Prisoners Voices: people with learning disabilities and the criminal justice system - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 32
About This Presentation
Title:

Prisoners Voices: people with learning disabilities and the criminal justice system

Description:

An independent UK charity working to create a just, humane and ... information, which rose to four-fifths for those with possible learning disabilities ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:156
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 33
Provided by: Jen145
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Prisoners Voices: people with learning disabilities and the criminal justice system


1
Prisoners Voices people with learning
disabilities and the criminal justice system
2
Presentation
  • About the Prison Reform Trust
  • About No One Knows
  • Prevalence
  • Five overarching themes
  • What needs to be done and what can we do now?

3
Prison Reform Trust
  • An independent UK charity working to create a
    just, humane and effective penal system
  • Which we achieve by inquiring into the workings
    of the system informing prisoners, staff and the
    wider public and by influencing Parliament,
    Government and officials towards reform

4
No One Knows
  • A three year programme that looked into the
    experiences of people with learning disabilities
    and difficulties who come into contact with the
    criminal justice system

5
Who did we include?
  • People who
  • experience difficulties in communicating and
    expressing themselves and understanding ordinary
    social cues
  • have unseen or hidden disabilities such as
    dyslexia
  • experience difficulties with learning and/or have
    had disrupted learning experiences
  • are on the autistic spectrum

6
Important to remember
  • One of the most prevalent vulnerable groups
    amongst offenders comprises those who do not have
    an intellectual disability as formally defined
    but who do have much lower cognitive and adaptive
    abilities than do either the general population
    or the offending population.
  • (McBrien, 2003)

7
How many people?
  • 20 30 of offenders have learning disabilities
    or difficulties that interfere with their ability
    to cope within the criminal justice system
    (Loucks 2007)
  • 7 of prisoners have an IQ of less than 70 and a
    further 25 have an IQ of less than 80 (Mottram,
    2007)
  • 23 of prisoners under 18 years of age have an IQ
    of less than 70 (Harrington and Bailey et al,
    2005)

8
How many people?
  • 20 of the prison population has a hidden
    disability that will affect and undermine their
    performance in both education and work settings.
    (Rack, 2005)
  • Dyslexia is three to four times more common
    amongst prisoners than amongst the general
    population (Rack, 2005)
  • There is a small over representation of those
    with ASD in the special hospital population
    (Hare, Gould, Mills and Wing 1996) but the number
    in prison is thought to be low (Allen 2008)

9
Actual numbers
  • Assuming a prison population of 82,000
  • 5,740 men and women with very low IQs of less
    than 70
  • 20,500 with IQs between 71 80
  • 16,400 with a hidden disability that will
    affect and undermine their performance in both
    education and work settings

10
Actual numbers
  • Assuming 200,000 adult offenders are supervised
    by probation staff on any given day
  • 14,000 with very low IQs of less than 70
  • 50,000 with IQs between 71 80
  • 40,000 with a hidden disability that will
    affect and undermine their performance in both
    education and work settings

11
Prisoners' Voices new data
  • 173 prisoners interviewed at 14 prisons of which
    154 were identified by staff as having learning
    disabilities or difficulties responses from the
    remaining 19 prisoners enabled comparisons to be
    drawn
  • Interviews between May November 2007
  • LIPS screening tool for learning disabilities
  • Experiences of the criminal justice system

12
Prisoners' Voices at the police station
  • The way they looked at you was scary. When you go
    up to the counter in the custody suite lots of
    people watched and they read out your charge.
    People look at you and then you are allowed to
    leave.
  • I didnt know what was going on I tried to take
    it in. They did their best.
  • I tried hanging myself. They found me when I was
    blue.

13
Prisoners' Voices in court
  • I couldnt really hear. I couldnt understand but
    I said, Yes, whatever to anything because if I
    say, I dont know they look at me as if Im
    thick. Sometimes they tell you two things at
    once.
  • I understand that I have done something wrong,
    but Im still not quite sure as to what that is.
  • I was scared. On the fourth day they charged me
    and the van came for me.

14
Prisoners' Voices in prison
  • I felt that it was the end of my life. I tried to
    kill myself. I tried to set fire to myself.
  • I told them I need help but they dont pay any
    interest in me.
  • I eat the same thing every time, I manage by
    copying from the previous form.
  • I dont know how to use the phone its that PIN
    thing isnt it?

