DIFFERENTIAL EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

DIFFERENTIAL EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE

Description:

All students who reach a state defined threshold level of ... Cosmetology. 47.23. 56.17. 1.01E-8 .68. Early Childhood Care and Education. 61.82. 57.35 ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:132
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 49
Provided by: brend166
Learn more at: https://nactei.org
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DIFFERENTIAL EXPECTATIONS OF STUDENT PERFORMANCE


1
DIFFERENTIAL EXPECTATIONS OFSTUDENT PERFORMANCE
  • NACTEI Conference 2008
  • Boise, Idaho
  • Dr. Paul Munyofu

2
Past and Present Requirement
  • All students who reach a state defined threshold
    level of vocational education will master the
    knowledge and skills that meet state established
    industry standards
  • Perkins III and IV (2S1)

3
Measurement
  • Numerator Number of career and technical
    education concentrators who perform at or above
    the Competent level on PDE approved occupational
    tests in the reporting year.
  • Denominator Number of career and technical
    education concentrators who complete the PDE
    approved occupational tests in the reporting year.

4
Related Requirement
  • All students who reach a state-defined level of
    education will attain a proficiency credential in
    conjunction with a secondary school diploma or
    its state equivalent
  • Perkins III (2S2), Perkins IV (3S1)

5
Measurement
  • Numerator Number of CTE concentrators who earned
    a regular secondary school diploma, or earned a
    proficiency credential, certificate, or degree,
    in conjunction with a secondary school diploma
    during the reporting year.
  • Denominator Number of CTE concentrators who left
    secondary education during the reporting year

6
PA Credential Measurement
  • Numerator Number of career and technical
    education students who achieve competency levels
    at or above the Advanced (PSC) on approved
    Job-Ready End-of-Program tests.
  • Denominator Number of career and technical
    education students who complete the approved
    Job-Ready End-of-Program tests.

7
Job-Ready Tests
  • Occupational Assessments
  • Industry Aligned
  • End of Program
  • Specific to CIP
  • Both Written and Performance
  • NOT to be confused with
  • Workplace Readiness (NOCTI)
  • Work Keys (ACT)

8
Assessments Utilized
  • NOCTI, ACF, AWS, ICE, AYES
  • NIMS, ASE, NATEF, CompTIA
  • State Licensures (COS, LPN, NA)

9
State Standard Setting
  • Levels of Performance
  • Advanced
  • Competent
  • Basic
  • Below Basic

10
Advanced, Competent
  • Advanced Level This level reflects mastery of
    competence and understanding of academic/career
    and technical skills and knowledge required for
    advanced placement in employment and/or
    postsecondary education.
  • Competent Level This level reflects a solid
    acquisition of academic/career and technical
    skills and knowledge required to enter employment
    and/or postsecondary education

11
Basic
  • Basic Level This level reflects an adequate
    attainment of academic/career and technical
    skills and knowledge required to enter employment
    or postsecondary education. Students with this
    score would function at an entry level, but
    would require some assistance on the job.

12
Below Basic
  • Below Basic Level This level reflects a
    partial acquisition of skills and knowledge
    needed to perform a given assignment, task or
    operation on the job. Additional instruction
    and/or assistance are necessary in order for the
    student to successfully complete specific
    assignments. Students with this score did not
    acquire the minimum skills required for the
    occupation.

13
The Nedelsky Model
  • Present a Multiple-Choice Question to a Subject
    Matter Expert.
  • In the mind of a new-hire who is Competent for
    employment
  • HOW MANY OF THE k ITEM CHOICES CAN THIS
    INDIVIDUAL ELIMINATE BEFORE RESORTING TO GUESSING
    FROM THE (k j) REMAINING CHOICES?

