Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom: Research Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 76
About This Presentation
Title:

Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom: Research Results

Description:

Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom: Research Results – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:169
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 77
Provided by: mike281
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom: Research Results


1
Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the
Mathematics Classroom Research Results
  • Mike Thomas
  • The University of Auckland

2
Overview
  • Background
  • Method
  • Results
  • Computers
  • Calculators
  • Implications

3
School Policy
  • 36 of mathematics departments have a technology
    policy
  • It is usually very basic

4
Computers in Mathematics Teaching
5
Worldwide Computer Use
  • Although computers have been in use in
    mathematics education in this country UK for
    well over twenty-five years, the pattern of usage
    is still very varied and very sparse.
  • (Askew Wiliam, 1995, p. 34)

6
UK
  • A UK Department of Education report (DFE, 1995)
    noted a low level of computer usage in
    mathematics, with an average of 15.6 minutes of
    lesson time per week spent using the computer
  • "Typically then, computer use remains low, and
    its growth slow."
  • (Ruthven Hennessey, 2002, p. 48).

7
USA
  • In the United States the position has been very
    similar (eg Ely, 1993)
  • Manouchehri (1999)
  • 181 surveys completed 116 high school
    mathematics teachers
  • 51 used computers at least once every 3 weeks
    mainly for drill and practice

8
Background - PTK
  • Pedagogical Technology Knowledge (PTK)
  • teacher attitudes to technology and their
    instrumentalisation of it
  • teacher instrumentation of the technology
  • epistemic mediation of the technology
  • integration of the technology in teaching
  • ways of employing technological tools in teaching
    mathematics that focus on the mathematics
  • Combines knowledge of self, technology, teaching
    and mathematics
  • (Thomas Hong, 2005a Hong Thomas,
    2006)

9
Method
  • Longitudinal study
  • Questionnaire1995 and 2005Posted
  • Population all secondary mathematics teachers in
    New Zealand
  • Lesson observation and interviews 32 teachers
    in 22 schools

10
Some of the questions
11
Some of the questions
12
Response demographics
2005 HoD mean age of 46.6 years
NZ has 336 secondary schools
13
School demographics
  • 68.4 co-educational schools
  • 57 state and 18.1 integrated schools
  • Mean size was 748 students

14
Numbers of computers
School with 1800 laptops excluded
15
Computers in maths classrooms
16
General use statistics
  • 31.6 of all secondary mathematics teachers never
    use a computer in their teaching constant over
    10 years

17
2005 Area Use
18
Curriculum areas used
19
Pattern of changes
  • Significant increase in use for statistics
    First choice curriculum area (?224.5, plt0.001)
    some use (?29.47, plt0.01)
  • Apparent fall in the use of geometry packages
    (not significant, ?22.07)
  • Others similar

20
Types of software used
21
Changing pattern Software
  • Decrease in use of specific content-oriented
    programs
  • graphical (?25.59, plt0.05)
  • mathematical (?238.7, plt0.001)
  • statistical packages (?212.3, plt0.001)
  • Increase in generic software
  • spreadsheet (?228.0, plt0.001)

22
Possible reasons
  • Budget
  • In 2005 only 20/193 mathematics departments had
    a technology budget (range NZ 200-15000, mean
    NZ 2762.50)
  • Graphic calculator used for graphing functions?
  • Spreadsheet provided with computers

23
Gender Differences
  • Significantly less use by females in trigonometry
    (?24.44, plt0.05), calculus (?24.89, plt0.05),
    and algebra (?27.68, plt0.01).
  • Significantly fewer females mentioned using
    mathematics software (?24.00, plt0.05), or
    statistics packages (?27.85, plt0.01) some
    evidence of less use of the Internet (?23.78,
    n.s.)

24
Internet use
  • 46.1 of teachers reported some use of it to
    teach mathematics.
  • 61.1 of the teachers have access in their
    classroom (and 68.4 in a staff room).
  • 26.4 of students have classroom access.
  • 95.6 of schools have ICT rooms connected.

