Manuscript review guidelines | Manuscript peer reviewer | Address Reviewer Comments (1)

1
GUIDELINES FOR ADDRESSING TO REVIEWERS COMMENTS
An Academic presentation by Dr. Nancy Agnes,
Head, Technical Operations, Pubrica Group
www.pubrica.com Email sales_at_pubrica.com
2

• Peer review is crucial for publishing scientific
  papers in high-impact journals, ensuring quality,
  originality, and accuracy.
• After manuscript peer review, authors may revise
  the manuscript based on editors' and reviewers'
  comments, which can significantly improve the
  manuscript.
• These comments are vital for communication
  between authors and reviewers.
• Most journals invite at least two to three
  reviewers, and sometimes up to six, but the more
  reviewers invited, the higher the likelihood of
  receiving harsh, conflicting comments on the
  manuscript.

3
Introduction

• Even though journals approve the majority of
  updated submissions, it is common to receive
  rejection after the first, second, or even third
  round of editing.
• To reduce the possibility of this
  "mistake"-rejection following revision, the
  writers should endeavour to answer the remarks as
  thoroughly as possible.

To know more about Response to reviewer services,
check our study guide. How do you respond to the
reviewers of your manuscript?
What are the rules for peer reviewers?

• Addressing reviewers' comments professionally and
  constructively is essential to improving the
  quality of your work and demonstrating your
  commitment to rigorous research.
• Here are some guidelines to effectively address
  reviewers' comments

Contd...
4

• Read Carefully

• Acknowledge and Thank you

• Begin your Response by expressing gratitude for
  the reviewers' time and effort in reviewing your
  work.
• This sets a positive tone for the interaction.

• Thoroughly understand each comment and suggestion
  made by the reviewers.
• This shows that you respect their feedback and
  are committed to improving your work.

• Provide Evidence

• Maintain Professionalism

• Keep your tone respectful and professional
  throughout your Response.
• Avoid defensive or confrontational language, even
  if you disagree with a comment.

• When explaining why you made certain choices or
  decisions, offer evidence from your work or
  existing literature to support your stance.

Contd...
5
(No Transcript)
6

• Suggest Alternative Solutions

• If you disagree with a comment, explain your
  reasoning respectfully.
• You can also offer alternative solutions that
  address the concern raised by the reviewer.

• Highlight Changes

• Clearly outline your changes in Response to the
  reviewers' comments.
• This makes it easier for the reviewers to see
  your revisions and demonstrates your commitment
  to improving your work.

Contd...
7
Contd...
8

• Provide a Summary

• At the end of your Response, summarise the key
  changes you've made based on the reviewers'
  feedback.
• This gives the reviewers an overview of your
  efforts to address their concerns.

• Timely Response

• Address the reviewers' comments within the
  timeframe specified by the journal or conference.
  
• This demonstrates your commitment and
  professionalism.

Contd...
9

• Remember that the goal is to improve the quality
  of your work and contribute positively to the
  scholarly community.
• Responding to reviewers' comments thoughtfully
  and respectfully enhances your chances of having
  your work accepted for publication.

The key to success is persistence

• Editors and reviewers rely on each other's
  expertise for final decisions, so following their
  suggestions is crucial.
• Authors may find obtaining manuscript acceptance
  after revision tedious, but focusing on improving
  the manuscript and receiving positive feedback is
  essential.
• Acceptance in the same or other journals
  signifies the effort paid off, so persevere and
  don't give up.
• The manuscript will likely find a suitable
  publication home. Good luck to those revising or
  planning to revise.
• Check out our sample Response to reviewer
  examples to see how the Response to the reviewer
  sampleis structured.

10
ABOUT PUBRICA

• Pubrica adheres to the highest standards and
  regulations of journal publishing ethics in all
  phases of services and operations.
• Pubrica follows the International Council of
  Medical Journal Editors' (ICJME) authorship
  rules, and the scope of services will be
  continuously updated in accordance with the
  Committee of Publication Ethics (COPE) and
  International Society of Medical Publication
  Professionals (ISMPP) principles.

11
Contact Us
UNITED KINGDOM
44 1618186353
INDIA
91-9884350006
EMAIL
sales_at_pubrica.com