Elevating Environmental Justice Into The Planning Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Elevating Environmental Justice Into The Planning Process

Description:

Elevating Environmental Justice Into The Planning Process – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: marilyn92
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Elevating Environmental Justice Into The Planning Process


1
Elevating Environmental JusticeInto The Planning
Process
  • Communications in the Age of the Environment

2
What is Environmental Justice ?
  • What do you think?

3
Historical Perspective on Environmental Justice
  • Dumping in Dixie
  • US General Accounting Office
  • Toxic Waste and Race Study 1987
  • EPA creates Office on EJ 1992
  • NIEHS and ATSDR Published
  • Grassroots Dr. Robert Bullard Clark Atlanta EJ
    Resource Center
  • Executive Order 12898 Federal Actions to
    Address Environmental Justice in Minority
    Populations and Low-Income Populations
  • 1964 Civil Rights Act No person in the United
    State shall, on the grounds of race, color, or
    national origin be excluded from participation
    in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to
    discrimination under any program or activity
    receiving Federal financial assistance.

4
Environmental Justice and California Law
  • Cal/EPA California law defines Environmental
    Justice to mean The fair treatment of people
    of all races, cultures and incomes with respect
    to the development, adoption, implementation and
    enforcement of all environmental laws,
    regulations and policies
  • Senate Bill 89 established a procedural framework
    for pursuing environmental justice and created
    the Interagency Working Group on Environmental
    Justice which includes heads of Cal EPAs Boards,
    Departments and Office and the Director of OPR.
    2000
  • Senate Bill 828 established a deadline for
    Cal/EPA Boards, Departments and Office to
    identify and address gaps in their programs that
    may impede the achievement of environmental
    justice
  • Assembly Bill 1533 required OPR to establish
    guidelines for incorporating environmental
    justice into the general plans adopted by cities
    and counties.

5
CARB
  • The California Air Resources Board Overseas Air
    Quality Management Districts
  • CARB Assumes Disproportionate Impacts in
    Environmental Justice Communities.

6
Environmental Justice IssuesDisproportionate
Impacts
  • Inequitable effects of Policies
  • Lack of Identification
  • Disparate Health Care
  • Failure to Empower

7
2007 Case StudyAir Quality Management District
  • Directed to adopt Environmental Justice standards
    based on local conditions.
  • Board of Directors direct staff to draft an
    environmental justice policy statement
  • Board adopts EJ policies and requires an
    implementation plan.

8
Environmental Justice Audit
  • A Compliance Tool

9
The Environmental Justice Audit
  • Complies with Legislative Acts, Policies and
    Orders
  • Establishes a Baseline
  • Initiates Partnerships
  • Increases Organizational Efficiencies

10
  • HOW?

11
Ask The Environmental Justice Question
  • Identification of Environmental Justice
    Populations
  • Is There A Low Income OR Minority Population
    Within 1/2 Mile Radius of The Improvement or
    Development Project?

12
The Audit
  • Task 1 Review of Client Programs and Services
  • Task 2 Identification of District Service Areas
  • Task 3 Demographic Analysis
  • Task 4 Evaluation of Client Public Outreach
    Process
  • Task 5 Identification of EJ Community
  • Task 6 ID English Language Needs
  • Task 7 Evaluation Client program impacts on EJ
    communities
  • Task 8 Issue/Opportunities of interface with EJ
    Communities
  • Task 9 Written Report
  • Contact mababio_at_pmcworld.com

13
(No Transcript)
14
Client Reference
  • CD of Audit Report is available upon request.

15
Equity A Review of Current Planning Practices
  • Public Participation Process
  • Public Surveys
  • Interactive Website
  • Outreach or Education
  • Targeted Marketing to EJ
  • Public Meetings
  • Focus Group/CAC
  • Specific Budget
  • Language Translations
  • EJ Audit
  • 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

16
WHEN?
17
Ask the Environmental Justice Question When..
  • A Proposed Project Creates Change
  • A physical barrier
  • Change in travel time
  • Disruption of access to neighborhood child care
  • Increase risk of physical injury/health
  • Decreased accessibility to usual
  • Congregational centers
  • Increased noise level
  • Reduction in open spaces

18
Selecting an AppropriateMethod of Analysis

19
Desk Top Evaluation Air Quality
  • The worse the general air quality is in an area
    due to whatever source, the greater the harm of
    additional emissions.
  • Transportation projects can affect ground level
    air quality

20
Desk Top EvaluationWater Quality/Drainage
  • Is the EJ population the dominate user of the
    impacted resource?
  • Does the EJ community use the resource
    differently than the population as a whole?
  • Are there unequal distributive effects of water
    quality and drainage improvements.