25
Internet Use Teacher Comments
  • That could include going on the web and asking
    questions, looking everywhereTo improve their
    learningis that to do with being self motivated,
    looking for answers to questions themselves?
  • With computers there are a lot of web sites and
    programs out there that can actually help them
    students with skills so its just a variety of
    the different ways of doing the skills There
    are also a lot of places they can go and look at
    problems if they are interested in maths.

26
Teaching methods
27
Changes
  • significant decline in the proportion of
  • skill development (?24.79, plt0.05)
  • free use of the computer (?218.0, plt0.001)
  • significant increase in the proportion of
  • demonstrations (?219.5, plt0.001)
  • due to lack of computers?

28
However
  • Around 60 reporting computer use for skill
    development and demonstrations, as well as
    investigations
  • Directed use and demonstration more common in
    2005, but not as often skill-directed
  • Significantly more males than females used
    investigations or problem solving (?28.60,
    plt0.05).
  • Are teachers using a constructivist approach with
    computers?

29
  • Proportions wanting to use computers more in
    their mathematics teaching
  • 1995 93.5
  • 2005 75.1
  • Significant decrease (?247.0, plt0.001), but on
    increased rate of use

30
Obstacles to increased use
31
Issues
  • Availability of computers remains the major issue
  • A significant increase in those mentioning it
    first (?27.49, plt0.01)
  • Agrees with Zamits (1992), Forgasz (2006). In
    both studies, lack of access to computers was the
    highest ranked factor.

32
Reasons Teacher comments
  • Access to computers at required time (of year
    and within school timetable blocks) was
    difficult
  • There is a problem getting into overused
    computer suites and
  • Due to the increased demand for IT classes it is
    very difficult to book a computer room for a
    class of 20-30 students

33
Changes
  • Significant decline in the proportion of those
    mentioning
  • lack of training first (?27.39, plt0.01), no
    change overall
  • No change in proportion mentioning
  • lack confidence in computer use (?22.31, n.s.)
  • There is still a need for training (41.2
    mention)
  • only 39.6 of the teachers had recently been on
    any kind of professional development with
    technology
  • HODs said that 3.1 teachers would not feel
    confident using technology in their teaching out
    of 7.2 full time and 3.1 part time mathematics
    teachers

34
Specific uses of computers
  • Powerpoint or Excel
  • demonstrate an algorithm
  • show how to solve problems using technology
  • an alternative to writing notes on the
    whiteboard
  • a teacher-directed manner.

35
Notes
36
(No Transcript)
37
(No Transcript)
38
Other uses Investigation
  • Once theyve got a basic understanding, then
    they can investigate a whole lot more and a whole
    lot quicker if they get a computer to do the
    mechanical part of itthey have to be
    interpreting what its giving it back to themyou
    can get a lot more time for the discussion and
    investigating different optionsthe important
    part of what we do in teaching is probably based
    on their conceptual learning.

39
Example
  • Powerpoint displayed a concave downward parabola
    in the first quadrant, where one of the roots was
    at the origin, to demonstrate the area bounded by
    the parabola and the x-axis, and how a strip from
    it may be revolved around the y-axis.
  • Java scripts showed in a dynamic way how the
    volume is formed. This promoted a three
    dimensional view of the process.
  • Demonstrated an element of the volume (a shell)
    taken from the parabola, together with the
    equation to demonstrate its volume, and the
    step-by-step process of obtaining the expression
    for the definite integral.

40
Interactive White Boards (IAW)
  • Students asked to drag tangent lines, already
    created by the teacher, and place them at a point
    on the curve y x2 1.
  • Students were then required to match a triangle
    (also prepared in advance by the teacher) with
    each of the tangent lines drawn.
  • Using this triangle, the gradient of the tangent
    and hence the gradient of the curve at each point
    was calculated.
  • A table of gradients was produced.

