Economic and social rights the welfare state - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Economic and social rights the welfare state

Description:

Economic and social rights as elements in social citizenship.' ( Marshall) ... South Africa: more than people live on less than $2.00 per day. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:90
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: chassUt
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Economic and social rights the welfare state


1
Economic and social rights -- the welfare state
  • Richard Simeon

2
Introduction from rights to government policy
  • Economic and social rights as elements in social
    citizenship. (Marshall)
  • Not freedom from but freedom to
  • Often found in modern Bills of rights not in
    older ones (Canada, US).
  • Economic and social rights are embodied in the
    idea of the welfare state, or social policy

3
Public policy
  • The decisions and programs that modern
    governments adopt
  • Through payments to people (e.g. pensions)
  • Providing services (e.g. education, swimming
    pools)
  • The tax system e.g. deductions for child care
  • Regulating public and private behaviour e.g.
    workplace safety rules

4
IDEA question Are economic and social rights
guaranteed to all?
  • Assumption this is a proper role for government.
  • Market cannot guarantee equality, cannot protect
    citizens from hardship
  • Cannot guarantee stable growth, full employment,
    etc.

5
Key question what is the proper role of
government?
  • The minimal night watchman state. People should
    look after themselves
  • Socialist view maximum role for government in
    social and economic affairs
  • Social democratic view blend capitalism and the
    market with active government basis of the
    welfare state

6
Why the welfare state rationales
  • Government has a responsibility to
  • Ensure at least a minimum standard of living for
    all the social safety net.
  • Protect people against lifes major hazards old
    age, sickness, disability, unemployment, etc.
  • To ensure a healthy, educated, productive
    workforce
  • Ensure some measure of equality of opportunity
  • Ensure some redistribution of wealth between
    richer and poorer

7
The social contract
  • Some see this as a fundamental social contract
    between business, government, and citizens
  • Citizens get education, health care, the right
    to a healthy work place, pensions, etc.
  • Business gets productive, healthy trained
    workers
  • A virtuous circle.

8
Origins of the welfare state
  • Big historical trends industrialization,
    urbanization, secularization, from 18th c.
  • Recent social trends women in the work force,
    aging population
  • Means family, church, local community no longer
    sufficient
  • Political rights for working class seeking to
    use voting power to alter balance between workers
    and employers

9
Evolution of the welfare state
  • First Bismarcks Germany co-opt the working
    class pre-empt revolution
  • Great depression of the 1930s failure of
    capitalism huge unemployment and distress
  • World War II shared sacrifice demonstrated
    competence of government
  • Postwar commitments the Keynesian welfare state

10
Historic compromise
  • Government commitment to social justice and full
    employment
  • Labour and socialist parties give up commitment
    to full public ownership.
  • Canada White paper on Incomes and Employment
    commits government to manage the economy to
    ensure full employment, and to build welfare state

11
Major building blocks of the welfare state Canada
  • Income security Old Age Pensions, Canada Pension
    Plan, Employment Insurance, Workers Compensation
  • Medicare public, and universal
  • Education
  • Welfare programs for children, the disabled, the
    poor, etc.
  • Together health, education and welfare make up
    great bulk of government spending
  • Workers right against discrimination, to a
    healthy workplace, to organize

12
Variations in welfare states
  • All modern countries have some form of the
    welfare state, but there are important
    differences
  • The liberal model North America, UK a
    limited welfare state prime responsibility rests
    with individuals limited, means-tested benefits
    minimal involvement in state provision of
    services little redistribution in the tax system

13
Social democratic model
  • Wide range of social benefits
  • Universally available
  • Scandinavian countries, Netherlands, Austria
  • Alternative the Conservative model, elsewhere in
    continental Europe

14
Welfare state in the developing world
  • South Africa more than ½ people live on less
    than 2.00 per day.
  • With so many poor people, who will pay for the
    dole?
  • Proposal for guaranteed payment of 10 per month
    for everyone.
  • It would help me feed my boys.
  • Poverty makes welfare state on western models
    almost an impossible dream

15
Explaining variations
  • What is to be explained -- crude measure how
    much do countries spend on social welfare?
  • Sweden 31 per cent of Gross Domestic Product
    (GDP) 1998
  • Canada 18 per cent
  • United States 14.6 per cent

16
Explanations
  • Wealth richer countries can afford more generous
    welfare states. Overall, yes, but what explains
    US and Japan as exceptions?
  • Culture, ideology a powerful explanation think
    of US individualism, hostility to big government.
    Cf. Canada, Europe.

17
Explanations/2
  • Homogeneous vs. diverse societies. C.f. US where
    race has been a major barrier to welfare state
    support
  • Political factors strong left/labour parties and
    strong trade union movements are associated with
    more generous welfare states.
  • Where business more powerful, weaker welfare
    states
  • Institutional federal countries more likely to
    have smaller welfare states. Why?

18
Modern crisis of the welfare state
  • In all western countries, welfare state spending
    grows fast until early 1970s, fuelled by rapid
    economic growth
  • Crunch in the 1970s and after.
  • Major factors

19
Are
  • End to postwar economic growth trade-offs become
    more difficult
  • Rising debts and deficits place pressure on all
    government spending
  • Aging population, new medical technologies,
    social changes make welfare state spending more
    expensive
  • Globalization increased emphasis on
    international competitiveness (taxes, etc.)

20
And. . .
  • To these economic and social forces is added the
    growth of neo-liberal ideology
  • State is too big saps individual initiative is
    creating a dependency society smaller
    government is better individual initiative is
    better people should be responsible for their
    own lives. Strongest in North America.

21
The result erosion of the welfarestate?
  • Canada and Ontario cuts in welfare, decline in
    social housing, tougher rules for employment
    insurance, increased university fees, etc. BUT
    no erosion of Medicare
  • US end of welfare as we know it. Clinton
  • Europe Blairs third way.

22
BUT
  • The numbers show that in fact, in terms of
    government spending, there was very little
    erosion of the welfare state in the 1990s
  • The feared rush to the bottom did not happen
    either within or between countries.
  • Debate what is the social role of government
    today?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com