What do we learn from the energy dependence of 2- and 3 particle correlations? ? results from SPS (CERES, NA49) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

What do we learn from the energy dependence of 2- and 3 particle correlations? ? results from SPS (CERES, NA49)

Description:

Counters. TPC : Time Projection Chamber : 2.1-2.65 (ymid=2.9) : 0 ... stat. uncertainties in v2) conditional yield correlation function. all charge combinations ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:64
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 27
Provided by: haral48
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What do we learn from the energy dependence of 2- and 3 particle correlations? ? results from SPS (CERES, NA49)


1
What do we learn from the energy dependence of 2-
and 3 particle correlations?? results from SPS
(CERES, NA49)
Harald Appelshäuser (CERES collaboration) Institu
t für Kernphysik Goethe Universität Frankfurt
2
jets at SPS
  • hard processes are rare at SPS
  • there is no pp reference
  • qualitative differences and/or
  • similarities can shed light on
  • jet quenching mechanisms at RHIC
  • is there an onset of such mechanisms?

3
jets at SPS
  • e.g. 3 GeV jet at vsNN17,3 GeV ? ltxgt 0.3
    0.4
  • jet production dominated by valence quark
    scattering
  • net charge conservation imprinted onto jet
    signal
  • isospin is an issue (pp is not a good reference)
  • dijet-over-jet yield is large at mid-rapidity

4
jets at SPS
  • can jets be observed at SPS?
  • if yes, are there modifications in A-A?
  • if yes, what is their origin?
  • does it round off the overall picture?

5
CERES history
identified pions ptgt1.2 GeV/c, untriggered
  • jet-like structures
  • at Df0 and Dfp
  • peak at Dfp broadens
  • in central collisions

CERES PRL92, 032301 (2004) Although the
back-to-back correlation broadens in central
collisions, there is no sign of its suppression.
PRL92,032301 (2004) J. Bielcikova, PhD work
6
CERES experiment
  • SDD
  • Silicon Drift Detector
  • RICH
  • Ring Imaging Cherenkov
  • Counters
  • TPC
  • Time Projection Chamber
  • ? 2.1-2.65 (ymid2.9)
  • ? 0-360

data set
3107 Pb-Au events at 158 AGeV/c (vsNN 17.3
GeV)
7
di-hadron correlation analysis
pt (2.5-4.0) GeV/c (1.0-2.5) GeV/c
flow
jet
two-source model
elliptic flow in trigger- (A) and associate (B)
pt range determined with CERES
reaction-plane analysis
ZYAM (Zero Yield At Minimum) J(??min) 0
? Subtract flow from C(??) to get jet
correlations
flow subtraction
conditional yield
Jet- associated particles per trigger
8
di-hadron correlations
all charge combinations trigger (2.5-4.0)
GeV/c assocs (1.0-2.5) GeV/c
flow contribution (/-stat.
uncertainties in v2)
conditional yield correlation function
Pb-Au 158 AGeV/c
CERES preliminary
  • jet-like peak at the near-side
  • broad structure at the away-side

9
di-hadron correlations
SPS
RHIC
Pb-Au 17.3 GeV 0-5
PHENIX PRL 98 (2007)
CERES preliminary
pt(T) 2.5 4 GeV/c, pt(A) 1.0 -2.5 GeV/c ??
(PHENIX) 0.7, ?? (CERES) 0.5
  • relative increase of the away-side yield
  • otherwise similar features at SPS and RHIC

10
di-hadron correlations
pt(T) 2.5 4 GeV/c, pt(A) 1.0 -2.5 GeV/c ??
(PHENIX) 0.7, ?? (CERES) 0.5
  • strong decrease of per-trigger yield at SPS
  • stronger trigger bias
  • larger contamination of non-jet triggers

11
near- and away-side yields
over- lapping pt ranges
12
near- and away-side yields
pt(T) 2.5-4.0 GeV/c
  • near-side spectrum softer
  • due to trigger bias
  • qualitatively same behaviour in data
  • pt-dependence of away-side yield
  • consistent with inclusive distribution

pt(T) 2.5-4.0 GeV/c
CERES Pb-Au 0-5 17.3 GeV Preliminary
13
near- and away-side yields
  • away-side yield shifted to lower pt?

14
charge correlations
  • near-side
  • higher yield for unlike-sign
  • combinations
  • charge correlation in the
  • fragmentation process
  • away-side
  • higher yield for positive
  • associates
  • ?net positive charge
  • look at ratios

for a given trigger sample
15
charge correlations - PYTHIA
vsNN 17.3 GeV CERES acceptance
16
charge correlations - PYTHIA
mid-rapidity
pt(T) 2.5-4.0 GeV/c pt(A) 1.0-2.5 GeV/c
R-
R-
17
charge correlations
near-side large difference observed in data
consistent with PYTHIA ? near-side is jetty
CERES Pb-Au 0-5 vsNN17.3 GeV preliminary
-1
0
1
qTrig
away-side data favor bulk composition rather
than jet fragmentation ? away-side is mediumy
qTrig
-1
0
1
18
three particle correlations
preliminary CERES results presented at QM2006
19
three particle correlations
flow
Two-particle correlation
measured!
Three-particle correlations
J. G. Ulery and F. Wang, NIM A595 (2008)
1. jet-jet
2. hardsoft
3. soft-soft (mixed events) flow trigger

20
three particle correlations
Stefan Kniege PhD Frankfurt
soft-soft trigger flow
raw hard-soft
CERES has no sensitivity to 3-p-correlations
21
three particle correlations
Stefan Kniege PhD Frankfurt
systematic errors assume 10 smaller v2
22
?? correlations
Stefan Kniege PhD Frankfurt
?? gt p - 1.0
?? lt 1.0
pt(A) 0 - 0.5 GeV/c
pt(A) 0 - 0.5 GeV/c
CERES Pb-Au preliminary
CERES Pb-Au preliminary
  • away-side structureless
  • evolution of peak with trigger pt
  • ridge unclear (? NA49)

23
??-?f correlations
pt(A) 0-0.5 GeV/c
pt(A) 1-1.5 GeV/c
pt(A) 0.5-1 GeV/c
??
CERES Pb-Au preliminary
pt(T) 3-4.5 GeV/c
pt(T) 2.5-4 GeV/c
pt(T) 2-3.5 GeV/c
pt(T) 1.5-3 GeV/c
pt(T) 1-2.5 GeV/c
?f
Stefan Kniege PhD Frankfurt
24
NA49 results
Marek Szuba, PhD Warsow (2009) HQ 2008
Excellent agreement with CERES results
25
NA49 results
correlation function C2(?f)
Marek Szuba, PhD Warsow (2009) HQ 2008
  • smooth evolution of
  • near and away-side
  • near-side correlation vanishes
  • away-side plateau increases
  • away-side plateau affected
  • by momentum conservation?

26
summary
  • evidence for jet-like correlations at SPS
  • the away-side is modified
  • the away-side reflects properties of the medium
  • valuable data to study the systematics of jet
    quenching
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com