Title: Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the Mathematics Classroom: Research Results
1Teacher Use of Computers and Calculators in the
Mathematics Classroom Research Results
- Mike Thomas
- The University of Auckland
2Overview
- Background
- Method
- Results
- Computers
- Calculators
- Implications
3School Policy
- 36 of mathematics departments have a technology
policy - It is usually very basic
4Computers in Mathematics Teaching
5Worldwide Computer Use
- Although computers have been in use in
mathematics education in this country UK for
well over twenty-five years, the pattern of usage
is still very varied and very sparse. - (Askew Wiliam, 1995, p. 34)
6UK
- A UK Department of Education report (DFE, 1995)
noted a low level of computer usage in
mathematics, with an average of 15.6 minutes of
lesson time per week spent using the computer - "Typically then, computer use remains low, and
its growth slow." - (Ruthven Hennessey, 2002, p. 48).
-
7USA
- In the United States the position has been very
similar (eg Ely, 1993) - Manouchehri (1999)
- 181 surveys completed 116 high school
mathematics teachers - 51 used computers at least once every 3 weeks
mainly for drill and practice -
8Background - PTK
- Pedagogical Technology Knowledge (PTK)
- teacher attitudes to technology and their
instrumentalisation of it - teacher instrumentation of the technology
- epistemic mediation of the technology
- integration of the technology in teaching
- ways of employing technological tools in teaching
mathematics that focus on the mathematics - Combines knowledge of self, technology, teaching
and mathematics - (Thomas Hong, 2005a Hong Thomas,
2006)
9Method
- Longitudinal study
- Questionnaire1995 and 2005Posted
- Population all secondary mathematics teachers in
New Zealand - Lesson observation and interviews 32 teachers
in 22 schools
10Some of the questions
11Some of the questions
12Response demographics
2005 HoD mean age of 46.6 years
NZ has 336 secondary schools
13School demographics
- 68.4 co-educational schools
- 57 state and 18.1 integrated schools
- Mean size was 748 students
14Numbers of computers
School with 1800 laptops excluded
15Computers in maths classrooms
16General use statistics
- 31.6 of all secondary mathematics teachers never
use a computer in their teaching constant over
10 years
172005 Area Use
18Curriculum areas used
19Pattern of changes
- Significant increase in use for statistics
First choice curriculum area (?224.5, plt0.001)
some use (?29.47, plt0.01) - Apparent fall in the use of geometry packages
(not significant, ?22.07) - Others similar
20Types of software used
21Changing pattern Software
- Decrease in use of specific content-oriented
programs - graphical (?25.59, plt0.05)
- mathematical (?238.7, plt0.001)
- statistical packages (?212.3, plt0.001)
- Increase in generic software
- spreadsheet (?228.0, plt0.001)
22Possible reasons
- Budget
- In 2005 only 20/193 mathematics departments had
a technology budget (range NZ 200-15000, mean
NZ 2762.50) - Graphic calculator used for graphing functions?
- Spreadsheet provided with computers
-
23Gender Differences
- Significantly less use by females in trigonometry
(?24.44, plt0.05), calculus (?24.89, plt0.05),
and algebra (?27.68, plt0.01). - Significantly fewer females mentioned using
mathematics software (?24.00, plt0.05), or
statistics packages (?27.85, plt0.01) some
evidence of less use of the Internet (?23.78,
n.s.)
24Internet use
- 46.1 of teachers reported some use of it to
teach mathematics. - 61.1 of the teachers have access in their
classroom (and 68.4 in a staff room). - 26.4 of students have classroom access.
- 95.6 of schools have ICT rooms connected.
25Internet Use Teacher Comments
- That could include going on the web and asking
questions, looking everywhereTo improve their
learningis that to do with being self motivated,
looking for answers to questions themselves? - With computers there are a lot of web sites and
programs out there that can actually help them
students with skills so its just a variety of
the different ways of doing the skills There
are also a lot of places they can go and look at
problems if they are interested in maths.
26Teaching methods
27Changes
- significant decline in the proportion of
- skill development (?24.79, plt0.05)
- free use of the computer (?218.0, plt0.001)
- significant increase in the proportion of
- demonstrations (?219.5, plt0.001)
- due to lack of computers?
28However
- Around 60 reporting computer use for skill
development and demonstrations, as well as
investigations - Directed use and demonstration more common in
2005, but not as often skill-directed - Significantly more males than females used
investigations or problem solving (?28.60,
plt0.05). - Are teachers using a constructivist approach with
computers?
29- Proportions wanting to use computers more in
their mathematics teaching - 1995 93.5
- 2005 75.1
- Significant decrease (?247.0, plt0.001), but on
increased rate of use
30Obstacles to increased use
31Issues
- Availability of computers remains the major issue
- A significant increase in those mentioning it
first (?27.49, plt0.01) - Agrees with Zamits (1992), Forgasz (2006). In
both studies, lack of access to computers was the
highest ranked factor.