21
Desk Top EvaluationNoise
  • Define Impact
  • Identify Protected Population land use and
    activities
  • Perform noise impact screening analysis (look up
    tables or FTA noise screening procedure)

22
Desk Top EvaluationNoise
  • Receptors near a project will incur the greatest
    noise level increase and sustain the greatest
    noise level.
  • Properties further from the project often are
    protected from noise.
  • Therefore, demographics of persons associated
    with specific properties are preferred over
    census data.

23
Desk Top EvaluationHazardous Materials
  • Identify existing hazardous waste data and
    integrate that data into demographic information
    to evaluate distributive effects to protected
    populations.
  • Evaluate transportation routes for hazardous
    materials.
  • Employ higher level evaluations when screening
    methods indicate significant potential for
    exposure.

24
Desk Top EvaluationSafety
  • Determine the extent to which a difference exists
    between road users in minority/low income areas
    compared to other areas
  • Attempt to reduce conflicts between vehicles and
    bicycles
  • Research EJ community habits i.e.. street corner
    assembly, middle of the block crossing,
    unintended paths or short cuts

25
Light Rail Case Study
  • City Of Louisville, Kentucky
  • Transit Authority Of River City
  • Parsons/Schimpler Joint Venture

26
(No Transcript)
27
Smoketown
28
Churchill Downs
29
Horseman and BoardersPublic Assistance
30
Americana Apartments
31
Outreach to Multi-ethnicMulti-lingual Communities
  • Make an effort to understand something relevant
    about the culture.
  • Use a culturally sensitive greeting.
  • Use visual outreach tools as primary presentation
    materials.
  • Organize sub-groups w/ language and/or technical
    translators to solicit feedback.
  • Training may be required. The American is a
    mystery.

32
(No Transcript)
33
(No Transcript)
34
(No Transcript)
35
(No Transcript)
36
(No Transcript)
37
Environmental Justice Community Involvement
Impact Summary
  • Community outreach can bring important
    intelligence into the planning process.
  • Environmental Justice provides an opportunity to
    substantiate the redistribution of investments

38
Transit Oriented DevelopmentBART Garage at
Fruitvale
39
Fruitvale Village-Unity Council
40
Selecting An Appropriate Method Of Analysis The
Future Challenge
41
Global Warning
  • Reduce Fossil Fuel Dependency
  • Anticipate Water Shortage
  • Population Increases
  • Recognize Change in ecosystems
  • Increase Ethanol and other alternative fuel
    production
  • Desalination Efforts
  • Land Use limits
  • Categorize and document

42
Disproportionate Impacts
  • Understanding the distributive impacts of
    economic benefits sheds light on who gains from a
    project.
  • EJ requires a shift in focus from aggregate
    benefit cost comparison to an understanding of
    which groups benefit and which do not.

43
Resources/References
  • Clark Atlanta University, Environmental Justice
    Resource Centerwww.ejrc.cau.welcome.html
  • Sanchez, Thomas W., Stolz,Rich, and Ma, Jacinta S
    (2003), Moving to Equity Addressing Inequitable
    Effects of Transportation Policies on Minorities.
    Cambridge, MA The Civil Rights Project at
    Harvard University
  • Authored by Thomas W. Sanchez, Associate
    Professor and James F. Wolf, Professor, Virginia
    Polytechnic Institute and State University 2004
  • Ababio, Marilyn (2002) Environmental Justice
    Technical Memorandum, TARC Schimpeler/Parsons
    Joint Venture, Louisville, KY
  • Forkenbrock, David J. and Sheeley, Jason (2004)
    Effective Methods for Environmental Justice
    Assessment. Washington DC Transportation
    Research Board

44
Environmental Justice Resources
  • Transportation Research Board www.TRB.org
  • Clark Atlanta University, EJ Resource Center,
    www.ejrc.cau.welcome.html
  • 3. Department of Transportation,
    www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/ej2.htm
  • COMTO, www.comto.org
  • Department of Environmental Protection,
    www.epa.gov/swerosps/ej
  • Environmental Defense, www.edf.org/programs/EJ
  • 7. Federal Transit Admin. www.fta.dot.gov link
    transit data and information, Title VI Compliance
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com