Evaluation of Hospital Drills: Using the Tool - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 63
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation of Hospital Drills: Using the Tool

Description:

Tabletop exercises. Operationalized drills involving specific victim scenarios. Evaluations ... a. [ ] Arm band. b. [ ] Hat. c. [ ] Name tag. d. [ ] Verbal ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:137
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 64
Provided by: aka55
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation of Hospital Drills: Using the Tool


1
Evaluation of Hospital Drills Using the Tool
  • Amy Kaji, MD, MPH
  • November 16th, 2005
  • Acute Care College Medical Student Seminar

2
Hospital Disaster Drills
  • Why are drills necessary?
  • Hospitals will be called upon to provide care to
    the ill, injured, exposed, and concerned
  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare
    Organizations (JCAHO) Requirement
  • May help train employees
  • Tests aspects of hospital response

3
Hospital Disaster Drills
  • Types
  • Computer simulation
  • Tabletop exercises
  • Operationalized drills involving specific victim
    scenarios
  • Evaluations
  • Can help maximize the value of the drill
  • Based on accurate observation
  • Benefit of standardization

4
Johns Hopkins University Evidence-based Practice
Center (JHU EPC)
  • Developed an evaluation tool for hospital drills
  • Assess impact of drill as hospital response
    progresses and develops
  • Presents topics for evaluation in a systematic
    manner
  • Identify strengths and weaknesses in hospital
    disaster preparedness
  • Promotes targeted efforts to strengthen
    preparedness
  • NOT intended to be used to determine whether a
    hospital passes or fails in its planning endeavors

5
The Evaluation Modules
  • Developed by a multi-disciplinary team of experts
    at JHU EPC
  • Based upon systematic review of published reports
    on hospital disaster drills and literature
    relevant to bioterrorism preparedness
  • Had expert input from federal, state, and local
    agencies
  • Piloted the modules in two multi-hospital
    regional disaster drills in the summer of 2003

6
Guiding Principles in Developing Evaluation
Modules
  • Need for observing multiple hospital zones
  • Evaluation of a disaster drill requires an
    understanding of drill activities in all areas of
    the hospital
  • Four zones identified include
  • Incident Command
  • Decontamination
  • Triage
  • Treatment
  • Addendum if Biological or Radiological Scenario
  • Decontamination Zone Module needed for radiation
    chemical drills not recommended in biological
    drill

7
Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
  • Need for documentation of time points
  • Recording time points of drill activities is a
    widely accepted method of evaluation
  • Labor-intensive if excessive number of time
    points and may detract from overall evaluation
  • Limited, specific time points thus predetermined

8
Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
  • Need for documenting clinical care outcomes
  • Track the volume of victims in each zone and
    adequacy of provisions made for them, including
    space, staff, supplies, etc.
  • Modules are not intended to collect individual
    victim level data
  • Modules monitor the zone and outcome for the zone
    as a whole, not for each victim

9
Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
  • Need for debriefing (after-action review)
  • Obtain feedback from participants, including
    organizers, staff, and victims
  • Allows for discussion of issues that span more
    than one zone
  • Evaluate and integrate cross-zone issues at a
    post-drill debriefing session

10
Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
  • Need for ease and flexibility of care
  • Designed to be readily understood, easy to use,
    and applicable to many different drill scenarios
  • Items on form are arranged by subject, and this
    is the same across all modules to facilitate
    analysis
  • Decision to include a module is dependent upon
    the specific scenario and drill

11
Guiding Principles in Developing the Evaluation
Modules
  • Need for safety and security
  • Consider planned drill activities i.e., use of
    unfamiliar equipment
  • Protect actual patients on the premises
  • Safety of drill victims and healthcare workers
  • Contingency plan to stop the drill in case of an
    actual emergency
  • Consider designating a safety officer to monitor
    the drill and its participants

12
Recommended Use of Evaluation Modules and Addenda
( X USE IT!)
13
Internal Structure of Evaluation Modules
  • Zone forms for Incident Command, Decontamination,
    Triage, and Treatment have same structure and
    subject headers
  • Time points
  • Zone description
  • Personnel
  • Zone operations
  • Communications
  • Information flow
  • Security
  • Victim decontamination and tracking
  • Victim flow
  • Personal protective equipment (PPE) and Safety
  • Equipment and Supplies
  • Rotation of Staff
  • Zone disruption

