Jo Benvenuti - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Jo Benvenuti

Description:

Victorian Women's Trust. http://www.watermarkaustralia.org.au/ourwatermark.html ... and Social Impacts of Water Trading: Case studies in the Victorian Murray Valley. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: toshs
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Jo Benvenuti


1
National water reform impacts for consumers
  • Jo Benvenuti
  • Executive Officer
  • Consumer Utilities Advocacy Centre (CUAC)

2
Overview
  • About CUAC
  • History of water sector policy reform in
    Australia
  • Water for the Future Program
  • National Water Initiative
  • Water Act 2007
  • National arrangements for water governance

3
Overview
  • Water entitlements and trading
  • Urban water reform
  • Consumer impacts of water reform
  • Community engagement in water planning and policy
  • Urban Water Stakeholder Reference Group
  • Where to from here?

4
About CUAC
  • Established to promote fair, equitable and more
    balanced regulatory outcomes in the electricity,
    gas and water industries in Victoria.
  • Particular focus on low income, disadvantaged and
    rural and regional consumers.
  • Collaboration/partnerships with other stakeholder
    groups.
  • Water policy work includes advocacy/submissions
    to Government, research on water issues (e.g.
    consumer access and affordability).

5
Water policy reform in Australia
  • History of state control
  • 1994 COAG Water Resources Policy beginning of
    substantial reform at a national level
    efficiency and sustainability through markets
  • National Water Initiative 2004
  • Water for the Future 2008

6
Water policy reform in Australia
  • Move to national reform coupled with shift to pro
    market policies
  • From public good to commodity
  • Water services industry third largest in the
    world behind oil and gas hydrocommerce
  • Example of Summit Global Water water is the
    only commodity that has absolutely no substitute
    at any price.

7
Water for the Future Program
  • April 2008 - 12.9 billion water investment
    program over ten years
  • Has four key priorities
  • 1) addressing climate change
  • 2) water efficiency i.e. irrigation, water
    markets, and supply in rural communities

8
Water for the Future Program
  • Four key priorities
  • 3) securing supply through desalination,
    recycling and stormwater projects and
  • 4) water market entitlement purchasing in the
    Murray Darling Basin.
  • Policies include the National Water Initiative
    (NWI), the Water Act 2007 and Council of
    Australian Government (COAG) Reforms.

9
National Water Initiative (NWI)
  • Agreed by COAG June 2004
  • According to Govt Developed
  • from the need for a more integrated and
    coordinated national approach to water
    management.
  • The National Water Commission (NWC) assists State
    governments with implementation
  • NWI involves actions across eight inter-related
    areas of water management.

10
National Water Initiative (NWI)
  • The NWI is expected to achieve
  • 1) expanded trade in water
  • 2) confidence for investors in water industry
    through entitlements, registry arrangements,
    reporting etc
  • 3) more sophisticated water planning
  • 4) address over allocated systems and
  • 5) efficient management of urban water, e.g.
    through increased recycled water and stormwater.
  • State and territory governments have had plans
    accredited by the NWC on how they will implement
    the NWI.

11
The Water Act 2007
  • Commenced 3 March 2008
  • The Water Act assists in implementing the NWI,
    including
  • A water market and trading scheme for
    Murray-Darling Basin (MDB)
  • Best practice water pricing in the MDB
  • Working for balance with the parties involved in
    MDB and
  • Record keeping of water availability and use.
  • Followed by the Water Amendment Act 2008 which
    gives effect to Intergovernmental Agreement on
    Murray-Darling Basin Reform

12
Water for the Future policy framework
Major policies
13
National arrangements for water governance
Council of Australian Governments (COAG)
Minister for Climate Change Water
Minister for Environment, Heritage the Arts
National Water Commission Act 2004
IGA National Water Initiative 2004
Reports to
National Water Commission
Dept of Environment, Water, Heritage the Arts
(DEWHA)
COAG Working Group on Climate Change Water
National Resource Management Ministerial Council
Advises
Water for the Future
Aust Govt National Water Initiative Impl. Plan
National Resource Management Standing Committee
COAG Forward Work Program on Water
COAG Water Sub Group
From National Water Commission web
site http//www.nwc.gov.au/www/html/2348-council-o
f-australian-governments-coag.asp
14
Water entitlements and trading
  • Rural Water Trading has been in Australia for
    around 20 years
  • Well established in MDB but has expanded since
    1990 reforms. Markets now more advanced than
    other countries
  • Community study in rural Victoria (Frontier
    Economics, 2007) indicated support for principles
    and practice of temporary water trading but
    opposition to permanent trading.

15
Urban water reform
  • Outlined in paragraphs 90-92 of NWI
  • December 2008 report (Frontier
  • Economics) on urban water markets found that to
    promote efficiency in urban markets reform
    options were
  • development of third party access regimes for
    water and wastewater networks
  • rural-urban water trade and
  • establishment of an independent procurement
    entity.

16
Urban Water Reform
  • Report states that if comprehensive market-based
    reforms are considered, a number of complementary
    measures will be required to ensure the continued
    achievement of social and environmental
    objectives in a more competitive urban water
    supply framework. (Frontier Economics, 2008)

17
Consumer impacts of water reform
  • Criticism that reform has not included measures
    of wellbeing and justice, ignoring social bottom
    line (Syme Nancarrow 2008)
  • Argument that more work is needed on social
    justice impacts of Australian water reform.
    (McKay and Bjornland 2002, in NAILSMA 2007)
  • Available research on water trading and rural
    communities shows perceived uncertainty, fear
    about population loss and community viability.
    (Frontier Economics, 2007)
  • Also perception that unregulated water trading
    will price farmers out of business.
  • Fear among farmers that water barons may buy
    water and manipulate supply in a tight market.
  • Example of Summit Global Management in Vic and SA.

