Dr Paul Miller Interoperability Focus

1
Delivering Heritage to the People a UK
perspective
Dr Paul MillerInteroperability
Focus p.miller_at_ukoln.ac.uk www.ukoln.ac.uk/
2
See www.fourmilab.ch/earthview/
3
What is Nordic Heritage ?
4
?
5
Nordic Heritage is

• Physical
• Tangible
• Enriching
• Inclusive
• National
• For us
• Finite
• Valuable

• Digital
• Ephemeral
• Uncomfortable
• Divisive
• International
• For our children
• Ever-expanding
• Expensive

6
Nordic Heritage is
Where we come from
Where we are
An indication of where we are going ?
7
Valuing Culture?

• Cultural memory, which is documented in the
  collections of museums, libraries and archives
  throughout the world, is a vital part of the
  human endeavour. It represents the knowledge
  accumulated through the generations, and enables
  humanity to build on the achievements of those
  who have gone before us. Cultural memory
• Benefits individuals, by promoting a sense of
  identity through shared cultural values and by
  supporting the quest for lifelong learning
• Benefits communities, by promoting economic
  prosperity and fostering the understanding that
  leads to a civil and just society and
• Benefits humanity as a whole, by promoting the
  values we share as global citizens and by
  increasing our capacity to connect with one
  another to meet universal challenges.
• Museums, libraries and archivesoften called
  memory institutionsare trusted organizations
  that collectively document the entire range of
  human experience and expression. Memory
  institutions are engaged in the important work
  of
• Capturing, authenticating, and making sense of
  cultural memory
• Preserving the human record for future
  generations and
• Sharing knowledge to support education and
  learning.

See www.ukoln.ac.uk/interop-focus/ccs/positions/
8
Trustees of the Heritage
9
Memory Institutions

• Museums Galleries, Libraries, Archives
• Hold the memory of the Nation in trust
• Actively interpret
• (Usually) under sell themselves
• Possibly perpetuate organisational structures
  irrelevant to the user
• Offer a human side of Government ?

10
Some facts

• In the UK, more people visit museums than go to
  theme parks and pop concerts
• Visiting libraries is more popular than going to
  the cinema
• There are over 4,000 public library branches in
  the UK
• The vast majority will be connected to the
  Peoples Network by 2003
• 70 already are.

11
Moving Online
12
Culture Online

• Placed online, large parts of our Culture can
  become
• available to the Nation/Continent/World, 24/7
• accessible
• democratised, and available equally to the
  inhabitants of Reykjavik, and of a small village
  on the Outer Hebrides
• a powerful advert for Europe
• comparable to similar resources from elsewhere
• viable as enablers and facilitators of Learning,
  both formal and lifelong.

13
Some assumptions

• Having access to digital surrogates of cultural
  heritage material is useful and desirable
• The public sector has a role to play in this,
  beyond simply granting digitisation rights to
  Microsoft
• Availability of regional/national/international
  corpora of material is more useful to the user
  than hundreds or thousands of individual sites
• Metadata is key to making the vision reality.

14
What is Metadata?
15
What is Metadata?

• meaningless jargon
• ora fashionable, and terribly misused, term for
  what weve always done
• ora means of turning data into information
• anddata about data
• andthe name of a person (Leif Eriksson)
• andthe title of a book (Njals Saga).

16
What is Metadata?

• Metadata may be applied to almost anything
• People
• Places
• Objects
• Concepts
• Web pages
• Databases.

17
What is Metadata?

• Resource Discovery Metadata fulfils three main
  functions
• Description of resource content
• What is it?
• Description of resource form
• How is it constructed?
• Description of resource use
• Can I afford it?.

18
Metadata is

• Cataloguing made cool
• But still a bit geeky?
• An important driver for the information economy ?
• A panacea in the battle against information
  overload ?
• Potentially useful as an affordable and
  costeffective means of unlocking a wealth of
  resources ?.

19
Some assumptions

• Having access to digital surrogates of cultural
  heritage material is useful and desirable
• The public sector has a role to play in this,
  beyond simply granting digitisation rights to
  Microsoft
• Availability of regional/national/international
  corpora of material is more useful to the user
  than hundreds or thousands of individual sites
• Metadata is key to making the vision reality.

20
Some more assumptions

• Distribution is better than centralisation
• Portals are good
• Thick portals are better
• A single portal is bad
• Shared middleware services play a key role
• The problem is bigger than the UK or Europe.

21
Internationalisation
22
Level 7

• An activity in need of a name!
• Organised with support from CIMI and Resource
• Recognised growing synergies between content
  creation activities globally
• Gathered funders and programme managers in London
• Reported in issue 5 of Cultivate Interactive.