14
Internal Structure of Evaluation Modules
  • Numbering of questions on the forms
  • C denotes questions that are common to several
    zones
  • Questions that are zone-specific are identified
    by a unique letter code
  • 120 questions per module
  • Coding on the forms and use of comment boxes
  • Yes Y No N Unclear U Not applicable NA
  • NA is not a substitute for missing information,
    negative information, or to avoid writing a
    comment
  • Color coding for the modules and addenda
  • Assists in organizing and tracking modules and
    addenda before and after a drill

15
Common Sample Questions from an Evaluation Module
(Time Points)
  • C1. Time the drill began ___AM/PM/U
  • C2. Time the hospital disaster plan was initiated
    in this zone ___AM/PM/U/Not initiated
  • C3. Time this zone was ready to accept
    victims ___AM/PM/U
  • C4. Time when this zone was notified that
    incident command was operational___AM/PM/U/Not
    notified
  • C5. Time the drill ended in this zone ___AM/PM/U

16
Common Sample Questions from an Evaluation Module
(Zone Description)
  • C8. Was the boundary for this zone defined? Y/N/U
  • C9. If this zone had a defined boundary, how was
    it defined? (Check all that apply)
  • Barricade
  • Security personnel
  • Sign
  • Tape
  • Vehicle
  • Wall (permanent or temporary)
  • No boundary
  • Other (specify) __________________

17
Common Sample Questions from an Evaluation Module
(Personnel)
  • C11. Did someone take charge of this zone?
    Y / N / U   
  • C12. If someone took charge of this zone, how
    many minutes after the drill activities in this
    zone began did this person take charge? (Check
    one)  
  • O lt 10 min
  • O 10 - 29 min
  • O 30 - 59 min 
  • O 1 - 2 hrs
  • O gt 2 hrs
  • O NA   
  • C13. If someone took charge of this zone, was it
    the officially designated person?
  • Y / N / U / NA

18
Common Sample Question from an Evaluation Module
(Personnel)
  • C14. How was the person in charge of the zone
    identified? (Check all that apply)
  • a.    Arm band
  • b.    Hat
  • c.    Name tag 
  • d.    Verbal statement
  • e.    Vest
  • f.     Not identified 
  • g.    Other physical identification (specify)
    __________________________________________

19
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Zone Operations)
  • C29. Was the space allocated for the zone
    adequate? Y/N/U
  • C30. If not enough space for the zone, where did
    zone activities overflow to? (Check all that
    apply)
  • Adequate space allotted
  • Conference room
  • Hallways
  • Outside hospital
  • Treatment/victim care areas
  • Waiting rooms
  • No overflow
  • NA
  • Other (specify) ______________________________
  • C31. Was this zone used for the same functions
    during non-drill operations? Y/N/U

20
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Zone Operations)
  • C33. Did clinical staff interact directly with
    families of victims? Y/N/U/NA
  • C34. Were families of victims referred to
    specially designated staff? Y/N/U/NA
  • C35. How was victims privacy ensured? (Check all
    that apply)
  • Curtains
  • Individual areas
  • Privacy screens
  • Not ensured
  • Other (specify) ____________________________

21
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Communications)
  • Communication device (s) If device not present ,
    circle N in column a and go to the next line.
  • A. Was device present? Y/N/U
  • B. If present, available
  • C. If present, was it used in drill? Y/N/U
  • D. Comments (note problems)
  • C36. 2 way radio/phones
  • C37. Direct line
  • C42. Numeric paging
  • C44. Text paging
  • C45. E-mail and internet access
  • C47. Intercom
  • C49. Runner

22
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Information Flow)
  • C54. How was this zone notified of the event?
    (Check all that apply)
  • FAX
  • Runner
  • Telephone
  • Not notified
  • Other (Specify)__________
  • C55. Who notified this zone of the event?
  • Drill organizer
  • Incident command center
  • Media
  • Other hospital staff
  • Outside source
  • Victims arriving
  • Not notified
  • Other (specify)____________

23
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Security)
  • C60. Were security present in this zone? Y/N/U
  • C62. If security personnel were present, what
    type of security? (Check all that apply and
    provide approximate numbers)
  • FBI ___
  • Hospital Security ___
  • Local Police ___
  • State Police ___
  • NA
  • Other (specify) ______________

24
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Victim Documentation and Tracking)
  • C74. Were all incoming victims registered and
    given a unique identification or medical record
    number? (check one)
  • Yes, before entering this zone
  • Yes, on entering this zone
  • No, not while in this zone
  • Unclear
  • C76. Was a central list of victims generated for
    this zone? Y/N/U
  • C77. Were the triage markers on the victims
    clearly visible? Y/N/U