32Reasons Teacher comments
- Access to computers at required time (of year
and within school timetable blocks) was
difficult - There is a problem getting into overused
computer suites and - Due to the increased demand for IT classes it is
very difficult to book a computer room for a
class of 20-30 students
33Changes
- Significant decline in the proportion of those
mentioning - lack of training first (?27.39, plt0.01), no
change overall - No change in proportion mentioning
- lack confidence in computer use (?22.31, n.s.)
- There is still a need for training (41.2
mention) - only 39.6 of the teachers had recently been on
any kind of professional development with
technology - HODs said that 3.1 teachers would not feel
confident using technology in their teaching out
of 7.2 full time and 3.1 part time mathematics
teachers
34Specific uses of computers
- Powerpoint or Excel
- demonstrate an algorithm
- show how to solve problems using technology
- an alternative to writing notes on the
whiteboard - a teacher-directed manner.
35Notes
36(No Transcript)
37(No Transcript)
38Other uses Investigation
- Once theyve got a basic understanding, then
they can investigate a whole lot more and a whole
lot quicker if they get a computer to do the
mechanical part of itthey have to be
interpreting what its giving it back to themyou
can get a lot more time for the discussion and
investigating different optionsthe important
part of what we do in teaching is probably based
on their conceptual learning.
39Example
- Powerpoint displayed a concave downward parabola
in the first quadrant, where one of the roots was
at the origin, to demonstrate the area bounded by
the parabola and the x-axis, and how a strip from
it may be revolved around the y-axis. - Java scripts showed in a dynamic way how the
volume is formed. This promoted a three
dimensional view of the process. - Demonstrated an element of the volume (a shell)
taken from the parabola, together with the
equation to demonstrate its volume, and the
step-by-step process of obtaining the expression
for the definite integral.
40Interactive White Boards (IAW)
- Students asked to drag tangent lines, already
created by the teacher, and place them at a point
on the curve y x2 1. - Students were then required to match a triangle
(also prepared in advance by the teacher) with
each of the tangent lines drawn. - Using this triangle, the gradient of the tangent
and hence the gradient of the curve at each point
was calculated. - A table of gradients was produced.
41IAWs
42(No Transcript)
43Another conceptual IAW lesson
- Data collected by students in their Year 12
Mathematics class at Piha beach. Recorded the
height of the water along the beach at high and
low tide. - Students investigated how data could be modelled
by a sine curve of the form y A sin B(x C)
D - Teacher simply dragged the sine curve graph to
demonstrate the change in both amplitude and
period - students marvelled!
44Overview
- Constant gt30 of mathematics teachers never use
computers in teaching - While there are many more computers in schools
and an increased frequency of use, access is
still the major obstacle - Common use is graphical, statistical or
spreadsheet for demonstration or skill
development - Only 20.7 of schools had a technology policy,
and its usually very basic
45The emphasis
- There has been little change over 10 years
- Just 8 of teachers believe computers aid
understanding - 16.8 claim they impede learning or understanding
46Calculators in Mathematics Teaching
47The questions
48(No Transcript)
49Maths department calculators
- 1995 -
- average 22.6 calculators in mathematics
departments - 52 Casio
- 96 of Year 12 (age 17 years) and 97 of Year 13
(age 18 years) students owned their own
calculators - 2005 -
- average 45.7 calculators in mathematics
departments - 68.6 Casio, 14.4 Texas Instruments and 15.4
Sharp - Year 12, 86.4 and Year 13, 87.9 owned their own
calculator
50Calculators may be detrimental to understanding
- 1995 24.8 agreed calculators may be detrimental
- 2005 26.6 thought that they often are
- The number disagreeing dropped significantly from
60.2 to 47.1 (?213.7, plt0.001)
51However
- Little benefit in mathematics teaching a large
majority disagreeing 87.3 in 1995 and 75.6 in
2005 - Implies? It depends how we use them?
