Regional Crash Analysis Utilizing GIS to Improve Regional Crash Analyses And Data Visualization - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Regional Crash Analysis Utilizing GIS to Improve Regional Crash Analyses And Data Visualization

Description:

Regional Crash Analysis Utilizing GIS to Improve Regional Crash Analyses And Data Visualization – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:95
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: mbal5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Regional Crash Analysis Utilizing GIS to Improve Regional Crash Analyses And Data Visualization


1
Regional Crash Analysis Utilizing GIS to
Improve Regional Crash Analyses And Data
Visualization
  • Melissa Baldwin
  • Transportation Planner
  • Area Plan Commission of Tippecanoe County
  • Lafayette, IN

2
Tippecanoe County
  • 504mi2
  • Population
  • 163,364
  • 9.8 in GQ
  • Housing
  • 65 Single Family
  • 35 Multi Family
  • Top 3 Employers
  • Purdue University
  • Subaru /Toyota
  • Wabash National Trailers
  • MPO Staff
  • Executive Director
  • Transportation Division Director
  • Senior Transportation Planner
  • Transportation Planner
  • GIS Tech (vacant)

3
Purdue University
  • West Lafayette Campus
  • 39,000 Students
  • 9 Part-time
  • 12 International
  • Largest University housing operation in the
    Country (31 of student body)
  • Major Highways
  • US231 East campus edge
  • SR26 Divides North and South Campus

4
Road Network
  • State Roads
  • I-65
  • US52, US231
  • SR25, SR26, SR28, SR43
  • 84 of Principal Arterials
  • Urbanized Area
  • 78.5mi2 (15.5 of County Total)
  • 41 of road miles
  • Safety Issues
  • Driver inattention
  • Wide and offset intersections
  • Lack of access control
  • Pedestrians
  • Rural County Roads
  • 74 paved and 26 gravel
  • Safety Issues
  • Deer
  • Horizontal curves (90 jogs around fields)
  • Vertical curves and sight distance

5
Multimodal Transportation
  • Transit (CityBus)
  • 2nd Largest ridership in IN
  • 4.7M Annual ridership
  • Rail
  • Major Lines
  • CSX
  • Norfolk Southern
  • Amtrak
  • Numerous industrial spurs and yards
  • Railroad relocation in 1990s
  • Pedestrian/Bike Facilities
  • On-road facilities
  • Recreational trails

Then
Now
6
Indiana ARIES (Automated Reporting Information
Exchange System)
  • State Crash Record Database
  • 100 digital in CY 2003
  • Electronic reporting
  • QC Checks
  • Linearly referenced to INDOTs road network
  • MPO Access
  • e-Report review
  • Data extracts
  • Report generation

7
Tippecanoe Co Annual Crash Report
  • Started in 1989
  • Report Contents
  • Countywide Crash Summary
  • Intersections for 10 Crashes (100ft rule)
  • Crash Frequency
  • Crash rate per MEV
  • Critical Rate Factor Comparison
  • Pedestrian
  • Bicycle
  • Motorcycle
  • New GIS analyses Spatial Patterns
  • Density Analyses (ArcGIS Spatial Analyst)
  • Hot Spot/Zone Analyses (ArcGIS core and ArcGIS
    Spatial Analyst)
  • Crash Density Visualizations (ArcGIS Spatial
    Analyst and 3D Analyst Extensions)

8
Tippecanoe County Crash Statistics
  • Yearly Statistics (approximate)
  • 1,700 Private property crashes
  • 5,700 Roadway crashes
  • 18 Injury crashes
  • 1.3 Fatality and incapacitating injury
  • 14-22 Fatality crashes per year
  • 56 Tippecanoe crashes correctly geo-referenced
    by Indiana ARIES
  • Local Processing
  • Assign intersection status
  • 100ft
  • 250ft (used by Indiana 5 report)
  • Mid-block
  • GIS Scripts Intersection Statistics
  • Assign crashes to intersection
  • Compute statistics and rates

9
Density Analysis
  • Density Summaries Useful for
  • Overlapping crash points
  • Data privacy concerns
  • Hiding geocoding errors
  • Smoothed data for 3D visualizations