25
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Victim Flow)
  • C81. Did a bottleneck develop in this zone?
    Y/N/U
  • C84. Were the paths leading to the next zone
    marked? Y/N/U
  • C86. Were the lowest acuity victims directed by
    staff to an area separate from higher acuity
    victims? Y/N/U
  • C87. What proportion of victims had treatment
    delayed because of zone staffing shortage? (Check
    one)
  • None
  • Less than half
  • At least half (but not all)
  • All
  • Unclear

26
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Personal Protective Equipment and Safety)
  • If needed, were these items for standard
    precautions available for the healthcare workers?
    Y/N/U
  • Used by staff? Y/N/U
  • Adequate supply? Y/N/U
  • Eye protection
  • Waterproof gowns
  • Isolation gowns
  • Gloves

27
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Equipment and supplies)
  • TX15. Were medications needed for the treatment
    of victims available within the
    hospital? Y/N/U/NA
  • TX16. Were medications requested from and outside
    source? Y/N/U
  • Were needed medical supplies available?
  • TX19. Bandages Y/N/U/NA
  • TX20. Basic airway equipment Y/N/U/NA
  • TX22. Blood drawing supplies Y/N/U/NA
  • TX23. Burn Packs Y/N/U/NA
  • TX24. Cleaning supplies for contaminated
    equipment
  • Y/N/U/NA
  • TX25. Crash carts Y/N/U/NA
  • TX26. Intravenous fluids Y/N/U/NA

28
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Rotation of staff)
  • C98. Was there a staff rotation /shift
    change? Y/N/U
  • C99. If there was a staff rotation, did the
    officially designated person in charge of the
    zone change? Y/N/U/NA
  • C101. What method of shift changing was used?
    (Check one)
  • Group shift change
  • Staggered shift change
  • NA
  • Other (specify) _____________
  • C102. How were incoming staff updated? (Check all
    that apply)
  • Group briefing
  • Individual briefing
  • Written notes
  • Not updated
  • NA
  • Other (Specify)_____________

29
Common Sample Questions from Evaluation Module
(Zone disruption)
  • C103. Was there a plan to relocate this zone if
    necessary? Y/N/U
  • C104. Did this zone close at any time during the
    drill? Y/N/U
  • If no, disregard the remainder of this section.
    STOP. This zone module is complete
  • C105. If the zone closed during the drill, what
    was the reason for closing? (Check all that
    apply)
  • Contamination
  • Other safety concerns
  • Space
  • Other (Specify) ________________

30
Description of Modules and Objectives
  • Pre-drill Module
  • Incident Command Center Zone Module
  • Decontamination Zone Module
  • Triage Zone Module
  • Treatment Zone Module
  • Group Debriefing Module

31
Pre-drill Module
  • Should be used in all disaster drills during the
    planning stages
  • Form is designed to collect the following
  • Goals and objectives for the scope of evaluation
  • Background information
  • Information on areas that hospital wishes to
    evaluate
  • Resources required
  • If multi-hospital or regional drill, each site
    must work closely with overall coordinators

32
Incident Command Center Zone Module
  • Designed to reliably collect information about
    operations of the incident command system (ICS)
  • Should be used in all disaster drills when
    evaluating the ICS
  • Form is designed to assess the following
  • Command structure in the zone
  • Adequacy of staffing in the ICS
  • Communication and information flow from hospital
    areas to the ICS
  • Communication with outside agencies
  • Adequacy of security, safety provisions, and
    physical space

33
Decontamination Zone Module
  • Designed to collect information re functioning
    of decontamination area
  • Used if scenario involves radiation or chemical
    exposure and decontamination is needed
  • Form assesses the following
  • Command structure in the zone
  • Communication and information flow in the zone
  • Victim and staff safety in the zone
  • Adequacy of staffing and physical space in the
    zone
  • Appropriateness of equipment and PPE
  • Victim flow in the zone

34
Triage Zone Module
  • Designed to collect information re functioning
    of treatment areas
  • Should be used whenever drill objectives include
    evaluation of patient care activities beyond
    triage
  • Appropriate for use in emergency department-based
    treatment areas or in other clinical areas

35
Triage Zone Module
  • Form designed to assess the following
  • Command structure in the zone
  • Communication and information flow in the zone
  • Victim and staff safety in the zone
  • Relation of physical characteristics of zone to
    treatment activities
  • Efficacy of treatment operations
  • Adequacy of materials and supplies in the zone
  • Victim flow in the zone

