The role of interpersonal violence and personality characteristics on parenting outcomes Johanna C. Malone, Ed.M., Alytia A. Levendosky, Ph.D., G. Anne Bogat, Ph.D., - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 1
About This Presentation
Title:

The role of interpersonal violence and personality characteristics on parenting outcomes Johanna C. Malone, Ed.M., Alytia A. Levendosky, Ph.D., G. Anne Bogat, Ph.D.,

Description:

http://www.itu.int/osg/spu/stn/digitalcontent/Presentations/Day1/Session3/SubLee.ppt – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:340
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 2
Provided by: WPI9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The role of interpersonal violence and personality characteristics on parenting outcomes Johanna C. Malone, Ed.M., Alytia A. Levendosky, Ph.D., G. Anne Bogat, Ph.D.,


1
The Role of Intimate Partner Violence and
Personality Characteristics on Parenting
Behaviors Johanna C. Malone, Ed.M., M.A.,
Carolyn Joy Dayton, M.S.W., M.A., Alytia A.
Levendosky, Ph.D.Michigan State University
  • INTRODUCTION
  • Parenting and Intimate Partner Violence
  • Intimate partner violence (IPV defined here as
    male violence against a female partner), can
    impact a mothers ability to provide sensitive
    parenting to her children (McCloskey et al.,
    1995 Levendosky et al., 2001) and is associated
    with less consistent parenting behaviors (Holden
    Richie, 1991, Rossman Rea, 2005).
  • However, empirical findings within this body of
    literature have been mixed and some findings have
    suggested that some women are able to parent
    effectively even in the presence of IPV (Holden
    et al., 1998 Levendosky et al., 2000 Sullivan
    et al., 19997.)
  • Previous research indicates that other factors
    associated with IPV may account for abused
    mothers feeling less effective as parents. These
    include mood and trauma symptoms, higher
    parenting stress, and lower emotional
    availability (Holden et al., 1991 1998
    Levendosky et al., 1998 2003, Owen et al.,
    2006).
  • In addition, factors such as social support,
    higher education, and high self-esteem provide
    women exposed to IPV with internal and external
    resources that allow them to still show
    effective, consistent, and warm parenting.
  • Parenting and Personality
  • Previous research suggests a relationship between
    personality and parenting behaviors. Metsapelto
    Pulkkinen (2003) found that Openness to new
    experiences, low Neuroticism, and Extraversion
    were related to higher levels of parental
    nurturance. They also found that low Openness was
    related to more restrictive parenting behaviors.
  • Some research has demonstrated that other factors
    interact with personality to determine parenting
    behavior. For example, using methodology from the
    field of developmental psychopathology, Clark and
    colleagues (2000) found that child
    characteristics such as temperament interact with
    maternal personality factors to affect parenting
    behaviors. Belsky and colleagues (1995) found
    evidence suggesting that maternal experiences of
    daily hassles and transient mood mediate the
    relationship between personality and parenting.
  • Thus, the relationship between personality and
    parenting have been shown to be influenced by
    other factors including child factors, effects of
    other maternal factors, and sources of maternal
    stress or support.
  • IPV as a Moderator of Personality and Parenting
  • This study examined the relationship between
    personality characteristics and parenting styles
    in women based on their experiences of IPV. We
    expected that IPV would moderate the relationship
    between personality and parenting style such that
    personality characteristics would be most related
    to parenting behaviors when women were victims of
    IPV.
  • When exposed to IPV, we expected that mothers
    would be left with fewer resources to parent
    effectively and, as a result, personality
    characteristics would become more influential in
    determining parenting behaviors for these
    victimized women.
  • This is consistent with research that has shown
    that IPV can have a negative effect on a womans
    ability to parent (Levendosky et al., 2000).
    Given an average, expectable, environment, most
    parents are able to parent in a manner which
    provides warmth and sensitivity to their
    children. Thus, variations in personality styles
    are not expected to impact parenting in
    significant ways in the absence of other risk
    factors.
  • RESULTS
  • A series of multiple regressions were conducted
    in order to determine the degree to which the
    personality traits of neuroticism, extroversion,
    agreeableness, openness, and conscientiousness
    predicted the three identified parenting
    behaviors (i.e., positive parenting, covert
    hostility, and controlling parenting).
  • Analyses were run separately for women who
    experienced IPV and women who did not experience
    IPV in order to assess for IPV as a moderator of
    personality and parenting. Figure 1 illustrates
    the mean factor score for each type of parenting
    based on womens exposure to IPV.
  • No IPV. The three models for each type of
    parenting including all of the personality
    predictor variables yielded non-significant
    results for women who did not experience IPV.
  • IPV. The significant results for the three
    models including all of the personality predictor
    variables for women who experienced IPV are
    presented below.
  • Positive Parenting This model resulted in a R2
    .18, F(5,61) 2.62 , MSE .71, plt.05. The
    standardized regression coefficient for the
    personality predictors were for neuroticism Ăź
    .43, t(61) 2.83, plt.01 and for agreeableness Ăź
    .32, t(61) 2.29, plt.05.
  • Controlling Parenting This model resulted in a
    R2 .21, F(5,61) 3.26, MSE 1.77, plt.05. The
    standardized regression coefficient for the
    personality predictors were for openness Ăź
    -.25, t(61) -2.08, plt.05, for agreeableness Ăź
    -.30, t(61) -2.20, plt.05, and for
    conscientiousness Ăź .44, t(61) 2.96, plt.01.

