relief
phase and insufficient funds for immediate recov
ery
Standby financing facility can
accelerate immediate recovery
Post-disaster gaps in recovery
Flash appeal by OCHA
0
12
18
4
months
End of relief phase
Disaster occurs
IFIs Recovery projects begin
End of immediate recovery phase
Source IRP paper
26
But global disaster landscape is changing
  • Greater recognition that disasters are a
    development issue..

27
Hyogo Framework for Action (HFA) adopted by 168
governments and international system is the
framework for disaster reduction
  • Growing consensus on vulnerability reduction by
    building disaster-resilience and adaptive
    capacity to changing climate
  • Consensus on pro-active approach to manage and
    reduce risks (HFA, Tsunami, Changing climate..)

28
Priority setting in resource constraint
environment is a challenging task
  • Disaster reduction requires multidisciplinary and
    multi-institutional intervention
  • Interventions need to be affordable, feasible,
  • socially acceptable, and effective
  • Stakeholders have different priorities
  • Approaches need to be tailored to local
    conditions
  • Soft factors and consultation are critical for
    success
  • Challenge of developing focused and effective
    mitigation program

29
Coordination among all partners is the key to
success
  • Lack of coordination internal as well as
    external
  • Lack of country frameworks that create win-win
    situation and are complementary
  • Guided by principle of comparative advantage
  • Countries should be in the driving seat
  • However, not every country has capacity to
  • coordinate

30
Capacity and drive of private sector is not
fully utilized
  • Provides highly specialist knowledge
  • Can contribute to risk financing
  • Potential partner as target group for
  • introducing change in the country
  • More focus needs to be given to partnerships
    between public and private sector

31
Countries are increasingly willing to invest into
disaster mitigation and emergency preparedness
  • Many development partners have success stories
  • WB success stories in Colombia, Turkey, and
    Romania
  • ?? 100 risk mitigation projects
  • ?? Prior to a catastrophic event
  • ?? Using own funds and external financing
    (no grants)
  • Demand for risk mitigation investments can be
    further stimulated through
  • ?? Knowledge creation and sharing
  • ?? Analytical work
  • ?? Financial incentives
  • ?? Successful programs in other countries

GFDRR
32
Increasing trend in vulnerability and consequent
disaster losses must be reversed quickly through
strategic interventions and optimal investment in
preparedness and mitigation
  • Targeted interventions in 86 natural disaster
    hotspot countries through PRSPs/SEDPs

33
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery designed as a partnership between
UN/ISDR and World Bank embedded in the ISDR
system
Building on good practices and global consensus
  • bridges knowledge gap,
  • fosters coordination and partnerships at all
    levels
  • increases level of cooperation,
  • helps to stimulate demand for disaster
    mitigation, vulnerability reduction and
    adaptation to climate change
  • provides funds for analytical work and
    facilitates knowledge sharing

34
Vulnerability reduction is the core of GFDRR and
mandated to reverse the rising trend in disaster
losses in developing countries by 2015
  • Support ISDR to develop a coherent and
    coordinated approach to risk reduction ( TRACK
    1)
  • Assist natural disaster hotspot countries to
    mainstream disaster risks in development
    strategies (TRACK 2)
  • Speedy and predictable financing for disaster
    recovery in low income countries (TRACK 3)

35
Ex-ante
Global and regional deliverables
Track 1Partnership and Advocacy
ISDR Sectt Advocacy, standardizations dissemina
tion
WB DGF funding 5 million per year
Risk assessment, Risk Management strategies, C
apacity building
Private-public partnerships
Track 2Prevention
UN, WB, other IFIs, IFRC, NSAs etc
Multi-donor Trust Funds
Country level deliverables
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery
Disaster Mitigation project Development, disaste
r recovery
Financing strategy
Track 3 Recovery Financing
standby financing facility for disaster
recovery

Ex-post recovery financing Facility for low inco
me countries
(integral to IDA)
36
TRACK I A partnership between the World Bank and
the Inter-agency Secretariat of the International
Strategy for Disaster Reduction (UN/ISDR)
  • To enhance global and regional advocacy,
    partnerships and knowledge management for
    mainstreaming hazard risk management in low and
    middle-income countries at risk.
  • To promote the standardization and harmonization
    of hazard risk management tools, methodologies
    and practices.

