Involving Students in Institutional Research and Planning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 17
About This Presentation
Title:

Involving Students in Institutional Research and Planning

Description:

Why involve students in institutional research and planning ... syllabi, interviewed faculty from liberal arts and professional areas to ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 18
Provided by: Maureen120
Learn more at: http://www.skagit.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Involving Students in Institutional Research and Planning


1
Involving Students in Institutional Research and
Planning
Maureen Pettitt, Ph.D. Skagit Valley College
  • Presented at PNAIRP
  • October 2002

2
Session Topics
  • Why involve students in institutional research
    and planning
  • Example Technical Writing Research Teams
  • Studies for review of general education
    curriculum
  • Advantages and Challenges of Student Involvement
  • Students, Faculty, and IR
  • Your examples, ideas and issues

3
Undergraduate Research
  • If learning is the coin of the realm, then
    student involvement in research is the gold!

4
Undergraduate Research
  • An often-cited factor in encouraging student
    engagement and student involvement described by
    Astin, Tinto, and Boyer
  • One of the facilitating strategies for Teaching
    to Create Intentional Learners in the recently
    released AACU National Panel Report, Greater
    Expectations (2002)
  • Should not be thought of as only available to
    students in research universities

5
Planning for a Review of the General Education
Curriculum
  • English 270 (Technical Writing)
  • Student Research Team Projects

6
Background
  • Instructor Dr. Lynn Dunlap
  • Similar strategy used in her Technical Writing
    class in 1991 as part of the colleges general
    education reform efforts
  • Students had access to the 1991 studies, bound in
    a report format

7
Implementation
  • Charge to the student research teams from the
    co-chairs of the Assessment Committee
  • Mike Witmer, chair of Social and Behavioral
    Sciences and Dr. Maureen Pettitt, Director of
    Institutional Research
  • Co-chairs also served as consultants to
    research teams research design, survey
    development, data collection

8
Research Team Projects
  • Multiculturalism in the Curriculum
  • Analyzed course syllabi, interviewed faculty from
    liberal arts and professional areas to determine
    the extent multiculturalism is infused in the
    curriculum.
  • On-Ground and Distance Education Course
    Characteristics
  • Examined core courses in English, Math, Natural
    Science, and Social Science to compare
    objectives, text, materials, assignments,
    assessments, grading, etc.

9
Research Team Projects
  • General Education Course-Taking Patterns of
    Professional Students
  • Used student surveys and de-identified transcript
    data to examine how/why students in professional
    programs choose their related education courses
  • Communication and Group Skills in the Sciences
  • Analyzed requirements and opportunities for
    students in science courses/majors to develop
    communication and group skills

10
Research Team Projects
  • Course Assessment Strategies
  • Analyzed course syllabi to identify assessment
    strategies being used at SVC by instructors and
    the degree to which those assessment methods were
    1) clearly identified and 2) appropriate to the
    objective they were measuring

11
IR Role
  • Teamed with faculty during first week in class to
    discuss research design attended periodically
    during the quarter to answer questions
  • Available for office consultation
    sessionsstudent research teams needed help
    primarily with survey development

12
IR Role
  • Provided de-identified data about student course
    taking patterns in several professional/technical
    programs for one team
  • Read final team reports worked with instructor
    on feedback and final grades for projects.

13
Advantages,
  • Increases visibility and value of IR on campus
  • Expands IR resources
  • Students have opportunity to learn how data
    becomes information about organizational culture
    and info politics to discern patterns, causes,
    relationships (i.e., critical thinking)

14
More Advantages
  • From the students perspective, the most
    important aspect was that their work was to be
    compiled, bound, and used to make important
    decisions on the campus.
  • For them, this was in stark contrast to course
    projects that seemed to have no use or meaning
    outside the course.

15
.and Challenges
  • Time spent pre-planning and coordination with
    faculty
  • Time spent in class and with research teams
    outside of class
  • Time reading and critiquing team reports

16
What about your campus?
  • Existing
  • Do you have some examples about successful
    student research on your own campus?
  • How did it come about? What was IRs role?
  • What worked well? What didnt work so well?

17
What about your campus?
  • Future
  • Are there initiatives or activities on your
    campus that could benefit from student research
    projects?
  • Do you have projects in your office that might be
    aligned with courses?
  • What steps could you take to encourage this?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com