See www.cultivate-int.org/issue5/
23
The Cultural Content Forum !

• Met in Washington in March
• around 40 representatives from Europe, Canada,
  USA, Australia, New Zealand and Taiwan
• Clear interest in a user focus
• new work item to gather and explore existing
  user evaluation work, in order to develop a
  better picture of what users want
• Reported in issue 7 of Cultivate Interactive.

See www.cultivate-int.org/issue7/washington/
24
Standardisation
25
Common Standards

• Commonality of approach enables interoperability,
  and facilitates access.
• Good standardisation is a foundation for good
  service, not a straitjacket to innovation
• Increasing moves towards common standards and
  guidelines
• NOF-digi
• JISC
• Canadian Cultural Content Initiative
• e-GIF
• RLG Cultural Materials Initiative
• NINCH G2GP
• etc.

26
Common Standards

• Work underway to standardise/harmonise
• Resource capture/creation
• Resource description
• Resource discovery
• Resource use
• Resource reuse
• Resource preservation
• etc
• Best/Good Practice and Community Building as
  important if not more

27
Metadata for Education

• Metadata for Education Group (MEG)
• open forum for debating the description and
  provision of educational resources at all
  educational levels across the United Kingdom
• Founded upon a set of fundamental principles
  enshrined in the MEG Concord
• intends to establish itself as an authority in
  the application of descriptive metadata to
  predominantly UK educational resources
• seeks to become the first point of call for
  policy questions.

See www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/education/
28
The MEG Concord
29
The MEG Concord

See www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/education/documents/
concord.html
30
Discovering Content
31
The current picture
Content (local and remote)

• Many different services
• Each has own user interface
• Each has a learning curve

End-user
Slide by Andy Powell of UKOLN
32
Towards an Architecture

• Need for contextualisation
• What are people doing
• And what are the best technologies to help them?
• How can we move towards the appearance of
  seamless service?
• No one-fit solution.

See www.dner.ac.uk/arch/
33
Towards an architecture

• Search
• Z39.50 and the Bath Profile
• Harvest
• OAI
• Alert
• RSS
• Shared Middleware Services
• Authenticate, Authorise, Collection Description,
  User Preference, Institutional Preference

Dublin Core
See www.dner.ac.uk/arch/
34
JISCs Information Environment
Content providers
Provisionlayer
Shared services
Authentication
Fusionlayer
Authorisation
Broker/Aggregator
Broker/Aggregator
Collectn Desc
Service Desc
Portal
Portal
Portal
Presentationlayer
Resolver
Instn Profile
End-user
Slide by Andy Powell of UKOLN
35
Architectural summary
provision
content
shared services
brokers and aggregators
m2m
fusion
infrastructure
publishing tools
portals
registries terminology indexing resolution authent
ication authorisation citation linking
presentation
Slide by Andy Powell of UKOLN
36
Building the IE

• Construction of various Portals in the
  Presentation Layer
• JISC Portal ?
• Data Centre Portals (EDINA, MIMAS)
• Subject Portals (the RDN, ADS, etc.)
• Data Type Portals (images, movies, sound)
• Institutional Portals
• Personal Portals (Pauls web!)
• Also providing other access to discrete resources.

See www.jisc.ac.uk/dner/
37
National or Local?

• JISC building various national services,
  including portals
• Institutions also building portals,
  Managed/Virtual Learning Environments, myLibrary
  services, etc.
• Where do we see the role for all?
• need to escape from e-, and reach u-.

38
See www.rdn.ac.uk/
39
See digital.hull.ac.uk/
40
See www.cultureonline.gov.uk/
41
Culture Online

• Announced September 2000
• Culture Onlines remit would be to use digital
  technologies to widen access to the resources of
  the arts and cultural sector, for the purposes of
  learning and enjoyment both at school and
  throughout life.
• Building directly upon NOF, and the lessons it
  teaches
• Call closes today for initial expressions of
  interest.

See www.cultureonline.gov.uk/
42
See www.curriculumonline.gov.uk/
43
Curriculum Online

• The vision for Curriculum Online is to give
  teachers easy online access to a wide range of
  digital learning materials, which they can use to
  support their teaching across the curriculum.
  These materials will form a consistent, coherent
  and comprehensive educational service for
  teachers and pupils.
• 50,000,000 investment in content and services
  for first year
• Schools have learning credits, to purchase
  content
• Portal launches in September.

