Some key differences between investment casting & sand casting - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Some key differences between investment casting & sand casting

Description:

Some key differences between investment casting & sand castingBoth investment casting and sand casting have their advantages and limitations, and the pick between the two methods depends on factors such as role complexity, production volume, surface finish needs, and budget constraints. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:0
Date added: 22 April 2024
Slides: 8
Provided by: MIPLCast
Category: Other
Tags:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Some key differences between investment casting & sand casting


1
Investment Casting vs. Sand Casting Choosing the
Right Method
2
  • Investment casting and sand casting are two
    popular methods used for casting metal parts.
    Sand casting and investment casting are often
    considered to be two of the most common casting
    techniques used in the industry. The process of
    selecting the appropriate approach for your
    project may be a challenging task yet, it is
    essential to guarantee that you get the greatest
    outcomes that are achievable.
  • In contrast to sand casting, which is chosen
    because to its cheaper cost and capacity to
    handle bigger parts, investment castings India is
    renowned for its high level of precision and
    detailed details.

3
Here Are Some Key Differences Between Investment
Casting and Sand Casting
  • 1. Process
  • Also known as lost-wax casting, investment
    casting involves creating a wax pattern of the
    part to be cast. The wax pattern is latercovered
    with anearthenware shell that toughens to make a
    mold. The wax is melted out of the mold, leaving
    a cavity that is then filled with molten metal.
  • At the beginning of the sand casting process, a
    pattern of the component is crafted out of wood,
    metal, or other materials. After the design has
    been removed, it is positioned in sand, and then
    molten metal is poured into the void that was
    made by cutting away the pattern.
  • 2. Surface Finish and Tolerance
  • In comparison to sand casting, investment casting
    often results in the production of components
    that have a superior surface polish and
    tolerances that are more precise. The ceramic
    shell that is utilized in investment casting is
    able to capture finer features of the component,
    which is why this attribute is present.
  • Because of the nature of the sand mold, sand
    casting often results in surface finishes that
    are more aggressive and tolerances that are more
    relaxed.

4
  • 3. Complexity
  • Investment casting is well-suited for casting
    complex parts with intricate geometries, thin
    walls, and fine details. It allows for the
    production of parts with intricate shapes that
    may be difficult or impossible to achieve using
    other casting methods.
  • Sand casting is better suited for simpler and
    larger parts with less intricate details. It may
    not be as suitable for complex parts as
    investment casting.
  • 4. Production Volume
  • Investment casting is often used for low to
    medium production volumes. It can be
    cost-effective for producing smaller quantities
    of parts due to the tooling and setup costs
    involved.
  • Sand casting is more commonly used for larger
    production volumes, especially for larger parts.
    It can be a cost-effective option for high-volume
    production runs.

5
  • 5. Cost
  • Investment casting tends to be more expensive
    than sand casting, especially for low-volume
    production, due to the additional steps involved
    in creating the wax patterns and ceramic shells.
  • Sand casting is generally considered a more
    cost-effective option for larger production runs,
    especially for simpler parts, as it requires less
    complex tooling and setup.
  • Furthermore, sand casting may be a
    labor-intensive procedure that calls for trained
    individuals to make and maintain the molds. Both
    of these tasks are necessary. The procedure also
    results in the generation of a substantial
    quantity of trash in the form of spent sand,
    which has to be disposed of in an appropriate
    manner.
  • The conclusion is that while sand casting is
    advantageous in terms of cost-effectiveness and
    variety when it comes to casting metal
    components, it also presents a number of
    obstacles, including rough surface finishes and
    procedures that need a lot of manual effort. It
    is vital to give careful thought to these
    advantages and disadvantages when selecting the
    casting procedure that is appropriate for the
    needs of your particular project.

6
Bottom Line
  • Investment castings India are known for their
    accuracy and superiority. With a capable
    workforce and unconventional technology, Indian
    foundries outshine in creating intricate and
    high-quality cast components for various
    industries. Both investment casting and sand
    casting have their own advantages and
    limitations, and the choice between the two
    methods depends on factors such as part
    complexity, production volume, surface finish
    requirements, and budget constraints.

7
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com