Management of Advanced Phase CML - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 55
About This Presentation
Title:

Management of Advanced Phase CML

Description:

Management of Advanced Phase CML – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:92
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 56
Provided by: mike376
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Management of Advanced Phase CML


1
Management of Advanced Phase CML
  • Mike Martin, MD

2
Outline
  • Review of advanced CML
  • Imatinib naïve disease
  • Imatinib resistant or intolerant disease
  • Impact of clonal evolution
  • Ongoing trials
  • Summary

3
Pathophysiology
  • Constitutive activation of ABL leads to genomic
    and epigenetic instability
  • Is any abnormal ABL safe? Low level BCRABL
    transcripts eventually lead to progression
    despite imatinib?
  • Stereotyped acquisition of further chromosomal
    abnormalities
  • Trisomy 8, isochromosome 17
  • Progress into an accelerated phase
  • Pre-TKI median duration was 6-18 months
  • Short, terminal BP with myeloid, lymphoid or
    undifferentiated morphology

4
Historic Treatment
  • 80/20 Myeloid undifferiented v. Lymphoid
  • MBP CR rates 10-30, median OS 2-3 months
  • LBP CR rates 30-60, medain OS 6-9 months
  • Sudden BC
  • Less than 3 months from CHR
  • Only 2 in first 2 years after diagnosis
  • Generally in low-risk individuals
  • 25 of BC
  • 21 Lymphoid over Myeloid

Kantarjian HM, Keating MJ, Talpaz M et al.
Chronic myelogenous leukemia in blast crisis.
Analysis of 242 patients. Am J Med. 1987 83
445-54.
5
Definitions of disease states (WHO)
  • Accelerated Phase
  • Blasts 10-19 in PB or BM
  • PB basophils gt20
  • Persistent thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis
  • Increasing spleen size and WBC count un
    responsive to therapy
  • Cytogenetic evidence of clonal evolution
  • Blast Phase
  • gt 20 blasts in PB or BM
  • Extramedullary blast proliferation
  • Large foci or clusters of blasts in the bone
    marrow biopsy

6
Response criteria
7
Response Criteria
  • IRIS trial MCyR by 12 months predicted OS
    regardless of therapy
  • CCyR independently predicts OS and is the most
    important prognostic indicator
  • Achieving a hematologic response is a
    prerequisite for a cytogenetic response

8
Traditional Chemotherapy
9
MBP only
Low-dose AraC lt1gm/m2 (5 studies) Intermediate-d
ose AraC 1-3gm/m2 (5 studies) High-dose AraC
9-36mg/m2 (6 studies) Combinations often include
an anthracycline and/or vincristine, etoposide or
carboplatin
10
and 2 from MDACC both with at least 1gm/m2 AraC
11
Decitabine
  • 123 patients
  • 64 BP, 51 AP, and 8 CP
  • 100mg/m2 q12h x5 days x13 pts
  • 75mg/m2 q12h x5 days x 33 pts
  • 50mg/m2 q12h x5 days x 84 pts
  • Dosing punch line no impact of dose intensity on
    response

12
TRM was 3 Febrile neutropenia in 37 Documented
infections in 34 going onto receive an Allo NR
13
Decitabine 2nd study
  • 35 patients
  • Imatinib resistant
  • 15mg/m2 x5 days a week for two weeks

14
(No Transcript)
15
Decitabine vs. Traditional Therapy
  • MDACC retrospective review of MP-CML
  • 162 patients
  • 90 intensive therapy
  • 31 decitabine
  • 41 other single agents
  • 10 only received HU
  • Decitabine group was older but otherwise no
    statistical differences
  • 71 older than 50 versus 37 in the intensive
    therapy arm

16
(No Transcript)
17
Imatinib naive
18
Imatinib in CML-BP
Imatinib doses ranged from 300 to 1000mg daily
in both studies Myeloid responses were slightly
more durable than lymphoid 9 went on to receive
Allo transplant
19
(No Transcript)
20
Sawyers et al Imatinib in BP
Imatinib dosed at 600 800mg daily
21
Imatinib plus etoposide/mitoxantrone and
cytarabine maintenance in MBP
22
Imatinib (600-800mg daily) is the preferred first
line therapy in advanced phase CML
23
Imatinib resistant or intolerant
24
Dasatinib (Talpaz et al, NEJM 2006)
  • Promiscuous inhibitor
  • Phase I
  • Any phase CML or Phi ALL
  • Imatinib resistant or intolerant
  • 84 patients enrolled

