Basics of Preaward Research Administration Susan Wyatt Sedwick, Ph.D., CRA Associate Vice President - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 120
About This Presentation
Title:

Basics of Preaward Research Administration Susan Wyatt Sedwick, Ph.D., CRA Associate Vice President

Description:

Gift is not generally subject to an exchange of consideration including ... Idea originates with recipient. No substantial involvement between sponsor and recipient ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:241
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 121
Provided by: ssed1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Basics of Preaward Research Administration Susan Wyatt Sedwick, Ph.D., CRA Associate Vice President


1
Basics of Pre-award Research AdministrationSusa
n Wyatt Sedwick, Ph.D., CRAAssociate Vice
President for Research andDirector, Office of
Sponsored ProjectsThe University of Texas at
Austin
2
Introductions
  • Name
  • Title
  • Institution
  • Experience in research administration
  • Unique qualifications

3
Strategy for Learning About Research
Administration
4
Research Administration ResourcesWebsites and
Discussion Groups
  • NCURA http//www.ncura.edu
  • Neighborhoods
  • SRA http//srainternational.org
  • AUTM http//www.autm.net
  • NACUBO http//www.nacubo.org
  • COGR http//www.cogr.edu
  • FDP http//thefdp.org
  • FAR http//farsite.hill.af.mil
  • CFR, FedReg, etc. http//www.gpoaccess.gov/nara
    /index.html
  • Grants.gov - http//www.grants.gov/
  • To subscribe to the Research Administrators
    listserv, send the message SUBSCRIBE RESADM-L
    your full name to listserv_at_hrinet.org

5
Types of Agreements/Documents
  • Sponsored Research Agreement
  • Subcontracts/Subrecipient Agreement
  • Service Agreement
  • Consulting Agreement
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Consortium Agreement

6
Types of Agreements/Documents cont.
  • Material Transfer Agreements
  • Uniform Biological Material Transfer Agreement
  • clearly define material involved
  • define proposed use for materials
  • define ownership of materials and derivatives
  • allow for publications and oral presentations
  • Indemnification
  • Testing Agreements/Laboratory Study Agreements
  • Non-Disclosure Agreements/Confidential Disclosure
    Agreement
  • Intellectual Property Agreements

7
Model Documents
  • http//www.utsystem.edu/ogc/IntellectualProperty/d
    bmock.htm

8
Research Administration ResourcesOther Resources
  • On-the-Job Training
  • Institutional Policies and Procedures
  • Agency (Sponsor) Guidelines

9
Pre-Award AdministrationProposal Information
  • Proposal Information
  • Submission Details
  • Personnel Information
  • Project Information
  • Intellectual Property
  • Export Regulation Compliance
  • Compliance Information
  • Subcontract Information
  • Budget Information
  • Additional Space
  • Renovation
  • Cost Sharing/Matching

10
Research AdministrationTypes of Offices
  • Central Institutional Office
  • Central School Office (i.e. Medical School)
  • Departmental Office
  • Combination Central/Departmental Office
  • Office Function
  • Specific divisions
  • Cradle-to-Grave

11
Sponsored Projects
  • Supports the mission of the institution
  • Increases the status of the institution
  • Supports faculty activities
  • Provides research experiences for students
  • Augments infrastructure/equipment
  • Advance knowledge

12
Pre-Award FunctionsFacilitator and Gatekeeper
  • Funding information
  • Educational programming
  • Proposal review and authorization
  • Award negotiation
  • Subcontract negotiation
  • Certifications and representations
  • Compliance assurance
  • Risk management

13
Research AdministrationResponsibilities of
Research Administrators
  • Assist/Serve/Collaborate with Faculty
  • Create a Positive Atmosphere
  • Protect the Institution by Ensuring Compliance
  • Ensure Appropriate Stewardship

14
Terminology
  • Direct costs
  • Facilities and Administrative Costs (FA) aka
    indirect costs (IDC) or overhead
  • Capital equipment
  • Program Income
  • Subawards
  • Cognizant agency
  • Subrecipient
  • Vendor
  • Consultant
  • Pass-through Funds

