Title: Department of Energy Senior Executive Service Performance Management System
1Department of EnergySenior Executive
ServicePerformance Management System
- FOCUSING ON LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS
Office of Management, Budget Evaluation SES
Performance Management System Briefing Training
2What is the New SES Performance Management System?
- The new system is a results oriented
performance measurement tool which places
emphasis on direct and clear linkages between
organizational mission/programs, strategic plans,
and individual senior executive performance
plans.
3When Will the New System Be Effective?
- The new Senior Executive Service (SES)
Performance Management System is effective
November 7, 2001 through the end of the FY 2002
SES performance appraisal cycle (i.e., September
30, 2002).
4Whats New About This System?
- TWO EQUALLY WEIGHTED
- CRITICAL ELEMENTS
- Key Programmatic Accomplishments
- Key Leadership Attributes
5Major Differences
- Major Feature Current System New
System - Rating Levels ME, NI, U
O, ME, NI, U - Performance Elements 3 Critical 2
Critical - Awards (Bonuses) 5 - 14 ME - 5
- O - 10 - 20
- Balanced Measures 360 Degree Promotes
ongoing communication and feedback
in support of customer
satisfaction. - Written Accomplishments None Required.
6Element I - Key Programmatic Accomplishments
- Focuses on the critical few program and
mission-related activities in the executives
area of responsibility - The objectives are developed by the executive and
his/her manager at the start of the performance
cycle -
- Each key objective will be tracked and evaluated
based on - (1) how efficiently and effectively the senior
executive executed or obtained results, and - (2) results achieved (e.g., program objectives,
outcomes, policy impacts).
7Critical Element II - Key Leadership Attributes
- This area of performance assessment is
- Generic
- Focuses on how the executive carries out
his/her responsibilities relative to highly
desirable leadership attributes that are expected
of all DOE Senior Executive Service members.
8II. KEY LEADERSHIP ATTRIBUTES
- Demonstrates Functional Competence
- Exhibits Analytical Ability Solves Problems
- Builds Diversity
- Serves Customers Builds Partnerships
- Communicates Effectively
- Innovates
- Demonstrates Personal Leadership
- Creates Effective Operating Plans
- Builds Capability
- Coaches, Motivates, Develops Mentors
9Progress Reviews
- At least one Progress Review is required
annually--more if deficiencies are noted - Prior to the Progress Review discussion, the
senior executive is responsible for documenting
progress made on the established program
objectives, projects and other priorities (page
14 of the plan) - The rater is responsible for discussing and
certifying any changes needed - Both the supervisor and senior executive certify
the form upon conclusion of the discussion.
10Optional Peer Feedback
- To facilitate performance excellence, Secretarial
Officers may require that peer assessments or
other forms of 360 Degree Feedback be conducted
on executives in their organizations. - The focus is on Element II - Key Leadership
Attributes and the results are for performance
improvement and developmental purposes only. - A standard form is included in the established
SES performance plan package.
11Rating Levels
- The new SES performance management system has
four summary rating levels - Exceeds Expectations (O)
- Meets Expectations (ME)
- Needs Improvement (NI)
- Fails to Meet (U)
12Performance Appraisal and Ratings
- Executive - Written accomplishments addressing
results achieved in terms of key performance
objectives and leadership attributes are required
of each senior executive being evaluated. - Rating Official - All annual performance
evaluations are required to be completed within 3
weeks following the annual appraisal cycle end
(October 20).
13Determining Annual Summary Ratings
- In assessing annual performance, the rater will
take into consideration the executives written
accomplishments, personal observations, customer
feedback, and other information received.
14Assessing Element I
- The rater will perform the following for each
executive being evaluated - Assess each objective in line with the respective
SES performance management plan, and - Assign a rating of Exceeds Expectations, Meets
Expectations, Needs Improvement, or Fails to Meet
for each.
15Overall Rating for Element I
- Following assessment of each objective under this
critical element, the rater assigns an overall
rating as follows - Exceeds Expectations (O) All objectives are
rated at Exceeds Expectations - Meets Expectations (ME) At least two objectives
are rated at ME, no more than one objective is
NI, and no objectives at U. - Needs Improvement (NI) Two or more objectives
are NI. - Fails to Meet (U) One or more objectives is
rated U.
16Assessing Element II
- In assessing this element, the rater is required
to rate each of the 10 attributes according to
the generic standards provided for each (refer
to pages 3-13 of the appraisal form). - A determination of Low, Mixed, Solid, Excellent,
or Outstanding performance is to be made on each
and documented on page 17 of the respective
performance plan.
17Determining a Summary Rating for Element II
- After assessing each attribute, an overall
summary rating must be assigned - Exceeds Expectations (O) All attributes are
rated at Excellent or Outstanding. - Meets Expectations (ME) Combination of Mixed
Performance, Solid, Excellent and Outstanding
performance no more than three ratings are
Mixed. - Needs Improvement (NI) Majority are rated at
either Mixed, Low or Fails to Meet no more than
two are Low. - Fails to Meet (U) Three or more at rated Low.
18Determining the Initial Summary Rating
- Rating officials are required to make their
overall assessments and document based on the
following - Exceeds Expectations (O) Both critical elements
are rated O. - Meets Expectations (ME) One or both critical
elements are ME. - Needs Improvement (NI) One or both critical
elements are NI. - Fails to Meet (U) One or both critical elements
is at U.
19Performance Bonuses for Career SES
- Exceeds Expectations Mandatory bonus of between
10 to 20 of basic pay. - Meets Expectations rating - May be nominated for
a bonus at 5 of basic pay. - Criteria for Nomination O or ME initial summary
rating and clearly documented significant
achievements/measurable results. Additional
criteria may be added annually by S-1 or S-2.
20NONCAREER SES AWARDS
- Pay Rate Adjustment - Increase in ES level. The
normal progression is one level annually. - Cash Award - Special Act or Service or On-The
-Spot Award. - Time-Off Award - For annual performance,
typically granted as 40 hours for Exceeds
Expectations rating, and 20 hours for Meets
Expectations. -
21Higher Level Review
- DOE policy requires that all SES initial ratings
be reviewed by an official in the organization
who is at a higher level than the rater. It is
advisable that this be done prior to documenting
the proposed rating or discussing with the
employee. - The higher level reviewer may concur or
non-concur on a documented initial rating, but is
not permitted to change the proposed rating.
22Determining the Final Rating and Performance
Recognition
- The DOE Performance Review Board (PRB) serves as
an advisory group to the Secretary and is
primarily responsible for conducting objective
reviews and evaluations of career SES annual
performance proposals, followed by providing
their final recommendations to the Secretary for
decision.
23Performance Management Assistance and Training
- The Executive Resources Management Division is
available to answer your questions on the new SES
Performance Management System. Please contact
Debra Gibson at (202) 586-8451 or Ina Shaw at
(202) 586-8464. - Additional training will be provided to DOE
organizations through their Training Points of
Contact, briefings upon request, and resources
including handouts, On-Line Learning Center
training, and web-based courses. For more
information, please contact Dottie VanSteinburg
(202) 287-1678 or Tanya Luckett at (202)
287-1655.