Evaluation of the Preparing for Life Programme: An Update - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 21
About This Presentation
Title:

Evaluation of the Preparing for Life Programme: An Update

Description:

Institi id Geary UCD, An Col iste Ollscoile, Baile tha Cliath, ... Orla Doyle; Olivia Joyner; Louise McEntee; Kelly McNamara; Sarah Thompson. Kelly McNamara ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:42
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 22
Provided by: colmh
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evaluation of the Preparing for Life Programme: An Update


1
Evaluation of the Preparing for Life Programme
An Update
Kelly McNamara
  • PFL Scientific Advisory Team
  • Colm Harmon James Heckman Cecily Kelleher
    Sharon Ramey Richard Tremblay

PFL Research Team Orla Doyle Olivia Joyner
Louise McEntee Kelly McNamara Sarah Thompson
2
Health, Behaviour and Preparing for Life
  • Overview of PFL programme
  • Update on the past 7 months
  • Other components to the PFL evaluation
  • Process Evaluation
  • Service Delivery
  • School Readiness Survey

3
The Northside Area
  • Community-led initiative operated by Northside
    Partnership in North Dublin
  • Designated Disadvantaged Community
  • Population of 6,439
  • 7 born outside Ireland
  • 63 social housing
  • 5 of adults with 3rd level education
  • 14 of adults out of work

4
The PFL Programme
  • First experimental early childhood intervention
    in Ireland
  • Intervention type School Readiness programme
  • Cognitive development
  • Physical health and motor skills
  • Social, emotional behavioural development
  • Approaches to learning
  • Language development and literacy
  • Lack of school readiness linked to lower
    education, higher teen pregnancy, unemployment,
    crime
  • Aim Help parents develop skills to help their
    children
  • Intervention length Pre-birth - 5 years

5
Sample Recruitment
  • Target group
  • Cohort of pregnant women residing in three
    communities of North Dublin
  • PFL Sample 200 births
  • Approximately 100 births per year
  • Recruitment
  • Maternity hospital at first booking visit and
    self-referral in the community
  • 2006/07 Birth Sample
  • 80.23 unmarried mothers 6 travellers average
    mothers age 27 years 9 age 18 or under 42
    with first birth

6
2 Teams Involved in PFL
  • PFL Team
  • Based in Darndale
  • Mentors, information officer
  • Responsible for delivering the intervention
  • UCD Team
  • Based in Geary
  • Research staff
  • Responsible for evaluating the intervention

7
PFL Evaluation
  • 4 Components
  • Impact Evaluation
  • Process Evaluation
  • Service Delivery
  • Annual School Readiness Survey

8
Impact Evaluation Longitudinal Experimental
Study
9
Impact Evaluation Quantitative Assessments
  • Data collection time points
  • Pre-intervention (baseline), 6mths, 12mths,
    18mths, 24mths, 3yrs, 4yrs, 5yrs
  • Informant
  • Mother is the primary informant, but also
    fathers, child, other independent data sources if
    possible

10
January to July, 2008Implementation Phase
  • Recruiting Participants
  • Piloting and Conducting Online Survey
  • Identifying Matched Community Sample
  • Designing 6-month Survey
  • European Network of Early Childhood Interventions
    (ENECI)

11
Recruitment
  • Both PFL and UCD teams involved
  • Self-referral in community
  • First hospital booking visit
  • Must be less than 27 weeks pregnant

12
Recruitment
13
Recruitment
14
Baseline Survey
  • The baseline survey is divided into ten modules
    which correspond to
  • You and your family (demographics, household
    comp., education)
  • Your pregnancy (planning, prenatal care, previous
    pregnancies)
  • How are you doing? (well-being, self-esteem,
    attachment style)
  • Your health (mental and physical health, use of
    health services)
  • Your personality (personality, future
    consequences)
  • Planning for you baby (intention to breastfeed,
    use childcare)
  • Thoughts about parenting (risk of abuse, KIDI)
  • Your work and finances (work status, income, use
    of services)
  • Your social support network (support,
    neighbourhood satisfaction)
  • Hopes and dreams (hopes and dreams for baby,
    family strengths and difficulties)

15
Baseline Survey
  • Piloting
  • To PFL pilot moms
  • Computerisation phase
  • Conducting
  • With moms in community (25 so far!)
  • CAPI (computer-assisted personal interviews)
  • WASI Assessment

16
Baseline Survey
17
Identifying Matched Community Sample
  • Need to choose another community with a similar
    socio-economic profile to PFL community
  • Data from Small Area Population Statistics
    (Census 2006) use hierarchical cluster analysis
    on all electoral districts in Dublin to rank
    degree of similarity

18
6 month survey
  • Parental characteristics (socio-economic profile,
    parent health, psychological well-being, health
    behaviours, family system, stress, separation
    anxiety)
  • Child characteristics (demographics, health,
    nutrition, rest and routine, development,
    temperament)
  • Parenting system (parental teamwork, parenting
    beliefs parenting style, father involvement)
  • Community supports (social support network,
    extended family, child care, health and social
    services)
  • Siblings (adjustment to baby, behaviour problems)

19
European Network of Early Childhood Interventions
(ENECI)
  • Aims of ENECI
  • to develop collaborations between network members
  • to share practices (methodology, evaluation) and
    make them available to the scientific community
    and practitioners
  • to enhance the comparability of the different
    projects
  • to provide recommendations on the optimal
    delivery and timing of ECI
  • to provide help and support for new emerging ECI
    projects
  • Current Network Members
  • Ireland - Preparing for Life Intervention
  • France CAPEDP Intervention
  • Italy Scommettiamo sui giovani
  • Website www.eneci.org

20
Conclusion
  • Impact Evaluation
  • Determine effectiveness of PFL in achieving its
    primary aim
  • Process Evaluation
  • Determine why PFL did or did not achieve its
    primary aim

21
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com