CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATIO - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATIO

Description:

Over 13 million Americans are estimated to have chronic kidney disease (CKD) ... Estimated (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2) calculated by simplified MDRD equation (Levey ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:46
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: rah62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATIO


1
CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE
PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR
FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)
2
Introduction
  • Over 13 million Americans are estimated to have
    chronic kidney disease (CKD)
  • Patients with CKD are at very high risk for
    cardiovascular disease (CVD)
  • There are limited data about the comparative
    effects of antihypertensive therapy on CVD
    outcomes in CKD patients
  • Since risk of CVD is much higher than risk for
    ESRD in CKD patients, choices of therapy need to
    be guided by effects on CVD outcomes
  • 17.7 (n7116) of ALLHAT participants had an
    estimated GFR lt60 ml/min/1.73m2 at baseline

3
Other Studies
  • Many trials that studied patients with CKD do not
    have adequate assessment / reporting or power to
    evaluate CV events
  • HOPE demonstrated increased CV risk in patients
    with renal insufficiency and that ramipril
    reduced risk in this subgroup compared to placebo
  • IDNT and RENAAL showed similar CV event rates
    with ARB vs CCB (IDNT) and placebo (RENAAL),
    except hospitalization for first heart failure in
    RENAAL was lower with the ARB
  • AASK (beta blocker, ACE, CCB) showed no
    difference in CV event rates

4
Baseline Characteristics Stratified By Estimated
GFR
Estimated (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2) calculated by
simplified MDRD equation (Levey et al., J Am Soc
Nephrol 11, A 0828. 2000.) plt.05 compared with
normal GFR NOTE Within each GFR stratum, there
was no significant difference in these
characteristics between patients assigned to
amlodipine or lisinopril compared with patients
assigned to chlorthalidone.
5
Relative Risk of Combined CVD by Baseline GFR
Group(Adjusted for Age, Race, Gender, BMI, SBP,
DBP, HDL-cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, fasting
triglycerides, history of diabetes, and cigarette
smoking)


Estimated (eGFR) (ml/min/1.73 m2) calculated by
simplified MDRD equation P lt0.001 vs. GFR90
6
Blood Pressure at 4 Years by Treatment Group and
Baseline GFR
7
Evaluating Treatment Effects by Subgroup
Interaction Use subgroup estimates of treatment
effects No interaction Use estimate of
treatment effect in total population
8
CHD (Nonfatal MI Fatal CHD) by Baseline GFR
Treatment Amlodipine vs Chlorthalidone
9
CHD (Nonfatal MI Fatal CHD) by Baseline GFR
Treatment Lisinopril vs Chlorthalidone
10
CHD (Nonfatal MI Fatal CHD) by Baseline GFR
Treatment in Diabetic Participants Amlodipine
vs Chlorthalidone
11
CHD (Nonfatal MI Fatal CHD) by Baseline GFR
Treatment in Diabetic Participants Lisinopril
vs Chlorthalidone
12
Combined CVD by Baseline GFR Treatment -
Amlodipine vs Chlorthalidone
13
Combined CVD by Baseline GFR Treatment
Lisinopril vs Chlorthalidone
14
Combined CVD by Baseline GFR Treatment in
Diabetic Participants - Amlodipine vs
Chlorthalidone
15
Combined CVD by Baseline GFR Treatment in
Diabetic Participants - Lisinopril vs
Chlorthalidone
16
Stroke by Baseline GFR Treatment - Amlodipine
vs Chlorthalidone
17
Stroke by Baseline GFR Treatment Lisinopril
vs Chlorthalidone
18
Stroke by Baseline GFR Treatment in Diabetic
Participants - Amlodipine vs Chlorthalidone
19
Stroke by Baseline GFR Treatment in Diabetic
Participants - Lisinopril vs Chlorthalidone
20
Heart Failure by Baseline GFR Treatment
-Amlodipine vs Chlorthalidone
21
Heart Failure by Baseline GFR Treatment -
Lisinopril vs Chlorthalidone
22
Heart Failure by Baseline GFR Treatment in
Diabetic Participants - Amlodipine vs
Chlorthalidone
23
Heart Failure by Baseline GFR Treatment in
Diabetic Participants - Lisinopril vs
Chlorthalidone
24
Discussion
  • ALLHAT confirms increased risk for CVD in
    patients with reduced GFR.
  • The overall study results of no difference in the
    primary outcome for the lisinopril vs.
    chlorthalidone and amlodipine vs. chlorthalidone
    comparisons was consistent across diabetes, GFR,
    and diabetes-GFR subgroups.

25
Conclusion
In high risk hypertensive patients with impaired
renal function
  • Amlodipine and lisinopril are not superior to
    chlorthalidone in preventing fatal CHD/non fatal
    MI
  • Chlorthalidone and amlodipine are similar but
    chlorthalidone is superior to lisinopril in
    reducing combined CVD events independent of level
    of renal function.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com