15
Five overarching themes
  • Disability discrimination and possible human
    rights abuses
  • Knowing who has learning disabilities
  • Implications for the criminal justice system
  • A needs led approach collaborative multi-agency
    working
  • Workforce development

16
Disability discrimination and possible human
rights abuses
  • Maltreatment of suspects by the police and prison
    officers
  • Lack of an AA during police interview
  • Lack of understanding and ability to participate
    in their own trial (Article 6)
  • Inaccessible information and prison regimes
    (Articles 5 and 14)

17
2. Knowing who has learning disabilities
  • No routine or systematic procedures for
    identifying suspects, defendants or offenders
    with learning disabilities and learning
    difficulties, or other people made vulnerable by
    the criminal justice process

18
3. Implications for the criminal justice system
  • Non-compliance with disability and human rights
    legislation
  • Reading over two-thirds had difficulties reading
    information, which rose to four-fifths for those
    with possible learning disabilities
  • Writing over two-thirds had difficulties filling
    in forms, which rose to over three-quarters for
    those with possible learning disabilities

19
continued
  • Understanding and being understood
  • Results from the LIPS screening tool showed that
    over two-thirds of prisoners experienced
    difficulties in verbal comprehension skills,
    including difficulties understanding certain
    words and in expressing themselves
  • Over half said they had difficulties making
    themselves understood, which rose to more than
    two-thirds for those with possible learning
    disabilities

20
continued
  • Prisoners with learning disabilities or
    difficulties were five times as likely as the
    comparison group to have been subject to control
    and restraint techniques
  • And were more than three times as likely as the
    comparison group to have spent time in segregation

21
continued
  • An inability to participate fully in prison
    regimes leaves prisoners at greater psychological
    risk
  • prisoners with learning disabilities or
    difficulties were almost three times as likely as
    those without such impairments to experience
    clinically significant depression
  • They were also almost three times as likely to
    experience clinically significant anxiety

22
continued
  • An inability to participate in CBTPs (or their
    exclusion from them) makes it less likely that
    offending behaviour will be addressed it may
    also mean that prisoners will spend longer in
    prison as a result (ECHR Articles 5 and 14)

23
4. A needs led approach collaborative
multi-agency working
  • Criminal justice agencies alone do not have
    requisite expertise to effectively work with this
    group
  • Paucity of multi-agency and multi-disciplinary
    schemes, including criminal justice liaison
  • A history of slotting people into what support
    services are available rather than what is needed

24
continued
  • Ping-pong
  • Procedures for referring offenders to specialist
    support services are often unclear
  • Prison and probation staff often dont know what
    support is available
  • Information sharing across and between
    organisations is often poor

25
5. Workforce development
  • Limited awareness training or specific training
    for specialist staff, for example police
    interview of vulnerable suspects
  • Gaps in service provision
  • Low quality services
  • Role of prison officer?

26
What needs to be done?
  • Full set of recommendations and check lists for
    action see Prisoners' Voices
    www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/nok
  • Bradley Review 30 April

27
What can we do now?
  • Ensure you have copies of Positive Practice
    Positive Outcomes Autism a guide for criminal
    justice professionals other good resources are
    available
  • Participate in awareness training (organised
    through Offender Health by Neisha Betts
    (neisha.betts_at_csip.org.uk)

28
What can we do?
  • A needs led approach be prepared to create
    packages of support around the individual rather
    than slotting people into what is available
  • Collaborative multi-agency, multi-disciplinary
    working
  • Develop a matrix of available support and gaps in
    provision, but remain flexible
  • Shared training

29
What can we do?
  • Timely and effective information sharing
  • Establish ways to find out who might need support
    and easy referral routes
  • Make changes that will benefit most people, for
    example translate written information into easy
    read

30
What can we do?
  • Prison and probation staff
  • Ensure you have access to learning disability
    expertise know when it is appropriate to
    divert a prisoner/offender into specialist
    services
  • Ensure education staff are qualified in special
    education needs including access to a dyslexia
    specialist work together to put in place
    practical arrangements to support people who
    cant read and write very well or at all

31
What can we do?
  • Try to arrange advocacy support in particular for
    parole boards and disciplinary hearings
  • Find out which prison regime/community activities
    are fully accessible, including CBTPs
  • Prison staff alert adult social services at
    least 12 weeks prior to a prisoner with learning
    disabilities (or otherwise vulnerable) leaving
    prison (see PRT article)

32
For further information
  • www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/nok
  • Thank you
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com