Telecommunications for Disaster Relief TDR: Technical requirements and standards - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Telecommunications for Disaster Relief TDR: Technical requirements and standards

Description:

During natural and manmade disasters, rapid organization and co-ordination of ... MM S A. CS-Networks. IP-based Networks. Dedicated. Networks. 5. 9/8/09 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:76
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: francine9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Telecommunications for Disaster Relief TDR: Technical requirements and standards


1
Telecommunications for Disaster Relief
(TDR)Technical requirements and standards
  • P.A.Probst
  • Senior Telecommunication Adviser, Swisscom
  • Chairman SG16/ITU-T

2
Summary
  • TDR scope
  • Trends
  • Role of standards
  • First steps and progress report
  • Conclusions on future work

3
TDR scope (1)
  • During natural and manmade disasters, rapid
    organization and co-ordination of recovery
    operations is essential to save lives and restore
    the community infrastructure
  • Recovery operations depend upon ready
    availability and access to telecommunication
    resources to support urgent communications
  • Telecommunication networks often experience
    severe stress due to damaged infrastructure
    and/or very high traffic loads
  • a

4
TDR Scope (2)Telecommunication networks normal
operating conditions
Customers
MM SA
Voice SA
Data SA
IP-based Networks
Dedicated Networks
CS-Networks
5
TDR Scope (3)Telecommunication networks
operations in crisis situation
Customers
TDR-Users
Voice SA
MM SA
Data SA
!
IP-based Networks
!
!
!
Dedicated Networks
CS-Networks
6
TDR Scope (4) Telecommunication networks in
crisis situation category of customers and their
needs ?
Citizens
NGOs
Citizens
Authorities
7
TDR scope (5)
  • There is a need to provide specific resources for
    authorized users (e.g. governments, fire
    brigades, police, medical services, etc)
  • The development and standardization of emergency
    telecommunication service capabilities provides
    the means for disaster recovery activities to
    effectively communicate
  • Specific standardization activities are therefore
    required to efficiently support these
    requirements
  • ITU-T can take advantage of its unique
    industry-government environment to produce
    relevant Recommendations

8
TDR scope (6)
  • Concept of Emergency telecommunications,
  • ETS and TDR
  • Access for the public to emergency utilities like
    police, medical and rescue services? Citizen
    Emergency Service (911, 112, )
  • Provision of telecommunications capabilities on a
    per occasion basis for disaster relief and
    mitigation? Telecommunications for Disaster
    Relief (TDR)
  • Capabilities of public telecommunications
    services (supplementary services) made available
    to national authorities to facilitate
    communications between and from authorized users
    in specific situations (emergency and disaster
    situation, emergency preparedness, )? Emergency
    Telecommunications Services (ETS)

9
TDR trends
  • Situation in the past-TDR are/were based on
    PSTN, ISDN, PLMN, 2G-mobile- Circuit switched
    technology- Voice centric applications-
    National solutions- Limited inter-working
  • Present trends- Use the possibility of
    multimedia (video)- New applications/services
    based on mobility, location-based
    information,- Evolution to IP-based platforms-
    Needs for global solutions (international)-
    Improve inter-working between platforms
    (public/private)- .

10
Key issues for TDR standardization
  • Customers- segmentation- requirements
  • Services and applications (incl QoS)- use of
    existing facilities- extension (new needs?)
  • Network capabilities for TDR support
  • Inter-working at- Service and application
    level- Network level
  • Regulatory framework

11
The role of standards for TDR
  • Inter-working, compatibility, evolution, economy
    of scale, are the main drivers for the
    development of aFamily of standards to ensure
    global interoperability of emergency
    telecommunications
  • - maintaining foundation of existing national
    capabilities,- enabling new national
    capabilities to be established,- expanding
    communications internationally on priority
    basis,- mapping ETS indicators code at national
    gateways,- facilitating orderly evolution to
    advancing technologies and enhanced
    capabilities.