10
Density Analysis
  • Drawbacks
  • More data, since continuous raster
  • Must determine suitable grid spacing and search
    radius
  • More work to display data and legend
  • Different patterns for different search radius
    and coloring scheme

SR25 N, Crashes per 0.1 mile (CY 2002-2007)
Hot Spot
2D Top View
3D View Looking SW
11
Spatial Pattern Analysis
  • Is the crash data
  • Clustered
  • Dispersed or
  • Randomly distributed
  • Is there significant spatial clustering of
  • Severe crashes
  • Deer-related crashes
  • Run-off-the-road crashes

12
Hotspot Analysis
  • Mapping Clusters -gt Hot Spot Analysis
  • Identifies statically significant clusters of
    points i.e., those with values higher in
    magnitude than you might expect to find by random
    chance
  • Hot Spot tool determines spatial hot and cold
    spots
  • Computes a z-score (standard deviation)
  • For 95 confidence level the z-score threshold is
    1.96
  • -1.96 z 1.96 statistically no pattern the
    expected pattern is one of hypothetical random
    chance
  • -1.96gtzgt1.96 statistically too unusual to be
    just another version of random chance

13
Crash Severity Hot Spots
  • 18 Injury crashes
  • 1.3 Fatality incapacitating injury of which
  • 6.4 Pedestrians
  • 4.4 Bicyclists
  • 21.2 Motorcycles
  • 58 at Intersections

(Data Ranges from 1-29 Crashes)
14
Fatality and Incapacitating Injury Crash Hot Spots
  • Conclusions
  • 45 of fatality crashes are occurring in
    statistically significant clusters
  • Need to incorporate additional years worth of
    data

15
2006 Deer Related Crash Hot Zones
16
Run-Off Crashes 2006-2007
  • Likely circumstances
  • Horizontal Curves
  • Vertical Grade
  • Road Type
  • 2 occurred on gravel roads
  • Surface Conditions
  • 52 Dry
  • 33 Wet
  • 14 Ice
  • Unexpected Hot Spot
  • Slight horizontal curve
  • Fairly new pavement
  • 55 mph
  • Possible safety Concerns.
  • 50 occurred during Wet surface conditions or
    Speed to Fast for Weather

Symbols Crashes Per 1000ftx1000ft Shading Hot
Spots (zgt1.96)
17
Run-Off Crashes 2006-2007Impaired/Speed/Failure
to Yield
Rural hot spots are centered around horizontal
curves
50 Speed and 50 Speed too Fast for Weather
100 Speed too Fast for Weather (Rain)
18
Crash Visualizations
  • ArcGIS 3D Analyst Extension
  • Crash Density Perspective Data Views
  • Comparison with Land Use/Land Cover
  • Comparison with Topography
  • 3D fly through animations
  • Flight Paths
  • Captured animations into a media file

19
Conclusions
  • Indiana MPOs can quickly and easily incorporate
    GIS-based safety analysis in the planning
    decisions
  • Hot Spot Analysis can help you identify spatially
    significant areas for further investigation
  • The public loves the density mapping and
    visualizations
  • Future work
  • More traffic enforcement related analyses (e.g.,
    right angles crashes at signals)
  • Land use vs. deer crash analysis with local
    wildlife biologists
  • Normalize crash densities with VMT from traffic
    count GIS layers
  • DEMO 2006 Crash Animations
  • - QUESTIONS and COMMENTS -

20
Density Analysis ArcGIS Tools
  • Point Statistics
  • Consolidate point data to a non-continuous
    gridded area
  • Kernel or Point Density
  • Consolidate point data based on density to a
    continuous gridded area
  • Steps
  • Geolocate reports on your network
  • Decide a grid spacing
  • Decide on the units for your density calculations
  • Set the Radius of Influence 1 (no smoothing of
    data to adjacent cells)

21
Additional Information
  • Several Analysis tools available
  • ArcGIS and Spatial Analyst Extension
  • CrimeStat
  • GeoDat
  • Good References
  • Chapter 4 Data and Information for Considering
    Safety in the Transportation Planning Process
    http//tmip.fhwa.dot.gov/clearinghouse/docs/safety
    /chapter4.stm
  • Mapping Crime Understanding Hotspots
    http//www.ojp.usdoj.gov.nij
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com