Dominant Processes in Catchment Hydrologic Response - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Dominant Processes in Catchment Hydrologic Response

Description:

Does Kirchner have a unique catchment not transferable to other locations? ... Instead of calling Kirchner's observed process fractal, should we just say it is ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:51
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: hiveBee
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Dominant Processes in Catchment Hydrologic Response


1
Dominant Processes in Catchment
Hydrologic Response
Background Summary of Papers Catskills
Data Discussion
0.36
0.36
2
Convolution Concept
Streamflow
Travel Time Distribution pdf
Precip Input
3
Width Function
x3
x2
x2
x2
x1
4
Rinaldo et al. Can One Gauge the Shape of a Basin?
Observation 1 Fractal structure doesnt
necessarily yield a fractal signal.
5
Rinaldo et al. Can One Gauge the Shape of a Basin?
Fig 6
Fig 7
uh/uc0.1 D0.05
uh/uc1 D0
uh/uc0.1 D0
uh/uc0.1 D0.2
W(x)
Observation 2 Hillslope velocity component also
transforms f(t).
6
Observation 3 Dynamic components of system
significantly transform response, limiting
possibility of inverse method (i.e. going from
hydrology to morphology).
No!
Can One Gauge the Shape of a Basin?
Observation 4 Observations of single events of
limited value, but Kirchners spectral methods
are actually revealing.
7
Botter Rinaldo. Scale Effect on Geomorphologic
and Kinematic Dispersion
velocity drawn from different distributions
Path 1
Path 2
constant velocity
- as many paths as unique starting sites
Observation 1 Simple models for assigning
hillslope velocities can provide useful insights
into travel time distributions.
8
Observation 2 By drawing from unquenched
velocity distribution, we can generate long
tails.
Observation 3 For long tails, no specific
process is demanded. We need to supply it.
t (104)
9
Area (km2)
Observation 4 Hillslope processes dominate f(t)
even at relatively large spatial scales since
hillslope processes are much slower than channel
processes.
10
Back to Kirchner
Kirchner et al. 2001
11
J. Taylor, 2006, PhD Thesis
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
J. Taylor, 2006, PhD Thesis
15
Does Kirchner have a unique catchment not
transferable to other locations?
If streamflow is 1/f in most catchments, can we
still separate out other solute transport
processes?
Instead of calling Kirchners observed process
fractal, should we just say it is indicative of
long-term power-law correlation?
Are there biological or chemical processes
present? What does response look like for
non-conservative solutes?
Is there a way to assess degree of heterogeneity
in system without really understanding underlying
processes?
16
Estimating Travel Time Distribution
Simplest means of calculating p(?)
Hatano Hatano. 1998.WRR
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com