15
Legal and Regulatory Framework
16
Sponsors
  • Federal
  • State
  • Foundations/Not-for-profit organizations
  • Industry
  • Foreign

17
Code of Federal and Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
  • Important to track CFDA numbers
  • http//www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/cfr-table-searc
    h.html

18
Federal Framework
  • OMB Circular A-21 Cost Principles for Educational
    Institutions
  • OMB Circular A-110 Uniform Administrative
    Requirements
  • OMB Circular A-133 Audits of State, Local
    Governments and Non-profits Organizations
  • Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
  • http//www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/index.html

19
Federal Framework cont.
  • OMB Circular A-87 Cost Principles for State,
    Local and Indian Tribal Governments
  • OMB Circular A-122 Cost Principles for
    Non-profit Organizations
  • OMB Circular A-102 Uniform Administrative
    Requirements for Grants and Cooperative
    Agreements with State and Local Governments

20
Federal Framework cont.
  • Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)
  • http//farsite.hill.af.mil/VFFARA.HTM
  • Defense FAR (DFARS)
  • http//farsite.hill.af.mil/VFDFARA.HTM

21
OMB Circular A-21
  • Defines allowable and unallowable costs (see J.
    section)
  • Defines methods of Facilities and Administrative
    (FA) cost rate identification and calculation
    (see sections E. through I.
  • Appendices
  • A. Cost Accounting Standards
  • B. CASB Disclosures Statement (DS-2)

22
OMB Circular A-21 cont.
  • Cost Accounting Standards Board Cost Accounting
    Standards
  • 501 Consistency in estimating, accumulating and
    reporting costs
  • 502 Consistency in allocating costs incurred for
    the same purpose
  • 505 Accounting for unallowable costs
  • 506 Cost accounting period

23
OMB Circular A-110
  • Subpart B Pre-award Requirements
  • Subpart C Post-award Requirements
  • Subpart D Closeout Requirements

24
OMB Circular A-110
  • Subpart A Pre-Award Requirements
  • SF 424 or other approved forms
  • Debarment
  • Preference for metric system and recycled
    materials
  • Encourages agencies to allow annual submission of
    certifications and representations (certs and
    reps) on an annual basis

25
OMB Circular A-110
  • Subpart C Post-award Requirements
  • Cost sharing and matching
  • Program income
  • Revisions requiring prior approval
  • Expanded authorities
  • Property management standards
  • Procurement
  • Reporting
  • Records
  • Early termination

26
OMB Circular A-110
  • Subpart D After-the-award Requirements
  • Final reports
  • Technical
  • Financial
  • Property
  • patent
  • Prompt payment by government
  • Right to disallow cost in audit

27
OMB Circular A-110
  • Expanded Authorities
  • 90 days pre-award costs
  • One-time no cost extension (NCE) of up to 12
    months
  • Carry forward unobligated balances to subsequent
    funding periods
  • Budget revisions among line items not to exceed
    10 percent of the total budget

28
OMB Circular A-133
  • Applies to non-Federal entities that expend
    500,000 annually
  • Single or program-specific audit annually
  • Applies to pass-through funds

29
Federal Acquisition Regulations (FAR)
  • Incorporated into procurement contracts
  • Part 52 states provisions and contract clauses
  • Part 53 reproduces federal forms
  • Parts 70 and up contains agency specific
    supplements
  • Circular A-21 is incorporated in its entirety by
    reference as part 31.3

30
Federal Demonstration Partnership (FDP)
  • Central test bed for demonstration of
    reengineered processes and systems
  • Increase productivity of federally supported
    research and education
  • Provide for increased stewardship of federal
    funds
  • Reduce administrative costs and burdens
  • Currently in Phase IV
  • Expanded authorities
  • Faculty Burden Survey

31
Research Business Models
  • Subcommittee of the Committee on Science of the
    National Science and Technology Council (NSTC)
    charged with
  • facilitating a coordinated effort across Federal
    agencies to address important policy implications
    arising from the changing nature of scientific
    research, and
  • examining the effects of these changes on
    business models for the conduct of scientific
    research sponsored by the Federal government.
  • http//rbm.nih.gov/