14
Probabilities from 4 Choices

Number Eliminated (j) Probability Expected
0 0.25
1 0.33
2 0.50
3 1.00
15
Probabilities from 5 Choices
Number Eliminated (j) Probability Expected
0 0.20
1 0.25
2 0.33
3 0.50
4 1.00
16
Training and Practice
  • Pennsylvania Drivers Examination
  • Practice Test

17
Practice
  • 1. What kind of crash is most likely to cause
    injury?
  • a. red light running
  • b. left-turn crashes
  • c. rear-ending a stopped or stopping vehicle
  • d. running off the road

18
Practice
  • 2. When driving on slick roads, you should
  • a. take turns more slowly
  • b. accelerate quickly
  • c. brake hard
  • d. change lanes quickly

19
Practice
  • 3. Hydroplaning is usually caused by
  • a. excessive speed
  • b. sudden turns
  • c. sudden stops
  • d. excessive stops

20
Practice
  • 4. What is the greatest danger factor for teen
    drivers?
  • a. lack of skill
  • b. risk taking
  • c. ignorance
  • d. alcohol and drugs

21
Practice
  • 5. What is the leading public health problem for
    young people aged 13 to 19?
  • a. AIDS
  • b. motor vehicle crashes
  • c. gun violence
  • d. cancer

22
Practice
  • 6. Allowing a space cushion is important because
    it
  • a. keeps other drivers alert
  • b. prevents distractions from other vehicles
  • c. keeps traffic flowing at a safe pace
  • d. allows you time to react to situation

23
Practice
  • Correct Answers
  • 1. c
  • 2. a
  • 3. a
  • 4. d
  • 5. b
  • 6. d

24
Results
  • Judgments from two tests
  • Precision Machining
  • Early Childhood Care

25

26
Item J 2(Ind.) J 3(Ind.) J 7(Ind.)
1 1.00 1.00 1.00
2 1.00 1.00 0.50
3 1.00 1.00 0.50
4 1.00 1.00 1.00
5 1.00 0.50 0.33
6 1.00 0.25 0.33

27
J 1(Instr.) J 4(Instr.) J 15 (Instr.) MeanInd. MeanInstr.
0.33 1.00 1.00 1.0000 0.6550
0.50 0.50 0.33 . 0.8750 0.6038
1.00 0.33 0.50 . 0.8750 0.5613
1.00 1.00 0.50 . 1.0000 0.7288
1.00 0.50 1.00 . 0.7075 0.6038
0.33 0.33 0.33 . 0.5200 0.3938

28
27 0.50 0.50 0.25
28 1.00 0.25 0.25
29 1.00 0.50 0.50
30 0.25 0.25 1.00
31 0.25 0.25 0.25
. . . .
171 1.00 0.50 0.50
Total 153.33 111.97 110.49
Mean 0.90 0.65 0.65
29

0.50 1.00 0.50 . 0.5625 0.5413
0.25 1.00 1.00 . 0.6250 0.5313
1.00 1.00 0.50 . 0.7500 0.6663
0.25 0.33 0.50 . 0.6250 0.3850
0.25 0.25 0.25 . 0.2700 0.2813
. . . . . .
0.33 0.33 0.33 . 0.7500 0.4775
91.04 107.35 80.51 . 130.10 97.19
0.53 0.63 0.47 . 76.08 56.84
30
(No Transcript)
31
Test Item J 1 (Ind.) J 3 (Ind.) J 9 (Ind.)
1 1.00 0.33 1.00
2 0.33 0.33 0.25
3 0.50 0.33 1.00
4 1.00 0.33 1.00
5 1.00 1.00 0.25
6 0.33 0.33 0.33

32
J 2 (Instr.) J 12 (Instr.) J 14 (Instr.) Mean (Ind.) Mean Instr.
. 0.50 1.00 0.50 . 0.8225 0.6667
. 0.33 0.50 0.25 . 0.3413 0.3733
. 1.00 1.00 0.33 . 0.6450 0.8050
. 0.50 1.00 0.25 . 0.9163 0.7917
. 1.00 0.50 0.33 . 0.7813 0.6100
. 0.33 0.33 0.33 . 0.3300 0.3583

33
27 0.33 0.33 0.33
28 0.33 0.33 0.50
29 1.00 1.00 0.25
30 0.50 0.50 1.00
31 1.00 0.33 1.00
. . . .
193 0.50 0.33 0.50
Total 109.08 90.53 149.28
Mean 0.57 0.47 0.77
34

