Reciprocal Peer Coaching as a Formative Assessment Strategy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Reciprocal Peer Coaching as a Formative Assessment Strategy

Description:

Key principle that tutor organises students to work in groups to a ... lens of selfhood, spatiality, temporality, embodiment, sociality, project and discourse ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: LOA1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Reciprocal Peer Coaching as a Formative Assessment Strategy


1
Reciprocal Peer Coaching as a Formative
Assessment Strategy
  • A qualitative study
  • 2008

2
What is RPC
  • A form of co-operative learning
  • Key principle that tutor organises students to
    work in groups to a specific task
  • Variety of models
  • PAL
  • RPC
  • Definition of coaching
  • Giving non-evaluative feedback, active listening,
    asking open-ended questions, exploring options
  • (Ladyshewsky 2001)

3
Theoretical Basis RPC
  • Cognitive development theory
  • Critical cognitive conflict/disequilibrium
  • Motivation to increase understanding
  • Vygotsky, zone of proximal development, learning
    as a social process
  • Behavioural learning Theory
  • Reward /punishment
  • Reinforcement external, self-administered,
    vicarious

4
Key elements
  • A mutually interdependent and specific goal that
    demands co-operation
  • We all sink or swim together
  • Individual accountability
  • Clear guidance about group processes
  • (Johnson and Johnson 1994)

5
BSc (Hons) Physiotherapy and RPC
  • Professional practice and clinical demands
  • Large number of skills to be learnt and assessed
  • Stress of summative assessment
  • Momentary competence
  • Increasing requirement for formative assessment
  • Time consuming

6
The study
  • Anecdotal evidence suggested value for students
    in RPC, motivated learning, valued instant
    feedback, assessment for learning
  • Literature suggests research needed re formative
    assessment
  • Fit to qualitative perspective
  • Phenomenological approach

7
Sample and method
  • 4 individual interviews
  • Focus group 8 students
  • Data analysis
  • Ashworths (2003) approach, considering data
    through lens of selfhood, spatiality,
    temporality, embodiment, sociality, project and
    discourse

8
Findings
  • 3 Themes
  • Motivating learning
  • Learning in and as a group
  • The Context of learning

9
Motivating Learning
  • Time
  • I think everyone was a bit shocked at how
    intimidating it was. But I think it did everyone
    good because it made us learn things halfway
    through rather than leaving it till the last
    minute
  • Like school, its that sort of format, you have a
    test at the end of the course, its good to have
    that format
  • Were under pressure whether its one person going
    to be asked to talk through a treatment or
    whether we all will. So straight away were all
    focused and we get to grips straight away with
    the case study

10
Motivating learning
  • Feedback
  • Anything I get from this experience will help me
    in the future, its not to scare me or put me off
    its just a back up of what Ive already been
    taught
  • Formative is a kind of invisible mark. It gives
    you a good idea of how you are doing in the year
    so far so if youve done rubbish you need to go
    away and revisit then because come the exam its
    going to be the same.
  • I think if we didnt do the formatives, people
    wouldnt bother reading over why it was used or
    the contraindications, it would just be left
    until they were in clinic and theyd be like
    what on earth is this!

11
Important note
  • Feedback occurred between peers, between tutors
    and peers and vicariously
  • But students saw little value in self and peer
    assessment, relying heavily on external
    feedback/reinforcement from tutors i.e. the
    experts!

12
Motivation
  • Emotional
  • Its still quite scary even though youre not
    being officially assessed on it. You dont want
    to look stupid and say something silly and you
    want to give the right answers
  • The one issue that Ive had recently was getting
    failed on a certain skill because of somebody
    elses inability to talk about it and explain it.
    I wasnt particularly happy about that I dont
    think its fair relying on somebody elses
    knowledge and ability.

13
Learning in and as a group
  • Also you get more pressure because it is,
    everyone in your group is relying on you to pass.
    Its like God if I fail this everyones going to
    fail it
  • It took the pressure off a little bit, because
    you are working as part of a team, but then if
    you were picked the pressure was on and it was
    your responsibility to make everybody do well
    because you all got the same.. well it was on
    everybodys head wasnt it

14
cont
  • Its not all about you, focus on making sure
    everybody else knows it as well as you do, so if
    they get picked, well its about team working,
    isnt it, so, making sure everybody knew what we
    were about to do and how to answer the questions
    and how to do things.
  • Teaching people is a really good way of
    solidifying your brain

15
Contextualising learning
  • But I think its good because when you get
    something like that wrong you wouldnt do it
    again. I think since I started here things like
    making sure the patient is comfortable is getting
    ingrained
  • (Student talking about being with a patient) So
    if youre confident obviously its going to make
    them a bit more at ease, whereas if youre a bit
    more scared theyll be thinking does he actually
    know how to do this whereas if you are confident
    you just do it and get a good rapport with them
  • It puts a clinical swerve on it and thats what
    were here to do at the end of the day

16
Discussion Self regulation of learning
  • Zimmermans model (2000) Self regulation is self
    generated thoughts, feelings and actions that are
    planned and cyclically adapted to the attainment
    of personal goals. (a social cognitive view
  • Triadic loop
  • Personal, behavioural, environmental

Adjusting Cognition and affective states
Adjusting environmental conditions
Adjusting performance, methods of learning
17
Cyclical
Forethought
18
Forethought
  • Goal setting important utility value, process
    goals as opposed to distal outcomes
  • Motivation linked to self efficacy belief about
    capabilities to organise and implement action
    necessary to perform a skill.
  • Intrinsic interest
  • Time management
  • Role of emotions

19
Performance
  • Environmental structuring (i.e. RPC process)
  • Time on task
  • Cognitive rehearsal

20
Self reflection
  • Mastery, previous performance, normative and
    collaborative

21
Some other thoughts!
  • The first year experience
  • Novices versus experts in SRL
  • Transition from school to university
  • Importance of feedback that is dialogic
  • Academic literacy
  • Feedback improves self-efficacy requires focus on
    positive
  • SRL can be learnt from instruction and modeling
    from teachers, parents, coaches and peers.
  • Self regulated students seek out help from others
    to improve their learning

22
References
  • Ladyshewsky (2001) Reciprocal Peer Coaching. The
    Higher Education Research and Development Society
    of Australia
  • Ashworth P (2003) The Phenomenology of the
    Lifeworld and Social Psychology, Social
    Psychological Review vol5, no 1, p18-34
  • Ladyshewsky R (2002) Reciprocal peer coaching as
    a strategy for the development of leadership and
    management competency. Teaching and learning
    forum proceedings Edith Cowan University
    http//lsn.curtin.edu.au/tlf/tlf2002/ladyshewsky.h
    tml
  • Johnson R and Johnson D (1994) An Overview of
    Cooperative Learning.
  • http//www.co-operation.org/pages/overviewpaper.ht
    ml
  • Zimmerman B (2000) Attaining Self-Regulation in
    Boekaerts M Pintrich P Zeidner M Handbook of Self
    Regulation, Elsevier Academic Press
  • Zimmerman B (2002) Becoming a Self-regulated
    learner an overview Theory into Practice vol 41,
    no 2, 64-70
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com