32
Research Business Models cont.
  • Facilitating multi-disciplinary research
  • Acknowledge multiple PIs in proposals and data
    systems
  • Identify models for stability of support
  • Develop consistent support for GRA and post docs
  • Facilitate collaboration between universities and
    federal labs
  • Improving consistency of agency practice
  • Develop standard formats for reporting, award
    notices and terms and conditions
  • Promote FDP standard subcontract
  • Harmonizing accountability
  • Streamline A-133 monitoring
  • Develop federalwide policies for misconduct and
    COI

33
State Regulations
  • Use of State resources
  • Indirect costs recovery
  • Use of facilities
  • Intellectual property
  • Office of Legal Counsel
  • Indemnification
  • Binding Arbitration
  • Governing law

34
Institutional Policies
  • Cost sharing/matching contributions
  • Determination of on- or off-campus rates
  • Restrictions on use of foreign nationals
  • Tuition remission
  • Incentive funds

35
Gift or Grant?
  • Gift is motivated by charitable intent
  • Gift is an irrevocable transfer of assets
  • Gift is not generally subject to an exchange of
    consideration including preferential access to
    intellectual property or other contractual
    requirements although use of funds may be
    restricted
  • Gift does not specify a period of performance
  • Gift does not require financial reporting

36
Types of Agreements
  • Grant
  • Cooperative Agreement
  • Contract
  • Teaming Agreement
  • Memorandum of Understanding/Agreement
  • Sponsored Research Agreement
  • Other Agreements
  • Material Transfer Agreement
  • Non-disclosure Agreement
  • Visiting Scientist Agreement

37
Assistance Agreement or Contract
  • Cooperative Agreement
  • Idea may originate with recipient
  • Substantial involvement between sponsor and
    recipient
  • Grant
  • Purpose is to transfer asset to accomplish a
    public purpose
  • Idea originates with recipient
  • No substantial involvement between sponsor and
    recipient
  • Contract
  • Procurement mechanism
  • Purpose is to acquire property, service or direct
    benefit for sponsor
  • Idea originates with sponsor

38
Funding Announcements
  • Grants/Coop. Agreements
  • Program Announcement (Grants.gov, sponsor
    publication, or Federal Register)
  • Request for Application (RFA)
  • Contracts
  • Request for Proposal (RFP)
  • Request for Quotation (RFQ)
  • Request for Bid (RFB)
  • Broad Agency Announcement (BAA)

39
Types of Award Actions
  • Notice of Award
  • Competitive renewal
  • Non-competing renewal (continuation)
  • Supplemental award
  • Modification/Amendment
  • No-cost extension (NCE)
  • Subaward

40
Types of Contracts
  • Cost reimbursable
  • Firm fixed price
  • Time and materials
  • Cost plus fixed fee

41
Pre-award Administration
42
Pre-award Overview
  • Source of Funds
  • Funding Instruments
  • Proposal Preparation including Budgets
  • Internal Review
  • Electronic Research Administration
  • Award Negotiations
  • Other Agreements
  • Subcontracts Process

43
Sources of Funding
  • Federal
  • State or local government
  • Industry
  • Foundation
  • Other universities and research institutes
  • Private
  • Foreign entities

44
Federal Agency Websites
  • U. S. Federal Agencies
  • Centers for Disease Control http//www.cdc.gov
  • Department of Agriculture http//www.usda.gov
  • Department of Commerce http//www.doc.gov
  • Department of Defense http//www.defenselink.mil
  • Department of Education http//www.ed.gov
  • Department of Energy http//www.doe.gov
  • Department of Health Human Services
    http//www.hhs.gov
  • Department of Transportation http//www.dot.gov
  • Environmental Protection Agency http//epa.gov
  • National Endowment for the Humanities
    http//neh.fed.us

45
Federal Agency Websites cont.
  • U. S. Federal Agencies(continued)
  • National Institutes of Health
    http//www.nih.gov
  • National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration
    http//www.noaa.gov
  • National Science Foundation http//www.nsf.gov

46
Non-government Sites
  • Non-Government Sites
  • Foundation Center http//www.fdncenter.org
  • Foundations On-Line http//www.foundations.org/g
    rantsmakers.html
  • American Cancer Society http//www.cancer.org
  • American Heart Association http//www.americanhe
    art.org

