Department of Energy Senior Executive Service Performance Management System - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Department of Energy Senior Executive Service Performance Management System

Description:

Office of Management, Budget & Evaluation. SES Performance Management System Briefing & Training ... Exceeds Expectations (O): All attributes are rated at ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:38
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: vans64
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Department of Energy Senior Executive Service Performance Management System


1
Department of EnergySenior Executive
ServicePerformance Management System
  • FOCUSING ON LEADERSHIP EFFECTIVENESS

Office of Management, Budget Evaluation SES
Performance Management System Briefing Training
2
What is the New SES Performance Management System?
  • The new system is a results oriented
    performance measurement tool which places
    emphasis on direct and clear linkages between
    organizational mission/programs, strategic plans,
    and individual senior executive performance
    plans.

3
When Will the New System Be Effective?
  • The new Senior Executive Service (SES)
    Performance Management System is effective
    November 7, 2001 through the end of the FY 2002
    SES performance appraisal cycle (i.e., September
    30, 2002).

4
Whats New About This System?
  • TWO EQUALLY WEIGHTED
  • CRITICAL ELEMENTS
  • Key Programmatic Accomplishments
  • Key Leadership Attributes

5
Major Differences
  • Major Feature Current System New
    System
  • Rating Levels ME, NI, U
    O, ME, NI, U
  • Performance Elements 3 Critical 2
    Critical
  • Awards (Bonuses) 5 - 14 ME - 5
  • O - 10 - 20
  • Balanced Measures 360 Degree Promotes
    ongoing communication and feedback
    in support of customer
    satisfaction.
  • Written Accomplishments None Required.

6
Element I - Key Programmatic Accomplishments
  • Focuses on the critical few program and
    mission-related activities in the executives
    area of responsibility
  • The objectives are developed by the executive and
    his/her manager at the start of the performance
    cycle
  • Each key objective will be tracked and evaluated
    based on
  • (1) how efficiently and effectively the senior
    executive executed or obtained results, and
  • (2) results achieved (e.g., program objectives,
    outcomes, policy impacts).

7
Critical Element II - Key Leadership Attributes
  • This area of performance assessment is
  • Generic
  • Focuses on how the executive carries out
    his/her responsibilities relative to highly
    desirable leadership attributes that are expected
    of all DOE Senior Executive Service members.

8
II. KEY LEADERSHIP ATTRIBUTES
  • Demonstrates Functional Competence
  • Exhibits Analytical Ability Solves Problems
  • Builds Diversity
  • Serves Customers Builds Partnerships
  • Communicates Effectively
  • Innovates
  • Demonstrates Personal Leadership
  • Creates Effective Operating Plans
  • Builds Capability
  • Coaches, Motivates, Develops Mentors

9
Progress Reviews
  • At least one Progress Review is required
    annually--more if deficiencies are noted
  • Prior to the Progress Review discussion, the
    senior executive is responsible for documenting
    progress made on the established program
    objectives, projects and other priorities (page
    14 of the plan)
  • The rater is responsible for discussing and
    certifying any changes needed
  • Both the supervisor and senior executive certify
    the form upon conclusion of the discussion.

10
Optional Peer Feedback
  • To facilitate performance excellence, Secretarial
    Officers may require that peer assessments or
    other forms of 360 Degree Feedback be conducted
    on executives in their organizations.
  • The focus is on Element II - Key Leadership
    Attributes and the results are for performance
    improvement and developmental purposes only.
  • A standard form is included in the established
    SES performance plan package.

11
Rating Levels
  • The new SES performance management system has
    four summary rating levels
  • Exceeds Expectations (O)
  • Meets Expectations (ME)
  • Needs Improvement (NI)
  • Fails to Meet (U)

12
Performance Appraisal and Ratings
  • Executive - Written accomplishments addressing
    results achieved in terms of key performance
    objectives and leadership attributes are required
    of each senior executive being evaluated.
  • Rating Official - All annual performance
    evaluations are required to be completed within 3
    weeks following the annual appraisal cycle end
    (October 20).

