Benchmarking Best Practices and Establishing Key Performance Indicators - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 26
About This Presentation
Title:

Benchmarking Best Practices and Establishing Key Performance Indicators

Description:

Benchmarking is the search for best practices. ... Paddy Campbell. Maintenance. PP 64B. S01366564. 3. No. Yes. No. Yes. No. Yes. Indicate Action Taken ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:395
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: ROGI5
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Benchmarking Best Practices and Establishing Key Performance Indicators


1
Benchmarking Best Practicesand EstablishingKey
Performance Indicators
  • CAUBO 2004
  • June 12, 2004

2
BenchmarkingThe U of C Experience
  • Definitions
  • Key Elements of Benchmarking
  • Key Performance Indicators and Measuring the
    Results
  • Outcomes
  • Observations and Issues

3
Benchmarking
  • Benchmarking is the search for best practices.
  • Benchmarking allows your organization to see what
    others are doing, what is working for them, and
    what to avoid.
  • The American Productivity Quality Center
    defines benchmarking as
  • "'the process of identifying, understanding, and
    adapting outstanding practices and processes from
    organizations anywhere in the world to help your
    organization improve its performance."

4
Best Practice
  • A best practice is a proven and documented
    strategy or tactic that delivers measurable
    improvements in economies, efficiency and/or
    effectiveness.
  • They must
  • Drive a measurable change in performance
  • Be Proven in practice
  • Apply to a broad spectrum of organizations
  • Exploit proven technologies
  • Ensure effective control and risk management
  • Best Practices allow companies to outperform
    their
  • competitors and peers in specific operational
    areas
  • and deliver more value at less cost.

PeopleSoft HEUG 2004
5
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
  • Definition
  • Activities, transactions and attributes of a
    supply department that are selected from accepted
    benchmarking practice measurements and from
    unique internal operations that represent the
    performance of the supply operation and which are
    used to compare and measure performance toward
    achieving the departments vision and best
    practice.
  • Types
  • Quantitative
  • Qualitative
  • Values Based
  • Richard Ogilvie 2004

6
Quantitative Indicators
  • These are
  • economies and efficiencies indicators that are
    easily quantifiable and lend themselves to
    statistical measurement and reporting.
  • These may include statistics such as
  • Number of purchase orders processed, dollar
    values of purchase orders etc.
  • Richard Ogilvie 2004

7
Qualitative Indicators
  • These are
  • effectiveness indicators
  • not as easily identifiable as their quantitative
    counterparts.
  • Identifiable attributes of your operation that
    can impact the success of your operation.
  • These can include
  • customer satisfaction levels, professional
    certification, defined skill sets, training,
    documented procedures, etc.
  • Richard Ogilvie 2004

8
Values Based Indicators
  • These relate
  • to areas that define the core activities, values
    and belief system of an organization and can
    represent a broad range of subject matter
    anywhere from business priorities and innovation
    through to social responsibilities and ethics.
  • These can include
  • values of an organization that distinguish it or
    make it stand out from other organizations
  • codes of conduct, quality of work life
    statements, statements of moral responsibility
    and positions on social and environmental issues
    as well as organizational emphasis on such things
    as the value and access to education, corporate
    contribution to the community, strategic business
    direction etc.
  • These are
  • seen most often as guiding principles underlying
    strategic supply relationships
  • Richard Ogilvie 2004

9
Key Elements of Benchmarking
  • Knowing what you want to be (vision)
    environmental scan and search for best practices
    external benchmarking and translate to fit your
    university
  • Knowing what you want to do to get there (goals)
    - environmental scan and search for best
    practices external benchmarking and translate
    to fit your university
  • Knowing where you have been and where you are now
    (past and current state assessment) internal
    scan and identify key performance indicators that
    can be tracked historically (how do you know
    where you want to be and how you want to get
    there, if you dont know where you have been and
    what you were doing and where you are today and
    how you got here)
  • Measuring your performance historical to current
    and between organizations - internal and external
    to let you know how you are doing and making
    adjustments where necessary
  • Continuous Improvement exercising
    Self-discipline in analyzing, interpreting,
    sharing data and information and implementing
    improvements
  • Richard Ogilvie 2004

