Leptree fossil project: when Lepidopterists meet Paleontologists - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Leptree fossil project: when Lepidopterists meet Paleontologists

Description:

2) Department of Paleontology, Smithsonian Institution. National Museum of Natural History, ... Synopsis of Leptree fossil data base entries. Categories. No. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:161
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: son154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Leptree fossil project: when Lepidopterists meet Paleontologists


1
Leptree fossil project when Lepidopterists
meet Paleontologists
  • Jae-Cheon SOHN1, Conrad LABANDEIRA2, and the
    LepTree Consorsium3
  • Department of Entomology, University of Maryland,
  • College Park, MD 20742
  • 2) Department of Paleontology, Smithsonian
    Institution
  • National Museum of Natural History,
    Washington, DC 20560
  • 3) Charles Mitter, Don Davis, John Brown, Susan
    Weller,
  • Cynthia Parr, Akito Kawahara, Andreas Zwick,
    Jerry Regier,
  • Michael Cummings, Soowon Cho and external
    contributors.

Lepidopterist
Paleontologist
Lepidopterists
Paleontologists
2
Fossils in Phylogeny inference- Why are they
important
  • Morphological phylogenetics
  • 1) bridging problematic morphological gaps
    subdividing long branches
  • (Gauthier et al., 1988)
  • 2) offering morphological snapshot close to
    the splitting of lineages (Novacek, 1992)
  • 3) assessing the direction of character
    evolution (Hennig, 1966)

Molecular Phylogenetics (critical for LepTree
project) Calibration (relaxed) molecular clock,
allowing all major lineages to be
dated using molecular tree
3
Difficulties of using fossils for evolutionary
study
  • Limited taxon availability
  • - the record is sparse
  • Incomplete preservation or visibility of
    characters
  • Taxomomic misinterpretation/ uncertainty of
    Phylogenetic placement
  • - synapomorphies not known, or not
  • observable
  • Geological uncertainty

4
Types of Lepidopteran Fossils
  • Preservation type
  • 1) Permineralization
  • - amber/copal
  • - silification
  • 2) Compression/impression
  • 3) Sieved residue
  • Forms of fossils
  • 1) Body fossil (egg/larva/pupa/adult)
  • 2) Trace fossil (feeding damage/coprolite/gut
    contents)

Prodryas persephone (Florrisant, Late Eocene)
From Meyer (2003)
A moth inclusion in Baltic amber (Eocene)
www.harunyahya.com
A fossil bat Palaeochiropteryx tupaiodon (Eocene)
from Richter Storch (1980)
A leaf-mine fossil (Eocene) From Grimaldi
Engel (2005)
5
Previous reviews of Fossil Lepidoptera
  • Taxonomic reviews
  • Scudder (1875) Fossil butterflies
  • Kusnezov (1941), Skalski (1976), Poinar (1992)
    Lepidoptera inclusions in ambers
  • Bachofen-Echt (1949) Lepidoptera in Baltic amber
  • Leestmans (1983) Lepidoptera fossils found in
    France
  • Kozlov (1988) all known Lepidoptera fossils
  • Danilevsky Martynova (1991) Fossil records of
    the Lepidopterous families
  • Carpenter (1992) Generic review of the known
    fossil Lepidoptera
  • Petrulevicius Martins-Neto (2000) South
    American Cenozoic Lepidoptera
  • Rasnitsyn Ross (2000) Lepidoptera in the
    Burmese amber collection at BMNH
  • Meyer (2003) Lepidoptera from the Florissant
    fossil beds
  • Grimaldi Engel (2005) Review of lepidopteran
    fossil record

Numerical estimation Kristensen Skalski
(1998) about 600-700 specimens known
(ca. 500
preserved in resin)
6
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 1) Limited taxon availability
  • Why are compression fossils of Lepidoptera rare?
  • fragility
  • buoyancy

ltTaphonomy of Lepidopteragt Fast decay
in water Ant
consumption -gt few remains (Duncan, 1997)
(Smith, 1998)
4 weeks
7
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • Biased sampling of Lepidoptera in Amber
  • - taxonomic composition of Microlepidoptera
    trapped in mordern pine resin differs from
    actual composition of fauna (Skalski, 1976)

Actual microlepidoptera fauna in the forest
Microlepidoptera fauna trapped in the pine resin
After Skalski (1976)
8
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 2) taxonomic misinterpretation
  • - misidentification by external analogy
  • ex) Palaeontinidae (Homoptera)

www.fossilmuseum.net
Palaeontina oolitica (after Butler, 1873)
9
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 2) taxonomic misinterpretation
  • - wrongly characterized by the distorted images
    of fossils

