Valuation: Evaluating the Deal Greg Endicott Silicon Forest Forum November 16, 2002 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Valuation: Evaluating the Deal Greg Endicott Silicon Forest Forum November 16, 2002

Description:

'Cheap Stock' Accounting & Compliance. Purposes. Employee Stock Ownership Plans ... These methodologies are based upon numerous assumptions, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:52
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: lindafit
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Valuation: Evaluating the Deal Greg Endicott Silicon Forest Forum November 16, 2002


1
ValuationEvaluating the DealGreg
EndicottSilicon Forest ForumNovember 16, 2002

2
Overview of Presentation
  • Defining Valuation
  • Valuation Methodologies
  • Evaluating the Deal

3
Who Performs Valuations
  • Business appraisers
  • Venture capitalists
  • Investment banks
  • Company executives
  • Analysts
  • Investors
  • Others such as financial intermediaries
    consultants, etc.

Defining Valuation
4
Reasons For Valuation
Legal Disputes
Accounting Compliance Purposes


FAS 141, 142
Divorce
Business Interruption
Option Pricing (FAS 123, etc.)
Shareholder Disputes
Tax Elections (Section 83b, etc.)
Cheap Stock
Employee Stock Ownership Plans
Restructuring
Defining Valuation
5
Definitions of Value
Fair Market Value
InvestmentValue
Intrinsic Value
Defining Valuation
6
What is Being Valued
Levels of Value
Tangible
ControllingInterest
Assets
Intangible
Control Premium
Minority Interest Discount
Common
MarketableMinority Interest
Equity
Preferred
Marketability Discount
Options, Warrants, etc.
Nonmarketable Minority Interest
Other
Defining Valuation
7
What Has Value?
Working Capital
Tangible Assets
Intangible Assets
Defining Valuation
8
Theoretical Valuation Methodologies
Income Approach
Market Approach
Cost Approach
  • These methodologies are based upon numerous
    assumptions,
  • most notably, efficient markets and informed and
    rational investors.

Valuation Methodologies
9
Characteristics of Emerging Companies
  • Short history with new, often innovative products
    / services
  • Steep growth curve and high risk
  • Months / years to first revenue or profit
  • Securing adequate capital critical to success
  • Complex ambiguous capital structures
  • Rules of thumb are typically not available or
    relevant
  • High risk / growth potential complicates the
    valuation process and can cause apparent market
    irrationality

10
Understand Companys Stage of Development
Stage
Early Stage
Mid-Stage
Late Stage
Initial Public Offering
Qualitative Quantitative Analysis Analysis
Valuation Methodologies
11
Applied Valuation Methodologies
Venture Capitalists
Investment Bankers
Potential Acquirers
Business Appraisers
  • Income approach
  • Market approach
  • Cost approach
  • Qualitative analysis at earlier stages with DCF/
    Market approaches typically applied at later
    stages
  • Market Guideline (IPO)
  • Market transaction and income approach (for MA)
  • Income approach almost always
  • Market approach and cost approach less often

12
Qualitative Valuation Metrics (Internal)
  • Management team
  • The story or value proposition
  • Underlying technology and state of development
  • RD pipeline
  • Patents/licenses
  • Strategic alliances
  • Market leadership
  • Sales and earnings capabilities (time to )
  • Sustainable competitive advantages
  • Achievement of milestones

Valuation Methodologies
13
Qualitative Valuation Metrics (External)
  • Size of the market and first mover advantage
  • Competitive environment
  • Product demand
  • Barriers to entry
  • Market mindset (.com, B2C, B2B, P2P, etc.)
  • MA market activity
  • Public market activity (IPO)

Valuation Methodologies
14
Income Approach
  • Capitalization of earnings is not usually
    relevant
  • Discounted cash flow is needed
  • Starting point is business plan projections (must
    be credible)
  • Projections are often optimistic and may require
    a haircut
  • Discount rate is based upon venture capital type
    rates of return and should be consistent with the
    projections
  • Terminal value is critical
  • Often use an exit multiple to estimate terminal
    value

Valuation Methodologies
15
Value and Risk Change Over Time
businessplan prototypes
full-scale operations, initial sales
break even (maybe!)
expansion, new products, new markets
increasing market share
goingpublic
KeyEvents
Valuation Methodologies
16
Market Approach
Transaction method
Guideline method
  • Usually minority value
  • Select appropriate comparables
  • Projected income streams
  • Move up the P/L to find profitability
  • Find IPO for similar company to derive a
    projected value and adjust backwards for risk (at
    VC rates) and time
  • Non-Financial Benchmarks
  • Usually control value
  • Look for prior funding
  • Transaction multiples are hard to find
  • Non-Financial Benchmarks

Valuation Methodologies
17
Cost Approach
  • Not usually relevant for emerging companies
    but might be relevant in the following
    situations
  • Situations where there is not yet significant
    intangible value.
  • Distressed companies
  • Buy vs. build analysis

Valuation Methodologies
18
Applied Valuation Methodologies Acquisition
Analysis
  • DCF
  • Target specific
  • Quantification of synergies
  • Cash vs. stock deal
  • Assets vs. Equity
  • Accounting issues (EPS dilution, IPRD, etc.)
  • Other structuring issues (earn outs, etc.)
  • Transaction environment (pool of buyers, auction,
    etc.)

Valuation Methodologies
19
Investment Bank IPO Valuation Methodology
  • Focus is on market guideline multiples
  • DCF as a reality check
  • Key valuation considerations
  • Overall market conditions
  • Sector definition and position
  • How to value off-line business segments
  • Focus on forward revenue/earnings
  • Industry metrics
  • Historical performance validates projections
    (momentum)
  • Credibility
  • Barriers to entry
  • Size of market
  • Business model/projections assumptions

Valuation Methodologies
20
Common Valuation Errors
  • Ambiguous definition of what is being valued
  • Poor understanding of the underlying business
    model, technology and/or market
  • Internal Inconsistencies
  • Improper use of comparable data (market
    approaches)
  • Application of earnings multiples or rates of
    return to incorrect earnings streams
  • Failure to properly consider the applicability of
    discounts
  • Lack of consideration of appropriate milestones
  • Discount Rate not consistent with level of risk
    in the projections
  • Improper use of non-financial benchmarks

Evaluating the Deal
21
Evaluating the Deal
  • Define what you are valuing and the purpose
  • Consider the current market conditions
  • Strategic vs. Financial Buyers
  • Buyer/seller motivations negotiating position
    what do they think they are buying? What do they
    think has value?
  • Recognize differences in valuation techniques
  • Beware of rules of thumb and non-financial
    metrics
  • Consider premiums/discounts depending on the
    methodology
  • Understand the components of value - do a sanity
    check
  • Consider the terms
  • Arm yourself with good information and present
    your case as convincingly as possible

Evaluating the Deal
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com