10
Knowing what you want to be (vision) best
practices and external benchmarking (external
environmental scan)
  • Some things to remember about university supply
    management and visioning your role
  • You function in a diverse and complex
    organization atmosphere! select your supply
    management tools carefully to reflect the
    diversity and decentralization necessary (do not
    put all of your eggs in one basket)
  • Whatever services you supply it is in support of
    the core mission of the university! (different
    institutions provide different supply services
    within their purchasing operations) do not
    consider these services in isolation of other
    services in the supply chain add value . dont
    download work
  • There is a myriad of information available to you
    on strategically positioning purchasing and
    supply management within organizations! (NIGP,
    ISM, CAPS etc.) research it
  • Adding value while reducing cost to your
    university is not just best practice! - it is the
    essence of supply chain management

11
Knowing what you want to be (vision) -
Translating the environmental scan and best
practice into vision at the U of C
  • Commencing in 1997
  • Have utilized a facilitated strategic planning
    process
  • Involves key Materials Management staff (50 of
    the total staff) and,
  • Occurs annually to review, adjust and update
    mission, goals and objectives this year will be
    our 7th.
  • Complete an annual environmental scan
  • Identify best practice externally and question as
    well as adjust our strategic purchasing alignment
    annually (benchmark)
  • Participate in external benchmarking exercises
    (e.g. U of A, CAUBO, CAPS etc) and,
  • Conduct SWOT Analysis (internally).
  • Examples of areas we look at include supply
    management tools and technology
  • Have developed a Strategic/ Vision Statement
  • Adopted a Supply Chain Management Strategy which
    sees the U of Cs Materials Management department
    as the synthesis of its customer and materiel
    requirements, its supply processes, its staff,
    the Universitys values and its supplier
    relationships - it exists to maximize the supply
    value to the organization

12
Knowing what you want to do to get there (goals)
Translating vision into measurable goals at the
U of C
  • Ultimately our U of C Materials Management Goals
    are to
  • Reduce the amount of time spent on purchasing
    transaction processing both centrally and
    de-centrally (best practice)
  • Increase the amount of time spent on introducing
    value-added supply services (best practice)
    and,
  • Increase the time spent on understanding and
    acting on the performance of supply services
    (best practice) .
  • We have planned to get there by
  • Searching for continuous improvement in our
    operations (best practice)
  • Emphasizing the importance of our staff and their
    professional development (best practice)
  • Applying technology wherever we can leverage
    efficiency (best practice)
  • Applying the appropriate supply management tools
    to fit the need (best practice) and,
  • Demonstrating respect and professionalism in our
    business approach and ethics (best practice) .

13
Traditional Purchasing ModelU of C 1996
  • Purchasing Cycle as a Function of Time

14
Strategic Supply Chain ManagementDesired State
(Materiel Management)1996
  • Supply Chain Management Cycle as a Function of
    Time

Coordinating Supply Programs (Transaction
Processing) Reduce Labour and Costs
Time
15
Knowing where you have been and where you are now
(past and current state assessment) Gathering
data and reporting on key performance indicators
  • Data Gathering
  • 1997 - Identified data that we wanted to start
    capturing that would allow U of C to measure
    ourselves next to our vision (best practices) and
    have continued to add data as we find ways to
    capture it
  • Report raw data and summarized information
    (selected key performance indicators) no less
    than annually and the majority of the data
    monthly, quarterly and annually
  • Benchmarking
  • Data is available to respond to best practice
    comparisons (e.g. external comparisons such as
    CAPS, CAUBO etc.)
  • Data is available to measure progress toward best
    practice

16
Measuring Performance - Quantitative Data
Gathering
  • Sample data gathered each month and compared to
    the previous four years (Purchasing Services
    Samples Only)
  • Number of purchase orders processed by type,
    Buyer, zone assignment, dollar value
  • Direct labour cost of producing a purchase order
    by type, Buyer, auto-distribution
  • Purchasing card transactions by individual and
    type
  • Competitive bids by type, Buyer, zone
    assignment, dollar value
  • Hours worked versus hours available
  • Workloads by activity, Buyer, zone assignment
    and cost centre
  • Supplier transactions, dollar volumes, fill
    rates, delivery time etc.

