Publicprivate Partnership for Rural Infrastructure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

Publicprivate Partnership for Rural Infrastructure

Description:

How do PPPs differ from privatisation? How do PPPs differ from contracting out? ... Privatisation: a privatised business is independent of the creation of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: fao
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Publicprivate Partnership for Rural Infrastructure


1
Public-private Partnership for Rural
Infrastructure
  • FAO-AGS September 2006

2
Outline of presentation
  • What is PPP?
  • Why PPP?
  • PPP Arrangements Models
  • Stages of PPP development
  • Issues

3
  • What is a PPP?

4
  • Arrangements where private parties participate in
    or provide support for the provision of
    infrastructure.
  • Arrangements between the government and the
    private sector with the main objective of
    securing investment and greater efficiency in the
    delivery of local infrastructure and support
    services

5
Questions about PPPs
  • Where did the idea of PPPs originate?
  • What caused the re-growth of PPPs?
  • What is wrong with traditional public procurement
    methods?
  • Can PPPs be structured to achieve value for
    money?
  • Can governments transform themselves from
    purchasers of infrastructure assets to managers
    of long term contractual relations?
  • What are the administrative requirements needed
    for them to do so?

6
Division of responsibilities and functions
  • The public sector transfers land, property or
    facilities controlled by it to the private sector
    entity for the term of the arrangement.
  • The private sector entity builds, extends and
    renovates a facility.
  • The public sector entity specifies the operating
    services of the facility
  • Services are provided by the private sector
    entity using the facility for a defined period of
    time.
  • The private sector entity agrees to transfer the
    facility to the public sector at the end of the
    arrangement.

7
What are the common characteristics of PPPs?
  • Participants Two or more parties with a least
    one of them a public body.
  • Relationship Partnerships need to be enduring
    and reliable
  • Resourcing Each participant must bring something
    of value to the partnership
  • Sharing Collaborative framework for sharing
    responsibility and risk for outcomes mutual
    interest and unifiedcommitment.
  • Continuity Underpinning the partnership will be
    a framework contract which sets out the rules of
    the game

8
Specific characteristics
  • Type economic, social, soft, hard
  • Focus on services paid by government to private
    entity services delivered through privately
    owned or rented infrastructure
  • Whole-of-life cycle costing complete integration
    design, construction, service delivery,
    operational, maintenance and refurbishment costs.
  • Innovation focus on output specifications
  • Risk allocation transfer of risk to private
    sector lowers cost to government

9
Common misconceptions
  • How do PPPs differ from privatisation?
  • How do PPPs differ from contracting out?
  • What is the impact of a PPP agenda on public
    sector management?

10
How do PPPs differ from privatization?
  • Privatization- The transfer of a public service
    or facility to the private sector costs and
    revenues are in private hands.
  • PPP - public sector actors share costs, revenues
    and responsibilities bringing private management
    into public service.

11
How do PPPs differ from contracting out?
  • Privatisation a privatised business is
    independent of the creation of competition (may
    hold a monopoly situation)
  • Contracting out involves opening up competition
    to new economic activities.

12
What is the impact of PPPs on public sector
management?
  • They have the potential to introduce market
    discipline into public services.
  • PPPs encourage a shift in the problem solution
    from processes towards outputs and outcomes
  • PPPs allow for financial risks to be shifted from
    public to private investors.
  • Partnership can be used to restructure public
    services.
  • PPPs can alter business-government relations
    creating an ethos of cooperation and trust,
    sharing of information, knowledge.

13
  • Why PPP?

14
Public character of infrastructure
  • Provision of network services that bind economic
    activity together.
  • Infrastructure gives rise to natural monopolies
  • Infrastructure involves very large investments
  • Network externalities (spill overs of costs and
    benefits)

15
Private sector contribution
  • Closer attention to revenues, costs and market
    demands.
  • Access to equity and private loan finance
  • Involves creating a management structure with
    clear goals, making managers accountable for
    performance.

16
Benefits
  • Value for money
  • Bundling
  • Capital requirements
  • Whole-life costing
  • Cost savings
  • Risk sharing
  • Improved level of services
  • Enhancement of income
  • More efficient implementation
  • Investing in human capital

17
  • PPP Arrangements and Models

18
PPP Arrangements
  • There is no one type public private partnership
    arrangement that can be recommended as best for
    all parties.
  • Arrangements vary from place to place, depending
    on the type of infrastructure, the nature and
    strength of the private sector etc.
  • In general PPP collaboration can take two forms
  • Formal types of partnerships through contracts,
    leasing arrangements and joint ventures and
  • Informal partnerships by forging alliances,
    clustering business enterprises, developing value
    chains and collaborative arrangements between
    different stakeholders.