47
Other Websites
  • Association of American Medical Colleges
    http//www.aamc.org
  • Association of University Technology Managers
    http//www.autum.net
  • Council on Governmental Relations
    http//www.cogr.edu
  • Federation of American Societies for Experimental
    Biology http//www.faseb.org
  • National Association of State Universities Land
    Grant Colleges http//www.nasulgc.org
  • National Council of Universities Research
    Administrators http//www.ncura.edu

48
Types of Proposals
  • Preliminary Proposal
  • Letter of Intent
  • White Paper
  • Preproposal with budget
  • Full Proposal

49
Budget Development
  • Salaries Wages
  • Institutional policy on salary recovery
  • Effort commitment
  • Personnel
  • Summer salary
  • Graduate students (salaries or stipends)
  • Technical support
  • Clerical support
  • Undergraduate students
  • Postdoctoral research associates
  • Percent of effort
  • Increases cost of living and merit-based
  • NIH salary cap (186,600 effective 1/1/07)

50
  • Fringe Benefits (use currently negotiated rate)
  • FICA
  • Retirement
  • Disability insurance
  • Workers compensation
  • Life insurance
  • Unemployment insurance
  • Health insurance
  • Defined contributions

51
Budget Development cont.
  • Consultants
  • Not an employee of your institution
  • Proven professional of technical competence and
    provides this to your organization
  • Is not controlled with regard to the manner of
    performance or the result of the service
  • Considered a work for hire and does not retain
    any rights to the end product
  • Reasonable allowable
  • Letter of intent (confirmation)

52
Budget Development cont.
  • Equipment
  • Definition (sponsor vs. institution)
  • Obtain vendor quotes
  • Installation costs
  • Shipping costs
  • Duty/US Custom fees (if purchased outside the US)
  • Fabrication

53
Budget Development cont.
  • Travel
  • trips X persons X days
  • Airfare
  • Ground transportation
  • Lodging
  • Meals
  • Conference fees/registration
  • Incidentals
  • Domestic or foreign

54
Budget Development cont.
  • Patient Care Costs
  • Inpatient outpatient care costs
  • Other Direct Costs
  • Materials Supplies
  • Expendable
  • Non-capital equipment

55
Budget Development cont.
  • Other Direct Costs
  • Materials Supplies
  • Publications
  • Computer software
  • Copying
  • Communications
  • Animal care costs
  • Human subject care costs
  • Shop charges
  • Maintenance/service contracts
  • Audio/visual services
  • Lease of facilities
  • Construction
  • Renovation
  • Remodeling costs

56
Budget Development cont.
  • Vendor/Professional Services Agreement
  • The procurement of goods or services from an
    organization or individual which provides the
    goods and services to many different purchasers
    as part of its/their normal business operations
    within a competitive environment
  • Not subject to the same compliance requirements
    as a subcontractor (if the source is Federal)

57
Budget Development cont.
  • Subcontracts (Partner)
  • Performs substantive programmatic work under a
    grant or contract
  • Bears responsibility for programmatic decision
    making and measurable performance requirement
  • Must adhere to Federal compliance requirements if
    the source is a Federal award
  • Retains intellectual property rights if a
    university
  • Reasonable allowable

58
Budget Development cont.
  • Facilities Administrative (FA) Costs
  • Calculated rate
  • Federally negotiated rate (Cap on Administrative
    Costs 26) On-campus, Off-campus and others
  • Federally negotiated uncapped rate
  • Restrictions
  • Waivers/contributions
  • On subcontracts in accordance with institutional
    rate agreement

59
Budget Development cont.
  • Cost Sharing
  • Cash
  • In-kind
  • Volunteer time
  • Existing equipment
  • Other
  • Required
  • Voluntary committed

60
Budget Development cont.
  • Summary of general points
  • Include direct costs
  • Include FA costs (indirect)
  • Detailed (at least in first year)
  • Include only allowable costs
  • May include matching or cost sharing
  • Remember Be consistent with sponsor policies
    and requirements.