25
Response were short lived with the majority of
the patients relapsing in less than 12 and 6
months, respectively No data on going on to
Tx (one mentioned in the results)
26
(No Transcript)
27
Dasatinib Phase II in MBP or LBP
With 8 months of median follow-up Percentage
going on to receive BMT not reported
28
Nilotinib Phase I
29
Nilotinib Phase II trial
  • Minimal cross-intolerance with imatinib
  • Thrombocytopenia only lab abnml intolerance
  • CML-AP
  • 400mg BID with dose-escalation for lack of
    response to 600mg BID

30
(No Transcript)
31
Imatinib plus chemotherapy
  • Imatinib (600mg) plus idarubicin biweekly and
    daily cytarabine
  • 19 patients in MBP
  • 17 had failed single agent imatinib
  • In addition they had failed a median of 5 prior
    therapies

32
Imatinib, idarubicin plus cytarabine
33
Decitabine plus imatinib
  • Decitabine 15mg/m2 daily x5 days x2 weeks
  • Imatinib 600mg daily continuously
  • 28 patients
  • 25 imatinib resistant
  • 32 FN

34
(No Transcript)
35
Dasatinib (70mg BID) is the preferred second line
therapy in advanced phase CML
36
3rd line TKIs?
37
Nilotinib (400mg BID dose-escalated to 600mg BID
for lack of response)
Patients resistant or intolerant of both imatinib
and dasatinib Commons AEs include cytopenias,
low PO4 and high Bilirubin
38
Bosutinib (500mg/day)
41 pts with CML-AP, 35 pts with CML-BP and 21
with Phi ALL Src and ABL TKI, similar to
dasatinib
39
None of the responses to these agents are
durable allogeneic stem cell transplantation is
only hope for long term survival
40
Allogeneic Transplantation
  • Only curative option for advanced disease
  • GVL prominent
  • Long term survival and relapse based on stage at
    time of transplantation
  • Early CP 57 5-year OS, 10 5-year relapse rate
  • NMDP analysis of over 1400 patients
  • 3-year relapse rates
  • CP 6
  • AP 25
  • 2nd CP 27
  • BP 56

Hansen JA, Gooley TA, Martin PJ, et al. Bone
marrow transplants from unrelated donors for
patients with chronic myeloid leukemia. NEJM.
1998 338 962-8. McGlave PB, Shu XO, Wen W, et
al. Unrelated donor marrow transplantation for
chronic myelogenous leukemia 9 years experience
of the National Marrow Donor Program. Blood.
2000 95 2219-25.
41
Other agents
42
HHT
  • Inhibits protein synthesis
  • Phase I trial of s.c. administration
  • 8 patients in BP and 2 in AP
  • Some minor activity described

43
Aurora Kinase inhibitors
  • AKs involved in regulation of mitotic chromosome
    segregation and cytokinesis
  • MK-0457
  • Small molecule AK inhibitor
  • Also blocks JAK2
  • Active in vitro v. T315I mutants
  • Brief report in Blood Jan 2007 describes in vivo
    activity in 3 patients with advanced disease and
    the mutation

44
Clonal evolution
45
Definitions of disease states (WHO)
  • Accelerated Phase
  • Blasts 10-19 in PB or BM
  • PB basophils gt20
  • Persistent thrombocytopenia or thrombocytosis
  • Increasing spleen size and WBC count un
    responsive to therapy
  • Cytogenetic evidence of clonal evolution
  • Blast Phase
  • gt 20 blasts in PB or BM
  • Extramedullary blast proliferation
  • Large foci or clusters of blasts in the bone
    marrow biopsy

46
Impact of clonal evolution
  • Defined as the acquisition of chromosomal
    abnormalities
  • In the Phi clone
  • Criteria for accelerated phase
  • BcrAbl independent proliferation?
  • 71 patients treated with 600mg day (ODwyer ME et
    al Blood 2002)

47
(No Transcript)
48
Imatinib 400-600mg daily
49
AP and Clonal evolution second generation TKIs
(n60)
50
Conclusions about CE
  • Clone still relies heavily on ABL kinase
  • Poor prognostic marker when combined with other
    features of advanced disease

51
CNS disease
52
  • CNS EML more common with lymphoid
  • Rare with myeloid
  • Imatinib does NOT cross the BBB
  • Dasatinib does
  • In vitro and small case series are encouraging
  • Bosutinib also cross the BBB
  • Role for lyposomal cytarabine, etc not fully
    defined

53
Ongoing trials
54
(No Transcript)
55
Acknowledgements
  • Geoffrey Uy, MD
  • John F. DiPersio, MD PhD
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com