Title: Presentation to NHS Industry Forum The Industry Perspective on the Therapeutic Development Assessmen
1Presentation to NHS Industry Forum - The Industry
Perspective on the Therapeutic Development
Assessment Process in Wales
- Julia EarnshawDirector of Health Outcomes, GSK
- Leader of ABPI TDA User Group
- 21st April 2004
2Objectives of todays presentation
- To clarify the role and objectives of the TDA
User Group - To clarify industrys perspective on the current
TDA process - To discuss potential options to address areas of
concern
3Key areas of activity which were an initial
concern with NICE
Clarity/Consistency of Process
KEY AREAS
Communication
Quality
4Industry User Group the links
Drug Review Bodies
User Group (Operational)
ABPI Members
5HTA User Group Objectives
- Share information and provide feedback
- Inform process improvement and methodology
- Prevention and early resolution of problems
- Develop constructive relationship
- Efficiency (single focus for important issues)
- Peer support
6Objectives of the TDA User Group in Wales
- To consolidate experiences and issues of the TDA
process amongst ABPI members to share best
practice and to establish key issues and areas of
concern - To propose improvements to facilitate the
development of a process learning from
experiences with other national HTA bodies
(NICE/SMC) - To provide an interface at an operational level
between industry and appropriate bodies in Wales,
to develop a constructive and effective
relationship. - NOT
- Other broader responsibilities of the AWMSG
7Membership of the TDA User Group
- The membership of the group should comprise
those operating in Wales and those involved in
HTA submissions across the UK.
- Jeremy Way - Novartis
- Jenny Snell - Amgen
- Jeremy Felvus - Pfizer
- Len Gooblar - Abbott
- Bernard Holton - MSD
- Julia Earnshaw - GSK (Lead)
- Rick Greville - ABPI
- Debbie Stephenson -Lilly
- Mike Baldwin - Aventis
- Alison Edwards - AstraZeneca
- Richard Evans - Janssen-Cilag
8Industrys Current Perspective on TDA in Wales
- The Process
- Confidentiality
- Communication
- Decision Making
- Consistency
- Appeals
9The process
- Is all information essential? - e.g. Form A
- Inconsistent use of Form B
- Need for assessment to be based on all available
data - Inconsistent reference to industry data in Form B
- Lack of clarity on how evidence has informed
decision making - Use of revised SMC form to avoid duplication
- Limited opportunity to comment on independent
report or correct factual inaccuracies - Role of medical experts
- Lack of patient involvement
10Transparency/Confidentiality
- AWMSG operates with a principle of transparency
- However considerable sensitivity particularly
pre-launch - ABPI negotiated agreement with SMC on how this
could be addressed - Similar agreement in Wales could minimise issues
with confidential data - whilst ensuring reviews
based on all evidence not just that in public
domain - Opportunity for confidential discussion at AWMSG?
- Need for some detailed information not to be on
web-site.
11Agreement between the Association of the British
Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) and the Scottish
Medicines Consortium (SMC) on guidelines for the
release of company data into the public domain
during a medicine appraisal
- Principles
- 1. SMC and ABPI acknowledge that while it is in
the interests of patients generally for all
relevant information about products being
appraised to be put into the public domain the
rights of the owners of the data must also be
respected - 2. SMC has made a commitment not to release into
or use in the public domain any information
provided to it during a technology appraisal
prior to the launch of the product(s) into the UK
market - 3. Any reference in this Agreement to abstracts
shall assume the adoption of the CONSORT rules
for trial reporting and abstracts in relation to
clinical trials, and an equivalent standard for
reporting economic models - 4. In circumstances that warrant publication of
data regarded by the data owner as confidential,
or the non-publication of data normally available
for publication in accordance with these
guidelines, both parties will negotiate in good
faith to seek to find a mutually acceptable
solution, recognising the need for SMC to support
its recommendations with evidence and the data
owners right to determine a global publication
strategy.. - 5. It is recognised that in all cases the data
owner retains the right to make a final decision
in relation to the release of information into
the public domain. - It is acknowledged that the principles in this
document apply to licence extensions as well as
new chemical entities
12What does the SMC agreement suggest should be in
the public domain?
- Published information
- Quotes from unpublished data where release date
is more than 12 months after sign off of the
study report. Detailed information not put on
web-site. - Economic models available for independent review
but not on web site - Price/SmPC/EPAR - after product launch
13Communication
- Clarifying scope of review in advance
- Industry to provide list of publicly available
information - Improved written confirmation of decisions
throughout the process - Retain opportunity for informal communication
- Opportunity for WMP and TDA User Group to address
issues on an ongoing basis
14Industrys Current Perspective on TDA in Wales
- The Process
- Confidentiality
- Communication
- Decision Making
- Consistency
- Appeals
15Summary Industrys Perspective on TDA Process
- Need for a process that is clear and transparent,
based on a careful and timely analysis of all the
evidence and doesnt unreasonably deny patients
in Wales access to new medicines. - Whilst accepting this is a new and evolving
process the industry currently has concerns with
how the process is working - Acknowledge the need of the NHS in Wales to have
a consistent view on their use of high cost new
medicines - In the spirit of partnership and with
constructive dialogue with the TDA User Group we
hope that it will be possible to develop a
process that is satisfactory to all parties