61
Budget Justification/Narrative
  • Explains the budget in narrative form.
  • Remember if proposed budget item is not justified
    appropriately, the reviewer will not understand
    why the item is necessary for the research
    project..
  • If the reviewer does not understand the need for
    a budget item, then a recommendation can be made
    for that item to be deleted or funding reduced.
  • Do not leave anything to the imagination. Good
    budget justifications provide the rationale for
    the budget item in the proposal

62
Proposal Authorization
  • Principal Investigator
  • Co-Principal Investigator
  • Department Chair/Director
  • Dean/AVP/VP
  • Center Director
  • Account sponsors for cost sharing
  • Research Office (i.e. OSP)

63
Proposal Review Documents
  • Guidelines
  • Forms requiring a signature
  • Abstract/statement of work
  • Budget
  • Budget Justification
  • Cost sharing commitments
  • Subcontract Information
  • Checklist

64
Proposal Review Checklist
  • Correct forms
  • Page limits
  • Format restrictions
  • All elements included
  • Budget correct
  • Correct rates used
  • Subcontractor commitment letter
  • Compliance Issues
  • Cost sharing
  • Signatures
  • Certifications
  • Correct number of copies
  • Postmark/receipt date
  • Address correct
  • Mode of delivery

65
Validation by Research Administrator
  • SF 424
  • Assurance information is correct
  • Proposed dollar amounts are correct
  • Proposed period of support is correct
  • Institutional name/address correct
  • Type of organization correct
  • EIN (tax id) number correct
  • Congressional district correct
  • Duns number correct

66
Validation by Research Administrator
  • BUDGET PAGES
  • Modular (not to exceed 250K)
  • All modules the same
  • modules different in any given year (if so, need
    to justify)
  • cost sharing statement
  • role and percent effort of all personnel on
    project listed

67
Validation by Research Administrator
  • Non-Modular
  • Totals correctly and matches justification
  • A21 items fully justified or removed
  • Fringe benefit rates are correct and
    identified in justification
  • Program income

68
Validation by Research Administrator
  • Correct indirect cost rate used
  • Acceptable inflation rate used
  • Salary cap recognized in all applicable years
  • No salary on federal grants, if PI or faculty on
    project already has K award.
  • Budgets over 500K of direct costs must have prior
    approval letter from NIH
  • Cost sharing authorization
  • Approval for cost sharing / IDC waiver

69
Validation by Research Administrator
  • Letter of Intent
  • Face page
  • Budget/budget justification
  • Checklist/certifications/assurances
  • Indirect cost rate agreement
  • Scope of Work
  • Current and Pending (effort commitments)

70
NIH Checklist
  • NIH Checklist
  • Indirect costs calculation correct
  • DHHS agreement date correct

71
Other Information (Primarily Non-Federal Agencies
  • Indirect cost rate agreement
  • Auditors report
  • Tax-exempt memo
  • Financial reports
  • Representations Certification (Reps/Certs)
  • Patents Publications (private agencies)

72
Compliance Reviews
  • Animal use
  • Human research participants
  • Recombinant DNA (rDNA)
  • Radiation/Radioisotopes
  • Biosafety (infectious agents, select agents,
    toxins, etc.
  • Export controls

73
Successful Grantsmanship
  • Good match for project and program
  • Target the proposal
  • Contact with Program Officer
  • Follow the guidelines
  • Compelling abstract
  • Multiple funding sources
  • Concise
  • Honor submission limitations
  • Collaboration with researchers outside your
    institution

74
Characteristics of Successful Proposals
  • Compelling Abstract
  • Innovation
  • Relevance
  • Uniqueness
  • Demonstrated competence
  • Adequate facilities resources
  • Literature search
  • Absence of jargon
  • Realistic budget
  • Justified costs
  • Timeline
  • Related to solicitation
  • Enthusiasm

75
Unfunded Proposals
  • PI should obtain review and resubmit
  • Contact Program Officer for clarification of any
    review items not fully understood
  • PI should analyze publications and research plan
  • Encourage PI to have a senior faculty member
    review the protocol

76
Electronic Research Administration
  • NSF Fastlane
  • Other systems
  • Grants.gov
  • Problems for Mac users
  • PureEdge forms Adobe
  • Revised deadlines after forms are issued
  • Duns Number
  • System2System Interface

