Vanderbilt%20University%20Honors%20182:%20Neuroethics - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Vanderbilt%20University%20Honors%20182:%20Neuroethics

Description:

Vanderbilt University Honors 182: Neuroethics – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:37
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: keith329
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Vanderbilt%20University%20Honors%20182:%20Neuroethics


1
Vanderbilt University Honors 182 Neuroethics
I Cannot Tell a Lie The Biological Basis of the
Excited Utterance Exception to the Hearsay Rule
Michael VandenberghDavid Chooljian Vanderbilt
University School of LawApril 6, 2006
2
Key Questions
  • What is the hearsay rule?
  • What is the excited utterance
  • exception?
  • Why do we have these rules?
  • Does our understanding of the
  • brain provide support for the
  • excited utterance exception?
  • Does it suggest modifications to
  • the excited utterance exception?
  • Can law help frame questions for
  • biological research?

2
3
The Hearsay Problem
  • The Problem Reliability of
  • Testimony
  • The Legal Solution Cross-
  • Examination
  • The Next Problem Hearsay
  • Cross Examination Witness v.
  • Declarant

3
4
The Hearsay Rule
  • Federal Rules of Evidence 801, 802
  • Out of court statement
  • By someone other than the witness
  • Offered for the truth of the
  • proposition
  • Example that has been on the
  • floor several hours

4
5
The Excited Utterance Exception
  • Federal Rule of Evidence 803(2)
  • Utterance admissible
  • If declarant experiences a
  • startling event or condition and
  • If declarant makes a statement
  • while under the stress of
  • excitement caused by the
  • condition

5
6
The Excited Utterance Exception
  • Unavailability of the declarant not required.
  • Tesimony that declarant was distraught and that
    there was a basis for the distress often
    sufficient to establish that the statement was
    made in a state of excitement.

6
7
The Excited Utterance Exception
  • Courts vary on the length of the temporal gap
    that may occur between the event and the
    statement (duration of the state of
    excitement).
  • Declarants increased trustworthiness is a
    surrogate for cross-examination.
  • Wigmore on Evidence 1747 (1904) a condition
    of excitement which temporarily stills the
    capacity of reflection and produces utterances
    free of conscious fabrication.

7
8
The Neurophysiology of Excited Utterances Key
Questions
  • Is it physically impossible to lie when making
    an excited utterance?
  • If not impossible, is it more difficult?
  • Any utterance or only wordless exclamations?
  • What is the maximum time interval?
  • What is the necessary extent of excitement?
  • Do certain events still the mind more than
    others?

8
9
The Neurophysiology of Excited Utterances
Overview
ACG
9
10
Implications, Part I
  • Is it physically impossible to lie when making an
    excited utterance?
  • Any utterance or only
  • wordless exclamations?
  • What is the maximum time
  • interval?
  • What is the necessary extent of
  • excitement?

10
11
Implications, Part II
  • Broader Questions
  • Does biological research offer insights for other
    rules of evidence (e.g., exception for present
    sense impressions)?
  • When can law frame questions for biological
    research?
  • When can the results of biological research
    influence legal doctrines?
  • Should law reflect the product of biological
    research?

11
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com