See www.curriculumonline.gov.uk/
44
Networks for Cultural Content
45
See www.rcahms.gov.uk/
46
See ads.ahds.ac.uk/catalogue/
47
See www.scran.ac.uk/
48
See ads.ahds.ac.uk/heirport/
49
Reaching the Citizen
50
Government

• to make the UK the best environment in the world
  for e-commerce by 2002
• to ensure that everyone who wants it has access
  to the internet by 2005
• to make all government services available
  electronically by 2005
• Focus upon services
• Focus upon the citizen
• Focus upon the Joined Up approach
• Recognition of multichannel architecture
• ?

See www.e-envoy.gov.uk/publications/int_comparison
s.htm
51
From Project Plan for the Development of
e-commerce and e-government 2000-2002
52
Focus on services

• Deliver services to the citizen
• Services rather than resources
• transactional web sites
• Not just about finding documents on a web site
• Change of address service
• https//www.addressingthechange.com
• www.ihavemoved.com/
• www.simplymove.co.uk/.

See www.gateway.gov.uk/
53
Focus on the Citizen

• Move away from the silo mentality
• Citizens need/want access to information/services
  /resources
• These exist in different parts of local and
  national government, organised according to
  internal needs or procedures, and packaged
  according to particular house styles and
  conventions
• None of which helps the citizen who just wants a
  new wheely bin (a.k.a Garbage can/ trash
  can/ dumpster ?)

See www.ukonline.gov.uk/
54
(No Transcript)
55
Recognise a multichannel future

• The web is not the only game in town
• Mobile phones/ WAP/ 3G
• PDAs
• Digital TV
• Telephone call centres
• One stop shop dropin centres
• High street information kiosks
• The Post Office
• Banks
• Traditional access mechanisms
• So create content once for largely automated
  repackaging and repurposing
• XML Schema/ XSL, etc .

56
The eGIF

• eGovernment Interoperability Framework
• Technical standards and policies at the heart of
  eGovernment
• Conformance is mandatory across the Public Sector
• Adoption of Internet and Web standards across
  government
• XML/XSL, plus governmentspecific schemas
• Change of Address service, for example, utilises
  XML Schemas to pass details between participants.

See www.govtalk.gov.uk/
57
The eGIF

• eGovernment Interoperability Framework
• Version 4 released in April
• Incorporates Metadata Framework (Dublin Core),
  the UK Government Metadata Element Set, and the
  Government Category List
• Under consideration for EC/ EU use.

See www.govtalk.gov.uk/
58
Generalising a model
59
A premise

• We want to provide useful services toour users.
• These should be
• Usable
• Functional
• Fit-for-purpose
• yet cool and attractive
• Sustainable
• Interoperable
• And could be
• Informational
• Transactional
• Technical standards are the dull but necessary
  reality for making this happen.

60
In search of solutions

• A common approach
• Mandated as a condition of grant?
• nofdigi technical standards and guidelines
• Although evidence of voluntary adoption
• DNER Learning Teaching Programme technical
  guidelines
• Canadian Digital Cultural Content Initiative
  technical guidelines
• eGIF
• An open approach
• Avoidance of proprietary solutions
• Based on emerging or established standards
• XML based. Mappable to Dublin Core.

61
In search of solutions

• A consensusbased approach
• Need community adoption and understanding
• Data creators and providers need a sense of
  ownership
• An evolutionary approach
• Channels
• New standards
• New user requirements
• Remember preservation.

62
An architecture

• Integrated information environment is complex
• An overarching architecture helps to place
  individual features in context
• searching
• harvesting
• alerting
• Shared middleware
• Common identifiers, etc.

See www.dner.ac.uk/architecture/
63
Part of a model

• Placing detailed descriptions of all cultural
  artefacts online infeasible?
• Expensive
• A big job!
• Leads to information overload
• Collection Level Description a way forward
• Pointers into collections
• Easier to harmonise across domains
• Achievable.

See www.ukoln.ac.uk/cd-focus/
64
The Big Issue(s)

• Language
• Whether technical or vernacular
• Terminological control
• Shared subject terms
• Certification/ Authenticity
• How do I know its an authoritative description
  of the Mona Lisa ?
• Infrastructure
• How to enable crosssearch?
• Meeting the requirements of new users
• Largely let down by our current offerings.

See www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue29/miller/
65
Conclusions
66
Conclusions

• The Heritage matters
• a digitised Heritage may be exploited in new
  ways, by new and old markets
• Effective exploitation requires
• Cooperation, collaboration, and consensus
  building
• shared vision
• new ways of working
• institutional and organisational change
• is library a meaningful concept to the learner?
• is museum?
• an interoperable technical base
• We need to be responsive to the needs of our
  users
• cultural tourist, student, lifelong learner,
  professional .

67
Delivering Heritage to the People a UK
perspective
Dr Paul MillerInteroperability
Focus p.miller_at_ukoln.ac.uk www.ukoln.ac.uk/