77
Other Electronic Research Administration Systems
  • National Institutes of HealthNIH Commons
  • U.S. Army Medical Research Material Command
  • American Heart Association
  • American Cancer Society
  • State government initiatives

78
Negotiation of Federal Awards
  • Reduction in proposed budget
  • May require revised
  • research plan
  • other support
  • budget
  • budget justification
  • Updated assurances
  • Cost sharing issues
  • Conflict of Interest certification
  • Most current FA rate agreement

79
Negotiations with Industry
  • Publication restrictions
  • Intellectual property rights
  • Confidentiality
  • Budget including FA rates
  • Conflicts of Interest
  • Indemnification
  • Governing law
  • Insurance clauses
  • Binding Arbitration
  • Coordination with Legal and Technology Management
  • If Clinical Study, IRB approval

80
Negotiations with Industry cont.
  • Contract Review
  • Insurance clauses
  • Governing law
  • Binding arbitration
  • Indemnification
  • Publication restrictions
  • Intellectual property ownership
  • FAR clauses
  • Coordination with Legal Counsel Technology
    Development offices
  • Confidentiality

81
Other Agreements
  • Clinical trial Agreements
  • Usually reimbursed on a per patient basis
    including a fixed FA rate of 10-30 TDC
  • Ownership of data and patient records
  • Confidentiality of patient records
  • Publication Rights
  • Patent Rights/Ownership of Intellectual Property
  • Indemnification
  • Internal Review Board (IRB) process

82
Subawards
  • Agency approval generally required
  • Check to see that FA agreement and assurances
    are current
  • Flowdown of required provisions from prime award
    to subaward
  • FDP subaward

83
Research Compliance
84
Effective Compliance Strategies
  • Institutional commitment
  • Standards of conduct
  • Roles and responsibilities with high level
    compliance officer
  • Policies and procedures
  • Educational programs
  • Assessment and audits
  • Assessing and mitigating risks
  • Violations are evidence of compliance

85
Risks of Non-compliance
  • False Claims Act
  • Exceptional or high risk status
  • U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Chapter 8
  • Effective compliance
  • Self reporting
  • Confidential/Anonymous Reporting
  • Office of Extramural Research Administration
    (OPERA) site visits
  • Office of Inspector General

86
Compliance Guidance
  • COGRs Managing Externally Funded Research
    Programs A Guide to Effective Management
    Practices
  • Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR)
  • NCURAs publications
  • Regulation and Compliance
  • Managing Federal Grants
  • Sponsored Programs Administration
  • A Guide to Effective Strategies and
    Recommended Practices

87
Ethics in Research
  • Scholarly Misconduct
  • Falsification
  • Plagiarism
  • Improper use of information
  • Manipulation of results
  • Material failure to comply with rules and
    regulations
  • Inappropriate behavior as it relates to
    misconduct, i.e. retaliation
  • Process for review, inquiry, investigation and
    adjudication

88
When is IRB review needed?
  • Research involving human subjects or use of data
    on human subjects including survey research that
    will be conducted on this campus and/or conducted
    by university staff, students or faculty and
    might be published must be reviewed.

89
Federal Regulations
  • 45 CFR 46 DHHS Protection of Human Subjects
  • Subpart A Common Rule
  • Subpart B Pregnant women, fetuses and neonates
  • Subpart C Prisoners
  • Subpart D Children
  • 21 CFR 56 FDA Clinical Investigations

90
Definitions
  • Research means a systematic investigation,
    including research development, testing and
    evaluation, designed to develop or contribute to
    generalizable knowledge.
  • Human Subject means a living individual about
    whom the investigator conducting research obtains
    (a) data through intervention or interaction with
    the individual or (b) identifiable private
    information (45 CFR 46.102F). Private information
    must be individually identifiable (i.e., the
    identity of the subject is or may readily be
    ascertained by the investigator or associated
    with the information) in order for obtaining the
    information to constitute research involving
    human subjects.
  • Vulnerable Subjects/Participants mean individuals
    who lack the capacity to provide informed consent
    or whose willingness to participate in research
    may be subject to undue influenced or coercion.
    Vulnerable subjects include, for example,
    children, prisoners, individuals with emotional
    or cognitive disorders/impairments, and
    economically or educationally disadvantaged
    persons.
  • Third Party Risk