17
Quantitative Performance Indicators for Measuring
Economies andEfficiencies Best Practice
  • Samples
  • Cost per Buyer Processed Order versus
    Electronically Processed Order measures labour
    cost reduction and impact of utilizing electronic
    business tools (best practice)
  • Number of Orders Processed Electronically versus
    Manually measures progress in moving from labour
    intensive transaction processing to electronic
    transaction processing (best practice)
  • Buyer Workload Purchase Order Processing
    Workload versus Competitive Bidding, Negotiation
    etc. Workload measures progress toward value add
    activities versus clerical activities (best
    practice)

18
Example - Individual YTD Direct Variable Purchase
Order and Competitive Bid/Contracts Processing
Costs per Activity Type
19
Example Quantitative IndicatorMeasuring
Progress toward Value-Add Purchasing
20
Measuring Performance - Qualitative Data Gathering
  • Sample data gathered (Purchasing Services Only)
  • Monthly contracted supplier sample audits
    includes product/price check, delivery check,
    method of requisitioning and customer
    satisfaction check with follow-up on issues
  • Staff training by staff member, by course, by
    budget (annually)
  • Professional and university designations by
    staff group (annually)
  • Types of purchasing programs/tools implemented
    and usage
  • Absenteeism rates
  • Documentation and procedural reviews about every
    three to four years

21
Qualitative Performance Indicators for Measuring
Effectiveness Best Practice
  • Samples
  • Professional Standards measures the level of
    staff training to address the changing
    complexities of the job in moving from
    transaction processing to value add (best
    practice)
  • Accreditation Standards measures whether the key
    components of a Materials Management operation
    are present and the appropriate purchasing tools
    are being used (best practice)
  • Customer Satisfaction measures whether the right
    product was ordered using the right purchasing
    tools and it was received at the right cost at
    the right time (best practice)

22
Example Monthly Quality Assurance and Internal
Control Audit
Catalyst Systems Contract W/O Catalogue Audit
Supplier Accurate Stamp April 2004
23
Measuring Performance Values Based Data
Gathering and Indicators
  • Under Construction
  • Best practice
  • strategic supplier relationships established
    through an alignment of organizational values
    (e.g. the Balanced Score Card)
  • U of C Actions to date
  • Created the Academic Plan the driver for all U
    of C activities
  • Created a Business Development Office to
    establish and manage strategic relationships
  • Formed draft policy for establishing strategic
    business relationships
  • Some value based purchasing policies in place
    e.g. environmental purchasing policy

24
OutcomeU of C Supply Chain Management2004
  • Supply Chain Management Cycle as a Function of
    Time

Coordinating Supply Programs (Transaction
Processing) Reduce Labour and Costs
Time
25
Benchmarking as Best Practice
  • The U of C Materials Management Experience
  • benchmarking is in itself a best practice
  • benchmarking is all about continuous business
    improvement it cannot be a one hit wonder it
    has to be integrated into your business
    philosophy and business practice
  • benchmarking is about change management giving
    staff and administration an understanding of what
    you want to achieve, reporting your progress and
    rewarding outcomes
  • benchmarking is about ensuring that you are
    selecting the best tools (best practices) to get
    the job done
  • . we would not have achieved our significant
    business advancements and improvements without it
    ..

26
University Supply Management BenchmarkingSome
Challenges and Issues
  • Lack of qualitative standards e.g. accreditation
    standards are non-existent that define, if not
    best practice, accepted practice
  • Lack of external reviews focusing on best and
    accepted practice
  • The One Hit Wonder i.e. no sustained
    benchmarking activity, that would benchmark
    institutions on a periodic but regular basis e.g.
    every 3 to 4 years
  • Institutions not geared for service evaluation
    e.g. treading water syndrome
  • Institutions not identifying the values and
    guiding principles that should drive business
    relationships with suppliers e.g. not only
    missing out on a best practice but how do you
    measure the effectiveness of these business
    relationships if you do not understand the basis
    on which they are built
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com