41
IAWs
42
(No Transcript)
43
Another conceptual IAW lesson
  • Data collected by students in their Year 12
    Mathematics class at Piha beach. Recorded the
    height of the water along the beach at high and
    low tide.
  • Students investigated how data could be modelled
    by a sine curve of the form y A sin B(x C)
    D
  • Teacher simply dragged the sine curve graph to
    demonstrate the change in both amplitude and
    period - students marvelled!

44
Overview
  • Constant gt30 of mathematics teachers never use
    computers in teaching
  • While there are many more computers in schools
    and an increased frequency of use, access is
    still the major obstacle
  • Common use is graphical, statistical or
    spreadsheet for demonstration or skill
    development
  • Only 20.7 of schools had a technology policy,
    and its usually very basic

45
The emphasis
  • There has been little change over 10 years
  • Just 8 of teachers believe computers aid
    understanding
  • 16.8 claim they impede learning or understanding

46
Calculators in Mathematics Teaching
47
The questions
48
(No Transcript)
49
Maths department calculators
  • 1995 -
  • average 22.6 calculators in mathematics
    departments
  • 52 Casio
  • 96 of Year 12 (age 17 years) and 97 of Year 13
    (age 18 years) students owned their own
    calculators
  • 2005 -
  • average 45.7 calculators in mathematics
    departments
  • 68.6 Casio, 14.4 Texas Instruments and 15.4
    Sharp
  • Year 12, 86.4 and Year 13, 87.9 owned their own
    calculator

50
Calculators may be detrimental to understanding
  • 1995 24.8 agreed calculators may be detrimental
  • 2005 26.6 thought that they often are
  • The number disagreeing dropped significantly from
    60.2 to 47.1 (?213.7, plt0.001)

51
However
  • Little benefit in mathematics teaching a large
    majority disagreeing 87.3 in 1995 and 75.6 in
    2005
  • Implies? It depends how we use them?

52
Obstacles to greater use
53
Need for more ideas and resources
  • 71.1 agree or strongly agree

54
Classroom observations 22 teachers
  • 2 groups confident and not confident
  • strong confidence more likely to have ideas for
    using technology to teach mathematics
    (Meanstrong4.3, Meanweak3.6)
  • Both wanted to improve their ability to teach
    with technology (Meanstrong4.4, Meanweak4.5)

55
GC use
  • Teacher levels of instrumentation of the GC are
    linked to their confidence
  • A low level of confidence in GC use in the
    classroom is characterised by
  • an emphasis on passing on to students operational
    matters, such as key presses and menu operations,
  • an emphasis on procedural calculations, to the
    detriment of the mathematical ideas
  • little or no freedom given to students to explore
    with the GC
  • GC seen as an add-on to the lesson rather than an
    integral part

56
Key entry
57
Key presses
58
Advantage of technology use
59
  • A higher level of instrumentation produces a
    higher level of confidence, which in turn frees
    the teacher to focus more on other important
    aspects, such as the linking of representations
    and investigation of concepts
  • linking of representations such as graphs,
    tables, and algebra
  • encourage students to engage with conceptual
    ideas of mathematics through individual and group
    exploration of the GC
  • investigation of mathematical ideas, and the use
    of prediction and test methodology
  • GC has been integrated into the lessons

60
Conceptual emphasis in GC use
61
Conceptual focus
62
PTK practice - comments
  • They really understood the concepts and answered
    the things in all cases the correct way
  • Its the amount of visual information they can
    generalise for themselves they had a much
    better concept
  • Technology is really important for multiple
    representations visual is really important
  • Understand it a lot better just by being given a
    chance to play and make those connections
  • Trying to make it a bit of fun not learning
    necessarily step-by-step processes

63
Good practice
  • Personal confidence in, and instrumentation of,
    the technology
  • Emphasis on mathematical concepts not key presses
    etc
  • Knowing when and how to use technology
    appropriately to reflect on mathematics
  • Teaching multiple representations of concepts
    while developing skills
  • Engaging and supporting the students
  • Ability to shift between technologies