36
Debriefing
  • Debriefing is integral part of drill process
  • Main objective of debriefing is to identify
    issues not captured by evaluation modules
  • Facilitators should create an open,
    non-judgmental atmosphere
  • Should occur in all drills to obtain feedback
    from participants and observers

37
Debriefing
  • Different approaches to debriefing exist
  • One method conduct a session with all
    participants and observers present and ask a
    series of general questions about the drill
  • Another method conduct a group debriefing
    session with the participants from that zone

38
Group Debriefing Module
  • Contains open-ended questions designed to
    facilitate discussion after completion of drill
  • Questions may be added or deleted
  • Designed to cover all issues, including incident
    command structure, communications, security,
    decontamination, triage, and treatment
  • Documenting the debriefing
  • A scribe should be assigned to record
  • Videotaping / audiotaping debriefing may help
    capture comments but should not hinder open
    exchange

39
Group Debriefing Module Questions
  • Did you feel you were notified of the disaster in
    a timely fashion?
  • Did the incident command center work effectively?
  • Did anyone receive incorrect information from the
    incident command center? If not correct, what
    specifics do you recall about incorrect
    information?
  • Was the information from the incident command
    center received by other zones in a timely way?

40
Group Debriefing Module Questions
  • Were there problems with information flow within
    the hospital?
  • Were memorandums of understanding with outside
    agencies (e.g., police) activated?
  • Did nurses and physicians respond quickly to the
    disaster call?
  • Was the zone set up when the first mock victim
    arrived?
  • Was security in place before the first mock
    victim arrived?

41
Group Debriefing Module Questions
  • Did people have a good understanding of their
    roles, as defined in the disaster plan?
  • Did the decontamination system work effectively?
  • Did you have any problems with the
    decontamination equipment? Functioning properly?
    Adequate number of units? Participants used
    correctly?
  • Were there delays in decontamination? If so, what
    triggered those delays?

42
Description of Addenda
  • Four addenda are part of the hospital disaster
    drill evaluation
  • Biological Incident Addendum
  • Radiation Incident Addendum
  • General observation and documentation addendum
  • Victim tracking addendum.
  • Used to supplement the zone forms
  • Example for a radiation exposure drill, the
    Radiation Incident Addendum is added to Incident
    Command Center, Decontamination, Triage, and
    Treatment Zone Modules

43
Biological Incident Addendum
  • Designed to collect additional information that
    address response to a biological incident
  • Should be added to end of each Incident Command,
    Triage, and Treatment Zone modules
  • Should be used in all drills that address a
    biological incident

44
Biological Incident Addendum
  • Form is designed to assess the following
  • Awareness that biological agent cause of illness
  • Whether appropriate personnel were contacted
  • Whether health and safety needs of staff were met
  • Whether health and safety needs of existing
    patients were met
  • Whether health and safety needs of victims were
    met
  • Availability of special medications and supplies

45
Biological Incident Addendum
  • BA11. Was the Center for Disease Control and
    Prevention (CDC) informed that a biological
    illness was present?
  • BA14. Was occupational health informed that a
    biological illness was present?
  • BA22. If the cause of the illness was not known
    prior to victim arrival, how long after the first
    victim arrived was the cause of the illness
    identified? (Check one)
  • lt1 hour
  • 1-4 hours
  • 5-8 hours
  • gt8 hours
  • Never identified
  • NA

46
Biological Incident Addendum
  • BA24. What resources were used to make the
    diagnosis? (Check all that apply)
  • Consultation with an in-hospital expert
  • Consultation with an expert from another hospital
  • Consultation with an expert from local health
    department
  • Consultation with an expert from state health
    department
  • Consultation with the CDC
  • History and physical exam by the treating
    physician
  • Microbiological data
  • Radiological data
  • NA
  • Other (specify) ______________

47
Biological Incident Addendum
  • BA26. Was isolation required for the suspected
    biological illness involved? Y/N/U (Isolation is
    required for smallpox, plague, viral hemorrhagic
    fever, certain pneumonias or rashes, and other
    symptoms suggestive of a contagious infectious
    outbreak)
  • BA27. If isolation was required, were victims
    transported into an isolation room? Y/N/U
  • BA28. If they were transported to an isolation
    room, was the room under negative
    pressure? Y/N/U/NA