12
First steps towards TDR standardization in ITU-T
(1)
  • Contributions submitted to several Study Groups
    to develop Recs on ETS/TDR (2001)
  • The need for improved coordination and liaison
    with other SDOs was recognized
  • Experiences made during the events in 2001/2002
  • Projects on Security (SG17) and NGN (SG13)
  • Needs expressed by the ITU-T membership, to
    develop a global and harmonized set of standards
    for ETS/TDR capabilities in close co-operation
    with other SDOs

13
First steps towards TDR standardization in ITU-T
(2)
  • Development and approval of a Question in SG16 (Q
    I/16 on TDR approved in October 2002)
  • Questionnaire on the use of public telecom
    services for emergency and disaster relief
    operations (TSB-Circular 132/15-11-2002)
  • Workshop on TDR (February 2003)
  • Development of first Recs (E.106/SG2, draft Rec.
    F.706/SG16)
  • Creation of an informal coordination entity TDR
    Partnership Coordination Panel (TDR PCP, endorsed
    by TSAG in February 2003)

14
First steps towards TDR standardization in ITU-T
(3)
  • TDR Partnership Coordination Panel
    MandateMonitor the progress of the technical
    standardisation work in general and in particular
    its mapping with the requirements of the
    different categories of users - Address
    high-level coordination issues between the
    partners involved- Develop and maintain the
    links with entities not traditionally involved in
    the development of standards- Report on the
    progress to TSAG

15
First steps towards TDR standardization in ITU-T
(4)
  • TDR Partnership Coordination PanelSummary of the
    results of the PCP-TDR Meeting in Geneva (May
    2004 during SG4)- ETS and TDR concepts
    discussed and proposal to consider them
    separately,- Detailed TDR/ETS aspects best dealt
    with by the experts in the specialised SGs,-
    Lack of overall coordination question for the
    various SGs,- Specific security requirements for
    TDR/ETS over and above those of the service
    capabilities,- Concept of interworking of ENIs
    (ETS National Implementation) would be a basis
    for ITU-T work,- Need to improve further the
    definitions and the concepts of TDR and ETS.

16
TDR organizations involved in the development of
standards
  • ITU-T SGs involved SG2, SG3, SG4, SG9, SG11,
    SG12, SG13, SG15, SG16, SG17, SSG
  • ITU- D SG 2
  • ITU-R SG4, SG9
  • IETF
  • ETSI
  • TIA
  • ASTAP
  • UN WGET
  • NGOs

17
TDR Standardization progress report (1)
  • GENERAL
  • The importance of global international standards
    in the area of ETS/TDR has been recognized,
  • Since various players are involved, there is a
    need for coordination in the development of
    ETS/TDR standards,
  • Considering the evolution of telecommunication
    networks (IP, Multimedia, Mobile, etc) a
    redesign of the traditional systems supporting
    TDR capabilities seems to be necessary,
  • The understanding of the needs of the various
    users has been improved,
  • Refinement of the ETS and TDR concepts,
  • Creation of an open informal platform to
    contribute to the development of TDR/ETS
    Standards (PCP-TDR),
  • Initialization of the work in the relevant ITU-T
    SGs,
  • Approval of first TDR relevant ITU-T Recs,
  • Considerations on future work in view of the new
    SG structure.

18
TDR Standardization progress report (2)
  • How to structure future ETS/TDR work?
  • TDR-PCP views are that,
  • The Definition of TDR and ETS needs further
    refinements,
  • There is a need for a specific TDR/ETS overall
    coordination question,
  • The detailed TDR/ETS aspects are best dealt with
    by the experts in each Study Group
    specialization,
  • The TDR-PCP needs a parent SG,
  • The TDR-PCP suggested to include the general
    requirements and coordination as part of a
    network (or NGN) SG.
  • TSAG concluded that,
  • ETS/TDR specific aspects will be dealt with in
    the specialized SGs,
  • Three possible options for the SG responsible for
    general TDR requirements SG M, SG K, SG I,
  • PCP-TDR will report to the SG that defines the
    general TDR requirements.

19
Conclusions Key factors for success and
challenges
  • Understand users requirements
  • Identify the regulatory framework
  • Develop a set of global and compatible Standards
  • Cost aspects
  • Evolutionary approach
  • National sovereignty
  • Partnership between Member States, private
    sector, GOs and NGOs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com