13
Determining Annual Summary Ratings
  • In assessing annual performance, the rater will
    take into consideration the executives written
    accomplishments, personal observations, customer
    feedback, and other information received.

14
Assessing Element I
  • The rater will perform the following for each
    executive being evaluated
  • Assess each objective in line with the respective
    SES performance management plan, and
  • Assign a rating of Exceeds Expectations, Meets
    Expectations, Needs Improvement, or Fails to Meet
    for each.

15
Overall Rating for Element I
  • Following assessment of each objective under this
    critical element, the rater assigns an overall
    rating as follows
  • Exceeds Expectations (O) All objectives are
    rated at Exceeds Expectations
  • Meets Expectations (ME) At least two objectives
    are rated at ME, no more than one objective is
    NI, and no objectives at U.
  • Needs Improvement (NI) Two or more objectives
    are NI.
  • Fails to Meet (U) One or more objectives is
    rated U.

16
Assessing Element II
  • In assessing this element, the rater is required
    to rate each of the 10 attributes according to
    the generic standards provided for each (refer
    to pages 3-13 of the appraisal form).
  • A determination of Low, Mixed, Solid, Excellent,
    or Outstanding performance is to be made on each
    and documented on page 17 of the respective
    performance plan.

17
Determining a Summary Rating for Element II
  • After assessing each attribute, an overall
    summary rating must be assigned
  • Exceeds Expectations (O) All attributes are
    rated at Excellent or Outstanding.
  • Meets Expectations (ME) Combination of Mixed
    Performance, Solid, Excellent and Outstanding
    performance no more than three ratings are
    Mixed.
  • Needs Improvement (NI) Majority are rated at
    either Mixed, Low or Fails to Meet no more than
    two are Low.
  • Fails to Meet (U) Three or more at rated Low.

18
Determining the Initial Summary Rating
  • Rating officials are required to make their
    overall assessments and document based on the
    following
  • Exceeds Expectations (O) Both critical elements
    are rated O.
  • Meets Expectations (ME) One or both critical
    elements are ME.
  • Needs Improvement (NI) One or both critical
    elements are NI.
  • Fails to Meet (U) One or both critical elements
    is at U.

19
Performance Bonuses for Career SES
  • Exceeds Expectations Mandatory bonus of between
    10 to 20 of basic pay.
  • Meets Expectations rating - May be nominated for
    a bonus at 5 of basic pay.
  • Criteria for Nomination O or ME initial summary
    rating and clearly documented significant
    achievements/measurable results. Additional
    criteria may be added annually by S-1 or S-2.

20
NONCAREER SES AWARDS
  • Pay Rate Adjustment - Increase in ES level. The
    normal progression is one level annually.
  • Cash Award - Special Act or Service or On-The
    -Spot Award.
  • Time-Off Award - For annual performance,
    typically granted as 40 hours for Exceeds
    Expectations rating, and 20 hours for Meets
    Expectations.

21
Higher Level Review
  • DOE policy requires that all SES initial ratings
    be reviewed by an official in the organization
    who is at a higher level than the rater. It is
    advisable that this be done prior to documenting
    the proposed rating or discussing with the
    employee.
  • The higher level reviewer may concur or
    non-concur on a documented initial rating, but is
    not permitted to change the proposed rating.

22
Determining the Final Rating and Performance
Recognition
  • The DOE Performance Review Board (PRB) serves as
    an advisory group to the Secretary and is
    primarily responsible for conducting objective
    reviews and evaluations of career SES annual
    performance proposals, followed by providing
    their final recommendations to the Secretary for
    decision.

23
Performance Management Assistance and Training
  • The Executive Resources Management Division is
    available to answer your questions on the new SES
    Performance Management System. Please contact
    Debra Gibson at (202) 586-8451 or Ina Shaw at
    (202) 586-8464.
  • Additional training will be provided to DOE
    organizations through their Training Points of
    Contact, briefings upon request, and resources
    including handouts, On-Line Learning Center
    training, and web-based courses. For more
    information, please contact Dottie VanSteinburg
    (202) 287-1678 or Tanya Luckett at (202)
    287-1655.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com