GIL Serial Holdings Working Group: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 15
About This Presentation
Title:

GIL Serial Holdings Working Group:

Description:

Small reduction in data elements required, however, the Working Group still ... Must attach holdings symbol in OCLC for records imported via remote searching ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:27
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 16
Provided by: guyf6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: GIL Serial Holdings Working Group:


1
GIL Serial Holdings Working Group
  • Update on additions and revisions of the
    Guidelines for Holdings Statements
  • http//books.valdosta.edu/gil/cat/guide.html

2
Identifying Updated and New Pages
  • LDR Batch Updates to OCLC Rev. in 2005
  • URLs in Holdings Pros and Cons New for 2005

3
Batch Loading LDRs in OCLC
  • OCLC Now in the 3rd revision of guidelines
  • New in the 3rd OCLC will now accept packaged
    data (e.g., Excel spreadsheet) which will then be
    convert to the appropriate subfields
  • Small reduction in data elements required,
    however, the Working Group still recommends all
    of the c/ps in the Leader, 008, etc. be recorded

4
Multivolume Monographs
  • Do not use an open dash for single volumes (e.g.,
    v.1)
  • Repeat caption (v.1-v.3,v.5) so that the display
    will be the same as serials
  • Coding of Leader (v) is optional
  • Coding of 008 c/p 6 as
  • 4 Currently Received
  • 2 Complete

5
Multivolume Monographs cont.
  • Optionally Record c/p 16
  • 1 Complete
  • 2 Incomplete
  • Textual v. coded terminology in ANSI/NISO
    standard textual values does not mean data
    recorded in the 866 field

6
  • Textual value example XXX Spec Coll c.1
    RA423.B24 19960111 (incomplete) v.1-10
  • Coded example XXX Spec Coll c.1 RA423.B24
    19960111 (a,ta,2,0,8) v.1-10
  • In Voyager, we only have the coded option

7
URL Location Options
  • Bibliographic Record
  • Holdings Record
  • Combination

8
URL in Bibliographic Record
  • Pros
  • Vendor supplied records
  • Free resources
  • Part of MARC description
  • Cons
  • Local access information
  • Union Catalog
  • Records without mfhds

9
URL in Holdings Record
  • Pros
  • More appropriate for local access information
  • Call number search
  • Union Catalog
  • Cons
  • Need dummy URL in bib record for all records if
    graphic display is desired

10
Combination Bib and Mfhd
  • Links for free resources in Bib, holdings, or
    both
  • Links for restricted resources in mfhd with dummy
    in bib
  • Links for related resources such as links to TOC,
    author information in bib

11
Recommendation for using the 856 tag in USG GIL
Catalogs
  • For all unrestricted access E-Resources
  • Insert 856 tag into bibliographic record or
    holdings (with bib dummy 856)
  • For all restricted access E-Resources
  • Bib records dummy 856 will link to active link
  • In UC, 856 tag with active link displays only for
    libraries with 856 tag in local mfhd
  • Voyager thumbnail will be activated in Title
    Results listing by the dummy 856 in bib record

12
Dummy Format
  • 856 _ _ u z lt/agtClick E-Resource below
  • 856 _ _ u z lt/agtSee Linked Resource below for
    online access.

13
Remote Searching in Voyager
  • Available in Cataloging Module
  • Remote search button appears at bottom right of
    search screen
  • Search one or more libraries
  • Search UC
  • Copy and past individual fields or save entire
    bib record

14
Uses for Remote Searching
  • Locating enhanced records
  • Checking for UC record
  • Tile selected record with local record and
    compare
  • Retrospective projects
  • Georgia documents

15
Proprietary Records
  • Must attach holdings symbol in OCLC for records
    imported via remote searching
  • Some vendors claim records are proprietary
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com