91
Levels of IRB Review
  • Exempt
  • Minimal risk
  • Expedited
  • Minimal risk (vulnerable populations)
  • Full Board
  • Data collection using video or audio taping
  • Investigational device or product
  • Invasive procedures or higher risk research
    involving vulnerable populations
  • Deception

92
Exemptions
  • Evaluation of normal educational practices
  • Educational tests, surveys and public
    observations unless subjects could be identified
    or beyond reasonable risk
  • Public officials or candidates for public office
  • Existing data, documents, records and
    pathological or diagnostic specimens
  • Evaluation of public service programs
  • Taste and food quality

93
Foundation of Protection of Human Research
Participant Protections
  • Belmont Report
  • Respect for persons
  • Autonomy
  • Additional protections for those with diminished
    capacities
  • Informed consent
  • Beneficence
  • Maximize benefits/minimize harm
  • Justice
  • Research should be related to the participant
    pool

94
Other Considerations
  • Federal-wide assurance
  • Association for the Accreditation of Human
    Research Protection Programs (AAHRPP)

95
Use of Animals in Research
  • International
  • Federal
  • State
  • Local
  • Institutional
  • Voluntary
  • Accreditation

96
Regulatory Framework
  • Animal Welfare Act
  • Administered by USDA
  • Alternatives are desirable
  • Minimize pain and discomfort/psychological
    well-being
  • Invasive procedures
  • Excludes mice, rats, birds and horses and
    livestock used for agricultural purposes
  • Includes live and dead warm-blooded animals
  • USDA inspections

97
PHS Policy on the Human Care and Use of
Laboratory Animals
  • Definition of laboratory animals includes any
    live vertebrate animal used or intended for use
    in research, research training, experimentation
    or biological testing
  • Appropriate care and use in PHS sponsored
    research
  • Annual assurance
  • IACUC
  • Mandated education

98
ILAR Guide for the Care of Use of Laboratory
Animals
  • Basis for Association for Assessment and
    Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care
    International (AAALAC )accreditation standards
  • Extensive review
  • Annual report/re-evaluation every three years
  • Professional judgment
  • Definition of lab animal includes any vertebrate
    animal used in research, teaching or testing

99
Biosafety
  • Recombinant DNA (rDNA)
  • Radioisotopes
  • Infectious agents
  • Material transfers
  • USA Patriot Act
  • Registration of laboratories
  • Select agents and toxins
  • Restricted persons/background checks
  • Public Health Security and Bioterrorism
    Preparedness and Response Act

100
Health Information Portability and Protection Act
of 1996
  • Requirements for the protection of identifiable
    health information
  • Protects identifiable health information that is
    transmitted or maintained in any form or medium
    (electronic, oral, or paper) by a covered entity
    or its business associates, excluding certain
    educational and employment records

101
US Patriot Act
  • Registration of laboratories
  • Bioterrorism provisions
  • Select agents and toxins
  • Surveillance and privacy
  • Information Available to the Public
  • Restricted Persons

102
Conflict of Interest
  • Financial and Commitment
  • Requires disclosure to the annually of outside
    interests
  • Requires review by Objectivity In Research
    Committee specific to a particular proposal
  • Management plan is used to manage or eliminate
    potential or perceived conflicts
  • Institutional conflicts
  • Use of human subjects

103
Terms
  • Investigator
  • PI/responsible for the design, conduct and
    reporting of research
  • Includes spouse and dependent children
  • Research
  • Significant Financial Interest
  • gt 10,000/5 equity interest
  • Does not include salaries, royalties or other
    remuneration from applicant institution including
    SBIR and for service on advisory
    committees/review panels, etc.

