Comparison of Visual Outcomes with Bilateral Apodized Diffractive Aspheric IOL and Contralateral Apodized Diffractive and Zonal Refractive IOL

1
Comparison of Visual Outcomes with Bilateral
Apodized Diffractive Aspheric IOL and
Contralateral Apodized Diffractive and Zonal
Refractive IOL
H.J. Reiser1, D.L. Carson2
1 Alcon Consultant 2 Alcon Employee
2
IOL Comparisons

• ReSTOR Aspheric
• Acrysof Material
• Apodized Diffractive
• Single piece
• Designed to induce negative spherical aberration
• UV and blue light filtration

• Acrysof ReSTOR
• Acrysof Material
• Apodized Diffractive
• Multipiece or single piece
• UV and blue light filtration

• ReZoom
• Acrylic or Silicone
• Zonal Refractive
• Multipiece
• UV light filtration

3
Objective

• To compare visual outcomes of subjects
  bilaterally implanted with Acrysof ReSTOR
  Aspheric IOLs to those implanted contralaterally
  with ReSTOR and ReZoom IOLs.

4
Methods

• 25 cataract patients with healthy eyes
• - 16 ReSTOR Aspheric
• - 9 ReSTOR/ReZoom
• 1 to 3 month evaluations collected
• - Binocular UCVA (4m, 50cm, 60cm, Near _at_
  Best Distance)
• - Subjective Questionnaire
• lt1D Astigmatism

5
Results
20/20
20/25
20/32
20/40
6
ReSTOR Aspheric group scored better on 19 of 27
subjective data points
Results
Based on a 5 point scale 0 No difficulty 5
Severe difficulty
7
Results
Based on a 5 point scale 0 No difficulty 5
Severe difficulty
8
Results
Based on a 5 point scale 0 No difficulty 5
Severe difficulty
9
Results
Based on a 5 point scale 0 No difficulty 5
Severe difficulty
10
Results
11
Results
Based on a 10 point scale 0 completely
unsatisfied 10 completely satisfied
12
Conclusion

• Bilateral implantation of AcrySof ReSTOR Aspheric
  IOLs provides
• Better distance vision
• Approximately equivalent intermediate and near
  VAs.
• Higher rating of patient satisfaction,
  spectacle independence and 19 of 27 subjective
  data points.