19
Rules of engagement
  • The public sector defines the services it
    requires over a given period specifies outputs
    and performance criteria.
  • No payments are made until the asset is delivered
    and working and subsequent payments are subject
    to reduction if performance standards are not
    met.
  • Design decisions are left to the private sector
    entity and assets are often owned and operated by
    the private sector.
  • Public sector provides no funding during the
    construction phase and risks of no meeting
    performance targets rests with the private
    sector.
  • Public sector devolves control over assets and
    resources needed to the private sector the
    latter bears the risk and receives the rewards of
    effective ownership.

20
Managing risk
  • PPP is about putting in place appropriate
    strategies for appraising and managing the risks.
  • PPP is a process that ensures that all risks
    (public and private) are taken into account and
    valued.
  • Having equity capital and borrowing at risk
    ensures that calculations are more realistic.

21
Common features of arrangements
  • Focus on services with the emphasis on the
    delivery of infrastructure services
  • Planning and specification so that desired
    outcomes and outputs are clear to the market
  • Creating a viable business case for private
    entities
  • Up front mobilisation of resources to enable
    governments to advance the project.
  • Clear contractual requirements centred on key
    performance specifications.
  • Contract management to monitor and implement the
    contract.

22
Delivery models
  • Public sector delivery of services with private
    entities providing infrastructure related
    services
  • Public sector delivery of core services with
    private parties providing infrastructure related
    and ancillary services
  • Public delivery of core services with private
    parties providing infrastructure related and
    ancillary services together with some services to
    the community
  • Private sector delivery of a full range of
    services to the community inclusive of
    infrastructure

23
Range of commercial scenarios
  • an arrangement where demand is effectively
    controlled by government and the costs of service
    delivery are substantially or fully funded by
    government
  • an arrangement where government has little
    control over demand and shares the costs of
    service provision with users
  • an arrangement where government has no control
    over demand, costs of service delivery are fully
    funded by users and governments role is limited
    to providing some supporting infrastructure or
    project facilitation in areas such as planning.

24
Common models
  • Build Operate Transfer (BOT)
  • Build Own Operate (BOO)
  • Leasing
  • Concessions
  • Joint ventures
  • Operational management contracts
  • Cooperative arrangements

25
  • Stages of PPP development

26
Stages of a PPP transaction
  • Pre-implementation
  • Identify the service need
  • Appraisal of options
  • Development of business case
  • Bidding/ tendering process
  • Selection of private sector contractors
  • Final negotiation and contract signing
  • Financial commitment

27
Stages of a PPP transaction (contd.)
  • Implementation
  • Design
  • Construction
  • Operations
  • Maintenance

28
Changed role of government
  • authorize contracts
  • evaluate infrastructure needs
  • Provide supporting facilities (e.g. land)
  • Define performance outcomes and standards,
  • Undertake procurement planning
  • Ensure facilities are constructed, used and
    maintained satisfactorily
  • Require compliance with standards and
    specifications
  • Monitor business and financial viability
  • Assess environmental impacts
  • Guarantee community access and achieve social
    policy objectives

29
Organisational arrangements
  • Partners public sector procurers, private
    sector, financiers, subcontractors, consultants
    and service providers
  • Organisational structure
  • Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV). This could be a
    project company to contract the public procurer
    and sub-contractors.

30
Critical factors for success
  • Creating common interest (compatible goals)
  • Public support (accountability to its customers)
  • Enabling environment (economic, business,
    regulatory, legal, political)

31
  • Issues

32
  • Fully integrated or bundled structures?
  • Are PPPs good value for money?
  • How should risk and uncertainty be handled?
  • How should PPPs be accounted for?
  • Can PPPs adequately provide for the public
    interest?

33
Issues (Contd.)
  • How to make the transition from public to
    private?
  • How to ensure fair contractual arrangements and
    transparency?
  • How and when to design incentives, subsidies and
    compensation?
  • What is the role of NGOs?
  • How to access investment finance?
  • What mechanisms can be used to resolve disputes?

34
Mechanisms used to resolve disputes
  • Negotiation
  • Mediation
  • Conciliation
  • Neutral evaluation
  • Expert determination
  • Adjudication
  • Arbitration
  • Litigation

35
Summary of issues
  • the need to create a common interest
  • create a conducive environment to promote
    partnerships
  • ensure that public support exists
  • ensure a smooth transition from public to private
    management
  • ensure transparency with respect to contractual
    matters and
  • make effective use of incentives and subsidies.

36
When should PPPs be used?
  • Service outcomes can be clearly specified and
    measured
  • There exists both potential and the incentive to
    design innovations and operational changes that
    can raise efficiency
  • Payment mechanisms give the operators the
    motivation to maintain service quality
  • Value for money can be demonstrated after taking
    into account the costs of project development and
    the costs of monitoring the contract
  • An integrated service can be provided with close
    working relationships and good communication
    between service providers and
  • There are transparent accountability procedures
    and due regard for the public interest.

37
Some concerns about PPPs
  • Return to at least partial private sector
    financing and operation of infrastructure is
    privatization through the back door.
  • Whether private sector participation in
    infrastructure will dilute accountability and
    erode the public interest.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com