104
Institutional Responsibilities
  • Written and enforced policies and procedures
  • Subrecipient monitoring
  • Review of individual projects
  • Requiring updates at least annually or when
    changes occur
  • Enforcement
  • Recordkeeping

105
Managing or Eliminating Conflicts
  • Public disclosure
  • Monitoring
  • Disqualification
  • Divestiture
  • Severance of relationship

106
Institutional Conflict of Interest
  • Equity interest in start-up companies
  • Use of human research participants

107
Export Controls, Embargoes and Sanctions
  • Regulations
  • EAR Export Administration Regulations US
    Department of Commerce Bureau of Industry and
    Security
  • ITAR International Traffic in Arms Regulations
    US Department of State Office of Defense Trade
    Controls
  • OFAC US Department of Treasury - Office of
    Foreign Assets Control
  • There are others

108
Regulatory Framework
  • EAR - Export Administration Act
  • ITAR - Arms Export Control Act
  • OFAC - Trading with the Enemy Act International
    Emergency Economic Powers Act and others

109
Risk for Universities
  • Collaborations/discussions with foreign national
    collaborators and students especially when
    involving proprietary information
  • Taking or shipping items or transferring
    technology that is controlled to a foreign
    country or foreign national
  • Performing defense services
  • Visiting scientists
  • Travel to foreign countries including fieldwork
  • Technology transfer
  • Faculty start up companies

110
Deemed Exports
  • Deemed Export foreign national with access to
    information restricted by EAR/ITAR.
  • Applies to research assistants and students
  • Applies to visiting foreign researchers
  • Applies to U.S. citizens visiting a foreign
    country
  • Does not apply to U.S. Citizens, permanent
    residents and those with US asylum protection

111
Exclusions and Exceptions
  • Exclusions
  • Information in the Public Domain
  • Fundamental research
  • University-based research in the US
  • Educational Exclusion
  • Catalog courses and instructional labs (EAR) and
    general math and science taught (ITAR)
  • Foreign patent applications
  • EAR
  • Temporary (TMP)
  • ITAR
  • If ordered under federal contract 126.4 (c)

112
EAR Controls
  • Controls are specific to the item or technology
    Country Groups
  • Terrorist Supporting Countries
  • Cuba
  • Iran
  • North Korea
  • Sudan
  • Syria

113
ITAR Controls
  • Prohibited Countries Belarus, Cuba, Iran, North
    Korea, Syria, Venezuela and Vietnam
  • Arms Embargoes Burma, China, Liberia, Somalia
    and Sudan
  • Bona fide Employee Exception
  • Policy to deny licenses
  • ¹Section 126.1 of the ITAR (22 CFR 126.1)

114
OFAC Sanctions
  • Balkans
  • Belarus
  • Burma
  • Côte divoire
  • Cuba
  • Iran
  • Iraq
  • Liberia
  • North Korea
  • Sudan
  • Syria
  • Zimbabwe

115
Foreign Travel
  • Not just a sponsored research issue
  • Remote access to information/email
  • Entity and individual screening
  • Traveling with equipment including laptops
  • Travel programs

116
Licensing/Documentation
  • Licensing requirements can cause delays
  • Licenses are agency specific
  • Technical Assistance Agreements (ITAR)
  • Technology Control Plans
  • Exceptions require documentation/ transaction
    logs and reports
  • Coordination with the responsible office
  • Ongoing assessment
  • Audit

117
Violations and Penalties
  • Civil Fines and forfeitures
  • Criminal Fines and incarceration
  • Loss of export privileges
  • Bad press
  • Voluntary disclosures and compliance efforts
    mitigate penalties

118
Compliance is a Team Effort
  • Sponsored Projects
  • Non-sponsored/ institutional research
  • Tech Transfer
  • Academic Units
  • Legal Counsel
  • Accounting
  • Revenue Accounts
  • Development
  • Gift Accounts
  • Payroll Office
  • International Programs
  • Shipping
  • Travel
  • Internal Audit
  • Purchasing/Inventory
  • Excess Property
  • Public Affairs

119
Effective Export Controls Compliance Strategies
  • Commitment from the top
  • Awareness and educational program
  • Designated official (empowered official)
  • Expert legal counsel
  • Self-assessment
  • Consider limiting performance of controlled
    research in separate, secure areas
  • Promote compliance through education
  • Focus on compliance
  • Good recordkeeping and documentation of
    decision-making process
  • Encourage prompt disclosure

120
QUESTIONS
  • sedwick_at_austin.utexas.edu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com