48
Biological Incident Addendum
  • BA29. Were there enough isolation rooms?
  • BA30. If not enough isolation rooms, how were
    victims isolated? (Check all that apply)
  • Conversion of other rooms/area (specify)_________
    __
  • Existing isolation room in other area
    (specify)__________
  • Overflow victims not isolated
  • Victims with the same suspected biological
    illness placed in the same isolation room
  • NA
  • Other

49
Radiation Incident Addendum
  • Designed to gather information in response to
    radiation-related incident
  • Should be added to end of each zone module
  • Should be used in all drills that address
    radiation exposure

50
Radiation Incident Addendum
  • Form is designed to assess the following
  • Awareness that radiation was cause of illness
  • Whether appropriate monitoring personnel were
    contacted
  • Whether health and safety needs of staff were met
  • Whether health and safety needs of existing
    patients were met
  • Whether health and safety needs of victims were
    met
  • Availability of special supplies

51
General Observation and Documentation Addendum
  • Designed for use by an additional observer to
    document detailed activities in a single unit
  • Example
  • During a chemical drill, an additional observer
    could be assigned to area where PPE is donned to
    document time required to dress, appropriateness
    of dress, etc.
  • Has a front page and a continuation page, which
    may be copied as necessary

52
General Observation and Documentation Addendum
  • Instructions Enter time and describe any
    activities in this zone related to drill.
    Include
  • Response to patients
  • Information received
  • Any activities (such as real emergencies) that
    may delay or prevent drill activities in this
    zone

53
Victim Tracking Addendum
  • Designed for use by an additional observer to
    track victims through the drill
  • May be used within one zone for a large group of
    victims, OR
  • Observer can follow victims across zones from
    beginning to end of drill disposition from
    medical perspective
  • Useful if there is victim descriptions and
    emergency medical procedures are well delineated
  • Has front page continuation page

54
Victim Tracking Addendum
55
Observers
  • Value and success of drill, depend on observers,
    who must be able to understand and record events
  • Observer selection is therefore critically
    important
  • Observers must be trained to use evaluation
    modules
  • Documentation by observers provides information
    for evaluation
  • Record the type and number of victims, as well as
    the care given or not given to victims
  • May record personal views but should note it as
    opinion

56
Role of Observer
  • Observers must not have any role other than that
    of evaluating the drill
  • Individual who normally works in zone may
    function as an observer, but during the drill,
    he/she may not assist with any activities
  • Must not respond to questions from drill
    participants about the drill
  • To qualify as observers, volunteers drawn from
    outside the hospital must have knowledge of
    hospital functions

57
Observers
  • Background knowledge required
  • General knowledge of operations of zone
  • Specific medical knowledge not required

58
Observers
  • Number of observers needed in each zone
  • One observer should be present in each zone
    continuously
  • Additional observers may be needed to observe
    numerous staff or victims
  • Should use victim tracking or general observation
    and documentation addendum

59
Observers
  • Number of observers needed in each zone
  • If extensive time point data collection is
    needed, an additional observer should be assigned
    to this task
  • Specific time points and reasons for collection
    should be outlined before drill
  • If clinical process or outcome data is needed,
    additional observers will be needed
  • Observers must have sufficient clinical knowledge
    to report on decision making

60
Observer Training
  • Training session
  • Receive zone assignments
  • Review relevant zone modules
  • Achieve familiarity with content of evaluation
    modules and zone configuration
  • Explain all questions and response sets
  • Address questions about forms
  • Instruct how to be an effective observer

61
Final Observer Training Points
  • All observations are confidential
  • Observer should evaluate drill without
    obstructing flow of drill
  • Observers may ask participants questions to
    clarify observations
  • Questions should be asked in an unobtrusive
    manner
  • Observers should refrain from asking questions
    that may alter drill actions

62
Final Observer Training Points
  • Observers must not participate in drill
    activities
  • If questioned about a drill issue by a drill
    participant, the observer should state that they
    are evaluating and unable to answer
  • Each question on each module should have a
    response
  • The response NA should be indicated only when the
    question does not apply

63
References
  • Cosgrove SE, Jenckes MW, Kohri D, Hsu EB, Green
    G, Feuerstein CJ, Catlett CL, Robinson KA, Bass
    EB. Evaluation of Hospital Disaster Drills A
    Module-Based Approach. Prepared by Johns Hopkins
    University Evidence-based Practice Center under
    Contract No. 290-02-0018. AHRQ Publication No.
    04-0032. Rockville, MD Agency for Healthcare
    Research and Quality. April 2004.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com