Roland Loudenburg, M'P'H' ABD Mountain Plains Evaluation, LLC Salem, SD - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Roland Loudenburg, M'P'H' ABD Mountain Plains Evaluation, LLC Salem, SD

Description:

Detox/ Withdrawal. Cognitive- Stabilization. Intensive. SA Treatment (comparable to. inpatient) ... Data is collected at Intake and completion of Phase II, III, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:321
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: HSPR26
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Roland Loudenburg, M'P'H' ABD Mountain Plains Evaluation, LLC Salem, SD


1
Roland Loudenburg, M.P.H. ABDMountain Plains
Evaluation, LLCSalem, SD
Summary of SDWP IMT Program Interim Evaluation
Findings
2
Example of Program Design and Evaluation
Assessments
Phase I Time Varies
Phase II 90 days
Phase III 90 days (Approximately)
Phase IV 180 days (Approximately)
Detox/ Withdrawal Cognitive- Stabilization
Intensive SA Treatment (comparable to inpatient)
½way House
Outpatient SA Treatment
Intake Assessment Battery
Begin Phase II Assessment Battery
End Phase II Assessment Battery
End Phase III Assessment Battery
End Phase IV Assessment Battery
3
Overlapping the IMT Treatment Model with Stages
of Recovery for Stimulant Users
Phase I Time Varies
Phase II 30-90 days
Phase III 90 days
Phase IV 180 days
DAY 0
DAY 15
DAY 45
DAY 120
DAY 180
Phase II
Phase III
Phase IV
Adjustment
Honeymoon
The Wall
Withdrawal
Resolution
Assessments
4
Evaluation Assessments
  • Data is collected at Intake and completion of
    Phase II, III, and IV
  • Areas assessed in addition to substance use
    include
  • Mental Health (CESD)
  • Family Functioning (Family APGAR)
  • Social Support (ISEL)
  • Self-Efficacy/Readiness for Change (MASE/URICA)
  • Other data
  • Track UAs, Adverse Events, and Program Status

5
Depression Symptoms
  • Overall, participants in the program report a
    reduction in depression symptoms through out the
    program as measured by the CES-D.

CES-D Scores Range form o to 60, a score of 16 or
above indicates possible depressive symptoms
6
(No Transcript)
7
Family Functioning Scale Scores
  • Program participants report on average an
    increase in family functioning during the course
    of the program.

FAPGAR Scores Range form 0 to 10, a score of 4
or less indicates concerns in family functioning
8
(No Transcript)
9
Readiness to Change
  • Overall, program participants are progressing
    along the Stages of Change continuum as they
    progress through the program.

10
Temptation and Confidence
  • Program participants report a reduction in
    temptation to use and an increase in their
    confidence to not use methamphetamine as they
    move through the program.

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Status of All Program Participants
Note There is a approximately one month in lag
time before adverse events, violations, or
completions are recorded in the database.
16
Status of Group Participants Scheduled to
Complete as of begging of October 2008
17
Survival Analysis for Groups Scheduled to have
Completed the Program
18
  • The following slides provide an illustration of
    program participation of four randomly selected
    program groups progression through the program.
  • o passed UA
  • x indeterminate UA
  • - Failed UA
  • V Adverse Event
  • p - Projected date of transition from phase
  • C Completed
  • D Dropped
  • 2, 3, 4 Received testing/assessment forms for
    corresponding phase
  • X exit interview

19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
(No Transcript)
23
National Research Benchmarks
  • From Matrix Model Outpatient Study of 420
    individuals
  • 67.1 of the sample remaining in treatment longer
    than 2 weeks
  • 56 remained in treatment longer than 1 month
  • Average length of treatment stay averaged 7.87
    (/- 6.6 weeks)
  • Retention as indicated by a treatment stay of 90
    days or longer was 35

Source Addiction, April 2007
24
National Research Benchmarks (cont)
  • Mean number of meth-free urine samples collected
    was 4.79 (/- 5.86)
  • The percentage of participants who provided three
    consecutive (in weeks) drug-free urine samples
    during the course of treatment was 45
  • 16-week treatment regimen (i.e. treatment
    completers) was 33.3

Source Addiction, April 2007
25
Comparison to National Benchmarks
  • National Benchmark
  • SDWP IMT Data
  • Average length of treatment stay averaged 7.87
    (/- 6.6 weeks)
  • Retention as indicated by a treatment stay of 90
    days or longer was 35
  • Mean number of meth-free urine samples collected
    was 4.79 (/- 5.86)
  • The average length of treatment recorded for
    participants completing Phase III is 12 weeks
  • Approximately 70 remain active in program or
    have completed the program
  • UA data available for analysis for Phase III and
    IV combined provided an average number of 40.3
    drug free urine samples per client.

26
Contact InformationRoland Loudenburg, M.P.H.
ABDMountain Plains Evaluation, LLCP.O. Box 530
/ 201 N. Main St.Salem, SD 57058RolandL_at_MtPlain
s.Com or rbl_at_triotel.net
26
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com