An unbiased flap sampler - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 19
About This Presentation
Title:

An unbiased flap sampler

Description:

First proposed for sampling of hammer-milled sugar cane ... Need to be able to handle large amount of diverted material and large samples ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:23
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 20
Provided by: robinsonge
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: An unbiased flap sampler


1
An unbiased flap sampler
  • Geoff RobinsonCSIRO Mathematical and Information
    Sciences

2
Structure of presentation
  • Description of proposed device
  • Why it works
  • Discussion of features

3
Origin of this idea
  • First proposed for sampling of hammer-milled
    sugar cane
  • Problem that hammer-milled sugar cane will not
    always fall down a vertical chute
  • Chute must increase in size from top to bottom
  • Other (political) considerations
  • Sampling of first expressed juice has probably
    changed in bias with improvements in mills

4
(No Transcript)
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
(No Transcript)
10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
How material is divided by continuous operation
of the proposed cutter
14
But Gy said flap samplers are always biased ..?
  • Always contain a larger part of one side of the
    stream
  • These devices are always incorrect and there is
    not remedy
  • The remedy is to take a pair of increments with
    complementary biases

15
Why is sampler correct?
  • Divides whole of continuous stream into discrete
    portions
  • Even if motion of flaps is not at uniform speed
  • Like a slat conveyor
  • Take one portion as a sample

16
Practical issues
  • Flaps and pathways could be organised differently
  • Final pathways for sample could be adjacent
  • Final pathways for through could also be
    adjacent
  • Take care that ultrafines do not get through
    cracks and end up being over-sampled
  • Ensure that dust goes into through most of the
    time

17
Good features
  • Cheap to construct
  • Chutes could be used instead of flaps
  • The system does not have to be open to the
    atmosphere
  • Easy to maintain

18
Disadvantage compared to falling stream cutters
and cross-stream cutters
  • Takes larger samples
  • Because flaps B and C must only be moved when not
    material is flowing past them
  • Thereby increases cost of next sample preparation
    steps
  • Need to be able to check that flaps B and C are
    not moved while material is flowing past them

19
Choice in practice
  • Need a reliable way to change the route travelled
    by the entire stream
  • Likely to be useful for sampling alumina?
  • Need to be able to handle large amount of
    diverted material and large samples
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com