Borkhausenites bachofeni Rebel (Oecophoridae) Balt
ic amber (Eocene) from Skalski (1977)
Original drawing by Rebel (1934)
A photograph of holotype
Wing venation redrawn by Skalski (1977)
10
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 2) taxonomic misinterpretation
  • - confusion between plant material and
    Lepidoptera

misidentified as a lepidopteran ex) Daudet
(1876) Satyrites incertus coniferous
male cone (Nel Nel, 1985)
misidentified as plants Reid (1915) Aralia
fruits Chandler (1961) Zelkova fruits
caterpillar coprolite (Lancucka-Srodoniowa,
1964)
www.mntca.org
11
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 3) geological uncertainty
  • - often absolute age estimation unavailable
  • - a fossil bed possible combination of
  • variously aged layers
  • - reworked fossil-bearing bed (ex. Burmese amber)

www.amberworkshop.com
Zherikhin Ross (2000) the fossil beds
reworked
(Late Cretaceous)
12
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 4) incomplete preservation
  • - Fossil taxa rarely displaying diagnostic
    characters (Kristensen Skalski, 1998)

Protolepis cuprealata (Late Jurassic) After
Kozlov (1989)
Lepidopteran groundplan autapomorphies Modifed
from Kristensen Skalski (1998)
13
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 4) incomplete preservation
  • - Fossils causing lots of missing data and
    negatively affecting phylogenetic study
  • - decreasing the resolution of tree
  • (Gauthier et al., 1988)
  • - lowering support values over whole
    tree
  • (Wilkinson Benton, 1996)
  • - bad influence on otherwise
    well-supported clades
  • (Wilkinson, 1995)

14
Problems in deciphering the fossil record of
Lepidoptera
  • 4) incomplete preservation
  • - contamination
  • new techniques
  • ex) Micro-tomography (ESRF synchrotron
    Lak et al., 2008)

After http//www.esrf.eu/news/general/amber
X-ray image
Micro-tomographic image
15
So, how to overcome these problems?
Incomplete Taxon Sampling
Taxonomic Misinterpretation
Lepidopterists
Paleontologists
New Technologies
Incomplete Preservation
Geological Uncertainty
16
Molecular Phylogeny Resolve backbone of
lepidopteran relationships
Training Workshops Develop and share molecular
markers protocols
Lepidoptera Fossil Database Compilation and
review of fossils for dating and hypothesis
testing
  • LepInformatics project
  • Provide the community with an interactive website
    and tools to present, discuss and expand our
    collective knowledge

Morphology Initiative Develop a comprehensive
illustrated glossary of descriptive terms based
on homologies
AToL (Alcohol Tubes of Lepidoptera) Build a
frozen tissue collection for all to use
17
Molecular backbone phylogeny and dating 26
nuclear genes 127 families
Twig Leaders
Morphology Projects
  • Compile current knowledge relevant to phylogeny
    character descriptions images, data matrices,
    trees, literature, primers, availability of
    material
  • Compile morphological homologies glossary
  • with reconciled terminologies, providing
    characters for future higher phylogeny studies

Lepidoptera fossil database
AToLep Tissue Collection
Training Workshops
18
How does Fossil Project progress?
19
Launched Website
Family Name
Species Name
http//www.leptree.net/fossil
20
Synopsis of Leptree fossil data base entries
Superfamily composition (439 specimens)
Composition by identification category
Composition by preservation type (526 specimens)
Composition by geological age
21
Species information sheet
  • 1) Body fossil
  • - Taxonomic information
  • rank
  • - Specimen information
  • preservation depository
  • - Geologic information
  • age locality
  • - Diagnostic character by authors
  • - References
  • - Image Description
  • 2) Trace fossil (leaf mines)
  • - host plant information

To be in future
22
Interaction in Fossil Project
  • comments section in each sheet
  • - To find new evidence of the known fossil
  • ex) Axel Hausmanns reevaluation of
    Hydriomena(?) protrita
  • Cockerell, 1922 (Florissant, Late
    Eocene)
  • - To find erroneously placed taxa and new
    position for them
  • - To place the fossil taxa remaining unsettled

Hydriomena (?) protrita (Florissant, Late
Eocene) After Cockerell (1922)
23
Acknowledgements
LepTree Twig leaders LepTree Collaborators
Axel Hausmann Joaquin Baixeras LepTree
Informatics Staff John Park Giho
Kim Technician Erika Koenig Helper for
Translation Kim Mitter Ada Szczepaniec
Smithsonian Paleontology Finnegan Marsh
Wenying Wu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com