Thinking About Justice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

Thinking About Justice

Description:

Criticized by both right and left in 1970s; currently out of fashion ... Community Justice. Restorative Justice. Restorative Justice. Goals. Assumptions. Efficacy ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 14
Provided by: kbec
Category:
Tags: justice | thinking

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Thinking About Justice


1
Thinking About Justice
  • How do conceptions of justice vary
    cross-culturally and historically? How do culture
    and politics shape approaches to justice? What
    kinds of cultural and political consequences do
    efforts to obtain justice have?

2
Justice is a Cultural and Political Phenomenon
  • Approaches to justice are shaped by cultural
    values and norms, religious beliefs, politics,
    economic systems, etc.
  • Example Balinese response to terrorist attack
  • Differences between Balinese and U.S. response?

3
Today Conceptions of Justiceand Rationales for
Punishment
  • Justice in the United States
  • Positive vs. negative rights
  • Four main rationales for punishment
  • Decline of rehabilitation
  • Alternative Approaches to Justice
  • Restorative justice

4
Negative vs. Positive Rights
  • U.S. emphasis is on negative rights
  • Less emphasis on positive rights
  • U.S. criminal justice institutions almost
    entirely concerned with violations of negative
    rights.
  • Exceptions?

5
Rationales for Punishment in the United States
  • First Rationale Retribution
  • Definition
  • Assumptions
  • Efficacy

6
2nd Rationale DeterrenceTwo types
  • General deterrence
  • Target
  • Assumptions
  • Efficacy
  • Specific deterrence
  • Target
  • Assumptions
  • Efficacy

7
3rd Rationale Incapacitation
  • Definition
  • Assumptions
  • Efficacy

8
4th rationaleRehabilitation
  • Was the primary rationale for about 100 years
  • Different versions, theories about how to
    correct
  • Criticized by both right and left in 1970s
    currently out of fashion
  • Corrections vs. incarceration
  • Assumptions?
  • Efficacy
  • 1970s- Nothing Works
  • More recent studies

9
Punishment in the U.S. Today
  • Legitimated almost exclusively in terms of
    retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation.
  • Rehabilitation has largely disappeared, but some
    recent exceptions
  • Mental health courts, drug courts, etc. --
    Therapeutic justice-get treated or else!
  • Contradiction probation and parole violations as
    a cause of prison expansion!

10
Alternatives
  • Harm reduction (for victimless crimes)
  • Community Justice
  • Restorative Justice

11
Restorative Justice
  • Goals
  • Assumptions
  • Efficacy

12
Restorative JusticeMajor Challenges
  • How to implement in large, urban societies?
  • Most experiments have involved youth
  • Dispute resolution in circles/conferences
    involving people most trusted by offender and the
    victim
  • Circles continue on for offender over time
  • Challenge how to generalize?
  • To adults
  • To more serious offenders

13
Next Time Restorative Justice in South Africa
  • Questions to consider next time
  • What were the Commissions goals?
  • What were its assumptions?
  • How do these differ from the contemporary U.S.
    approach to justice?
  • How did its implementation differ from that of
    traditional forms of and recent experiments with
    restorative justice?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com