Conflict, Power, and Politics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

Conflict, Power, and Politics

Description:

Organizational Politics. The Nature of Conflict. Conflict: ... Work content and goals. Potential to improve performance. Effects of Conflict on Task Performance ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:261
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: busi210
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Conflict, Power, and Politics


1
Chapter 12
  • Conflict, Power, and Politics

2
Chapter Outline
  • The Nature of Conflict
  • Causes of Conflict
  • Conflict Escalation and Outcomes
  • Responses to Conflict
  • Conflict Resolution Techniques
  • Bases of Power
  • Organizational Politics

3
The Nature of Conflict
  • Conflict one party perceives its interests
  • are being negatively affected by another party
  • Dysfunctional conflict
  • Interferes with performance
  • Take time, resources, and emotional energy
  • Functional conflict
  • Beneficial results

4
The Nature of Conflict
5
The Nature of Conflict
  • Relationship Conflict
  • Goals, values, or personalities
  • Negatively affect performance
  • Process Conflict
  • Responsibilities and how work should be completed
  • Negatively affect performance
  • Task Conflict
  • Work content and goals
  • Potential to improve performance

6
Effects of Conflict on Task Performance
Task Conflict
Relationship Conflict
Process Conflict
Task Performance
Degree of Conflict
7
Causes of Conflict
8
Causes of Conflict
  • Structural factors
  • Increased specialization
  • Interdependence among parties
  • Physical layout
  • Centralization versus decentralization

9
Causes of Conflict
  • Communication
  • Too much
  • Too little
  • Cognitive factors
  • Differing expectations
  • Perceptions of the other party

10
Causes of Conflict
  • Individual characteristics
  • Personality
  • Value differences
  • Goals
  • History
  • Past performance
  • Previous interactions

11
Conflict Escalation
  • Conflict escalation is more likely when
  • Cultural differences exist
  • Parties have a history of antagonism
  • Parties have insecure self-images
  • Status differences are uncertain
  • Parties have strong ties to each other
  • Parties do not identify with one another
  • One or both parties has the goal of beating the
    other

12
Conflict Outcomes
High
Win-Lose
Win-Win
Compromise
Satisfaction of self
Lose-Lose
Lose-Win
Low
High
Satisfaction of other
13
Responses to Conflict
High
Competing
Collaborating
Assertiveness
Compromising
Avoiding
Accommodating
Low
High
Cooperativeness
14
Responses to Conflict
  • Collaborating
  • Preferred approach
  • Parties do not have perfectly opposing interests
  • Trust information sharing
  • Avoiding
  • If issue is trivial or time is needed to cool off
  • Increases frustration

15
Responses to Conflict
  • Competing
  • You are correct dispute requires quick solution
  • Other party may take advantage of more
    cooperative strategies
  • Accommodating
  • Other party has more power than you
  • Issue not as important to you
  • May motivate other party to take advantage

16
Responses to Conflict
  • Compromising
  • Both parties have equal power
  • Under time pressures
  • Collaborating is the only style that is purely
    win/win oriented
  • Goal is to learn to apply different conflict
    styles to different situations

17
Conflict Resolution
  • Make a diagnosis
  • Diagnosis best carried out by third party
  • Functional or dysfunctional?
  • Cause of the conflict?
  • Expectations of the parties?

18
Conflict Resolution
  • Select appropriate conflict-management response
  • Determine situational factors
  • Select response that will help resolve the
    conflict
  • Competing, accommodating, avoiding, compromising,
    collaborating?

19
Conflict Resolution
  • Select appropriate conflict-resolution tactics
  • Those that can be used to achieve win-lose or
    lose win
  • Those that can be used to achieve win-win
  • Those that can be used to compromise

20
Conflict Resolution
  • Implement resolution technique
  • Follow up
  • Monitor the solution follow up to ensure that
    the conflict has been resolved

21
Power in Organizations
  • Ability of those who hold it to achieve the
    outcomes they desire
  • Negative connotation
  • Little would be accomplished if not exercised on
    a regular basis

22
Power in Organizations
Sources of Power
  • Legitimate
  • Reward
  • Coercive
  • Expert
  • Referent

Substitutability Centrality Discretion Visibility
23
Bases of Power
  • Position Power
  • Legitimate
  • Reward
  • Coercive
  • Personal Power
  • Expert
  • Referent

Legitimate Reward Coercive
24
Contingencies of Power
  • Power bases generate power under certain
  • conditions contingencies determine the
  • extent to which people can leverage their
  • power
  • Substitutability
  • Centrality
  • Discretion
  • Visibility

25
Power in Organizations
Sources of Power
  • Legitimate
  • Reward
  • Coercive
  • Expert
  • Referent

Substitutability Centrality Discretion Visibility
26
Contingencies of PowerSubstitutability
  • Controlling tasks
  • Legislation preventing outsiders from performing
    tasks
  • Controlling knowledge
  • Restrict enrollment in ed programs
  • Controlling labor
  • Unions controlling availability of labor
  • Differentiation
  • Unique resource

27
Contingencies of PowerCentrality
  • Centrality degree and nature of
  • interdependence
  • Number of people affected
  • Speed others are affected

28
Contingencies of PowerDiscretion
  • Discretion freedom to exercise judgment,
  • make decisions without permission or
  • referring to rules
  • Supervisors often judged not on discretionary
    skills but ability to follow rules
  • Less power

29
Contingencies of PowerVisibility
  • Visibility only when a persons source
  • of power is visible (known to others) will
  • it be meaningful
  • People-oriented jobs
  • Projects requiring frequent interaction with
    senior executives
  • Visible, face time
  • Symbolic cues
  • Mentoring

30
Power in Organizations
Sources of Power
Consequences of Power
Expert
Referent
Legitimate
Reward
Coercive
31
Power in Organizations
  • Soft rather than hard tactics
  • Consider influencers power base
  • Consider relative position of person being
    influenced
  • Higher, lower, or same
  • Consider cultural values
  • Consider employment relationships
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com