18
Community engagement in national water reform
  • NWI stakeholder panels include
  • Urban Water Stakeholder Reference Group,
    National Indigenous Reference Group, groups which
    advise on water recovery and irrigation.
  • Criticism that NWI directed towards trading and
    pricing. Requirements for public involvement are
    implied - lack of clear definition of
    participation (Mackenzie, 2008).
  • Grassroots community initiatives include
    Watermark Australia (2005-2007) and the
    Australian Water Network (2009).
  • Watermark Australia - Australians are not being
    encouraged to participate in discussions and
    debates about our water future.

19
Urban Water Stakeholder Reference Group
  • CUAC national consumer representative of the
    Reference Group but Victorian jurisdiction
  • Provides input on Water for the Future programs
    (12.9 billion), including national pricing
    principles
  • CUAC unable to consult at national level

20
Where to from here?
  • At State level CUAC is able to effectively
    represent consumers on issues such as water
    pricing and affordability.
  • Federal Government does not consult with a
    national consumer panel/group on its Water For
    the Future program.
  • Do we need a national consumer voice on water?

21
References
  • Byrne, P.J. Eagle, N. OBrien, J. McDonald, D.
    2006, High and dry how free trade in water will
    cripple Australian agriculture. Freedom
    Publishing, Melbourne.
  • Byrnes, J. Crase, L Dollery, B. 2006,
    Regulation versus pricing in urban water policy
    the case of the National Water Initiative. The
    Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource
    Economics, 50, 437-449
  • COAG 2004, Intergovernmental agreement on a
    National Water Initiative. http//www.nwc.gov.au/w
    ww/html/117-national-water-initiative.asp
  • Crooks, M. Chamley, W. 2007, Our water mark
    Australians making a difference in water reform.
    Victorian Womens Trust. http//www.watermarkaustr
    alia.org.au/ourwatermark.html
  • DEWHA 2009, The Water Act 2007 and Water
    Amendment Act 2008 Frequently asked questions.
    Commonwealth of Australia. http//www.environment.
    gov.au/water/action/water-act-faq.html
  • Frontier Economics et al 2007, The Economic and
    Social Impacts of Water Trading Case studies in
    the Victorian Murray Valley. Rural Industries
    Research and Development Corporation, National
    Water Commission, MurrayDarling Basin
    Commission. https//rirdc.infoservices.com.au/item
    s/07-121
  • Frontier Economics 2008, Urban water markets A
    final report prepared for the joint steering
    committee for water sensitive cities (JSCWSC)
    http//www.nwc.gov.au/resources/documents/Urban_wa
    ter_markets.pdf
  • MacKenzie, J. 2008, Watered down the role of
    public participation in Australian water
    governance. Social Alternatives, 273, 8-14
  • National Area Consultative Committee Network and
    Department of Transport and Regional Services,
    n.d., Case Studies on impacts of water reform on
    communities within Area Consultative Committee
    Regions Executive Summary. http//www.acc.gov.au/
    downloads/Community_Implications_National_Water_In
    itiative_exec_sum.pdf

22
References
  • National Water Commission 2009, National
    arrangements. Commonwealth of Australia
    http//www.nwc.gov.au/www/html/2354-national-arran
    gements.asp
  • National Water Commission 2008, Update of
    progress in water reform input into the Water
    Sub Group (WSG) stocktake report. Commonwealth of
    Australia. http//www.nwc.gov.au/resources/documen
    ts/COAG-Update-WR-150208.pdf
  • North Australian Indigenous Land and Sea
    Management Alliance 2007, Indigenous Interests
    and the National Water Initiative (NWI) Water
    Management, Reform and Implementation. NAILSMA
    http//www.nailsma.org.au/nailsma/publications/dow
    nloads/NAILSMA_NWI_Review_UPDATEDec07.pdf
  • Stock Journal 2009, Water network launched. 3
    April. http//sj.farmonline.com.au/news/state/agri
    business-and-general/services/water-network-launch
    ed/1477717.aspx
  • Summit Global 2007, The Case for Water Investing
    2007, http//www.financialsense.com/editorials/d
    ickerson/2007/0308.pdf
  • Syme, G and Nancarrow B. 2008, Justice and the
    allocation of benefits from water. Social
    Alternatives, 273, 21-25.
  • Tisdell, J. Ward, J. Grudzinski, T. 2002, The
    development of water reform in Australia.
    Technical Report 02/5. Cooperative Research
    Centre for Catchment Hydrology.
    http//www.catchment.crc.org.au/pdfs/technical2002
    05.pdf
  • Weekly Times Now 2009, Theres Summit about the
    water, April 1 http//www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/ar
    ticle/2009/04/01/67375_print_friendly_article.html
  • Weekly Times Now 2009, Yanks raid Aussie water
    market. April 2 http//www.weeklytimesnow.com.au/a
    rticle/2009/04/02/67451_water.html

23
The End
  • Contact
  • Jo Benvenuti
  • Executive Officer
  • Consumer Utilities Advocacy Centre
  • Ph 03 9639 7600
  • Email jo.benvenuti_at_cuac.org.au
  • www.cuac.org.au
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com