Striking a Balance between Enforcement of Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in a Developing C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 9
About This Presentation
Title:

Striking a Balance between Enforcement of Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in a Developing C

Description:

Sony has a 20% share of the Chinese digital camera market. ... non-Sony batteries from being used on Sony digital cameras and video-cameras. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:70
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 10
Provided by: abc7165
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Striking a Balance between Enforcement of Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in a Developing C


1
Striking a Balance between Enforcement of
Antitrust and Intellectual Property Laws in a
Developing Country the Chinese Perspective
  • Thomas K. Cheng
  • The University of Hong Kong

2
Relationship between Antitrust and IP
  • IP law focuses on dynamic efficienciesproviding
    sufficient ex ante incentives for innovation.
  • Antitrust law focuses on allocative efficiencies
    efficient allocation of resources after the
    creation of intellectual property has taken
    place.
  • Antitrust law also takes into account dynamic
    efficiencies.
  • Balancing in Rule of Reason analysis.
  • Antitrust and IP law enforcement from the
    consumers and the producers perspective.

3
Relationship between Antitrust and IP in
Developing Countries
  • Depends on whether the country is a major IP
    producer.
  • Dynamic efficiency considerations may lose much
    relevance in a developing country that does not
    produce much IP.
  • Braga Fink higher standards of protection
    will likely displace local producers, raise
    prices, and transfer rent from consumers and
    producers to foreign title-holders, resulting in
    a negative welfare impact.
  • Consideration of both domestic and foreign
    innovators interests.

4
Relationship between Antitrust and IP in
Developing Countries
  • Keith Maskus as developing countries strengthen
    their IPR regimes they should attract rising
    import volumes.
  • Ideal scenario selective enforcement of
    antitrust laws against foreign IP right holders.
    However, this is not attainable.

5
Relationship between Antitrust and IP in China
  • Emerging major producer of IP.
  • High production capabilities and still relatively
    low innovative capacity.
  • Enhanced IP protection may not provide much extra
    incentive to foreign producers to invest in
    China.
  • Consideration of foreign innovators interest,
    especially in light of the size of the Chinese
    market.

6
Dexian v. Sony
  • Chinas first reported antitrust case involving
    an alleged IP misuse.
  • Dexian is a Chinese lithium-ion manufacturer.
  • Sony has a 20 share of the Chinese digital
    camera market.
  • InfoLITHIUMa patented battery coding technology
    that prevents non-Sony batteries from being used
    on Sony digital cameras and video-cameras.
  • Filed under Article 2 of the Law on Unfair
    Competition, which requires voluntariness,
    equality, fairness, and honesty in market
    transactions.
  • Shanghai Peoples Intermediate Court No. 1.

7
Draft Anti-Monopoly Law
  • Most recent draft is the June 22, 2006 draft.
  • Article 55 deals with the relationship between
    antitrust and IP.
  • Article 55 states that
  • Where the undertakings utilize the intellectual
    property rights pursuant to the stipulations in
    laws and administrative regulations relating to
    intellectual property, this Law is not
    applicable. However, this Law is applicable to
    conduct by the undertakings eliminating or
    restricting competition by the abuse of the
    rights stipulated by the Intellectual Property
    Right Laws or administrative regulations.

8
Draft Anti-Monopoly Law
  • Essential facilities doctrine in an earlier draft
    of the law, the April 8, 2005 draft.
  • It has been taken out.
  • Former draft Article 22 states that
  • In the case that an undertaking is unable to
    compete with the undertakings with dominant
    market position without the access to a network
    or other infrastructures owned by those dominant
    undertakings in relevant market, the undertakings
    in dominant position shall not refuse to grant
    access to the network or other infrastructures to
    other undertakings at reasonable prices. However,
    the undertaking in dominant position may be
    exempted if it can establish that it is
    impossible or unreasonable to grant access to the
    network or other infrastructures to other
    undertakings on account of technology, security
    or other justifiable reasons.

9
Thank you.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com