Pragmatics and the Intuitions of Law Enforcement Officers - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Pragmatics and the Intuitions of Law Enforcement Officers

Description:

Agreement maxim. Sympathy maxim (see also Brown and Levinson, 1987) Hierarchy of Importance for the Conversational Maxims and the Politeness Principle : ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:89
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: plaz
Learn more at: http://plaza.ufl.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pragmatics and the Intuitions of Law Enforcement Officers


1
Pragmatics and the Intuitions of Law Enforcement
Officers
  • International Pragmatics Association Annual
    Conference, 2005
  • Riva del Garda, Italy

2
Introduction
  • If you are ever arrested in the US, remember
    that what you say may not be as important as how
    you say it.
  • Cho (200111).

3
Theories
  • Co-Operative Principle (Grice, 1975)
  • Relevance Theory (Sperber and Wilson, 1986)
  • Politeness Principle (Brown and Levinson, 1987)
  • Derivational Thinking (M.J. Hardman, 1996)
  • Norm Resistance Theory (Austin Turk, 1966)

4
Co-operative Principle
  •  
  • make your conversational contribution such as
    is required, at the stage at which it occurs, by
    the accepted purpose or direction of the talk
    exchange in which you are engaged.
  • Grice (199978)
  •  

5
Co-operative Maxims
  • Quantity make your contribution as informative
    as is required
  • Quality make your contribution one that is true
  • Relation be relevant
  • Manner be clear, unambiguous, brief, and
    orderly
  • Grice (197545-46)

6
Quality
  • Quality make your contribution one that is true
  • Do not say what you believe to be false
  • Do not say that for which you lack adequate
    evidence

COPS HATE LIARS sic. (Florida Police Officer
Ray Wisher, 199938)
7
Principle of Relevance
  • Principle of relevance
  • Every act of ostensive communication
    communicates the presumption of its own optimal
    relevance.
  • Sperber and Wilson (1986158)

8
Politeness Principle
  • Leechs (1983) maxims
  • Tact maxim
  • Generosity maxim
  • Approbation maxim
  • Modesty maxim
  • Agreement maxim
  • Sympathy maxim
  • (see also Brown and Levinson, 1987)

9
Hierarchy of Importance for the Conversational
Maxims and the Politeness Principle
  • 1) quality
  • 2) politeness
  • 3) relevance
  • 4) manner
  • 5) quantity

10
Derivational Thinking (DT)
  • Linguistic Postulates
  • number (use of singular/plural structures)
  • sex-based gender (with the masculine form as the
    root and the feminine derived from the masculine)
  • ranking comparative/absolute (e.g. better, best)
  • e.g. Hardman (1996)

11
Norm Resistance Theory
  • law is a consensus-coercion balance maintained
    by the authorities
  • Turk (1966607)

12
Variants of Authority-subject Values
  • Subjects and authorities both act congruently
    with their cultural norms
  • Little/no agreement between the verbal and
    behaviour of authorities and subjects and the
    cultural norms they hold
  • Congruence is present for the authorities with
    regard to adhering to their cultural norms, but
    incongruence exists for the subjects
  • Incongruence between official norms and
    behaviour among the authorities will reduce the
    chance of overt conflict because it deserves
    discretion, (Turk, 1966, p. 608)

13
Organization and Sophistication
  • Organization
  • Levels of support for actions within a group, and
    how far this is integrated into the group
    dynamics.
  • Turk assumes police have complex organization,
    whereas subject organization may vary according
    to their social circle.
  • Sophistication
  • Knowledge of others, which may be used to
    manipulate them.
  • Turk again assumes that authorities have high
    levels of sophistication, whereas the levels of
    subjects may vary.

14
Other Pragmatic Theories
  • Conversation Analysis (CA)
  • For example, Schegloff, Jefferson, and Sacks
    (1977)
  • See Heydon, 2005 for an example of CA used within
    a law enforcement setting

15
The Future
  • Aims
  • Prevent physical/verbal conflict caused by
    communicative frustration
  • Training law enforcement officers
  • Create a few simple, user-friendly categories
    that front line officers can access and utilise
    without effort

16
The End
  • Thank you
  • for listening!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com