Title: Glycobiology and NIH Study Section Reorganization Don Schneider, PhD Director, Division of Molecular
1Glycobiology and NIH Study Section
ReorganizationDon Schneider, PhDDirector,
Division of Molecular and Cellular
MechanismsAnnual Conference Society for
GlycobiologyNovember 11, 2005National
Institutes of HealthDepartment of Health and
Human Services
2Issues to be Considered
- History of study section formation
- Reorganization of CSR study sections
- Review homes for glycobiology
- How you can help yourself
- Additional issues
- - CSR Director Toni Scarpa
- - Electronic grant submission
3History of Study Section Formation Scientific
Peer Review at NIH and DRG/CSR
- 1945-1998 Study sections formed case-by-case
- 1998 Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health
Administration (ADAMHA) merger neuroscience
Integrated Review Groups (IRGs) formed with
community participation - 1998/9 AIDS IRG formed
- 1999 ADAMHA merger behavioral/social science
IRGs formed with community participation - 2000 Panel on Scientific Boundaries for Review
(PSBR) Report and launching of Phase II
systematic reorganization of study sections with
community participation
4PSBR Study Section Reorganization
- Set high standards
- Advance health-related science
- Encourage innovation risk taking
- Show fairness clarity
- Be monitored continuously
5Reorganize with aDisease/Organ Focus
- Mission to improve health is best served by
review in context of human condition - Basic studies should be rapidly applied to
disease problems - Exchange of ideas among reviewers in the IRGs may
encourage broader applications - Review of basic applied science in same IRG
provides overview of quality - Distribution of applications using powerful
methodologies enhances use of new methods for
disease problems
6Reorganization and Basic SciencesGuiding
Principles
- Clinical advances often rest on results of
seemingly unrelated basic research - A sizable proportion of basic science ensures
rigorous foundation for future progress - Much of basic research must be reviewed in a
fundamental context without regard to specific
disease/organ
7Cultural Norms and ChangesGuiding Principles
- Reviewers should be active researchers able to
judge scientific merit of broad areas - Advocacy for a field should not be a function of
peer review (avoid entitlements) - Exploratory research or methods development or
hypothesis-driven research must be judged on its
potential to impact biomedical and behavioral
research - Overemphasis on preliminary data discriminates
against bold new ideas - Applicants should participate in referral to
study section
8CSR Workloads May Councils2000 - 2005
9Timely Adjustments to Changes
- Changes/Problems
- Workload increases can exceed the metric of 80
applications a cycle per Scientific Review
Administrator (SRA), e.g., ONCs Cancer Etiology
at 134 (2005/05) - Implementation reveals clustering issues, e.g.,
DNA repair - Science changes, e.g., growth of epidemiology
applications in Health of the Population IRG
(from 2 to 5 study sections since 2001) - Fixes/Solutions
- Temporary responses involve forming Special
Emphasis Panels - Within 2-3 rounds, CSR will involve working
groups of active researchers and NIH staff in
forming regular study section(s) - Health of the Population IRG formed an
Epidemiology Working Group that met November 2004
to design 5 epidemiology study sections
10Status of Reorganization
- Systematic reorganization of study sections was
driven by multiple needs (increased breadth,
flexibility, openness, etc.) - Implementation of last study sections occurred on
schedule February 2005 (98 NEW STUDY SECTIONS!) - Workloads are still mostly reasonable as over
design of study sections and increase of
applications balance - Regular assessment of study sections by reviewers
and NIH program and review staff is scheduled - A process for timely adjustments to changes by
creation of new study sections is in place
11Review Homes for Glycobiology Applications
- The PSBR scheme for CSR study sections is based
on disease/organ/basic science, not disciplines - However, the Study Section Boundaries Teams also
planned for review of glycobiology applications
in the basic science IRGs
12Review homes for glycobiology in disease/organ
study sections
- Immunology (Innate Immunity Inflammation/III)
- Oncology (Drug Discovery Molecular
Pharmacology/DMP) - Oncology (Tumor Microenvironment/TME)
- Respiratory Sciences (Lung Cellular, Molecular
and Immunobiology/LCMI)
13Review homes for glycobiology in basic science
study sections
- Cell Biology (Intercellular Interactions/ICI)
- Biological Chemistry Macromolecular Biophysics
(Enabling Bioanalytical and Biophysical
Technologies/EBT) - Cell Biology (Membrane Biology and Protein
Processing/MBPP) - Others Modeling and Analysis of Biological
Systems Biodata Management and Analysis
Synthetic and Biological Chemistry A B
Macromolecular Structure and Function B Cell
Structure and Function Molecular Genetics A
14Basic study sections and application numbers
(01/2006)
- ICI 35 applications
- EBT 71
- MBPP 52
- MABS 64
- BDMA 60
- SBC AB 83 76
- MSFB 81
- CSF 51
- MGA 65
15Intercellular Interactions Study Section
- Chair Dr. Jean Schwarzbauer, Princeton
University - Guidelines The Intercellular Interactions study
section has an emphasis on how cells interact
with both their environment and with neighboring
cells, and how this regulates processes
associated with cell growth, proliferation,
differentiation and higher order complexity in
tissues and development, including the synthesis
of glycoproteins. ICI is also focused on how
extracellular signals regulate the cytoskeleton
and impact cell behavior.
16Present Status of Study Sections Reviewing
Glycobiology Applications
- Multiple review homes exist in disease/organ
study sections - Review homes in basic science study sections were
specifically designed for glycobiology, and most
have started well - Intercellular Interactions/ICI, with greatest
concentration of expertise in glycobiology,
appears to be underutilized
17Scoring of Glycobiology R01 Applications
18How Can You Help Yourself?
- Learn about the new study sections
- Include a Cover Letter with the Following
- Research Area and Hypothesis/Question/Method
- Methods and Approaches
- Areas of Special Expertise Required (do not
recommend reviewers by name) - Potential Conflicts
- Possible Interest to 1-2 ICs
- Possible Review by 1-2 study sections
19CSR Director Dr. Toni Scarpa(began July 1, 2005)
- Initial Priorities
- Shorten review cycle, especially for new
investigators - Develop and use auxiliary/alternate review
platforms - Promote research that is more bold/less
incremental
20CSR Director Dr. Toni Scarpa(initial efforts)
- Pilot 40 study sections with resubmission times
cut by half for new investigators, Feb 2006 - Standardize resume and summary of discussion
- Prepare new investigator summary statements first
and all within 30 days of meetings - Pilot 3 asynchronous-discussion and 2
camera-assisted review platforms - Provide high-quality telephone access to all
program staff at every review meeting
21Electric Receipt of Grant Applications (Form 424)
- See http//era.nih.gov/ElectronicReceipt/
- Small business December 1, 2005
- R15/AREA February 25, 2006
- R03/R21 Small grants June 1, 2006
- R01 Research project grants October 1, 2006
- AIDS R01s January 2, 2007
- Remaining mechanisms May 2007
22NIH Contacts
- Dr. Raya Mandler, SRA ICI
- Dr. Noni Byrnes, SRA EBT
- Dr. Ramesh Nayak, SRA MBPP
- Dr. Tina McIntyre, SRA III
- Dr. Morris Kelsey, SRA DMP
- Dr. Eun Ah Cho, SRA TME
- Dr. George Barnas, SRA LCMI
- Don Schneider, 301 435-1727, schneidd_at_csr.nih.gov