Title: Roland Loudenburg, M'P'H' ABD Mountain Plains Evaluation, LLC Salem, SD
1Roland Loudenburg, M.P.H. ABDMountain Plains
Evaluation, LLCSalem, SD
Summary of SDWP IMT Program Interim Evaluation
Findings
2Example of Program Design and Evaluation
Assessments
Phase I Time Varies
Phase II 90 days
Phase III 90 days (Approximately)
Phase IV 180 days (Approximately)
Detox/ Withdrawal Cognitive- Stabilization
Intensive SA Treatment (comparable to inpatient)
½way House
Outpatient SA Treatment
Intake Assessment Battery
Begin Phase II Assessment Battery
End Phase II Assessment Battery
End Phase III Assessment Battery
End Phase IV Assessment Battery
3Overlapping the IMT Treatment Model with Stages
of Recovery for Stimulant Users
Phase I Time Varies
Phase II 30-90 days
Phase III 90 days
Phase IV 180 days
DAY 0
DAY 15
DAY 45
DAY 120
DAY 180
Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
Adjustment
Honeymoon
The Wall
Withdrawal
Resolution
Assessments
4Evaluation Assessments
- Data is collected at Intake and completion of
Phase II, III, and IV - Areas assessed in addition to substance use
include - Mental Health (CESD)
- Family Functioning (Family APGAR)
- Social Support (ISEL)
- Self-Efficacy/Readiness for Change (MASE/URICA)
- Other data
- Track UAs, Adverse Events, and Program Status
5Depression Symptoms
- Overall, participants in the program report a
reduction in depression symptoms through out the
program as measured by the CES-D.
CES-D Scores Range form o to 60, a score of 16 or
above indicates possible depressive symptoms
6(No Transcript)
7Family Functioning Scale Scores
- Program participants report on average an
increase in family functioning during the course
of the program.
FAPGAR Scores Range form 0 to 10, a score of 4
or less indicates concerns in family functioning
8(No Transcript)
9Readiness to Change
- Overall, program participants are progressing
along the Stages of Change continuum as they
progress through the program.
10Temptation and Confidence
- Program participants report a reduction in
temptation to use and an increase in their
confidence to not use methamphetamine as they
move through the program.
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13(No Transcript)
14(No Transcript)
15Status of All Program Participants
Note There is a approximately one month in lag
time before adverse events, violations, or
completions are recorded in the database.
16Status of Group Participants Scheduled to
Complete as of begging of October 2008
17Survival Analysis for Groups Scheduled to have
Completed the Program
18- The following slides provide an illustration of
program participation of four randomly selected
program groups progression through the program. - o passed UA
- x indeterminate UA
- - Failed UA
- V Adverse Event
- p - Projected date of transition from phase
- C Completed
- D Dropped
- 2, 3, 4 Received testing/assessment forms for
corresponding phase - X exit interview
19(No Transcript)
20(No Transcript)
21(No Transcript)
22(No Transcript)
23National Research Benchmarks
- From Matrix Model Outpatient Study of 420
individuals - 67.1 of the sample remaining in treatment longer
than 2 weeks - 56 remained in treatment longer than 1 month
- Average length of treatment stay averaged 7.87
(/- 6.6 weeks) - Retention as indicated by a treatment stay of 90
days or longer was 35
Source Addiction, April 2007
24National Research Benchmarks (cont)
- Mean number of meth-free urine samples collected
was 4.79 (/- 5.86) - The percentage of participants who provided three
consecutive (in weeks) drug-free urine samples
during the course of treatment was 45 - 16-week treatment regimen (i.e. treatment
completers) was 33.3
Source Addiction, April 2007
25Comparison to National Benchmarks
- Average length of treatment stay averaged 7.87
(/- 6.6 weeks) - Retention as indicated by a treatment stay of 90
days or longer was 35 - Mean number of meth-free urine samples collected
was 4.79 (/- 5.86)
- The average length of treatment recorded for
participants completing Phase III is 12 weeks - Approximately 70 remain active in program or
have completed the program - UA data available for analysis for Phase III and
IV combined provided an average number of 40.3
drug free urine samples per client.
26Contact InformationRoland Loudenburg, M.P.H.
ABDMountain Plains Evaluation, LLCP.O. Box 530
/ 201 N. Main St.Salem, SD 57058RolandL_at_MtPlain
s.Com or rbl_at_triotel.net
26