Title: Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance Sector Catherine Guttmann 15 March 2006
1Adoption of IFRS in the Insurance
SectorCatherine Guttmann15 March 2006
- REPARIS Workshops on Accounting and Audit
Regulation, Vienna, March 2006
2What does IFRS 4 Phase I mainly say
3IFRS 4 Phase I Insurance Contracts
- Main features of the IFRS
- The IFRS on insurance contracts applies to all
insurance contracts (including reinsurance
contracts) and only to insurance contracts - Financial assets and liabilities of insurers
- are treated by IAS 39
- All IFRS standards apply to insurance companies
- Insurance contract definition is a definition
in substance and not a legal one - The standard on insurance contracts should then
be used for example in the banking industry
4IFRS 4 Phase I Insurance Contracts
- Definition of an insurance contract
- An insurance contract is a contract
- under which one party (the insurer) accepts
significant insurance risk from another party
(the policyholder) by agreeing to compensate the
policyholder if a specified uncertain futur event
(the insured event) adversely affects the
policyholder - The policyholder is defined as a party
that has a right to compensation under an
insurance contract if an insured event occurs
5IFRS 4 Phase I Insurance Contracts
- Definition of financial risk
- An insurance risk is a risk , other that
financial risk, transferred from the holder of a
contract to the issuer - A financial risk is the risk of a possible
future change in one or more of a specified
interest rate, financial instrument price,
commodity price, foreign exchange rate, index of
prices or rates, credit rating or credit index or
other variable, provided in the case of a
non-financial variable that the variable is not
specific to a party to the contract
6IFRS 4 Phase I Insurance Contracts
- Examples of insurance contracts
Are insurance contracts Are not insurance contracts
Insurance against theft or damage to property Insurance against product liability, professional liability, civil liability Disability and medical cover Life contingent annuities Death benefit Catastrophe bond if the triggering event includes a condition that the issuer of the bond suffered a specified loss Financial contracts which dont expose the insurer to significant insurance risk (investment contracts, financial reinsurance) Fronting Own insurance for example product warranty is issued directly by a manufacturer dealer or retailer Catastrophe bond triggered by an external event for which the issuer doesnt incure a specific loss
7IFRS 4 Phase I Insurance Contracts
First consequence classification of the
contracts and valuation principles
- IAS 39 for the financial component and liability
adequacy test - Local GAAP for the insurance component
- No need to separate
Significative insurance risk ?
yes
yes
no
Embedded derivative to separate
Financial Component ?
yes
no
Separate and Fair value the Embedded derivative
Discretionary Participating Feature ?
no
- Local GAAP and Liability adequacy test
Non discretionary
discretionary
IAS 39 / IFRS 4
IAS 39
8Second Consequence an insurer balance sheet
9(No Transcript)
10Orientations for Phase II
11IntroductionThe objectives of Phase II
- By splitting the insurance project into 2 phases,
the IASB board has postponed several key subjects
- Valuation of insurance contracts keeping
current accounting principles - Qualification and treatment of discretionary
participating features (shadow accounting) - Embedded derivatives
- Revenue recognition
- Phase II will have to deal with all these issues
with the following underlying purpose - To get a better financial reporting
- To reach a global consistency between all IAS
standards (IAS 39, IAS 18, IAS 37, ) and the
IFRS framework (comparability, reliability,
substance over form,)
12Agenda of the Phase II project
- A working group has been set up by the IASB board
- Meeting every 2 month
- Participants
- CFO of major insurance groups
- Allianz
- Axa
- Prudential
- AIG
- Nippon Life
-
- IASB board members
- Members of IOSCO, IAIS,EFRAG
- Actuaries (Chairman of IAA)
- Analysts (Standard Poors, DZ Bank AG)
- Public debate
- Regular publications
13Agenda of the Phase II project
- Agenda
- A Working Paper should be published by the
Working Group Phase II before year end 2006 - An Exposure Draft should be published in 2008
- Final standard could be published before year end
2008
Endorsement of phase II standard
Working paper published
ED published
Working Group meetings
14Some valuation approaches
- Approach C Current Entry Value
- Principles Approach C measures the insurance
liability at the amount that the insurer would
charge to a policyholder today for entering into
a contract with the same remaining rights and
obligations as the existing contract. - Initial measurement
- Discounting of future projected cash flows
using current yield curve (best estimate value) - Valuation of an implicit margin, equal to the
difference between premiums and the best
estimate value - Next measurements
- Best estimate value is calculated on current
assumptions (economic and non economic) - The initial margin is amortised among the
duration of the contract with the release of the
risk
15Some valuation approaches
- Approach D Current Exit Value
- Principles Approach D measures the insurance
liability at the amount that the insurer would
expect to have to pay today to another entity if
it transferred all its remaining contractual
rights and obligations immediately to that
entity. - Because there is no secondary market for most
insurance liabilities, that amount would need to
be estimated. - Specifically, approach D
- Measures the insurance liability as the present
value of future cash flows arising from the
contract (Uses a current risk-free discount
rate). - Does not defer acquisition costs as a separate
asset. - The measurement of the liability includes the
margin that market participants would require for
contractually assuming risks and providing
services - Margin for risks and uncertainty AND
- Margin for the servicing part included in the
insurance contract (servicing margin) - Profit at inception is limited
- by the level of the MRI and
- by the level of the Servicing margin
16Some valuation approaches
Approach C "Business to Customers
Approach D "Business to Business
Asset
Asset
Net equity
Net equity
No gain at inception
Some gain at inception but limited by the SM and
the MRI
Global Margin
Servicing margin
- Separation and valuation of the 3 parts of the
contracts - exit value "best estimate"
- Margin for risks
- Servicing margin
MRU
Global margin Premiums Exit Value best
estimate
Exit Value best-estimate
Exit Value best-estimate
17Some valuation approaches
- IAIS is working on a similar model so that the
same valuation for liabilities could be taken for
solvency purposes and accounting
- Questions still to be solved
- Definition of the MRU (level of confidence
Cost of capital), or pattern of amortisation - Definition and level of the servicing margin
(market reference ?) - Policyholder behaviour ?
- Paragraph 49 of IAS 39 for investment contracts
18(No Transcript)