37
How does Track 1 operate?
  • Only regional and global programs are eligible
  • Program partners are ISDR system members at
    global and regional levels
  • Regional intergovernmental organizations are the
    key partners for implementation of these
    initiatives
  • Under the overall framework approved by
    Consultative Group
  • Proposals prepared by ISDR and
  • reviewed by GFDRR Secretariat
  • GFDRR Steering Committee approves the Work
    Program
  • Proposals can be initiated by
  • Governments, UN system, IFIs, bilaterals, NGOs,
    private sector
  • Endorsed by Regional Intergovernmental
    organizations for all regional programs
  • Endorsed under the ISDR system joint workprogram

  • ISDR Sectt manages the Track 1 programs

38
Track 1 will support regional and sub-regional
strategies for disaster reduction
  • Track I will allocate almost three-quarters of
    its annual resources, of around US 5 million,
    to regional activities, in partnership with
    regional inter-governmental organisations.
  • World Bank provides this resource to ISDR

39
Priority results in FY 07 under Track 1Regional
level (in partnership with regional
inter-governmental organizations)
  • Regional Risk Reduction programmes
  • South Eastern Europe feasibility study in 10
    countries on regional cooperation in weather
    forecasting and an early warning system, disaster
    response coordination and a regional risk
    transfer pool.
  • Middle East and North Africa Study for
    identification of potential risks for natural
    hazards and mapping of institutional capacities.
  • South Asia knowledge networks for the exchange
    of good practices in emergency reconstruction and
    hazard risk management.
  • Africa a regional cooperation programme on
    drought risk reduction and climate change
    adapttaion, anchored in regional economic
    commissions.
  • Central America Regional study on risk exposure
    and financial response capacity of financial
    institutions

40
Priority results in FY 07 under Track 1Global
level
  • Global Information Platform established ,
    consisting of PreventionWeb to serve as virtual
    clearing-house for disaster risk reduction .
  • Global partnerships with research institutions,
    parliamentarians, media and the private sector to
    support implementation of the Hyogo Framework .
  • Contributing to the development of a global
    report on risk benchmarking and emerging risks
    (available in 2008).
  • A global report on progress made towards reducing
    disaster losses through the implementation of the
    Hyogo Framework for Action through the collation
    and aggregation of regional reports.
  • Guidelines on (a) implementing the Hyogo
    Framework for Action and (b) Disaster Proofing
    Millennium Development Goals through poverty
    reduction strategy papers (PRSPs).(c) Integrating
    disaster reduction in MDG of Reversing
    Environmental losses and in adapting to climate
    change.

41
Track 1will promote global Private-Public
dialogue on disaster risk reduction
  • A joint initiative of WEF, ISDR and WB
  • A. Overall Goal To foster and facilitate the
    engagement of the global private sector in
    disaster risk reduction activities
  • B. Main Activities
  • Insight Building
  • studies on role of private sector in disaster
    risk reduction
  • Multi-stakeholder workshops( e.g. economic
    summits)
  • Partnership development
  • Biletarel discussions,
  • Biletaral partnership development
  • Development of business alliances
  • Clearinghouse for PPP in disaster risk reduction

42
Ex-ante
Global and regional deliverables
Track 1Partnership and Advocacy
ISDR Sectt Advocacy, standardizations dissemina
tion
WB DGF funding 5 million per year
Risk assessment, Risk Management strategies, C
apacity building
Private-public partnerships
Track 2Mitigation
UN, WB, other IFIs, IFRC, NSAs etc
Multi-donor Trust Funds
Country level deliverables
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery
Disaster Mitigation project Development, disaste
r recovery
Financing strategy
Track 3 Recovery Financing
standby financing facility for disaster
recovery

