HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION PERSPECTIVES IN ICZM ADMINISTRATION MODELS : SMAP III GOKOVA EXAMPLE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION PERSPECTIVES IN ICZM ADMINISTRATION MODELS : SMAP III GOKOVA EXAMPLE

Description:

This Advisory Committee met every month to discuss a specific problematic issue of the region. ... MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT. LOCAL ENVIRONMENT BOARD (HEADED BY ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:100
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: CCC110
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION PERSPECTIVES IN ICZM ADMINISTRATION MODELS : SMAP III GOKOVA EXAMPLE


1
(No Transcript)
2
  • HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL INTEGRATION PERSPECTIVES
    IN ICZM ADMINISTRATION MODELS SMAP III GOKOVA
    EXAMPLE
  • 29- 30 JUNE 2009
  • SMAPIII REGIONAL SEMINAR
  • MARSEILLES
  • Prof. Dr. Atila Yücel
  • SMAPIII Gokova Project Coordinator

3
INTEGRATION IN MANAGEMENT MODELS
  • IN ANY MANAGEMENT MODEL, VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL
    INTEGRATION
  • -IS A VITAL ELEMENT FOR SUCCESS
  • -IS A PLANNED ACTIVITY
  • -SHOULD BE CAREFULLY STRUCTURED IN THE PROJECT
    PROPOSAL
  • -ALL LEVELS SHOULD BE INCLUDED AS PARTNERS OF
    THE PROJECT
  • -PROJECT SHOULD BE MANAGED WITH INTEGRATION IN
    MIND

4
SETTING FOR INTEGRATION
  • -During the execution of the Gokova Project an
    Advisory Committee made of a larger participation
    of offices of the partners plus all the local
    stakeholders was operational. This Advisory
    Committee met every month to discuss a specific
    problematic issue of the region. Altogether 27
    meetings were held throughout the Project. This
    Committee formed a good basis for horizontal
    integration.
  • .

5
SETTING FOR INTEGRATION
  • -However there was no means for a vertical
    integration. With the change in management of the
    Project an Executive Board was formed consisting
    of the high level representatives of the Partners
    namely Mugla Governorate (one vice governor), Ula
    Sub- Governorate (the sub-governor himself),
    Akyaka Mayorship (the Mayor himself) and EPASA
    representative (vice director of Koycegiz
    office). This Board held meetings almost every
    week to discuss and review the technical findings
    and administrative issues related to the region.
    The results were reported to higher levels
    periodically.

6
SETTING FOR INTEGRATION
  • These two seperate levels of Boards helped
    considerably in reaching satisfactory levels of
    commitments and both vertical and horizontal
    integration for implementation of the ICZM and
    Action Plan.

7
HORIZONTAL INTEGRATION IN GOKOVA ICZM
ADMINISTRATION MODEL

SUB-GOVERNORATE OF ULA
LOCAL STAKEHOLDERS
AKYAKA MUNICIPALITY
8
VERTICAL INTEGRATION
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AGENCY for SPECIAL AREAS
  • .

MINISTRY OF THE ENVIRONMENT
NATIONAL LEVEL
MUGLA GOVERNORATE
REGIONAL LEVEL
SUB-GOVERNORATE OF ULA
LOCAL LEVEL
9
ADMINISTRATION MODEL FOR GOKOVA

MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT LOCAL ENVIRONMENT
BOARD (HEADED BY MUGLA GOVERNOR)
PROVINCIAL LEVEL (REGIONAL)
ULA ICZM ADMINISTRATIVE BOARD (HEADED BY ULA
SUBGOVERNOR)
DISTRICT LEVEL (LOCAL)
ULA SUBGOVERNOR
EXECUTION OF DECISIONS
10
PRESENT STATUS
  • ICZMA Plan has been presented to partners and
    local stakeholders.
  • In order to start the implementation of the Plan
    financial means must be enabled.
  • As stated in the ICZMA Plan a new legislation is
    needed to be able to initiate a budget.
  • New projects and sources are needed to finance
    the implementation process.

11
THANKS FOR LISTENING
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com