52Obstacles to greater use
53Need for more ideas and resources
- 71.1 agree or strongly agree
54Classroom observations 22 teachers
- 2 groups confident and not confident
- strong confidence more likely to have ideas for
using technology to teach mathematics
(Meanstrong4.3, Meanweak3.6) - Both wanted to improve their ability to teach
with technology (Meanstrong4.4, Meanweak4.5)
55GC use
- Teacher levels of instrumentation of the GC are
linked to their confidence - A low level of confidence in GC use in the
classroom is characterised by - an emphasis on passing on to students operational
matters, such as key presses and menu operations,
- an emphasis on procedural calculations, to the
detriment of the mathematical ideas - little or no freedom given to students to explore
with the GC - GC seen as an add-on to the lesson rather than an
integral part
56Key entry
57Key presses
58Advantage of technology use
59- A higher level of instrumentation produces a
higher level of confidence, which in turn frees
the teacher to focus more on other important
aspects, such as the linking of representations
and investigation of concepts - linking of representations such as graphs,
tables, and algebra - encourage students to engage with conceptual
ideas of mathematics through individual and group
exploration of the GC - investigation of mathematical ideas, and the use
of prediction and test methodology - GC has been integrated into the lessons
60Conceptual emphasis in GC use
61Conceptual focus
62PTK practice - comments
- They really understood the concepts and answered
the things in all cases the correct way - Its the amount of visual information they can
generalise for themselves they had a much
better concept - Technology is really important for multiple
representations visual is really important - Understand it a lot better just by being given a
chance to play and make those connections - Trying to make it a bit of fun not learning
necessarily step-by-step processes
63Good practice
- Personal confidence in, and instrumentation of,
the technology - Emphasis on mathematical concepts not key presses
etc - Knowing when and how to use technology
appropriately to reflect on mathematics - Teaching multiple representations of concepts
while developing skills - Engaging and supporting the students
- Ability to shift between technologies
64Funding The Equity Issue
- our students are not rich and so cannot afford
calculators that our more sophisticated than a
basic scientific. I am concerned that there is a
growing gap between the experience of rich and
poor students. State schools are not sufficiently
funded to rectify this problem - This is a decile 3. Its not a high decile
school. A lot of our students will come from even
lower decile areas and theyll pay fees to
come here as well. The parents are committed to
their education and theres a lot of support. But
when you are asking for another 75, thats the
cheapest we could buy, 75 for a graphic
calculator, its just nah, its not gonna happen. - They are now down, the GC is now under 80 so
they are quite attainable. They are less than a
cellphone. I try to encourage the girls to see
them as their next best accessory and they will
probably get the thing in vibrant colours soon
just like the cell phones.
65NCEA
- Teachers in the study were reasonably happy with
the level of emphasis on calculators in NCEA - NCEA has too much emphasis on technology
- 11.7 percent either agreed or strongly agreed
- 44.2 disagreed or strongly disagreed
- 36.9 percent giving a neutral response
- mean agreement score 2.59 out of 5
66(No Transcript)
67NCEA assessment
- it has been a positive thing, in terms of
getting computers and using them because weve
been able to write our own standards and
activities using the basis of what we want to do.
Like we are doing three statistics achievement
standards that are internal, that are suitable
for using computers and doing (NCEA) has
increased our use of technology in terms of
teaching not that boring monotonous low skill
stuff.
68Positive
- NCEA has been really positive for technology in
mathematics because it has enabled us to take the
documentation from looking at the standards and
it says, students will use appropriate technology
and you have a go to the school management, have
a go to the board and look if theyre gonna do
NCEA, they must use appropriate technology, and
schools been really supportive and provided the
money.
69Another view
- We are getting a mixed message from the NCEA
examiners. The standard says appropriate
technology should be used but the Merit and
Excellence questions are often designed to
require algebraic manipulation, so we generally
teach algebraic techniques for solving equations,
knowing that weak girls will depend more on their
calculators than strong ones
70A Strong Contrary View
- NCEA encourages us to teach students to get
answers only (working is not marked) to questions
they do not understand by learning which buttons
to press, on a piece of technology that nobody
outside a classroom uses, and which will be out
of date within 3 years
71Curriculum
- need to re-look at the curriculum
- Maths must be adapted to utilise the technology
- Need less emphasis on skills and a shift to more
conceptual teaching - Gain more time to tackle and think about more
challenging work instead of learning and
practicing methods of calculations
72Overview comments
- I feel technology in lessons is over-rated. I
dont feel learning is significantly enhancedI
feel claims of computer benefits in education are
often over-stated. - Reliance on technology rather than understanding
content. - Sometimes some students rely too heavily on
technology without really understanding basic
concepts and unable to calculate by hand.
73- I think it is still important to be able to
manipulate, learn techniques and apply them. I
would be concerned if we sacrificed too much of
the calculus curriculum by using advanced
calculators and would need to be convinced that
AS/SAM calculators would not do this - GCs encourage kids to take short cuts,
especially in algebra. Real algebra skills are
lacking as a result - As the technology reduces in cost most students
will gain access to it and it will become an
integral part of most maths lessons
74Where to? Teachers
- a great deal of attention needs to be devoted
to educating teachers to teach in a new paradigm
and to rethink their practices. The major
challenge is understanding and helping
teachers. - Manouchehri (1999, p. 44)
- In particular we must consider teacher
confidence, the influence of teacher beliefs and
attitudes re technology, and the need for
appropriate PD -
75A model for PTK development
PD feeds into a number of these areas
76See the TLRI Report for a detailed summary
- Coming soon to
- http//www.tlri.org.nz/publications/