The Anthropogenic Ocean Carbon Sink - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

The Anthropogenic Ocean Carbon Sink

Description:

Due to oceanic and land sinks, less than 1/2 of CO2 emissions from industrial ... the Ocean Based on the Global Chlorofluorocarbon Data Set, Science, 299, 235-239. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:85
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: alan140
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Anthropogenic Ocean Carbon Sink


1
The Anthropogenic Ocean Carbon Sink
Alan Cohn March 29, 2006
http//science.hq.nasa.gov/oceans/images/carbon_py
ramid.jpg
2
Due to oceanic and land sinks, less than 1/2 of
CO2 emissions from industrial period remain in
atmosphere.
  • How much is due to land sink and how much is due
    to ocean sink?
  • How have sinks changed over time and how will
    they change in future?

http//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/5/55/Carb
on_cycle-cute_diagram.jpeg
3
O2/N2 technique used in 2001 IPCC report has come
under scrutiny due to inconsistencies in observed
oceanic oxygen concentrations with CO2 inventory.
  • More recent efforts have based CO2 inventories on
    age of water, carbonate chemistry

4
McNeil et al. (2003) used CFC concentrations to
estimate age of water masses
  • Problems with this method.
  • CFCs around for limited time
  • ? dating prior to 30yrs
  • impossible
  • Dont account for Revelle factor

5
Revelle factor is defined as
  • Describes how partial pressure of CO2 in seawater
    changes for a given change in DIC
  • Proportional to ratio btwn DIC and alkalinity
    (oceanic charge balance).
  • Low Revelle factors generally in warm tropical
    and subtropical waters
  • High Revelle factors in cold high latitude waters

6
Sabine et al. (2004) used direct measurements of
DIC to assess changes in anthropogenic ocean CO2
  • Used carbon tracer ?C method to separate
    anthropogenic component

http//www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci305
/5682/367
7
North Atlantic had highest vertically integrated
CO2 concentrations with 23 of global oceanic CO2
  • Mostly due to the rapid sinking of cold water

http//www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci305
/5682/367
8
Southern Ocean south of 50S only contains 9 of
global inventory
  • Southern Hemisphere oceans, however, contain
    about 60 of total oceanic CO2 inventory, mostly
    due to immense area

http//www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sci305
/5682/367
9
Highest concentrations of anthropogenic CO2 are
found near surface, since CO2 enters ocean by
air-sea gas exchange
  • Variations in surface CO2 concentration related
    to how long water has been exposed to atmosphere
    and Revelle factor

10
Capacity for ocean waters to take up
anthropogenic CO2 is inversely related to the
Revelle factor
  • Highest anthropogenic CO2 concentrations found in
    subtropical Atlantic due to low Revelle factor
  • North Pacific has high Revelle factor ? lower
    anthropogenic CO2 concentrations

11
Revelle factor limits uptake so that ocean CO2
inventory is significantly lower than what it
would be if one was to neglect its influence
12
CO2 concentrations at depth determined by how
rapidly near-surface anthropogenic CO2 is
transported into the ocean interior
  • Transport occurs along surfaces of constant
    density, or isopycnals
  • Deepest penetration at mid-latitude convergence
    zones
  • Low vertical penetration in upwelling regions
    like equatorial Pacific

Atmospheric CO2 concentration when water was last
in contact with surface also important
13
High anthropogenic CO2 concentrations off
Antarctica due to
  • High winds
  • Low initial anthropogenic CO2 content of water
  • Rapid sinking

Deepwater has low concentrations because
  • High Revelle factor
  • Limited contact with surface
  • Dilution with older waters

14
Sabine et al. suggest that land has been net
source while ocean is only true net sink
  • They estimate atmospheric CO2 would be about
    55ppmv higher today if it werent for oceanic
    uptake
  • What if oceanic uptake slows down?

http//www.windows.ucar.edu/earth_science/images/o
cean_currents1.jpg
15
Already, there are signs of slowing
  • Uptake fraction has decreased from 28-34 to 26
  • Ocean has slow mixing time
  • ? may not be able to keep up with emissions
  • If given thousands of years, ocean would uptake
    90
  • Positive and Negative feedbacks may take effect

16
Negative feedbacks are mostly chemical
  • Warming ? More stratification ? Transport into
    the interior slows down
  • McNeil et al. suggest that this will not have
    much effect on oceanic uptake
  • Chemical Greater PCO2 of surface ocean ?
    Decrease in carbonate ion concentration ?
    Increase in Revelle factor ? decreased ability to
    absorb CO2

17
Fung et al. modeled future oceanic uptake using 2
different emissions scenarios
  • Includes simplified form of solubility carbon
    pump, organic and inorganic carbon pump, and
    air-sea CO2 flux
  • Scenario A1B Balanced energy sources
  • Fossil Fuel emissions increase until 2050, then
    decrease
  • Scenario A2 Business-as-usual
  • Emissions increase exponentially

18
In balanced energy sources model, mixing of CO2
in deep ocean maintains slower surface CO2
increase
? Oceanic sink steadily increases
? Atmospheric CO2 concentrations in 2100 of 661
ppmv
? Temperature increase of 1.21 K
Oceanic CO2 fraction in 2100, compared to land
airborne CO2, is 24
19
In business-as-usual scenario, carbon
sequestration in land and ocean cant keep up
with emissions
? Capacity of sinks decreases as CO2 increases.
? Atmospheric CO2 concentrations in 2100 of 792
ppmv
? Temperature increase of 1.42 K
Oceanic CO2 fraction in 2100 is 21
20
Models did not include an increasing Revelle
factor!
  • Their results were based on a slowed ocean
    circulation
  • Also accounted for increased biological uptake

Difference between coupled and uncoupled
carbon-climate system (gC/m2)
http//www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/102/32/11201
21
Because they did not account for the Revelle
factor, they may have overestimated oceanic
uptake and underestimated atmospheric CO2
concentrations!
More model studies are need that account for
ocean acidification
Caldeira Wickett, Nature, 2003
22
References
  • Fung et al. (2005) Evolution of carbon sinks in
    a changing climate. PNAS, 102, 11201-11206.
  • Gruber, N., Sarmiento, J.L., and T. Stocker
    (1996) An improved method for detecting
    anthropogenic CO2 in the oceans, Global
    Biogeochemical Cycles, 10, 809-837.
  • Houghton et al. (2001) Climate Change 2001
    Synthesis Report, Cambridge Univ. Press,
    Cambridge, U.K.
  • McNeil et al. (2003) Anthropogenic CO2 Uptake by
    the Ocean Based on the Global Chlorofluorocarbon
    Data Set, Science, 299, 235-239.
  • Sabine et al. (2004) The Oceanic Sink for
    Anthropogenic CO2, Science, 305, 367-371.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com