Ex-post recovery financing Facility for low inco
me countries
(integral to IDA)
43
Track 2Mainstreaming disaster reduction in
development processes to ensure preparedness
becomes routinely mainstreamed into dimensions of
responsible public management in all planning
processes.
  • Through Track 2 of the Facility, the World
    Bank in partnership with development partners
    will mainstream hazard risk reduction and
    mitigation into its clients Country Assistance
    Strategies (CAS) and Poverty Reduction
    Strategies
  • Resources needed - 350 million over 10 years

44
Track 2A. Pre-disaster risk management strategy
and institutional development including early
warning systems and emergency preparedness in low
and middle income countries
  • (e.g., National strategies for risk reduction,
    institutional frameworks for risk management,
    including policy, legal, and organizational
    elements, National plans for multi-hazard early
    warning systems, National incident management
    system for emergency response, etc.)

45
Track 2B. Supporting innovative projects to
demonstrate cost-effective hazard risk mitigation
to reduce risks associated with critical
infrastructure
  • (e.g., as and where demand is articulated by
    client governments for specific initiatives like
    strengthening education and health infrastructure
    in hazard prone areas through community-based
    initiatives, promoting use of traditional
    construction techniques for disaster-resilient
    housing, etc.)

46
Track 2C. Learning, research, and knowledge
management for current and future risks
  • (e.g., documenting lessons from national
    experiences in disaster recovery and
    dissemination research in management of current
    and emerging risks documenting traditional
    coping mechanism scientific research in climate
    change management and adaptation managing the
    risks due to sea level rise, etc.)

47
Track 2D. Developing frameworks to catalyze
investment in hazard prevention, mitigation and
preparedness
  • (e.g., National Hurricane, Cyclone or Typhoon
    Risk Mitigation Program, National Earthquake Risk
    Mitigation Program, National Catastrophic Risk
    Financing Program, National Disaster Risk
    Communication Program, etc.)

48
Track 2E. Pre-disaster Recovery Financing
Strategy and Plans established in low and middle
income countries
Insurance
Cum. Prob.
  • (e.g. pre-disaster plans for damage and needs
    assessment and coordination for immediate,
    short-term and long term recovery developing
    risk financing and transfer options including
    insurance and reinsurance, catastrophe bonds,
    weather derivatives, contingent credit, reserve
    fund, etc )

Smoothing Mechanisms Credit, Reserve Funds
Retained Risk Self Funded
Size of Loss
49
Track 2 will promote private-public partnership
for mainstreaming disaster reduction
  • To establish economic incentives, both regulatory
    and market-driven, for improved risk-based
    monitoring and maintenance of key physical
    infrastructures (both publicly and privately
    owned and operated).
  • To put in place a cross-industry and
    public-private partnership with responsibility
    for this monitoring and maintenance.
  • Key issues
  • Identification of key infrastructures and
    relevant risk exposure
  • Insurance establishing risk-based rates
  • Incentives (market and regulatory) for highest
    standards in frequency and quality of maintenance
    and retrofitting. Discuss the role of government
    grants industry standards nationalized building
    codes other incentives
  • Taxation policy taxing property based on risk
  • Others

50
Phasing of countries for mainstreaming initiative
under Track II
3-yr TA
Ten countries enter planning cycle each year
51
How does Track 2 operate?
  • Countries lead the process
  • Selection of countries
  • Pipeline PRSPs/UNDAF/CASs/SEDPs are eligible
  • National governments may also request to develop
    a disaster reduction strategy
  • Proposals are routed thru WB Country Offices
  • Any partner of ISDR system at country level can
    initiate a proposal for mainstreaming,
  • however proposal has to be endorsed by national
    governments
  • CG approves final selection of countries (if more
    countries request than the resources permit)
  • GFDRR Sectt prepares consolidated proposals and
    recommendations of the Technical Advisory Group

52
Track 2 in FY 07
  • Work has commenced in Mozambique, Malawi,
    Nicaragua, Nepal and Vietnam with DFID funding
  • To be expanded to 10 more countries in the next
    few months
  • Close collaboration with all development partners
    in the country
  • Sweden, Switzerland, Australia, UK, Denmark have
    already pledged financial support
  • Canada, Japan, EC, Germany, Spain and other
    donors support being discussed
  • Many Recipient countries keen to contribute