1.00 0.50 0.33 . 0.4150 0.5267
0.25 0.50 0.33 . 0.3950 0.3733
1.00 0.25 0.25 . 0.8125 0.5417
0.50 0.33 0.25 . 0.5625 0.3600
1.00 0.50 0.33 . 0.7913 0.7217
. . . . . .
0.33 0.50 0.33 . 0.3738 0.3583
115.20 140.75 78.66 . 119.30 110.68
0.60 0.73 0.41 . 61.82 57.35
35
Results
  • Judgments from 17 tests
  • Industry Mean
  • Instructor Mean
  • Two-tail Significance
  • Correlation Coefficient

36
Table 3. Comparative Data on Mean Cut Scores for
Selected NOCTI Written Tests
Test Title Industry Mean Instructor Mean Significance Correlation
Advertising and Design 60.99 57.07 0.56 .66
Automotive Technician 52.52 49.52 .06 1.00
Building Construction Occupations 73.60 54.69 6.01E-27 .42
Business Information Processing 69.17 61.32 2.60E-8 .56
Carpentry 51.90 51.81 .94 .47
Commercial Foods 86.47 63.17 6.01E-27 .42
Computer Technology 51.44 51.91 .96 1.00
Cosmetology 47.23 56.17 1.01E-8 .68
Early Childhood Care and Education 61.82 57.35 3.46E-6 .70
Electrical Occupations 61.12 50.05 1.83E-23 .69
Food Production 76.62 71.37 1.98E-5 .16
Graphic Communications 62.68 62.14 .80 .31
Nurse Assisting 67.63 65.85 .24 .68
Precision Machining 76.08 56.84 1.26E-33 .54
Production Agriculture 64.75 48.99 4.7E-26 .57
Retail Trades 73.63 72.24 .28 .57
Welding 54.56 64.39 4.82E-12 .34

37
Results
  • Instructors, generally, tended to set a lower
    predicted cut score than their industry
    counterparts.
  •  
  • Many instructors said they were influenced by
    their own students.
  •  
  • Claim CTE was a dumping ground for students who
    were characteristically educationally-challenged
  •  

38
Results
  • Response
  • Under Perkins, all students who finish an
    approved career and technical education program
    are expected to be ready for college and work.

39
Results
  • Claim
  • NOCTI tests were outdated, showing little
    relevance to the present status of industry.
  •  

40
Results
  • Response
  • 2 3 year Revision Cycle on all tests
  • National subject matter experts involved in test
    development
  • All aligned to national industry standards.

41
Results
  •  
  • Claim
  • NOCTI assessments are relatively unknown.

42
Results
  • Response Not any more!
  • A vast array of services that the organization
    provided to their clients. The data contains
    individual, class, school, state and national
    information that can be used to evaluate and
    improve career and technical education programs.

43
Results
  • Claim
  • Some schools have a large percentage of special
    needs students enrolled in CTE.

44
Results
  • Response
  • Perkins IV has stressed the importance of wedding
    career and technical education with rigorous
    academics. It is the expectation that all
    students who complete career and technical
    education programs be prepared for postsecondary
    education and work.

45
Results
  • NOCTI also provides assessments for experienced
    workers and for potential teachers.
  • Missing is a postsecondary component.
  •  
  • Recommended that NOCTI develop tests that fill
    the gap and attain the Perkins gold standard.

46
Implications
  • Standard-setting is applicable anywhere there is
    an valid assessment.
  • Criteria for establishing levels of performance
    have to be clearly related to the graduates
    ability to work in their chosen industry.

47
Recommendations
  • Create or increase local Industry Partnerships
    for curriculum development, program evaluation,
    other assistive services.
  •  
  • Initiate an articulation of national performance
    levels, with corresponding cut scores that have
    the same meaning.

48
Contacts
  • Dr. Paul Munyofu
  • 717-783-6623
  • pmunyofu_at_state.pa.us
  • www.pde.state.pa.us/bcte/perkins
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com