64
Funding The Equity Issue
  • our students are not rich and so cannot afford
    calculators that our more sophisticated than a
    basic scientific. I am concerned that there is a
    growing gap between the experience of rich and
    poor students. State schools are not sufficiently
    funded to rectify this problem
  • This is a decile 3. Its not a high decile
    school. A lot of our students will come from even
    lower decile areas and theyll pay fees to
    come here as well. The parents are committed to
    their education and theres a lot of support. But
    when you are asking for another 75, thats the
    cheapest we could buy, 75 for a graphic
    calculator, its just nah, its not gonna happen.
  • They are now down, the GC is now under 80 so
    they are quite attainable. They are less than a
    cellphone. I try to encourage the girls to see
    them as their next best accessory and they will
    probably get the thing in vibrant colours soon
    just like the cell phones.

65
NCEA
  • Teachers in the study were reasonably happy with
    the level of emphasis on calculators in NCEA
  • NCEA has too much emphasis on technology
  • 11.7 percent either agreed or strongly agreed
  • 44.2 disagreed or strongly disagreed
  • 36.9 percent giving a neutral response
  • mean agreement score 2.59 out of 5

66
(No Transcript)
67
NCEA assessment
  • it has been a positive thing, in terms of
    getting computers and using them because weve
    been able to write our own standards and
    activities using the basis of what we want to do.
    Like we are doing three statistics achievement
    standards that are internal, that are suitable
    for using computers and doing (NCEA) has
    increased our use of technology in terms of
    teaching not that boring monotonous low skill
    stuff.

68
Positive
  • NCEA has been really positive for technology in
    mathematics because it has enabled us to take the
    documentation from looking at the standards and
    it says, students will use appropriate technology
    and you have a go to the school management, have
    a go to the board and look if theyre gonna do
    NCEA, they must use appropriate technology, and
    schools been really supportive and provided the
    money.

69
Another view
  • We are getting a mixed message from the NCEA
    examiners. The standard says appropriate
    technology should be used but the Merit and
    Excellence questions are often designed to
    require algebraic manipulation, so we generally
    teach algebraic techniques for solving equations,
    knowing that weak girls will depend more on their
    calculators than strong ones

70
A Strong Contrary View
  • NCEA encourages us to teach students to get
    answers only (working is not marked) to questions
    they do not understand by learning which buttons
    to press, on a piece of technology that nobody
    outside a classroom uses, and which will be out
    of date within 3 years

71
Curriculum
  • need to re-look at the curriculum
  • Maths must be adapted to utilise the technology
  • Need less emphasis on skills and a shift to more
    conceptual teaching
  • Gain more time to tackle and think about more
    challenging work instead of learning and
    practicing methods of calculations

72
Overview comments
  • I feel technology in lessons is over-rated. I
    dont feel learning is significantly enhancedI
    feel claims of computer benefits in education are
    often over-stated.
  • Reliance on technology rather than understanding
    content.
  • Sometimes some students rely too heavily on
    technology without really understanding basic
    concepts and unable to calculate by hand.

73
  • I think it is still important to be able to
    manipulate, learn techniques and apply them. I
    would be concerned if we sacrificed too much of
    the calculus curriculum by using advanced
    calculators and would need to be convinced that
    AS/SAM calculators would not do this
  • GCs encourage kids to take short cuts,
    especially in algebra. Real algebra skills are
    lacking as a result
  • As the technology reduces in cost most students
    will gain access to it and it will become an
    integral part of most maths lessons

74
Where to? Teachers
  • a great deal of attention needs to be devoted
    to educating teachers to teach in a new paradigm
    and to rethink their practices. The major
    challenge is understanding and helping
    teachers.
  • Manouchehri (1999, p. 44)
  • In particular we must consider teacher
    confidence, the influence of teacher beliefs and
    attitudes re technology, and the need for
    appropriate PD

75
A model for PTK development
PD feeds into a number of these areas
76
See the TLRI Report for a detailed summary
  • Coming soon to
  • http//www.tlri.org.nz/publications/
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com