METHODS Participants The current study utilized
data collected as part of a larger longitudinal
project, the Mother Infant Study (Levendosky,
Bogat, von Eye, Davidson), that examines the
effects of IPV on women and their children. The
present study uses data collected during the
first, third, and fifth waves of data collection.
  • Measures
  • Mother Child Interaction Data
  • Women and their children were videotaped during a
    10-minute, unstructured, free-play segment of a
    laboratory session when the child was one year of
    age.
  • 4 behavioral and 2 affective domains of maternal
    interactive behavior were coded Sensitivity,
    Engagement, Interfering Manipulation, Covert
    Hostility, Warmth Joy (adapted from Ainsworth
    (1971, 1974, 1978) Lyons-Ruth (1983) and
    Crittenden (1981).
  • An exploratory factor analysis using varimax
    rotation was conducted on the dependent variable
    yielding 3 primary factors 1) Positive
    Parenting, 2) Hostile Parenting and 3)
    Controlling Parenting
  • Severity of Violence Against Women Scales (SVAWS
    Marshall, 1992).
  • 46-item self-report questionnaire that assesses
    the amount of violence present
  • IPV was coded dichotomously (present or absent)
    based on endorsement of any of the mild to severe
    abuse items (items 9 46) during pregnancy or in
    the infants first year of life.
  • NE0 Five Factor Inventory Form S (Costa McRae)
  • 60-item personality inventory that yields 5
    factors Extroversion, Agreeableness, Openness to
    Experience, Neuroticism, and Conscientiousness.
  • Participants rate how true a statement is for
    them on a 5-pt, Likert scale ranging from
    strongly agree to strongly disagree.
  • This data was collected when the child was three
    years of age.
  • CONCLUSION
  • The personality characteristics of women who were
    not experiencing IPV were unrelated to parenting
    behavior. This is consistent with our hypothesis
    that personality characteristics most influence
    parenting when mothers are faced with a trauma
    that depletes their available resources.
  • Women experiencing IPV were more likely to
    demonstrate positive parenting if they scored
    higher on the personality constructs of
    neuroticism and agreeableness. Neuroticism is
    usually not considered a strength but perhaps in
    the context of IPV neurotic tendencies (e.g.,
    higher anxiety) may increase the likelihood that
    women put more effort into parenting. Higher
    agreeableness is associated with warmth, trust,
    straight-forwardness that is consistent with the
    common conception of positive parenting.
  • Women experiencing IPV were more likely to have a
    controlling (less sensitive) parenting style if
    they scored lower on the constructs of openness,
    agreeableness, and higher on conscientiousness.
    Higher conscientiousness is demonstrated by
    self-discipline and a value for order and being
    efficient. When faced with IPV, women who are
    high on conscientiousness may become more
    controlling of their children. In the face of
    IPV, controlling parental behavior may also
    become more likely when mothers personalities
    are less imaginative and warm due to the external
    stress.
  • These findings suggest that personality style is
    more influential on parenting behaviors when
    there is simultaneous exposure to the trauma of
    IPV and that particular personality constructs
    function as risk or resilience factors impacting
    the parenting behaviors of women experiencing
    IPV.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was funded in part
by a grant from the Centers for Disease Control
(RO1/CCR518519-01)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com