53
Track 2-work in progress
  • Design of different funds to support
    mainstreaming through partnership
  • Multi-donor fund for Mainstreaming Disaster
    Reduction in development strategies
  • In pipeline
  • Knowledge and Technology Transfer Fund
  • Space Application in disaster reduction Fund
  • Catalytic fund for Private-Public Partnership in
    disaster reduction and recovery

54
Ex-ante
Global and regional deliverables
Track 1Partnership and Advocacy
ISDR Sectt Advocacy, standardizations dissemina
tion
WB DGF funding 5 million per year
Risk assessment, Risk Management strategies, C
apacity building
Private-public partnerships
Track 2Mitigation
UN, WB, other IFIs, IFRC, NSAs etc
Multi-donor Trust Funds for Mainstreaming
Country level deliverables
Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and
Recovery
Disaster Mitigation project Development, disaste
r recovery
Financing strategy
Track 3 Recovery Financing
standby financing facility for disaster
recovery

Ex-post recovery financing Facility for low inco
me countries
(integral to IDA)
55
Track III
  • A Standby Recovery Financing track is under
    design, proposed to be operated through a
    mechanism linked to the International Development
    Association (IDA).

56
TRACK III Features
  • A Standby Recovery Financing Facility to support
    low-income countries
  • Phase I
  • Enhance global preparedness for recovery
  • Phase II
  • An incentive-based financing mechanism for low
    income countries to invest in ex ante risk
    management

57
Track III ResultsTo be implemented in close
consultation with the UN and IFIs
  • Phase I ( 50 million)
  • Greater institutional preparedness and
    coordination among all stakeholders for
    accelerated recovery
  • Pre-disaster Coordination among all stakeholders

  • Pre-disaster agreements on tools, co-financing
    etc
  • Phase II (to be estimated)
  • An incentive-based financing mechanism for low
    income countries to invest in ex ante risk
    management
  • Linked to ex ante investments
  • Rapid and predictable financing available for a
    sustainable disaster recovery operation

58
Building resilient communities and nations
Measuring Results in GFDRR
59
Governance and Management of GFDRR is in support
of ISDR arrangements
Global agenda setting in disaster reduction

Policy setting, strategic advice and goal setting
for the Facility
Global Platform for DRR
Consultative Group (GFDRR) Chair SDN VP Co-chai
r Donor Govt (1-largest donor)
Member Donor Govts (3), Recipient Govts (4),
Private Sector donors (2), Chairperson, GPDRR of
ISDR, MDBs, Industry/Academic/Professional
bodies(5)
Management Oversight Board
ISDR Sectt
System members
Technical Advisory Group (GFDRR)
Experts and professionals drawn from developed
and developing countries to advise on technical,
quality and monitoring issues,
Approval of work programme and budget, review and
monitoring
Steering Committee (GFDRR) Chair SDN VP/Director
(TUD) Members Reg Sector Directors, Director (O
PCS), Director (OPD), Director, ISDR Sectt, Reps
of regional organizations, Experts
Secretariat of the Global Facility
Operations Charter being developed will define
the TORs of all bodies
60
Operations Charter and financial structure of
GFDRR
  • Interim Operations Charter adopted on 29 Sept
  • constituting
  • Ad-hoc Steering Committee
  • Ad-hoc Consultative Group
  • Approved
  • Track 1 work program and results framework
  • Track 2 work program in five countries
  • Authorized GFDRR Sectt to develop detailed
    Operations Charter
  • Operations Charter being drafted for wider
    consultations and will be placed before next
    GFDRR meetings on 23 Feb 2007
  • Financial structure
  • Track 1
  • Bank contributes 5 million per year
  • Track 2 (donor contributions)
  • 350 million needed
  • 20 million in Y1 to 40 million in Y3 onwards
  • Core fund (minimum 5 million over 3-Yr period
    to be a CG member)
  • Non-core fund (earmarked contributions, no
    minimum)

61
Thank you sjha1_at_worldbank.org www.worldbank.org/
hazards/gfdrr
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com