Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning

Description:

The research is clear: students who are actively involved in both academic and ... Human factors: ergonomics, ethics, economics. Worcester Polytechnic Institute. 20 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: ECED7
Learn more at: http://ece.wpi.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Student Engagement: Promoting Better Learning


1
Student EngagementPromoting Better Learning
Rick Vaz Associate Dean Interdisciplinary and
Global Studies Worcester Polytechnic
Institute Worcester, Massachusetts,
USA Polytechnic of Namibia, 3 May 2006
2
What Really Matters in College?
  • The research is clear students who are actively
    involved in both academic and out-of-class
    activities gain more from the college experience
    than those who are not so involved.

Ernest T. Pascarella Patrick T. Terenzini How
College Affects Students
3
Finding Evidence of Educational Quality
  • Deep student learning is difficult and expensive
    to measure directly
  • Extensive research has linked certain behaviors
    and activities to learning
  • These behaviors and activities are easier to
    measure

4
Student Engagement
  • Educational involvement that leads students
    toward significant learning outcomes
  • Engaged students are good learners and effective
    teaching stimulates and sustains student
    engagement. Handelsman et al.
  • An indicator of educational effectiveness

5
Indicators of Engagement
  • Time on task
  • High expectations
  • Student-faculty contact
  • Writing and revision
  • Prompt feedback
  • Cooperation among students
  • Respect for diverse talents and ways of learning

6
National Survey ofStudent Engagement
  • Started in 1999 with 12 institutions grown to
    over 500 in NSSE 2005
  • Over a half million students (first-year students
    and seniors) at 850 colleges and universities
    (2000-2005)
  • Focus on undergraduate quality and institutional
    improvement
  • Research-based and extensively tested to ensure
    validity and reliability
  • Assesses the extent to which students are engaged
    in educational practices related to high levels
    of learning and development

7
NSSE Benchmarks for Educational Practice
  • Level of academic challenge
  • Active and collaborative learning
  • Student interactions with faculty members
  • Enriching educational experiences
  • Supportive campus environment

8
Student Engagement Quiz
  • What percentage of US college students study
    two hours or more for every hour in class?
  • (a) 12 (b) 20 (c) 31 (d) 39 (e) 49

(a) 12
9
Time on Task
10
How Students Spend Their Time
11
Variations in Student-Faculty Interaction by
Discipline
12
Student-Faculty Gap Analysis
13
What WPI Learned from NSSE
  • 4th year students highly engaged
  • Project work and research
  • Interactions with faculty
  • Collaboration with peers
  • 1st year students unengaged
  • Not working very hard
  • Not much writing
  • Not much thinking

14
Pedagogies of Engagement Association of American
Colleges and Universities
  • Collaborative inquiry
  • Service learning
  • Experiential learning
  • Integrative learning
  • Project-based learning

15
Enhancing WPIs First Year Strategies
  • Interdisciplinary
    seminars
  • Societal awareness
  • Peer learning
  • Faculty development
  • Connect academic and social life
  • More project work in courses

16
What Constitutes Project Work?
  • Open-ended problems
  • Many possible solutions
  • Goal, methods chosen by learners
  • Complexity, ambiguity
  • Real and messy

17
Key Learning Outcomes of Projects
  • Communication and teamwork
  • Research, analysis, synthesis
  • Problem solving
  • Critical thinking
  • Real world skills

18
Where Do Project Ideas Come From?
  • Facultychoose project(s) based on experience,
    challenge, support
  • Studentsdesign a project within some parameters
  • External sponsorscommunity organizations, local
    govt and schools, corporations, nonprofits, NGOs

19
Case Study Introduction to Design
  • Sophomore level course ( 7 weeks)
  • Preparation for senior design projects
  • Solving open-ended technical problems
  • Research, experimentation, simulation, synthesis
  • Human factors ergonomics, ethics, economics

20
Example Project Solar Lighting
You are to design a solar-powered lighting
application. Your design must be suitable for
use in the developing world. Your completed
prototype design must cost US50 or less.

21
Faculty and Student Roles (30 Students)
  • Students are in teams of design engineers
  • 10 teams of 3 students on each
  • Graduate assistant or undergraduate tutor acts as
    senior engineer
  • Primary source of technical guidance
  • Coaches students in teamwork
  • Faculty act as engineering managers
  • Consult, critique

22
Structured Activity
  • 4 classes per week process of design
  • Market analysis, user requirements
  • Brainstorming, teamwork
  • Project management, documentation
  • Standards, safety, ethics, quality
  • 3-hour design review each week
  • Presentation of interim results
  • Feedback and critique
  • Mandatory team meetings with senior engineers
  • Summary report to faculty

23
Assignments and Grading
  • Six weekly reports 30
  • Revised for final report
  • Final design
  • Final report 15
  • Presentation 10
  • Functionality 15
  • Three exams 30
  • Mostly to make sure they come to class

24
A Different Type of Dialogue
  • Old scenario
  • Student Prof, how do I solve this problem?
  • Prof Here, watch me do it
  • New scenario
  • Student Prof, how do I solve this problem?
  • Prof I dont know. What have you tried?
  • S I think X or Y might work, but Im not
    sure
  • P How could you test your ideas?
  • P What are the most important criteria?
  • P What do your partners think?

25
Student Course Evaluations
  • Overall, how much did you learn from this
    course?
  • Almost nothing 1
  • A little 10
  • Quite a lot 57
  • More than any course Ive taken 32

26
Impressions from the Faculty
  • Worth the effort
  • Basic knowledge applied and reinforced
  • The design process learned and applied
  • A wake-up call for students
  • Engagement, commitment
  • Teamwork, responsibility, pride
  • Suggests future work
  • Improve previous courses
  • Develop a remediation strategy

27
Our Students Are Not Like Us
  • Most faculty learn by reading and writing
  • Most students learn by doing
  • Universities reward academic abilities
  • The real world rewards practical abilities

28
How the National Survey of Student Engagement
is Used to Stimulate Effective Educational
Practices

Part of this presentation was based on
  • John Hayek
  • National Survey of Student Engagement
  • Jillian Kinzie
  • NSSE Institute for Effective Educational Practice
  • AACU Pedagogies of Engagement Conference
  • April 2004

29
Questions for Discussion
  • Are projects feasible for large courses?
  • Are projects appropriate at all levels?
  • Must projects be real?
  • Is group work essential?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com