Gravitational%20waves%20and%20cosmology - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Gravitational%20waves%20and%20cosmology

Description:

chirp line. coalesc. in 1 yr. black hole line. ground interf. ... Key parameter : chirp mass M = (m1 m2)3/5 (m1 m2)1/5. Amplitude of the gravitational wave: ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:56
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: danilele
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Gravitational%20waves%20and%20cosmology


1
Gravitational waves and cosmology
  • P. Binétruy
  • APC, Paris

6th Rencontres du Vietnam Hanoi, August 2006
2
At t 400 000 yrs, the Universe becomes
transparent photons no longer interact with
matter
Looking back to the primordial Universe
BIG BANG
Cosmological background T 3 K - 270 C
WMAP satellite
3
And before?
?
gravitons and neutrinos
4
If gravitons were in thermal equilibrium in the
primordial universe
? ?-1 d?/dlogf
?
g
5
When do graviton decouple?
T5
Interaction rate
? GN2 T5 ----
MPl4
T2
Expansion rate
H ----
(radiation dominated era)
MPl
T3
?
---- ----
H
MPl3
Gravitons decouple at the Planck era fossile
radiation
6
But gravitons could be produced after the Planck
era.
Gravitons of frequency f produced at temperature
T are observed at a redshifted frequency
1/6
f 1.65 10-7 Hz --- ( ----- ) ( ---- )
1
T
g
?
1GeV
100
At production ? ? H-1 (or f H/ ?)
Horizon length
Wavelength
7
Gravitational wave detection
VIRGO
8
d ?GW
1
?GW --- --------
, ?c 3H0/(8?GN)
?c
d logf
for ?1
9
Electroweak phase transition
If the transition is first order, nucleation of
true vacuum bubbles inside the false vacuum
Collision of bubbles ? production of
gravitational waves
Pros and cons for a 1st order EW phase transition
  • in the Standard Model, requires mh lt 72 GeV
    (ruled out)
  • in the MSSM, requires a light stop (less and
    less probable)
  • possible to recover a strong 1st order
    transition by including ?6 terms
  • in SM potential
  • needed to account for baryogenesis at the
    electroweak scale (? out
  • of equilibrium dynamics)

10
Efalse vac
? ---------
aT4
h02 ?GW
radiation energy at transition
Nicolis gr-qc/0303084
f in mHz
turbulence
bubble collision
fturb/fcoll 0.65 ut/vb
11
Long wavelength GW produce a redshift on the
photons of the CMB
Wavelength outside the horizon at LSS
Wavelength inside the horizon today
12
CMB polarisation
13
Thomson scattering leads to polarization of the
CMB
2003
2009
14
Vacuum fluctuations de Sitter inflation
(constant vacuum energy)
h02 ?GW 10-13 (H/10-4MPl)2
h02 ?GW 10-13(feq/f) 2(H/10-4MPl)2
Fluctuations reenter horizon during matter era
radiation era
15
More realistic inflation models slowroll
nT
h02 ?GW V f
nT - (V/V)2 MPl2 /8? -T/7S
16
String-motivated scenarios e.g. pre-big-bang
17
Cosmic strings
Presence of cusps enhances the production of
gravitational waves
Damour-Vilenkin
log h
LIGO
stochastic GW background
log 50 GN?
zlt1
zgt1 (MD)
zgt1 (RD)
Loops radiate at
18
How to measure a stochastic background?
Cross correlate ground interferometers
Let LISA move around the Sun
19
2. Dark energy in search of standard candles
  • Supernovae of type Ia

magnitude versus redshift
mB 5 log(H0dL) M - 5 log H0 25
  • Gamma ray bursts
  • Coalescence of black holes the ultimate
    standard candle?

20
Gravitational dynamics
f (?G?)1/2
R in m
f 10-4 Hz
space interf.
109
?
f 1 Hz
ground interf.
f 104 Hz
104
100
108
M/M?
21
Gravitational dynamics
Schwarzchild radius R 2GM/c2
R in m
space interf.
109
?
ground interf.
black hole line
104
100
108
M/M?
22
Gravitational dynamics
Supermassive BH mergers
R in m
space interf.
109
?
chirp line
coalesc. in 1 yr
ground interf.
black hole line
104
100
108
M/M?
NS-NS coalescence
after B. Schutz
23
(No Transcript)
24
Inspiral phase
(m1 m2)3/5
Key parameter chirp mass M
(1z)
(z)
(m1 m2)1/5
25
Inspiral phase
(m1 m2)3/5
Key parameter chirp mass M
(1z)
(z)
(m1 m2)1/5
Amplitude of the gravitational wave
frequency f(t) d?/2?dt
M(z)5/3 f(t)2/3
h(t) F
(angles) cos ?(t)
dL
Luminosity distance
26
Inspiral phase
(m1 m2)3/5
Key parameter chirp mass M
(1z)
(z)
(m1 m2)1/5
Amplitude of the gravitational wave
M(z)5/3 f(t)2/3
h(t) F
(angles) cos ?(t)
dL
Luminosity distance
poorly known in the case of LISA
10 arcmin
1 Hz
??
SNR
fGW
27
z 1 , m1 105 M?, m1 6.105 M?
3
?? (arcminutes)
5
Holz Hughes
?dL/dL
28
Using the electromagnetic counterpart
Allows both a measure of the direction and of the
redshift
0.5
Holz and Hughes
?dL/dL
But limited by weak gravitational lensing!
?dL/dL?lensing 1-1/??
29
Conclusions
  • LISA will provide complentary ways to identify
    the geometry
  • of the Universe.
  • regarding a stochastic background of primordial
    gravitational
  • waves, no detection in the standard inflation
    scenarios, but many
  • alternatives lead to possible signals within
    reach of advanced
  • ground interferometers or LISA.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com